A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production

Autores
Dainese, Matteo; Martin, Emily A.; Aizen, Marcelo Adrian; Albrecht, Matthias; Bartomeus, Ignasi; Bommarco, Riccardo; Carvalheiro, Luisa G.; Chaplin-Kramer, Rebecca; Gagic, Vesna; Garibaldi, Lucas Alejandro; Cavigliasso, Pablo; Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf
Año de publicación
2019
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Human land use threatens global biodiversity and compromises multiple ecosystem functions critical to food production. Whether crop yield–related ecosystem services can be maintained by a few dominant species or rely on high richness remains unclear. Using a global database from 89 studies (with 1475 locations), we partition the relative importance of species richness, abundance, and dominance for pollination; biological pest control; and final yields in the context of ongoing land-use change. Pollinator and enemy richness directly supported ecosystem services in addition to and independent of abundance and dominance. Up to 50% of the negative effects of landscape simplification on ecosystem services was due to richness losses of service-providing organisms, with negative consequences for crop yields. Maintaining the biodiversity of ecosystem service providers is therefore vital to sustain the flow of key agroecosystem benefits to society.
EEA Concordia
Fil: Dainese, Matteo. Eurac Research. Institute for Alpine Environment; Italia
Fil: Dainese, Matteo. University of Würzburg. Biocenter. Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology; Alemania
Fil: Martin, Emily A. University of Würzburg. Biocenter. Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology; Alemania
Fil: Aizen, Marcelo Adrian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente; Argentina
Fil: Aizen, Marcelo Adrian. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro Regional Universidad Bariloche. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente; Argentina.
Fil: Albrecht, Matthias. Agroscope. Agroecology and Environment; Suiza
Fil: Bartomeus, Ignasi. CSIC. Estación Biológica de Doñana. Integrative Ecology; España
Fil: Bommarco, Riccardo. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Department of Ecology; Suecia
Fil: Carvalheiro, Luisa G. Universidade Federal de Goias. Departamento de Ecologia; Brasil
Fil: Carvalheiro, Luisa G. Universidade de Lisboa. Faculdade de Ciencias. Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (CE3C); Portugal
Fil: Chaplin-Kramer, Rebecca. Stanford University. Natural Capital Project; Estados Unidos
Fil: Gagic, Vesna. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO); Australia
Fil: Garibaldi, Lucas Alejandro. Universidad Nacional de Rio Negro. Instituto de Investigaciones de Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural; Argentina
Fil: Garibaldi, Lucas Alejandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Cavigliasso, Pablo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Concordia; Argentina
Fil: Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf. University of Würzburg. Biocenter. Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology; Alemania
Fuente
Science Advances 5 (10) : eaax0121 (October 2019)
Materia
Cultivos
Producción
Biodiversidad
Rendimiento
Crops
Production
Biodiversity
Yields
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/10986
Acceder
id INTADig_35bfe4fcf5f7a55341593dec8cf3a7ac
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/10986
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop productionDainese, MatteoMartin, Emily A.Aizen, Marcelo AdrianAlbrecht, MatthiasBartomeus, IgnasiBommarco, RiccardoCarvalheiro, Luisa G.Chaplin-Kramer, RebeccaGagic, VesnaGaribaldi, Lucas AlejandroCavigliasso, PabloSteffan-Dewenter, IngolfCultivosProducciónBiodiversidadRendimientoCropsProductionBiodiversityYieldsHuman land use threatens global biodiversity and compromises multiple ecosystem functions critical to food production. Whether crop yield–related ecosystem services can be maintained by a few dominant species or rely on high richness remains unclear. Using a global database from 89 studies (with 1475 locations), we partition the relative importance of species richness, abundance, and dominance for pollination; biological pest control; and final yields in the context of ongoing land-use change. Pollinator and enemy richness directly supported ecosystem services in addition to and independent of abundance and dominance. Up to 50% of the negative effects of landscape simplification on ecosystem services was due to richness losses of service-providing organisms, with negative consequences for crop yields. Maintaining the biodiversity of ecosystem service providers is therefore vital to sustain the flow of key agroecosystem benefits to society.EEA ConcordiaFil: Dainese, Matteo. Eurac Research. Institute for Alpine Environment; ItaliaFil: Dainese, Matteo. University of Würzburg. Biocenter. Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology; AlemaniaFil: Martin, Emily A. University of Würzburg. Biocenter. Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology; AlemaniaFil: Aizen, Marcelo Adrian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente; ArgentinaFil: Aizen, Marcelo Adrian. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro Regional Universidad Bariloche. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente; Argentina.Fil: Albrecht, Matthias. Agroscope. Agroecology and Environment; SuizaFil: Bartomeus, Ignasi. CSIC. Estación Biológica de Doñana. Integrative Ecology; EspañaFil: Bommarco, Riccardo. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Department of Ecology; SueciaFil: Carvalheiro, Luisa G. Universidade Federal de Goias. Departamento de Ecologia; BrasilFil: Carvalheiro, Luisa G. Universidade de Lisboa. Faculdade de Ciencias. Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (CE3C); PortugalFil: Chaplin-Kramer, Rebecca. Stanford University. Natural Capital Project; Estados UnidosFil: Gagic, Vesna. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO); AustraliaFil: Garibaldi, Lucas Alejandro. Universidad Nacional de Rio Negro. Instituto de Investigaciones de Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural; ArgentinaFil: Garibaldi, Lucas Alejandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Cavigliasso, Pablo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Concordia; ArgentinaFil: Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf. University of Würzburg. Biocenter. Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology; AlemaniaAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science2021-12-23T15:05:48Z2021-12-23T15:05:48Z2019-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/10986https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aax01212375-2548https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax0121Science Advances 5 (10) : eaax0121 (October 2019)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-10-23T11:17:50Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/10986instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-10-23 11:17:50.393INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production
title A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production
spellingShingle A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production
Dainese, Matteo
Cultivos
Producción
Biodiversidad
Rendimiento
Crops
Production
Biodiversity
Yields
title_short A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production
title_full A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production
title_fullStr A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production
title_full_unstemmed A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production
title_sort A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Dainese, Matteo
Martin, Emily A.
