Impacts of different pig slurry application methods on soil quality indicators in a maize-soybean cropping sequence in the Sub-humid Pampas of Argentina

Autores
Pegoraro, Vanesa Romina; Cazorla, Cristian Roman; Bachmeier, Omar; Baigorria, Tomás; Boccolini, Monica Fabiola; Ortiz, Jimena; Lorenzon, Claudio Antonio; Hang, Susana; Zubillaga, Marta Susana
Año de publicación
2020
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Purpose: In Argentina, pig slurry (PS) is spread in surface with N losses in ammonia form. Different methods to decrease these emissions are available, but there is poor information about their impacts on the soil-plant system. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of different PS application methods on the soil quality in a maize-soybean cropping sequence. Methods: PS application methods were evaluated: acidified (AS), incorporated (IS), surface (SS), mineral fertilization (MF) and control (C). The experimental design was arranged in a randomized block with three replicates. Chemical parameters and microbiological parameters were determined. Also, grain yields and N uptake were measured. Results: IS caused increases in anaerobic nitrogen and basal respiration of soil on soybean. Treatments with PS and/or FM showed lower values in pH than C in both crops, and higher electrical conductivity only in maize. SS treatment showed higher Pe on soybean, indicating a maintenance of the P levels with respect to those in MF and C. The concentration of NO3- increased with MF in both crops. In maize, MF presented similar concentrations to AS and SS. IS increased grain yields of maize by 16 %, whereas SS and AS increased yields of soybean by 112% and 79%, respectively, compared to C. Conclusions: The different PS application methods had similar effects on most of the indicators of soil quality. In maize, IS and AS were more efficient in retaining N within the soil-plant system, whereas, in soybean, the SS led to higher yields.
EEA Marcos Juárez
Fil: Pegoraro, V.R. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez; Argentina
Fil: Cazorla, Cristian Roman. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez; Argentina
Fil: Bachmeier, O. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias. Cátedra de Edafología; Argentina.
Fil: Baigorria, Tomás. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez; Argentina
Fil: Boccolini, Monica Fabiola. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez; Argentina
Fil: Ortiz, J. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez; Argentina
Fil: Lorenzon, C.A. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez; Argentina
Fil: Hang, S. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias. Cátedra de Edafología; Argentina.
Fil: Zubillaga, M.S. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía; Argentina.
Fuente
International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture 9 (3) : 259-272 (September 2020)
Materia
Cerdo
Estiércol Líquido
Estiércol Fluido
Calidad del Suelo
Aplicación de Abonos
Ordenación de Cultivos
Sistemas de Cultivo
Maíz
Soja
Swine
Liquid Manures
Slurry
Soil Quality
Fertilizer Application
Cropping Patterns
Cropping Systems
Maize
Soybeans
Región Pampeana Subhúmeda
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/14697
Acceder
id INTADig_0fe12dde5f459c3209ce303c132024c7
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/14697
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Impacts of different pig slurry application methods on soil quality indicators in a maize-soybean cropping sequence in the Sub-humid Pampas of ArgentinaPegoraro, Vanesa RominaCazorla, Cristian RomanBachmeier, OmarBaigorria, TomásBoccolini, Monica FabiolaOrtiz, JimenaLorenzon, Claudio AntonioHang, SusanaZubillaga, Marta SusanaCerdoEstiércol LíquidoEstiércol FluidoCalidad del SueloAplicación de AbonosOrdenación de CultivosSistemas de CultivoMaízSojaSwineLiquid ManuresSlurrySoil QualityFertilizer ApplicationCropping PatternsCropping SystemsMaizeSoybeansRegión Pampeana SubhúmedaPurpose: In Argentina, pig slurry (PS) is spread in surface with N losses in ammonia form. Different methods to decrease these emissions are available, but there is poor information about their impacts on the soil-plant system. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of different PS application methods on the soil quality in a maize-soybean cropping sequence. Methods: PS application methods were evaluated: acidified (AS), incorporated (IS), surface (SS), mineral fertilization (MF) and control (C). The experimental design was arranged in a randomized block with three replicates. Chemical parameters and microbiological parameters were determined. Also, grain yields and N uptake were measured. Results: IS caused increases in anaerobic nitrogen and basal respiration of soil on soybean. Treatments with PS and/or FM showed lower values in pH than C in both crops, and higher electrical conductivity only in maize. SS treatment showed higher Pe on soybean, indicating a maintenance of the P levels with respect to those in MF and C. The concentration of NO3- increased with MF in both crops. In maize, MF presented similar concentrations to AS and SS. IS increased grain yields of maize by 16 %, whereas SS and AS increased yields of soybean by 112% and 79%, respectively, compared to C. Conclusions: The different PS application methods had similar effects on most of the indicators of soil quality. In maize, IS and AS were more efficient in retaining N within the soil-plant system, whereas, in soybean, the SS led to higher yields.EEA Marcos JuárezFil: Pegoraro, V.R. