Pruning after budburst delays phenology and affects yield components, crop coefficient and total evapotranspiration in Vitis vinífera L. cv. ‘Malbec’ in Mendoza, Argentina

Autores
Bustos Morgani, Marianela; Perez Peña, Jorge Esteban; Fanzone, Martín Leandro; Prieto, Jorge Alejandro
Año de publicación
2022
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Late pruning is a field technique that has recently been proposed to mitigate the advance in phenology produced by global warming. However, contrasting effects have been observed depending on the cultivar and the date of pruning evaluated. In this work, our aim was to evaluate the effects of delayed pruning on phenology, vegetative growth, yield components, and crop evapotranspiration in cv. Malbec. During three seasons, winter pruning (WP) was compared to three late pruning treatments: plants pruned at budburst (BB), at 2-3 unfolded leaves (2-3 L) and at 8 unfolded leaves (8 L). Our results showed that late pruning treatments delayed phenology from budburst to veraison the three years of experiment, but harvest date could not be postponed. Plants pruned at 2-3 L and 8 L showed a decrease in vine yield of 17% and 60%, respectively while plants pruned at budburst showed the same yield than control vines. Late pruning treatments did not cause carry over effects on yield formation the following season. Finally, plants pruned at 2-3 L and 8 L reduced annual crop evapotranspiration by 5–10% mainly at the beginning of the cycle, compared to control and BB. Our study provides evidence that late pruning is effective to delay the first phenological stages but it is not as effective to delay the total soluble solids accumulation fixed for harvest, in our conditions.
EEA Mendoza
Fil: Bustos Morgani, Marianela. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Perez Peña, Jorge Esteban. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Fanzone, Martin Leandro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Prieto, Jorge Alejandro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina
Fuente
Scientia Horticulturae 296 : 110886 (April 2022)
Materia
Vid
Poda
Elección de la Epoca
Fenología
Crecimiento
Rendimiento
Evapotranspiración
Grapevines
Pruning
Timing
Phenology
Growth
Yields
Evapotranspiration
Malbec
Mendoza, Argentina
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso restringido
Condiciones de uso
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/11250
Acceder
id INTADig_32d6c3a8fc57e769e6eaf96e7c3bd59a
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/11250
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Pruning after budburst delays phenology and affects yield components, crop coefficient and total evapotranspiration in Vitis vinífera L. cv. ‘Malbec’ in Mendoza, ArgentinaBustos Morgani, MarianelaPerez Peña, Jorge EstebanFanzone, Martín LeandroPrieto, Jorge AlejandroVidPodaElección de la EpocaFenologíaCrecimientoRendimientoEvapotranspiraciónGrapevinesPruningTimingPhenologyGrowthYieldsEvapotranspirationMalbecMendoza, ArgentinaLate pruning is a field technique that has recently been proposed to mitigate the advance in phenology produced by global warming. However, contrasting effects have been observed depending on the cultivar and the date of pruning evaluated. In this work, our aim was to evaluate the effects of delayed pruning on phenology, vegetative growth, yield components, and crop evapotranspiration in cv. Malbec. During three seasons, winter pruning (WP) was compared to three late pruning treatments: plants pruned at budburst (BB), at 2-3 unfolded leaves (2-3 L) and at 8 unfolded leaves (8 L). Our results showed that late pruning treatments delayed phenology from budburst to veraison the three years of experiment, but harvest date could not be postponed. Plants pruned at 2-3 L and 8 L showed a decrease in vine yield of 17% and 60%, respectively while plants pruned at budburst showed the same yield than control vines. Late pruning treatments did not cause carry over effects on yield formation the following season. Finally, plants pruned at 2-3 L and 8 L reduced annual crop evapotranspiration by 5–10% mainly at the beginning of the cycle, compared to control and BB. Our study provides evidence that late pruning is effective to delay the first phenological stages but it is not as effective to delay the total soluble solids accumulation fixed for harvest, in our conditions.EEA MendozaFil: Bustos Morgani, Marianela. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Perez Peña, Jorge Esteban. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; ArgentinaFil: Fanzone, Martin Leandro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; ArgentinaFil: Prieto, Jorge Alejandro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; ArgentinaElsevier2022-02-23T12:05:39Z2022-02-23T12:05:39Z2022-02-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/11250https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S03044238220001270304-4238https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2022.110886Scientia Horticulturae 296 : 110886 (April 2022)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/PNFRU-1105064/AR./Ecofisiología y manejo sostenible de los cultivos.info:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/2019-PD-E3-I060-001/2019-PD-E3-I060-001/AR./Adaptación de los cultivos al cambio climático: Bases ecofisiológicas para el manejo y la mejora genéticaMendoza .......... (province) (World, South America, Argentina)1001427info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-09-29T13:45:29Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/11250instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-29 13:45:29.401INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Pruning after budburst delays phenology and affects yield components, crop coefficient and total evapotranspiration in Vitis vinífera L. cv. ‘Malbec’ in Mendoza, Argentina
title Pruning after budburst delays phenology and affects yield components, crop coefficient and total evapotranspiration in Vitis vinífera L. cv. ‘Malbec’ in Mendoza, Argentina
spellingShingle Pruning after budburst delays phenology and affects yield components, crop coefficient and total evapotranspiration in Vitis vinífera L. cv. ‘Malbec’ in Mendoza, Argentina
Bustos Morgani, Marianela
