Institutional challenges in putting ecosystem service knowledge in practice

Autores
Saarikoski, Heli; Primmer, Eeva; Saarela, Sanna-Riikka; Antunes, Paula; Aszalós, Réka; Baró, Francesc; Berry, Pam; Blanko, Gemma Garcia; Gómez Baggethun, Erik; Carvalho, Laurence; Dick, Jan; Dunford, Robert; Hanzu, Mihail; Harrison, Paula A.; Izakovicova, Zita; Kertész, Miklós; Kopperoinen, Leena; Köhler, Berit; Langemeyer, Johannes; Lapola, David; Liquete, Camino; Luque, Sandra; Mederly, Peter; Niemelä, Jari; Palomo, Ignacio; Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José; Peri, Pablo Luis; Preda, Elena; Priess, Jörg A.; Santos, Rui; Schleyer, Christian; Turkelboom, Francis; Vadineanu, Angheluta; Verheyden, Wim; Vikström, Suvi; Young, Juliette
Año de publicación
2018
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The promise that ecosystem service assessments will contribute to better decision-making is not yet proven. We analyse how knowledge on ecosystem services is actually used to inform land and water management in 22 case studies covering different social-ecological systems in European and Latin American countries. None of the case studies reported instrumental use of knowledge in a sense that ecosystem service knowledge would have served as an impartial arbiter between policy options. Yet, in most cases, there was some evidence of conceptual learning as a result of close interaction between researchers, practitioners and stakeholders. We observed several factors that constrained knowledge uptake, including competing interests and political agendas, scientific disputes, professional norms and competencies, and lack of vertical and horizontal integration. Ecosystem knowledge played a small role particularly in those planning and policy-making situations where it challenged established interests and the current distribution of benefits from ecosystems. The factors that facilitated knowledge use included application of transparent participatory methods, social capital, policy champions and clear synergies between ecosystem services and human well-being. The results are aligned with previous studies which have emphasized the importance of building local capacity, ownership and trust for the long-term success of ecosystem service research.
Fil: Saarikoski, Heli. Finnish Environment Institute; Finlandia
Fil: Primmer, Eeva. Finnish Environment Institute; Finlandia
Fil: Saarela, Sanna-Riikka. Finnish Environment Institute; Finlandia
Fil: Antunes, Paula. Universidade Nova de Lisboa. Faculdade de Ciências E Tecnologia; Portugal
Fil: Aszalós, Réka. Hungarian Academy Of Sciences. Institute Of Ecology And Botany; Hungría
Fil: Baró, Francesc. Hospital del Mar; España. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; España
Fil: Berry, Pam. University of Oxford; Reino Unido
Fil: Blanko, Gemma Garcia. Tecnalia; España
Fil: Gómez Baggethun, Erik. Norwegian University of Life Sciences; Noruega. Norwegian Institute For Nature Research; Noruega
Fil: Carvalho, Laurence. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology; Reino Unido
Fil: Dick, Jan. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology; Reino Unido
Fil: Dunford, Robert. University of Oxford; Reino Unido. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology; Reino Unido
Fil: Hanzu, Mihail. Romanian National Institute Of Research And Development In Forestry 'marin Dracea';
Fil: Harrison, Paula A.. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology; Reino Unido
Fil: Izakovicova, Zita. Slovak Academy of Science. Institute of Landscape Ecology; Eslovaquia
Fil: Kertész, Miklós. Hungarian Academy Of Sciences. Institute Of Ecology And Botany; Hungría
Fil: Kopperoinen, Leena. Finnish Environment Institute; Finlandia
Fil: Köhler, Berit. Norwegian Institute For Nature Research; Noruega
Fil: Langemeyer, Johannes. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; España. Hospital del Mar; España
Fil: Lapola, David. Universidade Estadual de Campinas; Brasil
Fil: Liquete, Camino. European Commission Joint Research Centre; Italia
Fil: Luque, Sandra. ational Research Institute of Science and Technology for Environment and Agriculture; Francia
