Analysis of biodiversity attributes for extensive vegetated roofs in a semiarid region of central Argentina

Autores
Cáceres, Natalia; Robbiati, Federico Omar; Hick, Emmanuel C.; Suárez, Mario; Matoff, Evangelina; Galetto, Leonardo; Imhof, Leila
Año de publicación
2022
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Vegetated roofs (VRs) contribute to the resiilience of cities by providing multiple ecosystem functions. A wide range of these benefits depends on the plant layer. Here, we hypothesized that increasing biodiversity attributes (i.e., composition, structural, and functional) in VRs will improve their performance under the climate conditions of semiarid regions. We aimed to (i) characterize functional groups of eight species assessed from key functional traits, (ii) evaluate species performance through survival and coverage, comparing biodiversity attributes from mono to polyculture treatments, (iii) analyze the relationship between performance with biodiversity attributes, and (iv) systematize and rank the treatments using an index to select those with the best performance and to recommend them for VRs in semiarid regions. We expect those treatments with higher biodiversity attributes will show better performances than simpler ones. Functional traits as indicators of ecosystem functions of eight species and four life-forms (succulents: Sedum acre, S. lineare, S. reflexum, creeping herbs: Phyla nodiflora, Glandularia x hybrida, tall forb: Grindelia cabrerae, and grasses: Eustachys distichophylla, and Nassella tenuissima) were evaluated through a trial using 22 microcosms during a 12-month experimental study. A principal component analysis and a cluster analysis were used to detect functional groups according to leaf and plant height traits. We used the Kaplan-Meier analysis to assess species survival among the treatments. Final coverage and growth increment (and their coefficients of variation) were used to construct the performance index. The PCA and CA determined five functional groups: I) succulents; II) creeping herbs; III) N. tenuissima; IV) E. distichophylla, and V) G. cabrerae. Four species showed significantly differences in survival rates among the treatments (p < 0.05), and six treatments were characterized as the best ones: with the highest coverage (>93%) and growth increment (81%), and with low CVs. Although some monoculture (Sedum spp., P. nodiflora and, E. distichophylla) reached comparable index values with respect to mixed microcosms, for VRs we recommend those plant mixtures combining biodiversity attributes because they provide both more ecosystem services and higher chances of survival and phenological complementarity in the long term.
EEA Manfredi
Fil: Cáceres, Natalia. Universidad Católica de Córdoba (UCC). Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales y Sustentabilidad José Sánchez Labrador S. J. (IRNASUS). Laboratorio de Recursos Genéticos y Sustentabilidad Bioclimática; Argentina
Fil: Cáceres, Natalia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales y Sustentabilidad José Sánchez Labrador S. J. (IRNASUS). Laboratorio de Recursos Genéticos y Sustentabilidad Bioclimática; Argentina
Fil: Robbiati, Federico Omar. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (UNC). Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales; Argentina
Fil: Hick, Emmanuel C. Universidad Católica de Córdoba (UCC). Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales y Sustentabilidad José Sánchez Labrador S. J. (IRNASUS). Laboratorio de Recursos Genéticos y Sustentabilidad Bioclimática; Argentina
Fil: Hick, Emmanuel C. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales y Sustentabilidad José Sánchez Labrador S. J. (IRNASUS). Laboratorio de Recursos Genéticos y Sustentabilidad Bioclimática; Argentina
Fil: Suárez, Mario. Universidad Católica de Córdoba (UCC). Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales y Sustentabilidad José Sánchez Labrador S. J. (IRNASUS). Laboratorio de Recursos Genéticos y Sustentabilidad Bioclimática; Argentina
Fil: Suárez, Mario. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales y Sustentabilidad José Sánchez Labrador S. J. (IRNASUS). Laboratorio de Recursos Genéticos y Sustentabilidad Bioclimática; Argentina
Fil: Matoff, Evangelina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Manfredi. Agencia de Extensión Rural Córdoba; Argentina
Fil: Galetto, Leonardo. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (UNC). Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (IMBIV); Argentina
Fil: Galetto, Leonardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (IMBIV); Argentina
Fil: Imhof, Leila. Universidad Católica de Córdoba (UCC). Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales y Sustentabilidad José Sánchez Labrador S. J. (IRNASUS). Laboratorio de Recursos Genéticos y Sustentabilidad Bioclimática; Argentina
Fil: Imhof, Leila. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales y Sustentabilidad José Sánchez Labrador S. J. (IRNASUS). Laboratorio de Recursos Genéticos y Sustentabilidad Bioclimática; Argentina
Fuente
Ecological Engineering 178 : 106602 (May 2022)
Materia
Biodiversidad
Tejados
Zona Semiárida
Argentina
Índice de Rendimiento
