Yield gaps of lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) in livestock systems of Argentina
- Autores
- Jauregui, José Martín; Ojeda, Jonathan Jesus; Berone, German Dario; Lattanzi, Fernando Alfredo; Baudracco, Javier; Fariña, Santiago; Moot, Derrick
- Año de publicación
- 2022
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Argentina grows the second-largest area of lucerne in the world. Despite its importance, a yield gap exists between potential and measured yields, but factors contributing to it are still unclear. This study aimed to identify management factors and research needs to reduce the lucerne yield gap to improve the livestock systems in this region. We used meteorological data coupled with lucerne crop modelling and measured yields from the National Lucerne Cultivar Evaluation Network (NLCEN) to quantify the lucerne yield gap in nine sites located within the Argentinian Pampas (between parallels 30–45°S and meridians 58–65°W) and three sites outside the Pampas. Specifically, we used the model developed by McCall & Bishop-Hurley (2003), adapted and calibrated for lucerne in Argentina by Berone et al. (2017) to estimate the potential yield (PY) for 12 locations (three irrigated and nine rainfed), and compared those results with measured yields from the NLCEN to calculate yield gaps. We found the average available photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) and temperatures were sufficient to achieve 21.5 ± 3.7 t dry matter (DM) ha−1 yr−1 under rainfed conditions (environments with mean annual rainfall from 400 to 1,200 mm). However, the average measured yield from the NLCEN was 16.8 ± 2.4 t DM ha−1 yr−1 (a 22% gap). Potential yields ranged between 10 and 25 t DM ha−1 yr−1 under rainfed conditions and between 25 and 39 t DM ha−1 yr−1 for irrigated crops. As latitude increased rainfed locations had lower yields, while irrigated locations had higher yields. Adding irrigation was predicted to increase yields to 35.4 ± 2.0 t DM ha−1 yr−1 (a 53% gap) in rainfed sites. For irrigated locations, the gap was smaller (27.3 ± 3.5 vs 32.4 ± 2.2 t DM ha−1 yr−1 for measured vs potential yield, respectively), and most likely linked to nutrient deficits. Also, current grazing management was estimated to achieve approximately 50% less grazing efficiency than optimal grazing management. Our results demonstrated that the livestock industry can potentially increase animal production under current environmental conditions. The four main adjustments to achieve this are increased use of irrigation, increased use of fertilisers, earlier commencement of grazing in spring and increased stocking rates. The costs of irrigation, fertilisers and grazing management are envisaged to be small compared with potential increases in incomes and thus profitability available to beef and dairy farmers using lucerne as a major feed source in Argentina.
EEA Balcarce
Fil: Jáuregui, José Martín. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.
Fil: Ojeda, Jonathan Jesús. Regrow Ag; Australia.
Fil: Berone, Germán Darío. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.
Fil: Berone, Germán Darío. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.
Fil: Lattanzi, Fernando Alfredo. Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria. Estación Experimental La Estanzuela; Uruguay.
Fil: Baudracco, Javier. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.
Fil: Fariña, Santiago Rafael. Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria. Estación Experimental La Estanzuela; Uruguay
Fil: Moot, Derrick. Lincoln University. Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences; Nueva Zelanda. - Fuente
- Annals of Applied Biology : 1-11 (2022)
- Materia
-
Medicago Sativa
Manejo del Cultivo
Rendimiento
Ganadería
Pastoreo
Argentina
Crop Management
Yields
Animal Husbandry
Grazing
Alfalfa
Lucerne - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso restringido
- Condiciones de uso
- Repositorio
.jpg)
- Institución
- Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
- OAI Identificador
- oai:localhost:20.500.12123/11934
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
| id |
INTADig_073c58c43d21e577b7b25e3b9319c1e1 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/11934 |
| network_acronym_str |
INTADig |
| repository_id_str |
l |
| network_name_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
| spelling |
Yield gaps of lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) in livestock systems of ArgentinaJauregui, José MartínOjeda, Jonathan JesusBerone, German DarioLattanzi, Fernando AlfredoBaudracco, JavierFariña, SantiagoMoot, DerrickMedicago SativaManejo del CultivoRendimientoGanaderíaPastoreoArgentinaCrop ManagementYieldsAnimal HusbandryGrazingAlfalfaLucerneArgentina grows the second-largest area of lucerne in the world. Despite its importance, a yield gap exists between potential and measured yields, but factors contributing to it are still unclear. This study aimed to identify management factors and research needs to reduce the lucerne yield gap to improve the livestock systems in this region. We used meteorological data coupled with lucerne crop modelling and measured yields from the National Lucerne Cultivar Evaluation Network (NLCEN) to quantify the lucerne yield gap in nine sites located within the Argentinian Pampas (between parallels 30–45°S and meridians 58–65°W) and three sites outside the Pampas. Specifically, we used the model developed by McCall & Bishop-Hurley (2003), adapted and calibrated for lucerne in Argentina by Berone et al. (2017) to estimate the potential yield (PY) for 12 locations (three irrigated and nine rainfed), and compared those results with measured yields from the NLCEN to calculate yield gaps. We found the average available photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) and temperatures were sufficient to achieve 21.5 ± 3.7 t dry matter (DM) ha−1 yr−1 under rainfed conditions (environments with mean annual rainfall from 400 to 1,200 mm). However, the