Fil: Mederly, Peter. Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra; Eslovaquia
Fil: Niemelä, Jari. University of Helsinki; Finlandia
Fil: Palomo, Ignacio. Basque Centre For Climate Change; España
Fil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; Argentina
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Preda, Elena. Universitatea Din Bucuresti; Rumania
Fil: Priess, Jörg A.. Helmholtz Zentrum Für Umweltforschung; Alemania
Fil: Santos, Rui. Universidade Nova de Lisboa. Faculdade de Ciências E Tecnologia; Portugal
Fil: Schleyer, Christian. Alpen-adria-universität Klagenfurt; Austria
Fil: Turkelboom, Francis. Research Institute For Nature And Forest; Bélgica
Fil: Vadineanu, Angheluta. Universitatea Din Bucuresti; Rumania
Fil: Verheyden, Wim. Research Institute For Nature And Forest; Bélgica
Fil: Vikström, Suvi. Finnish Environment Institute; Finlandia
Fil: Young, Juliette. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology; Reino Unido
Materia
ecosystem service assessment
stakeholders
policy-making
social capital
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/94804

id CONICETDig_016a4608a22d056a30368f2119b416ce
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/94804
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Institutional challenges in putting ecosystem service knowledge in practiceSaarikoski, HeliPrimmer, EevaSaarela, Sanna-RiikkaAntunes, PaulaAszalós, RékaBaró, FrancescBerry, PamBlanko, Gemma GarciaGómez Baggethun, ErikCarvalho, LaurenceDick, JanDunford, RobertHanzu, MihailHarrison, Paula A.Izakovicova, ZitaKertész, MiklósKopperoinen, LeenaKöhler, BeritLangemeyer, JohannesLapola, DavidLiquete, CaminoLuque, SandraMederly, PeterNiemelä, JariPalomo, IgnacioMartínez Pastur, Guillermo JoséPeri, Pablo LuisPreda, ElenaPriess, Jörg A.Santos, RuiSchleyer, ChristianTurkelboom, FrancisVadineanu, AnghelutaVerheyden, WimVikström, SuviYoung, Julietteecosystem service assessmentstakeholderspolicy-makingsocial capitalhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1The promise that ecosystem service assessments will contribute to better decision-making is not yet proven. We analyse how knowledge on ecosystem services is actually used to inform land and water management in 22 case studies covering different social-ecological systems in European and Latin American countries. None of the case studies reported instrumental use of knowledge in a sense that ecosystem service knowledge would have served as an impartial arbiter between policy options. Yet, in most cases, there was some evidence of conceptual learning as a result of close interaction between researchers, practitioners and stakeholders. We observed several factors that constrained knowledge uptake, including competing interests and political agendas, scientific disputes, professional norms and competencies, and lack of vertical and horizontal integration. Ecosystem knowledge played a small role particularly in those planning and policy-making situations where it challenged established interests and the current distribution of benefits from ecosystems. The factors that facilitated knowledge use included application of transparent participatory methods, social capital, policy champions and clear synergies between ecosystem services and human well-being. The results are aligned with previous studies which have emphasized the importance of building local capacity, ownership and trust for the long-term success of ecosystem service research.Fil: Saarikoski, Heli. Finnish Environment Institute; FinlandiaFil: Primmer, Eeva. Finnish Environment Institute; FinlandiaFil: Saarela, Sanna-Riikka. Finnish Environment Institute; FinlandiaFil: Antunes, Paula. Universidade Nova de Lisboa. Faculdade de Ciências E Tecnologia; PortugalFil: Aszalós, Réka. Hungarian Academy Of Sciences. Institute Of Ecology And Botany; HungríaFil: Baró, Francesc. Hospital del Mar; España. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; EspañaFil: Berry, Pam. University of Oxford; Reino UnidoFil: Blanko, Gemma Garcia. Tecnalia; EspañaFil: Gómez Baggethun, Erik. Norwegian University of Life Sciences; Noruega. Norwegian Institute For Nature Research; NoruegaFil: Carvalho, Laurence. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology; Reino UnidoFil: Dick, Jan. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology; Reino UnidoFil: Dunford, Robert. University of Oxford; Reino Unido. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology; Reino UnidoFil: Hanzu, Mihail. Romanian National Institute Of Research And Development In Forestry 'marin Dracea'; Fil: Harrison, Paula A.. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology; Reino UnidoFil: Izakovicova, Zita. Slovak Academy of Science. Institute of Landscape Ecology; EslovaquiaFil: Kertész, Miklós. Hungarian Academy Of Sciences. Institute Of Ecology And Botany; HungríaFil: Kopperoinen, Leena. Finnish Environment Institute; FinlandiaFil: Köhler, Berit. Norwegian Institute For Nature Research; NoruegaFil: Langemeyer, Johannes. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; España. Hospital del Mar; EspañaFil: Lapola, David. Universidade Estadual de Campinas; BrasilFil: Liquete, Camino. European Commission Joint Research Centre; ItaliaFil: Luque, Sandra. ational Research Institute of Science and Technology for Environment and Agriculture; FranciaFil: Mederly, Peter. Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra; EslovaquiaFil: Niemelä, Jari. University of Helsinki; FinlandiaFil: Palomo, Ignacio. Basque Centre For Climate Change; EspañaFil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; ArgentinaFil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Preda, Elena. Universitatea Din Bucuresti; RumaniaFil: Priess, Jörg A.. Helmholtz Zentrum Für Umweltforschung; AlemaniaFil: Santos, Rui. Universidade Nova de Lisboa. Faculdade de Ciências E Tecnologia; PortugalFil: Schleyer, Christian. Alpen-adria-universität Klagenfurt; AustriaFil: Turkelboom, Francis. Research Institute For Nature And Forest; BélgicaFil: Vadineanu, Angheluta. Universitatea Din Bucuresti; RumaniaFil: Verheyden, Wim. Research Institute For Nature And Forest; BélgicaFil: Vikström, Suvi. Finnish Environment Institute; FinlandiaFil: Young, Juliette. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology; Reino UnidoElsevier2018-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/94804Saarikoski, Heli; Primmer, Eeva; Saarela, Sanna-Riikka; Antunes, Paula; Aszalós, Réka; et al.; Institutional challenges in putting ecosystem service knowledge in practice; Elsevier; Ecosystem Services; 29; Part C; 2-2018; 579-5982212-0416CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041617300141info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.019info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T14:59:09Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/94804instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 14:59:09.301CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Institutional challenges in putting ecosystem service knowledge in practice
title Institutional challenges in putting ecosystem service knowledge in practice
spellingShingle Institutional challenges in putting ecosystem service knowledge in practice
Saarikoski, Heli
ecosystem service assessment
stakeholders
policy-making
social capital
title_short Institutional challenges in putting ecosystem service knowledge in practice
title_full Institutional challenges in putting ecosystem service knowledge in practice
title_fullStr Institutional challenges in putting ecosystem service knowledge in practice
title_full_unstemmed Institutional challenges in putting ecosystem service knowledge in practice
title_sort Institutional challenges in putting ecosystem service knowledge in practice
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Saarikoski, Heli
Primmer, Eeva
Saarela, Sanna-Riikka
Antunes, Paula
Aszalós, Réka
Baró, Francesc
Berry, Pam
Blanko, Gemma Garcia
Gómez Baggethun, Erik
Carvalho, Laurence
Dick, Jan
Dunford, Robert
Hanzu, Mihail
Harrison, Paula A.
Izakovicova, Zita
Kertész, Miklós
Kopperoinen, Leena
Köhler, Berit
Langemeyer, Johannes
Lapola, David
Liquete, Camino
Luque, Sandra
Mederly, Peter
Niemelä, Jari
Palomo, Ignacio
Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José
Peri, Pablo Luis
Preda, Elena
Priess, Jörg A.
