Risks of cattle babesiosis (Babesia bovis) outbreaks in a semi-arid region of Argentina
- Autores
- Morel, Nicolas; Mastropaolo, Mariano; Torioni, Susana Marta; Signorini, Marcelo; Mangold, Atilio Jose
- Año de publicación
- 2019
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- The epidemiology of Babesia bovis was studied in terms of enzootic stability/instability and husbandry and abiotic factors influencing B. bovis transmission rate in northeastern Santiago del Estero province, Argentina. The area is of limited suitability for its only vector in Argentina, the tick Rhipicephalus microplus. The proportion of calf herds in a state of enzootic stability/instability to B. bovis was determined and husbandry practices and abiotic factors associated with variations in B. bovis transmission rates were explored using a cross-sectional observational study design. Daily probability of infection (inoculation rate, h) with B. bovis was calculated from age-specific seroprevalence via ELISAi in 58 herds of 4.5–8.5-month-old calves. Herds were considered to be in enzootic instability (EI) when h < 0.005, and therefore inferred to be at risk of babesiosis outbreaks. Husbandry practices associated with differences in B. bovis transmission were analyzed using generalized linear models. Sixty-two percent of herds were found to be in an EI situation for B. bovis. Calves raised exclusively on permanent pastures –where higher cattle density is achieved– were exposed to higher B. bovis inoculation rates (h = 0.0063, 95% CI 0.0032-0.0123) than those reared under forage combinations (h = 0.0024, 95% CI 0.0011-0.0051) (P = 0.05). In addition, calves from herds located in the area of intermediate suitability for R. microplus development were more likely to become infected with B. bovis (h = 0.0067, 95% CI 0.0037-0.0121) than those reared in the ecologically unfavorable area for the vector (h = 0.0023, 95% CI 0.0010-0.0049) (P = 0.02). Neither the frequency of treatment with acaricides nor the use of long-acting acaricides to control R. microplus influenced the inoculation rate (P = 0.99 and P = 0.26, respectively). This result indicates that current R. microplus control schemes are not effective in reducing B. bovis transmission. Enzootic instability still prevails in the study area despite the drastic changes occurred in cattle production system. However, 38% of herds did reach enzootic stability; therefore, a specific epidemiological status cannot be assumed at a regional level. Yearly determination of the immunological status of each calf cohort is considered a proper approach to decision-making in vaccination against B. bovis.
EEA Rafaela
Fil: Morel, Nicolas. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina
Fil: Mastropaolo, Mariano. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Cátedra de Parasitología y Enfermedades Parasitarias; Argentina
Fil: Torioni, Susana Marta. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina
Fil: Signorini, Marcelo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Mangold, Atilio Jose. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina - Fuente
- Preventive Veterinary Medicine 170 : 104747 (October 2019)
- Materia
-
Ganado Bovino
Enfermedades de los Animales
Babesia bovis
Babesiosis
Epidemia
Zona Semiárida
Argentina
Cattle
Animal Diseases
Epidemics
Semiarid Zones - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso restringido
- Condiciones de uso
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
- OAI Identificador
- oai:localhost:20.500.12123/5696
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
INTADig_3d2df134bc87a1bd29260d745e20d098 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/5696 |
network_acronym_str |
INTADig |
repository_id_str |
l |
network_name_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
spelling |
Risks of cattle babesiosis (Babesia bovis) outbreaks in a semi-arid region of ArgentinaMorel, NicolasMastropaolo, MarianoTorioni, Susana MartaSignorini, MarceloMangold, Atilio JoseGanado BovinoEnfermedades de los AnimalesBabesia bovisBabesiosisEpidemiaZona SemiáridaArgentinaCattleAnimal DiseasesEpidemicsSemiarid ZonesThe epidemiology of Babesia bovis was studied in terms of enzootic stability/instability and husbandry and abiotic factors influencing B. bovis transmission rate in northeastern Santiago del Estero province, Argentina. The area is of limited suitability for its only vector in Argentina, the tick Rhipicephalus microplus. The proportion of calf herds in a state of enzootic stability/instability to B. bovis was determined and husbandry practices and abiotic factors associated with variations in B. bovis transmission rates were explored using a cross-sectional observational study design. Daily probability of infection (inoculation rate, h) with B. bovis was calculated from age-specific seroprevalence via ELISAi in 58 herds of 4.5–8.5-month-old calves. Herds were considered to be in enzootic instability (EI) when h < 0.005, and therefore inferred to be at risk of babesiosis outbreaks. Husbandry practices associated with differences in B. bovis transmission were analyzed using generalized linear models. Sixty-two percent of herds were found to be