Risks of cattle babesiosis (Babesia bovis) outbreaks in a semi-arid region of Argentina

Autores
Morel, Nicolas; Mastropaolo, Mariano; Torioni, Susana Marta; Signorini, Marcelo; Mangold, Atilio Jose
Año de publicación
2019
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The epidemiology of Babesia bovis was studied in terms of enzootic stability/instability and husbandry and abiotic factors influencing B. bovis transmission rate in northeastern Santiago del Estero province, Argentina. The area is of limited suitability for its only vector in Argentina, the tick Rhipicephalus microplus. The proportion of calf herds in a state of enzootic stability/instability to B. bovis was determined and husbandry practices and abiotic factors associated with variations in B. bovis transmission rates were explored using a cross-sectional observational study design. Daily probability of infection (inoculation rate, h) with B. bovis was calculated from age-specific seroprevalence via ELISAi in 58 herds of 4.5–8.5-month-old calves. Herds were considered to be in enzootic instability (EI) when h < 0.005, and therefore inferred to be at risk of babesiosis outbreaks. Husbandry practices associated with differences in B. bovis transmission were analyzed using generalized linear models. Sixty-two percent of herds were found to be in an EI situation for B. bovis. Calves raised exclusively on permanent pastures –where higher cattle density is achieved– were exposed to higher B. bovis inoculation rates (h = 0.0063, 95% CI 0.0032-0.0123) than those reared under forage combinations (h = 0.0024, 95% CI 0.0011-0.0051) (P =  0.05). In addition, calves from herds located in the area of intermediate suitability for R. microplus development were more likely to become infected with B. bovis (h = 0.0067, 95% CI 0.0037-0.0121) than those reared in the ecologically unfavorable area for the vector (h = 0.0023, 95% CI 0.0010-0.0049) (P =  0.02). Neither the frequency of treatment with acaricides nor the use of long-acting acaricides to control R. microplus influenced the inoculation rate (P =  0.99 and P =  0.26, respectively). This result indicates that current R. microplus control schemes are not effective in reducing B. bovis transmission. Enzootic instability still prevails in the study area despite the drastic changes occurred in cattle production system. However, 38% of herds did reach enzootic stability; therefore, a specific epidemiological status cannot be assumed at a regional level. Yearly determination of the immunological status of each calf cohort is considered a proper approach to decision-making in vaccination against B. bovis.
EEA Rafaela
Fil: Morel, Nicolas. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina
Fil: Mastropaolo, Mariano. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Cátedra de Parasitología y Enfermedades Parasitarias; Argentina
Fil: Torioni, Susana Marta. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina
Fil: Signorini, Marcelo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Mangold, Atilio Jose. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina
Fuente
Preventive Veterinary Medicine 170 : 104747 (October 2019)
Materia
Ganado Bovino
Enfermedades de los Animales
Babesia bovis
Babesiosis
Epidemia
Zona Semiárida
Argentina
Cattle
Animal Diseases
Epidemics
Semiarid Zones
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso restringido
Condiciones de uso
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/5696

id INTADig_3d2df134bc87a1bd29260d745e20d098
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/5696
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Risks of cattle babesiosis (Babesia bovis) outbreaks in a semi-arid region of ArgentinaMorel, NicolasMastropaolo, MarianoTorioni, Susana MartaSignorini, MarceloMangold, Atilio JoseGanado BovinoEnfermedades de los AnimalesBabesia bovisBabesiosisEpidemiaZona SemiáridaArgentinaCattleAnimal DiseasesEpidemicsSemiarid ZonesThe epidemiology of Babesia bovis was studied in terms of enzootic stability/instability and husbandry and abiotic factors influencing B. bovis transmission rate in northeastern Santiago del Estero province, Argentina. The area is of limited suitability for its only vector in Argentina, the tick Rhipicephalus microplus. The proportion of calf herds in a state of enzootic stability/instability to B. bovis was determined and husbandry practices and abiotic factors associated with variations in B. bovis transmission rates were explored using a cross-sectional observational study design. Daily probability of infection (inoculation rate, h) with B. bovis was calculated from age-specific seroprevalence via ELISAi in 58 herds of 4.5–8.5-month-old calves. Herds were considered to be in enzootic instability (EI) when h < 0.005, and therefore inferred to be at risk of babesiosis outbreaks. Husbandry practices associated with differences in B. bovis transmission were analyzed using generalized linear models. Sixty-two percent of herds were found to be in an EI situation for B. bovis. Calves raised