Effects of long-term low intensity silviculture and habitat on birds in Nothofagus antarctica forests of south Patagonia

Autores
Benitez, Julieta; Barrera, Marcelo Daniel; Sola, Francisco Javier; Blazina, Ana P.; Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José; Peri, Pablo Luis; Lencinas, María Vanessa
Año de publicación
2022
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Low intensity silviculture has been used to decrease the impact of forest harvesting, for example, on bird species and structural diversity. The objective of this work was to analyse the long-term effect of thinning on bird communities of Nothofagus antarctica forests in Tierra del Fuego (Argentina), compared with unthinned forests at two different locations. Thinning was performed 15 and 50 years ago at each location (ranches), therefore we also evaluated other common forest habitat types to differentiate these effects (location and time). We sampled four habitat types associated to overstory canopy cover (CC) categories: thinned (35–65% CC), and three unthinned forests (open with <35% CC, closed with 65–85% CC, and very closed with >85% CC), totalling 32 sampling sites (2 ranches × 4 canopy cover × 4 replicates). Bird assemblages’ structure and functional traits (e. g., richness, density, trophic groups, use of strata) were surveyed during two consecutive summers (2017–2020) at each site. We also characterized habitats by: (i) forest structure and ground cover (e.g., basal area, debris, and saplings); and (ii) food availability, considering understory plants consumed by birds (e.g., plant richness, grasses and dicots cover) and arthropods (e.g., total abundance). We evaluated the effect of CC, ranch, time, habitat and food availability by Generalised Linear Mixed Models and multivariate analyses (Multiple Response Permutation Procedure, Canonical Correspondence Analysis). In thinned forests, some bird structure and functional traits remained similar to closed forests; however, thinning increased bird species richness, being more similar to open forests. Effect of time could not be detected. CC and ranch were the factors that better described bird community structure, while forest structure, ground cover and food availability (e.g., dominant height, basal area, proportion of Hymenoptera) were the main drivers of most functional traits. The whole bird assemblage was better explained by 4–6 habitat structure and food availability variables depending on location (ranch). Results suggest thinning will benefit bird conservation if thinned forests maintain characteristics of mature forests (e.g., basal area > 40 m2/ha, shrub cover > 5%).
EEA Santa Cruz
Fil: Benitez, Julieta. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas. Laboratorio de Recursos Agroforestales; Argentina.
Fil: Barrera, Marcelo Daniel. Universidad Nacional de la Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo. Laboratorio de Investigaciones en Maderas; Argentina.
Fil: Sola, Francisco Javier. Universidad Nacional de Tierra del Fuego. Instituto de Ciencias Polares, Ambiente y Recursos Naturales; Argentina.
Fil: Blazina, Ana P. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas. Laboratorio de Recursos Agroforestales; Argentina.
Fil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC); Argentina.
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina.
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina.
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.
Fil: Lencinas, María Vanessa. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC); Argentina.