in an EI situation for B. bovis. Calves raised exclusively on permanent pastures –where higher cattle density is achieved– were exposed to higher B. bovis inoculation rates (h = 0.0063, 95% CI 0.0032-0.0123) than those reared under forage combinations (h = 0.0024, 95% CI 0.0011-0.0051) (P = 0.05). In addition, calves from herds located in the area of intermediate suitability for R. microplus development were more likely to become infected with B. bovis (h = 0.0067, 95% CI 0.0037-0.0121) than those reared in the ecologically unfavorable area for the vector (h = 0.0023, 95% CI 0.0010-0.0049) (P = 0.02). Neither the frequency of treatment with acaricides nor the use of long-acting acaricides to control R. microplus influenced the inoculation rate (P = 0.99 and P = 0.26, respectively). This result indicates that current R. microplus control schemes are not effective in reducing B. bovis transmission. Enzootic instability still prevails in the study area despite the drastic changes occurred in cattle production system. However, 38% of herds did reach enzootic stability; therefore, a specific epidemiological status cannot be assumed at a regional level. Yearly determination of the immunological status of each calf cohort is considered a proper approach to decision-making in vaccination against B. bovis.EEA RafaelaFil: Morel, Nicolas. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; ArgentinaFil: Mastropaolo, Mariano. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Cátedra de Parasitología y Enfermedades Parasitarias; ArgentinaFil: Torioni, Susana Marta. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; ArgentinaFil: Signorini, Marcelo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Mangold, Atilio Jose. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; ArgentinaElsevier2019-08-27T11:53:33Z2019-08-27T11:53:33Z2019-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167587718306901http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/56960167-58771873-1716https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104747Preventive Veterinary Medicine 170 : 104747 (October 2019)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-09-29T13:44:44Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/5696instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-29 13:44:45.007INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Risks of cattle babesiosis (Babesia bovis) outbreaks in a semi-arid region of Argentina |
title |
Risks of cattle babesiosis (Babesia bovis) outbreaks in a semi-arid region of Argentina |
spellingShingle |
Risks of cattle babesiosis (Babesia bovis) outbreaks in a semi-arid region of Argentina Morel, Nicolas Ganado Bovino Enfermedades de los Animales Babesia bovis Babesiosis Epidemia Zona Semiárida Argentina Cattle Animal Diseases Epidemics Semiarid Zones |
title_short |
Risks of cattle babesiosis (Babesia bovis) outbreaks in a semi-arid region of Argentina |
title_full |
Risks of cattle babesiosis (Babesia bovis) outbreaks in a semi-arid region of Argentina |
title_fullStr |
Risks of cattle babesiosis (Babesia bovis) outbreaks in a semi-arid region of Argentina |
title_full_unstemmed |
Risks of cattle babesiosis (Babesia bovis) outbreaks in a semi-arid region of Argentina |
title_sort |
Risks of cattle babesiosis (Babesia bovis) outbreaks in a semi-arid region of Argentina |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Morel, Nicolas Mastropaolo, Mariano Torioni, Susana Marta Signorini, Marcelo Mangold, Atilio Jose |
author |
Morel, Nicolas |
author_facet |
Morel, Nicolas Mastropaolo, Mariano Torioni, Susana Marta Signorini, Marcelo Mangold, Atilio Jose |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mastropaolo, Mariano Torioni, Susana Marta Signorini, Marcelo Mangold, Atilio Jose |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Ganado Bovino Enfermedades de los Animales Babesia bovis Babesiosis Epidemia Zona Semiárida Argentina Cattle Animal Diseases Epidemics Semiarid Zones |
topic |
Ganado Bovino Enfermedades de los Animales Babesia bovis Babesiosis Epidemia Zona Semiárida Argentina Cattle Animal Diseases Epidemics Semiarid Zones |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
The epidemiology of Babesia bovis was studied in terms of enzootic stability/instability and husbandry and abiotic factors influencing B. bovis transmission rate in northeastern Santiago del Estero province, Argentina. The area is of limited suitability for its only vector in Argentina, the tick Rhipicephalus microplus. The proportion of calf herds in a state of enzootic stability/instability to B. bovis was determined and husbandry practices and abiotic factors associated with variations in B. bovis transmission rates were explored using a cross-sectional observational study design. Daily probability of infection (inoculation rate, h) with B. bovis was calculated from age-specific seroprevalence via ELISAi in 58 herds of 4.5–8.5-month-old calves. Herds were considered to be in enzootic instability (EI) when h < 0.005, and therefore inferred to be at risk of babesiosis outbreaks. Husbandry practices associated with differences in B. bovis transmission were analyzed using generalized linear