exclusively on permanent pastures –where higher cattle density is achieved– were exposed to higher B. bovis inoculation rates (h = 0.0063, 95% CI 0.0032-0.0123) than those reared under forage combinations (h = 0.0024, 95% CI 0.0011-0.0051) (P =  0.05). In addition, calves from herds located in the area of intermediate suitability for R. microplus development were more likely to become infected with B. bovis (h = 0.0067, 95% CI 0.0037-0.0121) than those reared in the ecologically unfavorable area for the vector (h = 0.0023, 95% CI 0.0010-0.0049) (P =  0.02). Neither the frequency of treatment with acaricides nor the use of long-acting acaricides to control R. microplus influenced the inoculation rate (P =  0.99 and P =  0.26, respectively). This result indicates that current R. microplus control schemes are not effective in reducing B. bovis transmission. Enzootic instability still prevails in the study area despite the drastic changes occurred in cattle production system. However, 38% of herds did reach enzootic stability; therefore, a specific epidemiological status cannot be assumed at a regional level. Yearly determination of the immunological status of each calf cohort is considered a proper approach to decision-making in vaccination against B. bovis.EEA RafaelaFil: Morel, Nicolas. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; ArgentinaFil: Mastropaolo, Mariano. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Cátedra de Parasitología y Enfermedades Parasitarias; ArgentinaFil: Torioni, Susana Marta. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; ArgentinaFil: Signorini, Marcelo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Mangold, Atilio Jose. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; ArgentinaElsevier2019-08-27T11:53:33Z2019-08-27T11:53:33Z2019-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167587718306901http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/56960167-58771873-1716https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104747Preventive Veterinary Medicine 170 : 104747 (October 2019)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-09-29T13:44:44Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/5696instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-29 13:44:45.007INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Risks of cattle babesiosis (Babesia bovis) outbreaks in a semi-arid region of Argentina
title Risks of cattle babesiosis (Babesia bovis) outbreaks in a semi-arid region of Argentina
spellingShingle Risks of cattle babesiosis (Babesia bovis) outbreaks in a semi-arid region of Argentina
Morel, Nicolas
Ganado Bovino
Enfermedades de los Animales
Babesia bovis
Babesiosis
Epidemia
Zona Semiárida
Argentina
Cattle
Animal Diseases
Epidemics
Semiarid Zones
title_short Risks of cattle babesiosis (Babesia bovis) outbreaks in a semi-arid region of Argentina
title_full Risks of cattle babesiosis (Babesia bovis) outbreaks in a semi-arid region of Argentina
title_fullStr Risks of cattle babesiosis (Babesia bovis) outbreaks in a semi-arid region of Argentina
title_full_unstemmed Risks of cattle babesiosis (Babesia bovis) outbreaks in a semi-arid region of Argentina
title_sort Risks of cattle babesiosis (Babesia bovis) outbreaks in a semi-arid region of Argentina
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Morel, Nicolas
Mastropaolo, Mariano
Torioni, Susana Marta
Signorini, Marcelo
Mangold, Atilio Jose
author Morel, Nicolas
author_facet Morel, Nicolas
Mastropaolo, Mariano
Torioni, Susana Marta
Signorini, Marcelo
Mangold, Atilio Jose
author_role author
author2 Mastropaolo, Mariano
Torioni, Susana Marta
Signorini, Marcelo
Mangold, Atilio Jose
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ganado Bovino
Enfermedades de los Animales
Babesia bovis
Babesiosis
Epidemia
Zona Semiárida
Argentina
Cattle
Animal Diseases
Epidemics
Semiarid Zones
topic Ganado Bovino
Enfermedades de los Animales
Babesia bovis
Babesiosis
Epidemia
Zona Semiárida
Argentina
Cattle
Animal Diseases
Epidemics
Semiarid Zones
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The epidemiology of Babesia bovis was studied in terms of enzootic stability/instability and husbandry and abiotic factors influencing B. bovis transmission rate in northeastern Santiago del Estero province, Argentina. The area is of limited suitability for its only vector in Argentina, the tick Rhipicephalus microplus. The proportion of calf herds in a state of enzootic stability/instability to B. bovis was determined and husbandry practices and abiotic factors associated with variations in B. bovis transmission rates were explored using a cross-sectional observational study design. Daily probability of infection (inoculation rate, h) with B. bovis was calculated from age-specific seroprevalence via ELISAi in 58 herds of 4.5–8.5-month-old calves. Herds were considered to be in enzootic instability (EI) when h < 0.005, and therefore inferred to be at risk of babesiosis outbreaks. Husbandry practices associated with differences in B. bovis transmission were