Fuente
Forest Ecology and Management 516 : 120254. ( July 2022)
Materia
Primary Forests
Silviculture
Harvesting
Habitats
Birds
Biodiversity Conservation
Bosque Primario
Silvicultura
Cosecha
Nothofagus
Habitat
Aves
Conservación de la Diversidad Biológica
Arthropoda
Tierra del Fuego (Argentina)
Bird Community Structure
Bird Functional Traits
Understory Plants
Tree Canopy Cover
Estructura de la Comunidad de Aves
Características Funcionales de las Aves
Plantas de Sotobosque
Cobertura de Dosel de Arboles
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso restringido
Condiciones de uso
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/11780

id INTADig_2a5c8b387ce5b18968a5320f6234a1bc
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/11780
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Effects of long-term low intensity silviculture and habitat on birds in Nothofagus antarctica forests of south PatagoniaBenitez, JulietaBarrera, Marcelo DanielSola, Francisco JavierBlazina, Ana P.Martínez Pastur, Guillermo JoséPeri, Pablo LuisLencinas, María VanessaPrimary ForestsSilvicultureHarvestingHabitatsBirdsBiodiversity ConservationBosque PrimarioSilviculturaCosechaNothofagusHabitatAvesConservación de la Diversidad BiológicaArthropodaTierra del Fuego (Argentina)Bird Community StructureBird Functional TraitsUnderstory PlantsTree Canopy CoverEstructura de la Comunidad de AvesCaracterísticas Funcionales de las AvesPlantas de SotobosqueCobertura de Dosel de ArbolesLow intensity silviculture has been used to decrease the impact of forest harvesting, for example, on bird species and structural diversity. The objective of this work was to analyse the long-term effect of thinning on bird communities of Nothofagus antarctica forests in Tierra del Fuego (Argentina), compared with unthinned forests at two different locations. Thinning was performed 15 and 50 years ago at each location (ranches), therefore we also evaluated other common forest habitat types to differentiate these effects (location and time). We sampled four habitat types associated to overstory canopy cover (CC) categories: thinned (35–65% CC), and three unthinned forests (open with <35% CC, closed with 65–85% CC, and very closed with >85% CC), totalling 32 sampling sites (2 ranches × 4 canopy cover × 4 replicates). Bird assemblages’ structure and functional traits (e. g., richness, density, trophic groups, use of strata) were surveyed during two consecutive summers (2017–2020) at each site. We also characterized habitats by: (i) forest structure and ground cover (e.g., basal area, debris, and saplings); and (ii) food availability, considering understory plants consumed by birds (e.g., plant richness, grasses and dicots cover) and arthropods (e.g., total abundance). We evaluated the effect of CC, ranch, time, habitat and food availability by Generalised Linear Mixed Models and multivariate analyses (Multiple Response Permutation Procedure, Canonical Correspondence Analysis). In thinned forests, some bird structure and functional traits remained similar to closed forests; however, thinning increased bird species richness, being more similar to open forests. Effect of time could not be detected. CC and ranch were the factors that better described bird community structure, while forest structure, ground cover and food availability (e.g., dominant height, basal area, proportion of Hymenoptera) were the main drivers of most functional traits. The whole bird assemblage was better explained by 4–6 habitat structure and food availability variables depending on location (ranch). Results suggest thinning will benefit bird conservation if thinned forests maintain characteristics of mature forests (e.g., basal area > 40 m2/ha, shrub cover > 5%).EEA Santa CruzFil: Benitez, Julieta. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas. Laboratorio de Recursos Agroforestales; Argentina.Fil: Barrera, Marcelo Daniel. Universidad Nacional de la Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo. Laboratorio de Investigaciones en Maderas; Argentina.Fil: Sola, Francisco Javier. Universidad Nacional de Tierra del Fuego. Instituto de Ciencias Polares, Ambiente y Recursos Naturales; Argentina.Fil: Blazina, Ana P. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas. Laboratorio de Recursos Agroforestales; Argentina.Fil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC); Argentina.Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina.Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina.Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.Fil: Lencinas, María Vanessa. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC); Argentina.Elsevier2022-05-02T18:13:50Z2022-05-02T18:13:50Z2022-04-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/11780https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112722002481Benitez J.; Barrera M.D.; Sola F.J.; Blazina A.P.; Martínez Pastur G.; Peri P.L.; Lencinas M.V. (2022) Effects of long-term low intensity silviculture and habitat on birds in Nothofagus antarctica forests of south Patagonia. Forest Ecology and Management 516: 120254. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2022.1202540378-1127https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120254Forest Ecology and Management 516 : 120254. ( July 2022)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2026-01-08T10:38:39Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/11780instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2026-01-08 10:38:40.369INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effects of long-term low intensity silviculture and habitat on birds in Nothofagus antarctica forests of south Patagonia
title Effects of long-term low intensity silviculture and habitat on birds in Nothofagus antarctica forests of south Patagonia
spellingShingle Effects of long-term low intensity silviculture and habitat on birds in Nothofagus antarctica forests of south Patagonia
Benitez, Julieta
Primary Forests
Silviculture
Harvesting
Habitats
Birds
Biodiversity Conservation
Bosque Primario
Silvicultura
Cosecha
Nothofagus
Habitat
Aves
Conservación de la Diversidad Biológica
Arthropoda
Tierra del Fuego (Argentina)
Bird Community Structure
Bird Functional Traits
Understory Plants
Tree Canopy Cover
Estructura de la Comunidad de Aves
Características Funcionales de las Aves
Plantas de Sotobosque
Cobertura de Dosel de Arboles
title_short Effects of long-term low intensity silviculture and habitat on birds in Nothofagus antarctica forests of south Patagonia
title_full Effects of long-term low intensity silviculture and habitat on birds in Nothofagus antarctica forests of south Patagonia
title_fullStr Effects of long-term low intensity silviculture and habitat on birds in Nothofagus antarctica forests of south Patagonia
title_full_unstemmed Effects of long-term low intensity silviculture and habitat on birds in Nothofagus antarctica forests of south Patagonia
title_sort Effects of long-term low intensity silviculture and habitat on birds in Nothofagus antarctica forests of south Patagonia
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Benitez, Julieta
Barrera, Marcelo Daniel
Sola, Francisco Javier
Blazina, Ana P.
Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José
Peri, Pablo Luis
Lencinas, María Vanessa
author Benitez, Julieta
author_facet Benitez, Julieta
Barrera, Marcelo Daniel
Sola, Francisco Javier
Blazina, Ana P.
Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José
Peri, Pablo Luis
Lencinas, María Vanessa
author_role author
author2 Barrera, Marcelo Daniel
Sola, Francisco Javier
Blazina, Ana P.
Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José
Peri, Pablo Luis
Lencinas, María Vanessa
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Primary Forests
Silviculture
Harvesting
Habitats
Birds
Biodiversity Conservation
Bosque Primario
Silvicultura
Cosecha
Nothofagus
Habitat
Aves
Conservación de la Diversidad Biológica
Arthropoda
Tierra del Fuego (Argentina)
Bird Community Structure
Bird Functional Traits
Understory Plants
Tree Canopy Cover
Estructura de la Comunidad de Aves
Características Funcionales de las Aves
Plantas de Sotobosque
Cobertura de Dosel de Arboles
topic Primary Forests
Silviculture
Harvesting
Habitats
Birds
Biodiversity Conservation
Bosque Primario
Silvicultura
Cosecha
Nothofagus
Habitat
Aves
Conservación de la Diversidad Biológica
Arthropoda
Tierra del Fuego (Argentina)
Bird Community Structure
Bird Functional Traits
Understory Plants
Tree Canopy Cover
Estructura de la Comunidad de Aves
Características Funcionales de las Aves
Plantas de Sotobosque
Cobertura de Dosel de Arboles
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Low intensity silviculture has been used to decrease the impact of forest harvesting, for example, on bird species and structural diversity. The objective of this work was to analyse the long-term effect of thinning on bird communities of Nothofagus antarctica forests in Tierra del Fuego (Argentina), compared with unthinned forests at two different locations. Thinning was performed 15 and 50 years ago at each location (ranches), therefore we also evaluated other common forest habitat types to differentiate these effects (location and time). We sampled four habitat types associated to overstory canopy cover (CC) categories: thinned (35–65% CC), and three unthinned forests (open with <35% CC, closed with 65–85% CC, and very closed with >85% CC), totalling 32 sampling sites (2 ranches × 4 canopy cover × 4 replicates). Bird assemblages’ structure and functional traits (e. g., richness, density, trophic groups, use of strata) were surveyed during two consecutive summers (2017–2020) at each site. We also characterized habitats by: (i) forest structure and ground cover (e.g., basal area, debris, and saplings); and (ii) food availability, considering understory plants consumed by birds (e.g., plant richness, grasses and dicots cover) and arthropods (e.g., total abundance). We evaluated the effect of CC, ranch, time, habitat and food availability by Generalised Linear Mixed Models and multivariate analyses (Multiple Response Permutation Procedure, Canonical Correspondence Analysis). In thinned forests, some bird structure and functional traits remained similar to closed forests; however, thinning increased bird species richness, being more similar to open forests. Effect of time could not be detected. CC and ranch were the factors that better described bird community structure, while forest structure, ground cover and food availability (e.g., dominant height, basal area, proportion of Hymenoptera) were the main drivers of most functional traits. The whole bird assemblage was better explained by 4–6 habitat structure and food availability variables depending on location (ranch). Results suggest thinning will benefit bird conservation if thinned forests maintain characteristics of mature forests (e.g., basal area > 40 m2/ha, shrub cover > 5%).
