Rapid detection of equine infectious anaemia virus nucleic acid by insulated isothermal RT-PCR assay to aid diagnosis under field conditions

• Autores: Cook, R.F.; Barrandeguy, Maria Edith; Lee, Pei-Yu Alison; Tsai, Chuan-Fu; Shen, Yu-Han; Tsai, Yun-Long; Chang, Hsiao-Fen G.; Wang, Hwa-Tang Thomas; Balasuriya, Udeni B.R.
• Año de publicación: 2018
• Idioma: inglés
• Tipo de recurso: artículo
• Fuente: Equine veterinary journal (24 October 2018)
• Materia: Caballos; Virus de los Animales; Horses; Equine Infectious Anaemia; Diagnosis; Diagnóstico; Anemia Infecciosa Equina; PCR; Animal Viruses; Equinos; Insulated Isothermal RT-PCR; Point-of-Need Testing
• Institución: Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria

Background: Control of equine infectious anaemia (EIA) currently depends on serological diagnosis of infected equids. However, recently infected equids may not produce detectable anti-EIAV antibodies up to 157 days post infection and so present a high transmission risk. Therefore, direct nucleic acid detection methods are urgently needed to improve EIAV surveillance and management programs in counties where the disease is endemic. Objectives: To evaluate a field-deployable, reverse transcription-insulated isothermal PCR (RT-iiPCR) assay targeting the conserved 50 untranslated region (50 UTR)/exon 1 of the tat gene of EIAV. Study design: The analytical and clinical performance of the newly developed EIAV RT-iiPCR was evaluated by comparison with a EIAV real-time RTPCR (RT-qPCR) along with the AGID test. Methods: Analytical sensitivity was determined using in vitro transcribed RNA containing the target area of the 50 UTR/tat gene and samples from two EIAV-positive horses. Specificity was verified using nine common equine viruses. Clinical performance was evaluated by comparison with EIAV RT-qPCR and AGID using samples derived from 196 inapparent EIAV carrier horses. Results: EIAV RT-iiPCR did not react with other commonly encountered equine viruses and had equivalent sensitivity (95% detection limit of eight genome equivalents), with a concordance of 95.41% to conventional EIAV RT-qPCR. However, the RT-qPCR and RT-iiPCR had sensitivities of 43.75 and 50.00%, respectively, when compared to the AGID test. Main limitations: Low viral loads commonly encountered in inapparent EIAV carriers may limit the diagnostic sensitivity of RT-PCR-based tests. Conclusions: Although EIAV RT-iiPCR is not sufficiently sensitive to replace the current AGID test, it can augment control efforts by identifying recently exposed or “serologically silent” equids, particularly as the latter often represent a significant transmission risk because of high viral loads. Furthermore, the relatively low cost and field-deployable design enable utilisation of EIAV RT-iiPCR even in remote regions.
Instituto de Virología
Fil: Cook, R.F. Louisiana State University. School of Veterinary Medicine. Louisiana Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory and Department of Pathobiological Sciences; Estados Unidos
Fil: Barrandeguy, Maria Edith. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Virología; Argentina. Universidad del Salvador. Escuela de Veterinaria. Cátedra de Enfermedades Infecciosas; Argentina
Fil: Lee, Pei-Yu Alison. GeneReach USA, Lexington; Estados Unidos
Fil: Tsai, Chuan-Fu. GeneReach USA, Lexington; Estados Unidos
Fil: Shen, Yu-Han. GeneReach USA, Lexington; Estados Unidos
Fil: Tsai, Yun-Long. GeneReach USA, Lexington; Estados Unidos
Fil: Chang, Hsiao-Fen G. GeneReach USA, Lexington; Estados Unidos
Fil: Wang, Hwa-Tang Thomas. GeneReach USA, Lexington; Estados Unidos
Fil: Balasuriya, Udeni B.R. Louisiana State University. School of Veterinary Medicine. Louisiana Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory and Department of Pathobiological Sciences; Estados Unidos