Biodiversity
Roofs
Semi-arid Zones
Performance Index
Vegetated Roofs
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/23173

id INTADig_2f69b7e6131d1a76754efa4c91f4487c
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/23173
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Analysis of biodiversity attributes for extensive vegetated roofs in a semiarid region of central ArgentinaCáceres, NataliaRobbiati, Federico OmarHick, Emmanuel C.Suárez, MarioMatoff, EvangelinaGaletto, LeonardoImhof, LeilaBiodiversidadTejadosZona SemiáridaArgentinaÍndice de RendimientoBiodiversityRoofsSemi-arid ZonesPerformance IndexVegetated RoofsVegetated roofs (VRs) contribute to the resiilience of cities by providing multiple ecosystem functions. A wide range of these benefits depends on the plant layer. Here, we hypothesized that increasing biodiversity attributes (i.e., composition, structural, and functional) in VRs will improve their performance under the climate conditions of semiarid regions. We aimed to (i) characterize functional groups of eight species assessed from key functional traits, (ii) evaluate species performance through survival and coverage, comparing biodiversity attributes from mono to polyculture treatments, (iii) analyze the relationship between performance with biodiversity attributes, and (iv) systematize and rank the treatments using an index to select those with the best performance and to recommend them for VRs in semiarid regions. We expect those treatments with higher biodiversity attributes will show better performances than simpler ones. Functional traits as indicators of ecosystem functions of eight species and four life-forms (succulents: Sedum acre, S. lineare, S. reflexum, creeping herbs: Phyla nodiflora, Glandularia x hybrida, tall forb: Grindelia cabrerae, and grasses: Eustachys distichophylla, and Nassella tenuissima) were evaluated through a trial using 22 microcosms during a 12-month experimental study. A principal component analysis and a cluster analysis were used to detect functional groups according to leaf and plant height traits. We used the Kaplan-Meier analysis to assess species survival among the treatments. Final coverage and growth increment (and their coefficients of variation) were used to construct the performance index. The PCA and CA determined five functional groups: I) succulents; II) creeping herbs; III) N. tenuissima; IV) E. distichophylla, and V) G. cabrerae. Four species showed significantly differences in survival rates among the treatments (p < 0.05), and six treatments were characterized as the best ones: with the highest coverage (>93%) and growth increment (81%), and with low CVs. Although some monoculture (Sedum spp., P. nodiflora and, E. distichophylla) reached comparable index values with respect to mixed microcosms, for VRs we recommend those plant mixtures combining biodiversity attributes because they provide both more ecosystem services and higher chances of survival and phenological complementarity in the long term.EEA ManfrediFil: Cáceres, Natalia. Universidad Católica de Córdoba (UCC). Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales y Sustentabilidad José Sánchez Labrador S. J. (IRNASUS). Laboratorio de Recursos Genéticos y Sustentabilidad Bioclimática; ArgentinaFil: Cáceres, Natalia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales y Sustentabilidad José Sánchez Labrador S. J. (IRNASUS). Laboratorio de Recursos Genéticos y Sustentabilidad Bioclimática; ArgentinaFil: Robbiati, Federico Omar. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (UNC). Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales; ArgentinaFil: Hick, Emmanuel C. Universidad Católica de Córdoba (UCC). Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales y Sustentabilidad José Sánchez Labrador S. J. (IRNASUS). Laboratorio de Recursos Genéticos y Sustentabilidad Bioclimática; ArgentinaFil: Hick, Emmanuel C. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales y Sustentabilidad José Sánchez Labrador S. J. (IRNASUS). Laboratorio de Recursos Genéticos y Sustentabilidad Bioclimática; ArgentinaFil: Suárez, Mario. Universidad Católica de Córdoba (UCC). Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales y Sustentabilidad José Sánchez Labrador S. J. (IRNASUS). Laboratorio de Recursos Genéticos y Sustentabilidad Bioclimática; ArgentinaFil: Suárez, Mario. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales y Sustentabilidad José Sánchez Labrador S. J. (IRNASUS). Laboratorio de Recursos Genéticos y Sustentabilidad Bioclimática; ArgentinaFil: Matoff, Evangelina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Manfredi. Agencia de Extensión Rural Córdoba; ArgentinaFil: Galetto, Leonardo. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (UNC). Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (IMBIV); ArgentinaFil: Galetto, Leonardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (IMBIV); ArgentinaFil: Imhof, Leila. Universidad Católica de Córdoba (UCC). Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales y Sustentabilidad José Sánchez Labrador S. J. (IRNASUS). Laboratorio de Recursos Genéticos y Sustentabilidad Bioclimática; ArgentinaFil: Imhof, Leila. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales y Sustentabilidad José Sánchez Labrador S. J. (IRNASUS). Laboratorio de Recursos Genéticos y Sustentabilidad Bioclimática; ArgentinaElsevier2025-07-25T13:13:39Z2025-07-25T13:13:39Z2022-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/23173https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857422000635?via%3Dihub0925-8574https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106602Ecological Engineering 178 : 106602 (May 2022)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología AgropecuariaengArgentina .......... (nation) (World, South America)7006477info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-09-04T09:51:12Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/23173instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-04 09:51:12.665INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Analysis of biodiversity attributes for extensive vegetated roofs in a semiarid region of central Argentina
title Analysis of biodiversity attributes for extensive vegetated roofs in a semiarid region of central Argentina
spellingShingle Analysis of biodiversity attributes for extensive vegetated roofs in a semiarid region of central Argentina
Cáceres, Natalia
Biodiversidad
Tejados
Zona Semiárida
Argentina
Índice de Rendimiento
Biodiversity
Roofs
Semi-arid Zones
Performance Index
Vegetated Roofs
title_short Analysis of biodiversity attributes for extensive vegetated roofs in a semiarid region of central Argentina
title_full Analysis of biodiversity attributes for extensive vegetated roofs in a semiarid region of central Argentina
title_fullStr Analysis of biodiversity attributes for extensive vegetated roofs in a semiarid region of central Argentina
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of biodiversity attributes for extensive vegetated roofs in a semiarid region of central Argentina
title_sort Analysis of biodiversity attributes for extensive vegetated roofs in a semiarid region of central Argentina
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Cáceres, Natalia
Robbiati, Federico Omar
Hick, Emmanuel C.
Suárez, Mario
Matoff, Evangelina
Galetto, Leonardo
Imhof, Leila
author Cáceres, Natalia
author_facet Cáceres, Natalia
Robbiati, Federico Omar
Hick, Emmanuel C.
Suárez, Mario
Matoff, Evangelina
Galetto, Leonardo
Imhof, Leila
author_role author
author2 Robbiati, Federico Omar
Hick, Emmanuel C.
Suárez, Mario
Matoff, Evangelina
Galetto, Leonardo
Imhof, Leila
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Biodiversidad
Tejados
Zona Semiárida
Argentina
Índice de Rendimiento
Biodiversity
Roofs
Semi-arid Zones
Performance Index
Vegetated Roofs
topic Biodiversidad
Tejados
Zona Semiárida
Argentina
Índice de Rendimiento
Biodiversity
Roofs
Semi-arid Zones
Performance Index
Vegetated Roofs
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Vegetated roofs (VRs) contribute to the resiilience of cities by providing multiple ecosystem functions. A wide range of these benefits depends on the plant layer. Here, we hypothesized that increasing biodiversity attributes (i.e., composition, structural, and functional) in VRs will improve their performance under the climate conditions of semiarid regions. We aimed to (i) characterize functional groups of eight species assessed from key functional traits, (ii) evaluate species performance through survival and coverage, comparing biodiversity attributes from mono to polyculture treatments, (iii) analyze the relationship between performance with biodiversity attributes, and (iv) systematize and rank the treatments using an index to select those with the best performance and to recommend them for VRs in semiarid regions. We expect those treatments with higher biodiversity attributes will show better performances than simpler ones. Functional traits as indicators of ecosystem functions of eight species and four life-forms (succulents: Sedum acre, S. lineare, S. reflexum, creeping herbs: Phyla nodiflora, Glandularia x hybrida, tall forb: Grindelia cabrerae, and grasses: Eustachys distichophylla, and Nassella tenuissima) were evaluated through a trial using 22 microcosms during a 12-month experimental study. A principal component analysis and a cluster analysis were used to detect functional groups according to leaf and plant height traits. We used the Kaplan-Meier analysis to assess species survival among the treatments. Final coverage and growth increment (and their coefficients of variation) were used to construct the performance index. The PCA and CA determined five functional groups: I) succulents; II) creeping herbs; III) N. tenuissima; IV) E. distichophylla, and V) G. cabrerae. Four species showed significantly differences in survival rates among the treatments (p < 0.05), and six treatments were characterized as the best ones: with the highest coverage (>93%) and growth increment (81%), and with low CVs. Although some monoculture (Sedum spp., P. nodiflora and, E. distichophylla) reached comparable index values with respect to mixed microcosms, for VRs we recommend those plant mixtures combining biodiversity attributes because they provide both more ecosystem services and higher chances of survival and phenological complementarity in the long term.
