Yield gaps of lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) in livestock systems of Argentina

Autores
Jauregui, José Martín; Ojeda, Jonathan Jesus; Berone, German Dario; Lattanzi, Fernando Alfredo; Baudracco, Javier; Fariña, Santiago; Moot, Derrick
Año de publicación
2022
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Argentina grows the second-largest area of lucerne in the world. Despite its importance, a yield gap exists between potential and measured yields, but factors contributing to it are still unclear. This study aimed to identify management factors and research needs to reduce the lucerne yield gap to improve the livestock systems in this region. We used meteorological data coupled with lucerne crop modelling and measured yields from the National Lucerne Cultivar Evaluation Network (NLCEN) to quantify the lucerne yield gap in nine sites located within the Argentinian Pampas (between parallels 30–45°S and meridians 58–65°W) and three sites outside the Pampas. Specifically, we used the model developed by McCall & Bishop-Hurley (2003), adapted and calibrated for lucerne in Argentina by Berone et al. (2017) to estimate the potential yield (PY) for 12 locations (three irrigated and nine rainfed), and compared those results with measured yields from the NLCEN to calculate yield gaps. We found the average available photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) and temperatures were sufficient to achieve 21.5 ± 3.7 t dry matter (DM) ha−1 yr−1 under rainfed conditions (environments with mean annual rainfall from 400 to 1,200 mm). However, the average measured yield from the NLCEN was 16.8 ± 2.4 t DM ha−1 yr−1 (a 22% gap). Potential yields ranged between 10 and 25 t DM ha−1 yr−1 under rainfed conditions and between 25 and 39 t DM ha−1 yr−1 for irrigated crops. As latitude increased rainfed locations had lower yields, while irrigated locations had higher yields. Adding irrigation was predicted to increase yields to 35.4 ± 2.0 t DM ha−1 yr−1 (a 53% gap) in rainfed sites. For irrigated locations, the gap was smaller (27.3 ± 3.5 vs 32.4 ± 2.2 t DM ha−1 yr−1 for measured vs potential yield, respectively), and most likely linked to nutrient deficits. Also, current grazing management was estimated to achieve approximately 50% less grazing efficiency than optimal grazing management. Our results demonstrated that the livestock industry can potentially increase animal production under current environmental conditions. The four main adjustments to achieve this are increased use of irrigation, increased use of fertilisers, earlier commencement of grazing in spring and increased stocking rates. The costs of irrigation, fertilisers and grazing management are envisaged to be small compared with potential increases in incomes and thus profitability available to beef and dairy farmers using lucerne as a major feed source in Argentina.
EEA Balcarce
Fil: Jáuregui, José Martín. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.
Fil: Ojeda, Jonathan Jesús. Regrow Ag; Australia.
Fil: Berone, Germán Darío. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.
Fil: Berone, Germán Darío. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.
Fil: Lattanzi, Fernando Alfredo. Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria. Estación Experimental La Estanzuela; Uruguay.
Fil: Baudracco, Javier. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.
Fil: Fariña, Santiago Rafael. Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria. Estación Experimental La Estanzuela; Uruguay
Fil: Moot, Derrick. Lincoln University. Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences; Nueva Zelanda.
Fuente
Annals of Applied Biology : 1-11 (2022)
Materia
Medicago Sativa
Manejo del Cultivo
Rendimiento
Ganadería
Pastoreo
Argentina
Crop Management
Yields
Animal Husbandry
Grazing
Alfalfa
Lucerne
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso restringido
Condiciones de uso
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/11934

id INTADig_073c58c43d21e577b7b25e3b9319c1e1
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/11934
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Yield gaps of lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) in livestock systems of ArgentinaJauregui, José MartínOjeda, Jonathan JesusBerone, German DarioLattanzi, Fernando AlfredoBaudracco, JavierFariña, SantiagoMoot, DerrickMedicago SativaManejo del CultivoRendimientoGanaderíaPastoreoArgentinaCrop ManagementYieldsAnimal HusbandryGrazingAlfalfaLucerneArgentina grows the second-largest area of lucerne in the world. Despite its importance, a yield gap exists between potential and measured yields, but factors contributing to it are still unclear. This study aimed to identify management factors and research needs to reduce the lucerne yield gap to improve the livestock systems in this region. We used meteorological data coupled with lucerne crop modelling and measured yields from the National Lucerne Cultivar Evaluation Network (NLCEN) to quantify the lucerne yield gap in nine sites located within the Argentinian Pampas (between parallels 30–45°S and meridians 58–65°W) and three sites outside the Pampas. Specifically, we used the model developed by McCall & Bishop-Hurley (2003), adapted and calibrated for lucerne in Argentina by Berone et al. (2017) to estimate the potential yield (PY) for 12 locations (three irrigated and nine rainfed), and compared those results with measured yields from the NLCEN to calculate yield gaps. We found the average available photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) and temperatures were sufficient to achieve 21.5 ± 3.7 t dry matter (DM) ha−1 yr−1 under rainfed conditions (environments with mean annual rainfall from 400 to 1,200 mm). However, the average measured