EEA Santa Cruz
Fil: Benitez, Julieta. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas. Laboratorio de Recursos Agroforestales; Argentina.
Fil: Barrera, Marcelo Daniel. Universidad Nacional de la Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo. Laboratorio de Investigaciones en Maderas; Argentina.
Fil: Sola, Francisco Javier. Universidad Nacional de Tierra del Fuego. Instituto de Ciencias Polares, Ambiente y Recursos Naturales; Argentina.
Fil: Blazina, Ana P. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas. Laboratorio de Recursos Agroforestales; Argentina.
Fil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC); Argentina.
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina.
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina.
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.
Fil: Lencinas, María Vanessa. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC); Argentina.
description Low intensity silviculture has been used to decrease the impact of forest harvesting, for example, on bird species and structural diversity. The objective of this work was to analyse the long-term effect of thinning on bird communities of Nothofagus antarctica forests in Tierra del Fuego (Argentina), compared with unthinned forests at two different locations. Thinning was performed 15 and 50 years ago at each location (ranches), therefore we also evaluated other common forest habitat types to differentiate these effects (location and time). We sampled four habitat types associated to overstory canopy cover (CC) categories: thinned (35–65% CC), and three unthinned forests (open with <35% CC, closed with 65–85% CC, and very closed with >85% CC), totalling 32 sampling sites (2 ranches × 4 canopy cover × 4 replicates). Bird assemblages’ structure and functional traits (e. g., richness, density, trophic groups, use of strata) were surveyed during two consecutive summers (2017–2020) at each site. We also characterized habitats by: (i) forest structure and ground cover (e.g., basal area, debris, and saplings); and (ii) food availability, considering understory plants consumed by birds (e.g., plant richness, grasses and dicots cover) and arthropods (e.g., total abundance). We evaluated the effect of CC, ranch, time, habitat and food availability by Generalised Linear Mixed Models and multivariate analyses (Multiple Response Permutation Procedure, Canonical Correspondence Analysis). In thinned forests, some bird structure and functional traits remained similar to closed forests; however, thinning increased bird species richness, being more similar to open forests. Effect of time could not be detected. CC and ranch were the factors that better described bird community structure, while forest structure, ground cover and food availability (e.g., dominant height, basal area, proportion of Hymenoptera) were the main drivers of most functional traits. The whole bird assemblage was better explained by 4–6 habitat structure and food availability variables depending on location (ranch). Results suggest thinning will benefit bird conservation if thinned forests maintain characteristics of mature forests (e.g., basal area > 40 m2/ha, shrub cover > 5%).
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-05-02T18:13:50Z
2022-05-02T18:13:50Z
2022-04-30
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/11780
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112722002481
Benitez J.; Barrera M.D.; Sola F.J.; Blazina A.P.; Martínez Pastur G.; Peri P.L.; Lencinas M.V. (2022) Effects of long-term low intensity silviculture and habitat on birds in Nothofagus antarctica forests of south Patagonia. Forest Ecology and Management 516: 120254. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120254
0378-1127
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120254
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/11780
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112722002481
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120254
identifier_str_mv Benitez J.; Barrera M.D.; Sola F.J.; Blazina A.P.; Martínez Pastur G.; Peri P.L.; Lencinas M.V. (2022) Effects of long-term low intensity silviculture and habitat on birds in Nothofagus antarctica forests of south Patagonia. Forest Ecology and Management 516: 120254. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120254
0378-1127
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv restrictedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Forest Ecology and Management 516 : 120254. ( July 2022)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1853758466431123456
score 13.113929