Santos, Rui
Schleyer, Christian
Turkelboom, Francis
Vadineanu, Angheluta
Verheyden, Wim
Vikström, Suvi
Young, Juliette
author Saarikoski, Heli
author_facet Saarikoski, Heli
Primmer, Eeva
Saarela, Sanna-Riikka
Antunes, Paula
Aszalós, Réka
Baró, Francesc
Berry, Pam
Blanko, Gemma Garcia
Gómez Baggethun, Erik
Carvalho, Laurence
Dick, Jan
Dunford, Robert
Hanzu, Mihail
Harrison, Paula A.
Izakovicova, Zita
Kertész, Miklós
Kopperoinen, Leena
Köhler, Berit
Langemeyer, Johannes
Lapola, David
Liquete, Camino
Luque, Sandra
Mederly, Peter
Niemelä, Jari
Palomo, Ignacio
Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José
Peri, Pablo Luis
Preda, Elena
Priess, Jörg A.
Santos, Rui
Schleyer, Christian
Turkelboom, Francis
Vadineanu, Angheluta
Verheyden, Wim
Vikström, Suvi
Young, Juliette
author_role author
author2 Primmer, Eeva
Saarela, Sanna-Riikka
Antunes, Paula
Aszalós, Réka
Baró, Francesc
Berry, Pam
Blanko, Gemma Garcia
Gómez Baggethun, Erik
Carvalho, Laurence
Dick, Jan
Dunford, Robert
Hanzu, Mihail
Harrison, Paula A.
Izakovicova, Zita
Kertész, Miklós
Kopperoinen, Leena
Köhler, Berit
Langemeyer, Johannes
Lapola, David
Liquete, Camino
Luque, Sandra
Mederly, Peter
Niemelä, Jari
Palomo, Ignacio
Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José
Peri, Pablo Luis
Preda, Elena
Priess, Jörg A.
Santos, Rui
Schleyer, Christian
Turkelboom, Francis
Vadineanu, Angheluta
Verheyden, Wim
Vikström, Suvi
Young, Juliette
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv ecosystem service assessment
stakeholders
policy-making
social capital
topic ecosystem service assessment
stakeholders
policy-making
social capital
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The promise that ecosystem service assessments will contribute to better decision-making is not yet proven. We analyse how knowledge on ecosystem services is actually used to inform land and water management in 22 case studies covering different social-ecological systems in European and Latin American countries. None of the case studies reported instrumental use of knowledge in a sense that ecosystem service knowledge would have served as an impartial arbiter between policy options. Yet, in most cases, there was some evidence of conceptual learning as a result of close interaction between researchers, practitioners and stakeholders. We observed several factors that constrained knowledge uptake, including competing interests and political agendas, scientific disputes, professional norms and competencies, and lack of vertical and horizontal integration. Ecosystem knowledge played a small role particularly in those planning and policy-making situations where it challenged established interests and the current distribution of benefits from ecosystems. The factors that facilitated knowledge use included application of transparent participatory methods, social capital, policy champions and clear synergies between ecosystem services and human well-being. The results are aligned with previous studies which have emphasized the importance of building local capacity, ownership and trust for the long-term success of ecosystem service research.