analyzed using generalized linear models. Sixty-two percent of herds were found to be in an EI situation for B. bovis. Calves raised exclusively on permanent pastures –where higher cattle density is achieved– were exposed to higher B. bovis inoculation rates (h = 0.0063, 95% CI 0.0032-0.0123) than those reared under forage combinations (h = 0.0024, 95% CI 0.0011-0.0051) (P =  0.05). In addition, calves from herds located in the area of intermediate suitability for R. microplus development were more likely to become infected with B. bovis (h = 0.0067, 95% CI 0.0037-0.0121) than those reared in the ecologically unfavorable area for the vector (h = 0.0023, 95% CI 0.0010-0.0049) (P =  0.02). Neither the frequency of treatment with acaricides nor the use of long-acting acaricides to control R. microplus influenced the inoculation rate (P =  0.99 and P =  0.26, respectively). This result indicates that current R. microplus control schemes are not effective in reducing B. bovis transmission. Enzootic instability still prevails in the study area despite the drastic changes occurred in cattle production system. However, 38% of herds did reach enzootic stability; therefore, a specific epidemiological status cannot be assumed at a regional level. Yearly determination of the immunological status of each calf cohort is considered a proper approach to decision-making in vaccination against B. bovis.
EEA Rafaela
Fil: Morel, Nicolas. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina
Fil: Mastropaolo, Mariano. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Cátedra de Parasitología y Enfermedades Parasitarias; Argentina
Fil: Torioni, Susana Marta. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina
Fil: Signorini, Marcelo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Mangold, Atilio Jose. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina
description The epidemiology of Babesia bovis was studied in terms of enzootic stability/instability and husbandry and abiotic factors influencing B. bovis transmission rate in northeastern Santiago del Estero province, Argentina. The area is of limited suitability for its only vector in Argentina, the tick Rhipicephalus microplus. The proportion of calf herds in a state of enzootic stability/instability to B. bovis was determined and husbandry practices and abiotic factors associated with variations in B. bovis transmission rates were explored using a cross-sectional observational study design. Daily probability of infection (inoculation rate, h) with B. bovis was calculated from age-specific seroprevalence via ELISAi in 58 herds of 4.5–8.5-month-old calves. Herds were considered to be in enzootic instability (EI) when h < 0.005, and therefore inferred to be at risk of babesiosis outbreaks. Husbandry practices associated with differences in B. bovis transmission were analyzed using generalized linear models. Sixty-two percent of herds were found to be in an EI situation for B. bovis. Calves raised exclusively on permanent pastures –where higher cattle density is achieved– were exposed to higher B. bovis inoculation rates (h = 0.0063, 95% CI 0.0032-0.0123) than those reared under forage combinations (h = 0.0024, 95% CI 0.0011-0.0051) (P =  0.05). In addition, calves from herds located in the area of intermediate suitability for R. microplus development were more likely to become infected with B. bovis (h = 0.0067, 95% CI 0.0037-0.0121) than those reared in the ecologically unfavorable area for the vector (h = 0.0023, 95% CI 0.0010-0.0049) (P =  0.02). Neither the frequency of treatment with acaricides nor the use of long-acting acaricides to control R. microplus influenced the inoculation rate (P =  0.99 and P =  0.26, respectively). This result indicates that current R. microplus control schemes are not effective in reducing B. bovis transmission. Enzootic instability still prevails in the study area despite the drastic changes occurred in cattle production system. However, 38% of herds did reach enzootic stability; therefore, a specific epidemiological status cannot be assumed at a regional level. Yearly determination of the immunological status of each calf cohort is considered a proper approach to decision-making in vaccination against B. bovis.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-08-27T11:53:33Z
2019-08-27T11:53:33Z
2019-10
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167587718306901
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/5696
0167-5877
1873-1716
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104747
url https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167587718306901
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/5696
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104747
identifier_str_mv 0167-5877
1873-1716
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv restrictedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Preventive Veterinary Medicine 170 : 104747 (October 2019)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1844619136542441472
score 12.559606