average measured yield from the NLCEN was 16.8 ± 2.4 t DM ha−1 yr−1 (a 22% gap). Potential yields ranged between 10 and 25 t DM ha−1 yr−1 under rainfed conditions and between 25 and 39 t DM ha−1 yr−1 for irrigated crops. As latitude increased rainfed locations had lower yields, while irrigated locations had higher yields. Adding irrigation was predicted to increase yields to 35.4 ± 2.0 t DM ha−1 yr−1 (a 53% gap) in rainfed sites. For irrigated locations, the gap was smaller (27.3 ± 3.5 vs 32.4 ± 2.2 t DM ha−1 yr−1 for measured vs potential yield, respectively), and most likely linked to nutrient deficits. Also, current grazing management was estimated to achieve approximately 50% less grazing efficiency than optimal grazing management. Our results demonstrated that the livestock industry can potentially increase animal production under current environmental conditions. The four main adjustments to achieve this are increased use of irrigation, increased use of fertilisers, earlier commencement of grazing in spring and increased stocking rates. The costs of irrigation, fertilisers and grazing management are envisaged to be small compared with potential increases in incomes and thus profitability available to beef and dairy farmers using lucerne as a major feed source in Argentina.EEA BalcarceFil: Jáuregui, José Martín. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.Fil: Ojeda, Jonathan Jesús. Regrow Ag; Australia.Fil: Berone, Germán Darío. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.Fil: Berone, Germán Darío. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.Fil: Lattanzi, Fernando Alfredo. Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria. Estación Experimental La Estanzuela; Uruguay.Fil: Baudracco, Javier. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.Fil: Fariña, Santiago Rafael. Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria. Estación Experimental La Estanzuela; UruguayFil: Moot, Derrick. Lincoln University. Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences; Nueva Zelanda.Wiley2022-05-23T18:19:36Z2022-05-23T18:19:36Z2022-02-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/11934https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aab.127451744-7348https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12745Annals of Applied Biology : 1-11 (2022)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/2019-PE-E1-I007-001/2019-PE-E1-I007-001/AR./Incremento sostenible de la producción y utilización de pasturas y forrajes conservadosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-10-23T11:17:58Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/11934instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-10-23 11:17:58.71INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Yield gaps of lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) in livestock systems of Argentina |
| title |
Yield gaps of lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) in livestock systems of Argentina |
| spellingShingle |
Yield gaps of lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) in livestock systems of Argentina Jauregui, José Martín Medicago Sativa Manejo del Cultivo Rendimiento Ganadería Pastoreo Argentina Crop Management Yields Animal Husbandry Grazing Alfalfa Lucerne |
| title_short |
Yield gaps of lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) in livestock systems of Argentina |
| title_full |
Yield gaps of lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) in livestock systems of Argentina |
| title_fullStr |
Yield gaps of lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) in livestock systems of Argentina |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Yield gaps of lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) in livestock systems of Argentina |
| title_sort |
Yield gaps of lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) in livestock systems of Argentina |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Jauregui, José Martín Ojeda, Jonathan Jesus Berone, German Dario Lattanzi, Fernando Alfredo Baudracco, Javier Fariña, Santiago Moot, Derrick |
| author |
Jauregui, José Martín |
| author_facet |
Jauregui, José Martín Ojeda, Jonathan Jesus Berone, German Dario Lattanzi, Fernando Alfredo Baudracco, Javier Fariña, Santiago Moot, Derrick |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Ojeda, Jonathan Jesus Berone, German Dario Lattanzi, Fernando Alfredo Baudracco, Javier Fariña, Santiago Moot, Derrick |
| author2_role |
author author author author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Medicago Sativa Manejo del Cultivo Rendimiento Ganadería Pastoreo Argentina Crop Management Yields Animal Husbandry Grazing Alfalfa Lucerne |
| topic |
Medicago Sativa Manejo del Cultivo Rendimiento Ganadería Pastoreo Argentina Crop Management Yields Animal Husbandry Grazing Alfalfa Lucerne |
| dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Argentina grows the second-largest area of lucerne in the world. Despite its importance, a yield gap exists between potential and measured yields, but factors contributing to it are still unclear. This study aimed to identify management factors and research needs to reduce the lucerne yield gap to improve the livestock systems in this region. We used meteorological data coupled with lucerne crop modelling and measured yields from the National Lucerne Cultivar Evaluation Network (NLCEN) to quantify the lucerne yield gap in nine sites located within the Argentinian Pampas (between parallels 30–45°S and meridians 58–65°W) and three sites outside the Pampas. Specifically, we used the model developed by McCall & Bishop-Hurley (2003), adapted and calibrated for lucerne in Argentina by Berone et al. (2017) to estimate the potential yield (PY) for 12 locations (three irrigated and nine rainfed), and compared those results with measured yields from the NLCEN to calculate yield gaps. We found the average available photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) and