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez; ArgentinaFil: Cazorla, Cristian Roman. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez; ArgentinaFil: Bachmeier, O. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias. Cátedra de Edafología; Argentina.Fil: Baigorria, Tomás. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez; ArgentinaFil: Boccolini, Monica Fabiola. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez; ArgentinaFil: Ortiz, J. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez; ArgentinaFil: Lorenzon, C.A. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez; ArgentinaFil: Hang, S. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias. Cátedra de Edafología; Argentina.Fil: Zubillaga, M.S. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía; Argentina.Islamic Azad University–Isfahan Branch2023-07-05T10:18:11Z2023-07-05T10:18:11Z2020-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/14697https://ijrowa.isfahan.iau.ir/article_674424.html2195-32282251-7715https://doi.org/10.30486/ijrowa.2020.674424International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture 9 (3) : 259-272 (September 2020)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/PNNAT-1128042/AR./Tecnologías y estrategias de gestión de residuos y efluentes en sistemas agropecuarios y agroindustriales.info:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/PNSUELO-1134042/AR./Aprovechamiento de residuos para aumentar el reciclado en el suelo. Sumideros de carbono y emisiones del suelo.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-09-29T13:46:00Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/14697instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-29 13:46:00.666INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Impacts of different pig slurry application methods on soil quality indicators in a maize-soybean cropping sequence in the Sub-humid Pampas of Argentina
title Impacts of different pig slurry application methods on soil quality indicators in a maize-soybean cropping sequence in the Sub-humid Pampas of Argentina
spellingShingle Impacts of different pig slurry application methods on soil quality indicators in a maize-soybean cropping sequence in the Sub-humid Pampas of Argentina
Pegoraro, Vanesa Romina
Cerdo
Estiércol Líquido
Estiércol Fluido
Calidad del Suelo
Aplicación de Abonos
Ordenación de Cultivos
Sistemas de Cultivo
Maíz
Soja
Swine
Liquid Manures
Slurry
Soil Quality
Fertilizer Application
Cropping Patterns
Cropping Systems
Maize
Soybeans
Región Pampeana Subhúmeda
title_short Impacts of different pig slurry application methods on soil quality indicators in a maize-soybean cropping sequence in the Sub-humid Pampas of Argentina
title_full Impacts of different pig slurry application methods on soil quality indicators in a maize-soybean cropping sequence in the Sub-humid Pampas of Argentina
title_fullStr Impacts of different pig slurry application methods on soil quality indicators in a maize-soybean cropping sequence in the Sub-humid Pampas of Argentina
title_full_unstemmed Impacts of different pig slurry application methods on soil quality indicators in a maize-soybean cropping sequence in the Sub-humid Pampas of Argentina
title_sort Impacts of different pig slurry application methods on soil quality indicators in a maize-soybean cropping sequence in the Sub-humid Pampas of Argentina
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Pegoraro, Vanesa Romina
Cazorla, Cristian Roman
Bachmeier, Omar
Baigorria, Tomás
Boccolini, Monica Fabiola
Ortiz, Jimena
Lorenzon, Claudio Antonio
Hang, Susana
Zubillaga, Marta Susana
author Pegoraro, Vanesa Romina
author_facet Pegoraro, Vanesa Romina
Cazorla, Cristian Roman
Bachmeier, Omar
Baigorria, Tomás
Boccolini, Monica Fabiola
Ortiz, Jimena
Lorenzon, Claudio Antonio
Hang, Susana
Zubillaga, Marta Susana
author_role author
author2 Cazorla, Cristian Roman
Bachmeier, Omar
Baigorria, Tomás
Boccolini, Monica Fabiola
Ortiz, Jimena
Lorenzon, Claudio Antonio
Hang, Susana
Zubillaga, Marta Susana
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Cerdo
Estiércol Líquido
Estiércol Fluido
Calidad del Suelo
Aplicación de Abonos
Ordenación de Cultivos
Sistemas de Cultivo
Maíz
Soja
Swine
Liquid Manures
Slurry
Soil Quality
Fertilizer Application
Cropping Patterns
Cropping Systems
Maize
Soybeans
Región Pampeana Subhúmeda
topic Cerdo
Estiércol Líquido
Estiércol Fluido
Calidad del Suelo
Aplicación de Abonos
Ordenación de Cultivos
Sistemas de Cultivo
Maíz
Soja
Swine
Liquid Manures
Slurry
Soil Quality
Fertilizer Application
Cropping Patterns
Cropping Systems
Maize
Soybeans
Región Pampeana Subhúmeda