Aizen, Marcelo Adrian
Albrecht, Matthias
Bartomeus, Ignasi
Bommarco, Riccardo
Carvalheiro, Luisa G.
Chaplin-Kramer, Rebecca
Gagic, Vesna
Garibaldi, Lucas Alejandro
Cavigliasso, Pablo
Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf
author Dainese, Matteo
author_facet Dainese, Matteo
Martin, Emily A.
Aizen, Marcelo Adrian
Albrecht, Matthias
Bartomeus, Ignasi
Bommarco, Riccardo
Carvalheiro, Luisa G.
Chaplin-Kramer, Rebecca
Gagic, Vesna
Garibaldi, Lucas Alejandro
Cavigliasso, Pablo
Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf
author_role author
author2 Martin, Emily A.
Aizen, Marcelo Adrian
Albrecht, Matthias
Bartomeus, Ignasi
Bommarco, Riccardo
Carvalheiro, Luisa G.
Chaplin-Kramer, Rebecca
Gagic, Vesna
Garibaldi, Lucas Alejandro
Cavigliasso, Pablo
Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Cultivos
Producción
Biodiversidad
Rendimiento
Crops
Production
Biodiversity
Yields
topic Cultivos
Producción
Biodiversidad
Rendimiento
Crops
Production
Biodiversity
Yields
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Human land use threatens global biodiversity and compromises multiple ecosystem functions critical to food production. Whether crop yield–related ecosystem services can be maintained by a few dominant species or rely on high richness remains unclear. Using a global database from 89 studies (with 1475 locations), we partition the relative importance of species richness, abundance, and dominance for pollination; biological pest control; and final yields in the context of ongoing land-use change. Pollinator and enemy richness directly supported ecosystem services in addition to and independent of abundance and dominance. Up to 50% of the negative effects of landscape simplification on ecosystem services was due to richness losses of service-providing organisms, with negative consequences for crop yields. Maintaining the biodiversity of ecosystem service providers is therefore vital to sustain the flow of key agroecosystem benefits to society.
EEA Concordia
Fil: Dainese, Matteo. Eurac Research. Institute for Alpine Environment; Italia
Fil: Dainese, Matteo. University of Würzburg. Biocenter. Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology; Alemania
Fil: Martin, Emily A. University of Würzburg. Biocenter. Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology; Alemania
Fil: Aizen, Marcelo Adrian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente; Argentina
Fil: Aizen, Marcelo Adrian. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro Regional Universidad Bariloche. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente; Argentina.
Fil: Albrecht, Matthias. Agroscope. Agroecology and Environment; Suiza
Fil: Bartomeus, Ignasi. CSIC. Estación Biológica de Doñana. Integrative Ecology; España
Fil: Bommarco, Riccardo. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Department of Ecology; Suecia
Fil: Carvalheiro, Luisa G. Universidade Federal de Goias. Departamento de Ecologia; Brasil
Fil: Carvalheiro, Luisa G. Universidade de Lisboa. Faculdade de Ciencias. Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (CE3C); Portugal
Fil: Chaplin-Kramer, Rebecca. Stanford University. Natural Capital Project; Estados Unidos
Fil: Gagic, Vesna. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO); Australia
Fil: Garibaldi, Lucas Alejandro. Universidad Nacional de Rio Negro. Instituto de Investigaciones de Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural; Argentina
Fil: Garibaldi, Lucas Alejandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Cavigliasso, Pablo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Concordia; Argentina
Fil: Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf. University of Würzburg. Biocenter. Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology; Alemania
description Human land use threatens global biodiversity and compromises multiple ecosystem functions critical to food production. Whether crop yield–related ecosystem services can be maintained by a few dominant species or rely on high richness remains unclear. Using a global database from 89 studies (with 1475 locations), we partition the relative importance of species richness, abundance, and dominance for pollination; biological pest control; and final yields in the context of ongoing land-use change. Pollinator and enemy richness directly supported ecosystem services in addition to and independent of abundance and dominance. Up to 50% of the negative effects of landscape simplification on ecosystem services was due to richness losses of service-providing organisms, with negative consequences for crop yields. Maintaining the biodiversity of ecosystem service providers is therefore vital to sustain the flow of key agroecosystem benefits to society.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10
2021-12-23T15:05:48Z
2021-12-23T15:05:48Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/10986
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aax0121
2375-2548
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax0121
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/10986
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aax0121
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax0121
identifier_str_mv 2375-2548
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv American Association for the Advancement of Science
publisher.none.fl_str_mv American Association for the Advancement of Science
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Science Advances 5 (10) : eaax0121 (October 2019)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1846787552954023936
score 12.982451

Publicaciones similares