EEA Manfredi
Fil: Cáceres, Natalia. Universidad Católica de Córdoba (UCC). Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales y Sustentabilidad José Sánchez Labrador S. J. (IRNASUS). Laboratorio de Recursos Genéticos y Sustentabilidad Bioclimática; Argentina
Fil: Cáceres, Natalia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales y Sustentabilidad José Sánchez Labrador S. J. (IRNASUS). Laboratorio de Recursos Genéticos y Sustentabilidad Bioclimática; Argentina
Fil: Robbiati, Federico Omar. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (UNC). Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales; Argentina
Fil: Hick, Emmanuel C. Universidad Católica de Córdoba (UCC). Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales y Sustentabilidad José Sánchez Labrador S. J. (IRNASUS). Laboratorio de Recursos Genéticos y Sustentabilidad Bioclimática; Argentina
Fil: Hick, Emmanuel C. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales y Sustentabilidad José Sánchez Labrador S. J. (IRNASUS). Laboratorio de Recursos Genéticos y Sustentabilidad Bioclimática; Argentina
Fil: Suárez, Mario. Universidad Católica de Córdoba (UCC). Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales y Sustentabilidad José Sánchez Labrador S. J. (IRNASUS). Laboratorio de Recursos Genéticos y Sustentabilidad Bioclimática; Argentina
Fil: Suárez, Mario. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales y Sustentabilidad José Sánchez Labrador S. J. (IRNASUS). Laboratorio de Recursos Genéticos y Sustentabilidad Bioclimática; Argentina
Fil: Matoff, Evangelina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Manfredi. Agencia de Extensión Rural Córdoba; Argentina
Fil: Galetto, Leonardo. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (UNC). Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (IMBIV); Argentina
Fil: Galetto, Leonardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (IMBIV); Argentina
Fil: Imhof, Leila. Universidad Católica de Córdoba (UCC). Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales y Sustentabilidad José Sánchez Labrador S. J. (IRNASUS). Laboratorio de Recursos Genéticos y Sustentabilidad Bioclimática; Argentina
Fil: Imhof, Leila. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales y Sustentabilidad José Sánchez Labrador S. J. (IRNASUS). Laboratorio de Recursos Genéticos y Sustentabilidad Bioclimática; Argentina
description Vegetated roofs (VRs) contribute to the resiilience of cities by providing multiple ecosystem functions. A wide range of these benefits depends on the plant layer. Here, we hypothesized that increasing biodiversity attributes (i.e., composition, structural, and functional) in VRs will improve their performance under the climate conditions of semiarid regions. We aimed to (i) characterize functional groups of eight species assessed from key functional traits, (ii) evaluate species performance through survival and coverage, comparing biodiversity attributes from mono to polyculture treatments, (iii) analyze the relationship between performance with biodiversity attributes, and (iv) systematize and rank the treatments using an index to select those with the best performance and to recommend them for VRs in semiarid regions. We expect those treatments with higher biodiversity attributes will show better performances than simpler ones. Functional traits as indicators of ecosystem functions of eight species and four life-forms (succulents: Sedum acre, S. lineare, S. reflexum, creeping herbs: Phyla nodiflora, Glandularia x hybrida, tall forb: Grindelia cabrerae, and grasses: Eustachys distichophylla, and Nassella tenuissima) were evaluated through a trial using 22 microcosms during a 12-month experimental study. A principal component analysis and a cluster analysis were used to detect functional groups according to leaf and plant height traits. We used the Kaplan-Meier analysis to assess species survival among the treatments. Final coverage and growth increment (and their coefficients of variation) were used to construct the performance index. The PCA and CA determined five functional groups: I) succulents; II) creeping herbs; III) N. tenuissima; IV) E. distichophylla, and V) G. cabrerae. Four species showed significantly differences in survival rates among the treatments (p < 0.05), and six treatments were characterized as the best ones: with the highest coverage (>93%) and growth increment (81%), and with low CVs. Although some monoculture (Sedum spp., P. nodiflora and, E. distichophylla) reached comparable index values with respect to mixed microcosms, for VRs we recommend those plant mixtures combining biodiversity attributes because they provide both more ecosystem services and higher chances of survival and phenological complementarity in the long term.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-05
2025-07-25T13:13:39Z
2025-07-25T13:13:39Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/23173
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857422000635?via%3Dihub
0925-8574
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106602
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/23173
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857422000635?via%3Dihub
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106602
identifier_str_mv 0925-8574
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Argentina .......... (nation) (World, South America)
7006477
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ecological Engineering 178 : 106602 (May 2022)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1842341443109126144
score 12.623145