models. Sixty-two percent of herds were found to be in an EI situation for B. bovis. Calves raised exclusively on permanent pastures –where higher cattle density is achieved– were exposed to higher B. bovis inoculation rates (h = 0.0063, 95% CI 0.0032-0.0123) than those reared under forage combinations (h = 0.0024, 95% CI 0.0011-0.0051) (P = 0.05). In addition, calves from herds located in the area of intermediate suitability for R. microplus development were more likely to become infected with B. bovis (h = 0.0067, 95% CI 0.0037-0.0121) than those reared in the ecologically unfavorable area for the vector (h = 0.0023, 95% CI 0.0010-0.0049) (P = 0.02). Neither the frequency of treatment with acaricides nor the use of long-acting acaricides to control R. microplus influenced the inoculation rate (P = 0.99 and P = 0.26, respectively). This result indicates that current R. microplus control schemes are not effective in reducing B. bovis transmission. Enzootic instability still prevails in the study area despite the drastic changes occurred in cattle production system. However, 38% of herds did reach enzootic stability; therefore, a specific epidemiological status cannot be assumed at a regional level. Yearly determination of the immunological status of each calf cohort is considered a proper approach to decision-making in vaccination against B. bovis. EEA Rafaela Fil: Morel, Nicolas. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina Fil: Mastropaolo, Mariano. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Cátedra de Parasitología y Enfermedades Parasitarias; Argentina Fil: Torioni, Susana Marta. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina Fil: Signorini, Marcelo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Mangold, Atilio Jose. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina |
description |
The epidemiology of Babesia bovis was studied in terms of enzootic stability/instability and husbandry and abiotic factors influencing B. bovis transmission rate in northeastern Santiago del Estero province, Argentina. The area is of limited suitability for its only vector in Argentina, the tick Rhipicephalus microplus. The proportion of calf herds in a state of enzootic stability/instability to B. bovis was determined and husbandry practices and abiotic factors associated with variations in B. bovis transmission rates were explored using a cross-sectional observational study design. Daily probability of infection (inoculation rate, h) with B. bovis was calculated from age-specific seroprevalence via ELISAi in 58 herds of 4.5–8.5-month-old calves. Herds were considered to be in enzootic instability (EI) when h < 0.005, and therefore inferred to be at risk of babesiosis outbreaks. Husbandry practices associated with differences in B. bovis transmission were analyzed using generalized linear models. Sixty-two percent of herds were found to be in an EI situation for B. bovis. Calves raised exclusively on permanent pastures –where higher cattle density is achieved– were exposed to higher B. bovis inoculation rates (h = 0.0063, 95% CI 0.0032-0.0123) than those reared under forage combinations (h = 0.0024, 95% CI 0.0011-0.0051) (P = 0.05). In addition, calves from herds located in the area of intermediate suitability for R. microplus development were more likely to become infected with B. bovis (h = 0.0067, 95% CI 0.0037-0.0121) than those reared in the ecologically unfavorable area for the vector (h = 0.0023, 95% CI 0.0010-0.0049) (P = 0.02). Neither the frequency of treatment with acaricides nor the use of long-acting acaricides to control R. microplus influenced the inoculation rate (P = 0.99 and P = 0.26, respectively). This result indicates that current R. microplus control schemes are not effective in reducing B. bovis transmission. Enzootic instability still prevails in the study area despite the drastic changes occurred in cattle production system. However, 38% of herds did reach enzootic stability; therefore, a specific epidemiological status cannot be assumed at a regional level. Yearly determination of the immunological status of each calf cohort is considered a proper approach to decision-making in vaccination against B. bovis. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-08-27T11:53:33Z 2019-08-27T11:53:33Z 2019-10 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167587718306901 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/5696 0167-5877 1873-1716 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104747 |
url |
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167587718306901 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/5696 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104747 |
identifier_str_mv |
0167-5877 1873-1716 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
restrictedAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Preventive Veterinary Medicine 170 : 104747 (October 2019) reponame:INTA Digital (INTA) instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
reponame_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
collection |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar |
_version_ |
1844619136542441472 |
score |
12.559606 |