temperatures were sufficient to achieve 21.5 ± 3.7 t dry matter (DM) ha−1 yr−1 under rainfed conditions (environments with mean annual rainfall from 400 to 1,200 mm). However, the average measured yield from the NLCEN was 16.8 ± 2.4 t DM ha−1 yr−1 (a 22% gap). Potential yields ranged between 10 and 25 t DM ha−1 yr−1 under rainfed conditions and between 25 and 39 t DM ha−1 yr−1 for irrigated crops. As latitude increased rainfed locations had lower yields, while irrigated locations had higher yields. Adding irrigation was predicted to increase yields to 35.4 ± 2.0 t DM ha−1 yr−1 (a 53% gap) in rainfed sites. For irrigated locations, the gap was smaller (27.3 ± 3.5 vs 32.4 ± 2.2 t DM ha−1 yr−1 for measured vs potential yield, respectively), and most likely linked to nutrient deficits. Also, current grazing management was estimated to achieve approximately 50% less grazing efficiency than optimal grazing management. Our results demonstrated that the livestock industry can potentially increase animal production under current environmental conditions. The four main adjustments to achieve this are increased use of irrigation, increased use of fertilisers, earlier commencement of grazing in spring and increased stocking rates. The costs of irrigation, fertilisers and grazing management are envisaged to be small compared with potential increases in incomes and thus profitability available to beef and dairy farmers using lucerne as a major feed source in Argentina. EEA Balcarce Fil: Jáuregui, José Martín. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Fil: Ojeda, Jonathan Jesús. Regrow Ag; Australia. Fil: Berone, Germán Darío. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Fil: Berone, Germán Darío. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Fil: Lattanzi, Fernando Alfredo. Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria. Estación Experimental La Estanzuela; Uruguay. Fil: Baudracco, Javier. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Fil: Fariña, Santiago Rafael. Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria. Estación Experimental La Estanzuela; Uruguay Fil: Moot, Derrick. Lincoln University. Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences; Nueva Zelanda. |
| description |
Argentina grows the second-largest area of lucerne in the world. Despite its importance, a yield gap exists between potential and measured yields, but factors contributing to it are still unclear. This study aimed to identify management factors and research needs to reduce the lucerne yield gap to improve the livestock systems in this region. We used meteorological data coupled with lucerne crop modelling and measured yields from the National Lucerne Cultivar Evaluation Network (NLCEN) to quantify the lucerne yield gap in nine sites located within the Argentinian Pampas (between parallels 30–45°S and meridians 58–65°W) and three sites outside the Pampas. Specifically, we used the model developed by McCall & Bishop-Hurley (2003), adapted and calibrated for lucerne in Argentina by Berone et al. (2017) to estimate the potential yield (PY) for 12 locations (three irrigated and nine rainfed), and compared those results with measured yields from the NLCEN to calculate yield gaps. We found the average available photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) and temperatures were sufficient to achieve 21.5 ± 3.7 t dry matter (DM) ha−1 yr−1 under rainfed conditions (environments with mean annual rainfall from 400 to 1,200 mm). However, the average measured yield from the NLCEN was 16.8 ± 2.4 t DM ha−1 yr−1 (a 22% gap). Potential yields ranged between 10 and 25 t DM ha−1 yr−1 under rainfed conditions and between 25 and 39 t DM ha−1 yr−1 for irrigated crops. As latitude increased rainfed locations had lower yields, while irrigated locations had higher yields. Adding irrigation was predicted to increase yields to 35.4 ± 2.0 t DM ha−1 yr−1 (a 53% gap) in rainfed sites. For irrigated locations, the gap was smaller (27.3 ± 3.5 vs 32.4 ± 2.2 t DM ha−1 yr−1 for measured vs potential yield, respectively), and most likely linked to nutrient deficits. Also, current grazing management was estimated to achieve approximately 50% less grazing efficiency than optimal grazing management. Our results demonstrated that the livestock industry can potentially increase animal production under current environmental conditions. The four main adjustments to achieve this are increased use of irrigation, increased use of fertilisers, earlier commencement of grazing in spring and increased stocking rates. The costs of irrigation, fertilisers and grazing management are envisaged to be small compared with potential increases in incomes and thus profitability available to beef and dairy farmers using lucerne as a major feed source in Argentina. |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-05-23T18:19:36Z 2022-05-23T18:19:36Z 2022-02-02 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/11934 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aab.12745 1744-7348 https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12745 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/11934 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aab.12745 https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12745 |
| identifier_str_mv |
1744-7348 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/2019-PE-E1-I007-001/2019-PE-E1-I007-001/AR./Incremento sostenible de la producción y utilización de pasturas y forrajes conservados |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
restrictedAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Annals of Applied Biology : 1-11 (2022) reponame:INTA Digital (INTA) instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
| reponame_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
| collection |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
| instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar |
| _version_ |
1846787557737627648 |
| score |
12.982451 |