yield from the NLCEN was 16.8 ± 2.4 t DM ha−1 yr−1 (a 22% gap). Potential yields ranged between 10 and 25 t DM ha−1 yr−1 under rainfed conditions and between 25 and 39 t DM ha−1 yr−1 for irrigated crops. As latitude increased rainfed locations had lower yields, while irrigated locations had higher yields. Adding irrigation was predicted to increase yields to 35.4 ± 2.0 t DM ha−1 yr−1 (a 53% gap) in rainfed sites. For irrigated locations, the gap was smaller (27.3 ± 3.5 vs 32.4 ± 2.2 t DM ha−1 yr−1 for measured vs potential yield, respectively), and most likely linked to nutrient deficits. Also, current grazing management was estimated to achieve approximately 50% less grazing efficiency than optimal grazing management. Our results demonstrated that the livestock industry can potentially increase animal production under current environmental conditions. The four main adjustments to achieve this are increased use of irrigation, increased use of fertilisers, earlier commencement of grazing in spring and increased stocking rates. The costs of irrigation, fertilisers and grazing management are envisaged to be small compared with potential increases in incomes and thus profitability available to beef and dairy farmers using lucerne as a major feed source in Argentina.EEA BalcarceFil: Jáuregui, José Martín. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.Fil: Ojeda, Jonathan Jesús. Regrow Ag; Australia.Fil: Berone, Germán Darío. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.Fil: Berone, Germán Darío. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.Fil: Lattanzi, Fernando Alfredo. Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria. Estación Experimental La Estanzuela; Uruguay.Fil: Baudracco, Javier. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.Fil: Fariña, Santiago Rafael. Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria. Estación Experimental La Estanzuela; UruguayFil: Moot, Derrick. Lincoln University. Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences; Nueva Zelanda.Wiley2022-05-23T18:19:36Z2022-05-23T18:19:36Z2022-02-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/11934https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aab.127451744-7348https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12745Annals of Applied Biology : 1-11 (2022)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/2019-PE-E1-I007-001/2019-PE-E1-I007-001/AR./Incremento sostenible de la producción y utilización de pasturas y forrajes conservadosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-10-23T11:17:58Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/11934instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-10-23 11:17:58.71INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Yield gaps of lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) in livestock systems of Argentina
title Yield gaps of lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) in livestock systems of Argentina
spellingShingle Yield gaps of lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) in livestock systems of Argentina
Jauregui, José Martín
Medicago Sativa
Manejo del Cultivo
Rendimiento
Ganadería
Pastoreo
Argentina
Crop Management
Yields
Animal Husbandry
Grazing
Alfalfa
Lucerne
title_short Yield gaps of lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) in livestock systems of Argentina
title_full Yield gaps of lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) in livestock systems of Argentina
title_fullStr Yield gaps of lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) in livestock systems of Argentina
title_full_unstemmed Yield gaps of lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) in livestock systems of Argentina
title_sort Yield gaps of lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) in livestock systems of Argentina
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Jauregui, José Martín
Ojeda, Jonathan Jesus
Berone, German Dario
Lattanzi, Fernando Alfredo
Baudracco, Javier
Fariña, Santiago
Moot, Derrick
author Jauregui, José Martín
author_facet Jauregui, José Martín
Ojeda, Jonathan Jesus
Berone, German Dario
Lattanzi, Fernando Alfredo
Baudracco, Javier
Fariña, Santiago
Moot, Derrick
author_role author
author2 Ojeda, Jonathan Jesus
Berone, German Dario
Lattanzi, Fernando Alfredo
Baudracco, Javier
Fariña, Santiago
Moot, Derrick
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Medicago Sativa
Manejo del Cultivo
Rendimiento
Ganadería
Pastoreo
Argentina
Crop Management
Yields
Animal Husbandry
Grazing
Alfalfa
Lucerne
topic Medicago Sativa
Manejo del Cultivo
Rendimiento
Ganadería
Pastoreo
Argentina
Crop Management
Yields
Animal Husbandry
Grazing
Alfalfa
Lucerne
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Argentina grows the second-largest area of lucerne in the world. Despite its importance, a yield gap exists between potential and measured yields, but factors contributing to it are still unclear. This study aimed to identify management factors and research needs to reduce the lucerne yield gap to improve the livestock systems in this region. We used meteorological data coupled with lucerne crop modelling and measured yields from the National Lucerne Cultivar Evaluation Network (NLCEN) to quantify the lucerne yield gap in nine sites located within the Argentinian Pampas (between parallels 30–45°S and meridians 58–65°W) and three sites outside the Pampas. Specifically, we used the model developed by McCall & Bishop-Hurley (2003), adapted and calibrated for lucerne in Argentina by Berone et al. (2017) to estimate the potential yield (PY) for 12 locations (three irrigated and nine rainfed), and compared those results with measured yields from the NLCEN to calculate yield gaps. We found the average available photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) and temperatures were sufficient to achieve 21.5 ± 3.7 t dry matter (DM) ha−1 yr−1 under rainfed conditions (environments with mean annual rainfall from 400 to 1,200 mm). However, the average measured yield from the NLCEN was 16.8 ± 2.4 t DM ha−1 yr−1 (a 22% gap). Potential yields ranged between 10 and 25 t DM ha−1 yr−1 under rainfed conditions and between 25 and 39 t DM ha−1 yr−1 for irrigated crops. As latitude increased rainfed locations had lower yields, while irrigated locations had higher yields. Adding irrigation was predicted to increase yields to 35.4 ± 2.0 t DM ha−1 yr−1 (a 53% gap) in rainfed sites. For irrigated locations, the gap was smaller (27.3 ± 3.5 vs 32.4 ± 2.2 t DM ha−1 yr−1 for measured vs potential yield, respectively), and most likely linked to nutrient deficits. Also, current grazing management was estimated to achieve approximately 50% less grazing efficiency than optimal grazing management. Our results demonstrated that the livestock industry can potentially increase animal production under current environmental conditions. The four main adjustments to achieve this are increased use of irrigation, increased use of fertilisers, earlier commencement of grazing in spring and increased stocking rates. The costs of irrigation, fertilisers and grazing management are envisaged to be small compared with potential increases in incomes and thus profitability available to beef and dairy farmers using lucerne as a major feed source in Argentina.
EEA Balcarce
Fil: Jáuregui, José Martín. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.
Fil: Ojeda, Jonathan Jesús. Regrow Ag; Australia.
Fil: Berone, Germán Darío. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.
Fil: Berone, Germán Darío. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.
Fil: Lattanzi, Fernando Alfredo. Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria. Estación Experimental La Estanzuela; Uruguay.
Fil: Baudracco, Javier. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.
Fil: Fariña, Santiago Rafael. Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria. Estación Experimental La Estanzuela; Uruguay
Fil: Moot, Derrick. Lincoln University. Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences; Nueva Zelanda.
description Argentina grows the second-largest area of lucerne in the world. Despite its importance, a yield gap exists between potential and measured yields, but factors contributing to it are still unclear. This study aimed to identify management factors and research needs to reduce the lucerne yield gap to improve the livestock systems in this region. We used meteorological data coupled with lucerne crop modelling and measured yields from the National Lucerne Cultivar Evaluation Network (NLCEN) to quantify the lucerne yield gap in nine sites located within the Argentinian Pampas (between parallels 30–45°S and meridians 58–65°W) and three sites outside the Pampas. Specifically, we used the model developed by McCall & Bishop-Hurley (2003), adapted and calibrated for lucerne in Argentina by Berone et al. (2017) to estimate the potential yield (PY) for 12 locations (three irrigated and nine rainfed), and compared those results with measured yields from the NLCEN to calculate yield gaps. We found the average available photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) and temperatures were sufficient to achieve 21.5 ± 3.7 t dry matter (DM) ha−1 yr−1 under rainfed conditions (environments with mean annual rainfall from 400 to 1,200 mm). However, the average measured yield from the NLCEN was 16.8 ± 2.4 t DM ha−1 yr−1 (a 22% gap). Potential yields ranged between 10 and 25 t DM ha−1 yr−1 under rainfed conditions and between 25 and 39 t DM ha−1 yr−1 for irrigated crops. As latitude increased rainfed locations had lower yields, while irrigated locations had higher yields. Adding irrigation was predicted to increase yields to 35.4 ± 2.0 t DM ha−1 yr−1 (a 53% gap) in rainfed sites. For irrigated locations, the gap was smaller (27.3 ± 3.5 vs 32.4 ± 2.2 t DM ha−1 yr−1 for measured vs potential yield, respectively), and most likely linked to nutrient deficits. Also, current grazing management was estimated to achieve approximately 50% less grazing efficiency than optimal grazing management. Our results demonstrated that the livestock industry can potentially increase animal production under current environmental conditions. The four main adjustments to achieve this are increased use of irrigation, increased use of fertilisers, earlier commencement of grazing in spring and increased stocking rates. The costs of irrigation, fertilisers and grazing management are envisaged to be small compared with potential increases in incomes and thus profitability available to beef and dairy farmers using lucerne as a major feed source in Argentina.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-05-23T18:19:36Z
2022-05-23T18:19:36Z
2022-02-02
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/11934
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aab.12745
1744-7348
https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12745
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/11934
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aab.12745
https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12745
identifier_str_mv 1744-7348
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/2019-PE-E1-I007-001/2019-PE-E1-I007-001/AR./Incremento sostenible de la producción y utilización de pasturas y forrajes conservados
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv restrictedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Annals of Applied Biology : 1-11 (2022)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1846787557737627648
score 12.982451