Vid
Poda
Elección de la Epoca
Fenología
Crecimiento
Rendimiento
Evapotranspiración
Grapevines
Pruning
Timing
Phenology
Growth
Yields
Evapotranspiration
Malbec
Mendoza, Argentina
title_short Pruning after budburst delays phenology and affects yield components, crop coefficient and total evapotranspiration in Vitis vinífera L. cv. ‘Malbec’ in Mendoza, Argentina
title_full Pruning after budburst delays phenology and affects yield components, crop coefficient and total evapotranspiration in Vitis vinífera L. cv. ‘Malbec’ in Mendoza, Argentina
title_fullStr Pruning after budburst delays phenology and affects yield components, crop coefficient and total evapotranspiration in Vitis vinífera L. cv. ‘Malbec’ in Mendoza, Argentina
title_full_unstemmed Pruning after budburst delays phenology and affects yield components, crop coefficient and total evapotranspiration in Vitis vinífera L. cv. ‘Malbec’ in Mendoza, Argentina
title_sort Pruning after budburst delays phenology and affects yield components, crop coefficient and total evapotranspiration in Vitis vinífera L. cv. ‘Malbec’ in Mendoza, Argentina
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Bustos Morgani, Marianela
Perez Peña, Jorge Esteban
Fanzone, Martín Leandro
Prieto, Jorge Alejandro
author Bustos Morgani, Marianela
author_facet Bustos Morgani, Marianela
Perez Peña, Jorge Esteban
Fanzone, Martín Leandro
Prieto, Jorge Alejandro
author_role author
author2 Perez Peña, Jorge Esteban
Fanzone, Martín Leandro
Prieto, Jorge Alejandro
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Vid
Poda
Elección de la Epoca
Fenología
Crecimiento
Rendimiento
Evapotranspiración
Grapevines
Pruning
Timing
Phenology
Growth
Yields
Evapotranspiration
Malbec
Mendoza, Argentina
topic Vid
Poda
Elección de la Epoca
Fenología
Crecimiento
Rendimiento
Evapotranspiración
Grapevines
Pruning
Timing
Phenology
Growth
Yields
Evapotranspiration
Malbec
Mendoza, Argentina
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Late pruning is a field technique that has recently been proposed to mitigate the advance in phenology produced by global warming. However, contrasting effects have been observed depending on the cultivar and the date of pruning evaluated. In this work, our aim was to evaluate the effects of delayed pruning on phenology, vegetative growth, yield components, and crop evapotranspiration in cv. Malbec. During three seasons, winter pruning (WP) was compared to three late pruning treatments: plants pruned at budburst (BB), at 2-3 unfolded leaves (2-3 L) and at 8 unfolded leaves (8 L). Our results showed that late pruning treatments delayed phenology from budburst to veraison the three years of experiment, but harvest date could not be postponed. Plants pruned at 2-3 L and 8 L showed a decrease in vine yield of 17% and 60%, respectively while plants pruned at budburst showed the same yield than control vines. Late pruning treatments did not cause carry over effects on yield formation the following season. Finally, plants pruned at 2-3 L and 8 L reduced annual crop evapotranspiration by 5–10% mainly at the beginning of the cycle, compared to control and BB. Our study provides evidence that late pruning is effective to delay the first phenological stages but it is not as effective to delay the total soluble solids accumulation fixed for harvest, in our conditions.
EEA Mendoza
Fil: Bustos Morgani, Marianela. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Perez Peña, Jorge Esteban. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Fanzone, Martin Leandro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Prieto, Jorge Alejandro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina
description Late pruning is a field technique that has recently been proposed to mitigate the advance in phenology produced by global warming. However, contrasting effects have been observed depending on the cultivar and the date of pruning evaluated. In this work, our aim was to evaluate the effects of delayed pruning on phenology, vegetative growth, yield components, and crop evapotranspiration in cv. Malbec. During three seasons, winter pruning (WP) was compared to three late pruning treatments: plants pruned at budburst (BB), at 2-3 unfolded leaves (2-3 L) and at 8 unfolded leaves (8 L). Our results showed that late pruning treatments delayed phenology from budburst to veraison the three years of experiment, but harvest date could not be postponed. Plants pruned at 2-3 L and 8 L showed a decrease in vine yield of 17% and 60%, respectively while plants pruned at budburst showed the same yield than control vines. Late pruning treatments did not cause carry over effects on yield formation the following season. Finally, plants pruned at 2-3 L and 8 L reduced annual crop evapotranspiration by 5–10% mainly at the beginning of the cycle, compared to control and BB. Our study provides evidence that late pruning is effective to delay the first phenological stages but it is not as effective to delay the total soluble solids accumulation fixed for harvest, in our conditions.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-02-23T12:05:39Z
2022-02-23T12:05:39Z
2022-02-23
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/11250
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304423822000127
0304-4238
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2022.110886
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/11250
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304423822000127
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2022.110886
identifier_str_mv 0304-4238
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/PNFRU-1105064/AR./Ecofisiología y manejo sostenible de los cultivos.
info:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/2019-PD-E3-I060-001/2019-PD-E3-I060-001/AR./Adaptación de los cultivos al cambio climático: Bases ecofisiológicas para el manejo y la mejora genética
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv restrictedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Mendoza .......... (province) (World, South America, Argentina)
1001427
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Horticulturae 296 : 110886 (April 2022)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1844619162330071040
score 12.559606

Publicaciones similares