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Purpose: In Argentina, pig slurry (PS) is spread in surface with N losses in ammonia form. Different methods to decrease these emissions are available, but there is poor information about their impacts on the soil-plant system. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of different PS application methods on the soil quality in a maize-soybean cropping sequence. Methods: PS application methods were evaluated: acidified (AS), incorporated (IS), surface (SS), mineral fertilization (MF) and control (C). The experimental design was arranged in a randomized block with three replicates. Chemical parameters and microbiological parameters were determined. Also, grain yields and N uptake were measured. Results: IS caused increases in anaerobic nitrogen and basal respiration of soil on soybean. Treatments with PS and/or FM showed lower values in pH than C in both crops, and higher electrical conductivity only in maize. SS treatment showed higher Pe on soybean, indicating a maintenance of the P levels with respect to those in MF and C. The concentration of NO3- increased with MF in both crops. In maize, MF presented similar concentrations to AS and SS. IS increased grain yields of maize by 16 %, whereas SS and AS increased yields of soybean by 112% and 79%, respectively, compared to C. Conclusions: The different PS application methods had similar effects on most of the indicators of soil quality. In maize, IS and AS were more efficient in retaining N within the soil-plant system, whereas, in soybean, the SS led to higher yields.
EEA Marcos Juárez
Fil: Pegoraro, V.R. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez; Argentina
Fil: Cazorla, Cristian Roman. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez; Argentina
Fil: Bachmeier, O. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias. Cátedra de Edafología; Argentina.
Fil: Baigorria, Tomás. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez; Argentina
Fil: Boccolini, Monica Fabiola. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez; Argentina
Fil: Ortiz, J. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez; Argentina
Fil: Lorenzon, C.A. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez; Argentina
Fil: Hang, S. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias. Cátedra de Edafología; Argentina.
Fil: Zubillaga, M.S. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía; Argentina.
description Purpose: In Argentina, pig slurry (PS) is spread in surface with N losses in ammonia form. Different methods to decrease these emissions are available, but there is poor information about their impacts on the soil-plant system. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of different PS application methods on the soil quality in a maize-soybean cropping sequence. Methods: PS application methods were evaluated: acidified (AS), incorporated (IS), surface (SS), mineral fertilization (MF) and control (C). The experimental design was arranged in a randomized block with three replicates. Chemical parameters and microbiological parameters were determined. Also, grain yields and N uptake were measured. Results: IS caused increases in anaerobic nitrogen and basal respiration of soil on soybean. Treatments with PS and/or FM showed lower values in pH than C in both crops, and higher electrical conductivity only in maize. SS treatment showed higher Pe on soybean, indicating a maintenance of the P levels with respect to those in MF and C. The concentration of NO3- increased with MF in both crops. In maize, MF presented similar concentrations to AS and SS. IS increased grain yields of maize by 16 %, whereas SS and AS increased yields of soybean by 112% and 79%, respectively, compared to C. Conclusions: The different PS application methods had similar effects on most of the indicators of soil quality. In maize, IS and AS were more efficient in retaining N within the soil-plant system, whereas, in soybean, the SS led to higher yields.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-09
2023-07-05T10:18:11Z
2023-07-05T10:18:11Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/14697
https://ijrowa.isfahan.iau.ir/article_674424.html
2195-3228
2251-7715
https://doi.org/10.30486/ijrowa.2020.674424
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/14697
https://ijrowa.isfahan.iau.ir/article_674424.html
https://doi.org/10.30486/ijrowa.2020.674424
identifier_str_mv 2195-3228
2251-7715
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/PNNAT-1128042/AR./Tecnologías y estrategias de gestión de residuos y efluentes en sistemas agropecuarios y agroindustriales.
info:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/PNSUELO-1134042/AR./Aprovechamiento de residuos para aumentar el reciclado en el suelo. Sumideros de carbono y emisiones del suelo.
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Islamic Azad University–Isfahan Branch
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Islamic Azad University–Isfahan Branch
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture 9 (3) : 259-272 (September 2020)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1844619176730165248
score 12.559606

Publicaciones similares