Fil: Saarikoski, Heli. Finnish Environment Institute; Finlandia
Fil: Primmer, Eeva. Finnish Environment Institute; Finlandia
Fil: Saarela, Sanna-Riikka. Finnish Environment Institute; Finlandia
Fil: Antunes, Paula. Universidade Nova de Lisboa. Faculdade de Ciências E Tecnologia; Portugal
Fil: Aszalós, Réka. Hungarian Academy Of Sciences. Institute Of Ecology And Botany; Hungría
Fil: Baró, Francesc. Hospital del Mar; España. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; España
Fil: Berry, Pam. University of Oxford; Reino Unido
Fil: Blanko, Gemma Garcia. Tecnalia; España
Fil: Gómez Baggethun, Erik. Norwegian University of Life Sciences; Noruega. Norwegian Institute For Nature Research; Noruega
Fil: Carvalho, Laurence. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology; Reino Unido
Fil: Dick, Jan. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology; Reino Unido
Fil: Dunford, Robert. University of Oxford; Reino Unido. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology; Reino Unido
Fil: Hanzu, Mihail. Romanian National Institute Of Research And Development In Forestry 'marin Dracea';
Fil: Harrison, Paula A.. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology; Reino Unido
Fil: Izakovicova, Zita. Slovak Academy of Science. Institute of Landscape Ecology; Eslovaquia
Fil: Kertész, Miklós. Hungarian Academy Of Sciences. Institute Of Ecology And Botany; Hungría
Fil: Kopperoinen, Leena. Finnish Environment Institute; Finlandia
Fil: Köhler, Berit. Norwegian Institute For Nature Research; Noruega
Fil: Langemeyer, Johannes. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; España. Hospital del Mar; España
Fil: Lapola, David. Universidade Estadual de Campinas; Brasil
Fil: Liquete, Camino. European Commission Joint Research Centre; Italia
Fil: Luque, Sandra. ational Research Institute of Science and Technology for Environment and Agriculture; Francia
Fil: Mederly, Peter. Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra; Eslovaquia
Fil: Niemelä, Jari. University of Helsinki; Finlandia
Fil: Palomo, Ignacio. Basque Centre For Climate Change; España
Fil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; Argentina
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Preda, Elena. Universitatea Din Bucuresti; Rumania
Fil: Priess, Jörg A.. Helmholtz Zentrum Für Umweltforschung; Alemania
Fil: Santos, Rui. Universidade Nova de Lisboa. Faculdade de Ciências E Tecnologia; Portugal
Fil: Schleyer, Christian. Alpen-adria-universität Klagenfurt; Austria
Fil: Turkelboom, Francis. Research Institute For Nature And Forest; Bélgica
Fil: Vadineanu, Angheluta. Universitatea Din Bucuresti; Rumania
Fil: Verheyden, Wim. Research Institute For Nature And Forest; Bélgica
Fil: Vikström, Suvi. Finnish Environment Institute; Finlandia
Fil: Young, Juliette. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology; Reino Unido
description The promise that ecosystem service assessments will contribute to better decision-making is not yet proven. We analyse how knowledge on ecosystem services is actually used to inform land and water management in 22 case studies covering different social-ecological systems in European and Latin American countries. None of the case studies reported instrumental use of knowledge in a sense that ecosystem service knowledge would have served as an impartial arbiter between policy options. Yet, in most cases, there was some evidence of conceptual learning as a result of close interaction between researchers, practitioners and stakeholders. We observed several factors that constrained knowledge uptake, including competing interests and political agendas, scientific disputes, professional norms and competencies, and lack of vertical and horizontal integration. Ecosystem knowledge played a small role particularly in those planning and policy-making situations where it challenged established interests and the current distribution of benefits from ecosystems. The factors that facilitated knowledge use included application of transparent participatory methods, social capital, policy champions and clear synergies between ecosystem services and human well-being. The results are aligned with previous studies which have emphasized the importance of building local capacity, ownership and trust for the long-term success of ecosystem service research.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-02
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/94804
Saarikoski, Heli; Primmer, Eeva; Saarela, Sanna-Riikka; Antunes, Paula; Aszalós, Réka; et al.; Institutional challenges in putting ecosystem service knowledge in practice; Elsevier; Ecosystem Services; 29; Part C; 2-2018; 579-598
2212-0416
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/94804
identifier_str_mv Saarikoski, Heli; Primmer, Eeva; Saarela, Sanna-Riikka; Antunes, Paula; Aszalós, Réka; et al.; Institutional challenges in putting ecosystem service knowledge in practice; Elsevier; Ecosystem Services; 29; Part C; 2-2018; 579-598
2212-0416
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041617300141
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.019
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846083132530360320
score 13.22299