Fodor's non-conceptual representations and the computational theory of mind

Autores
Destéfano, Mariela Natalia
Año de publicación
2013
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Fodor (2007; 2008) holds that the very early stages of perceptual processing operate upon non-conceptual representations. In my view, this position is incompatible with the main tenets that Fodor himself (1975; 1998a; 1998b; 2001a) has largely defended in his computational theory of mind (CTM). My aim in this paper is to present the problems CTM would face if the modules involved in perceptual processing computed non-conceptual representations. To achieve this, I will offer a trilemma whose first horn consists of the possibility that perceptual modules operate on both non-conceptual representations and representations of the language of thought (LOT). Since non-conceptual representations do not have the necessary properties to figure in a classical computational process, Fodor would have to accept that part of the perceptual modules is not explained in classical computational terms. The second horn of the trilemma is the possibility that perceptual modules may only compute nonconceptual representations. This would be a worst-case scenario, since CTM would then not explain how perceptual modules work. Finally, the last horn of the trilemma presents a third possibility in which perceptual modules operate on both non-conceptual representations and representations that are not fullblown LOT. I will argue that this position is inadequate in that it presents the same difficulties mentioned in the first and second horns of the trilemma.
Fil: Destéfano, Mariela Natalia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Materia
LANGUAGE OF THOUGHT
COMPUTATIONAL THEORY OF MIND
NON-CONCEPTUAL REPRESENTATIONS
ICONIC REPRESENTATIONS
PERCEPTUAL MODULES
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/26463

id CONICETDig_ffce43bc7376a9ae272fed6ab95b8c8d
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/26463
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Fodor's non-conceptual representations and the computational theory of mindDestéfano, Mariela NataliaLANGUAGE OF THOUGHTCOMPUTATIONAL THEORY OF MINDNON-CONCEPTUAL REPRESENTATIONSICONIC REPRESENTATIONSPERCEPTUAL MODULEShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6Fodor (2007; 2008) holds that the very early stages of perceptual processing operate upon non-conceptual representations. In my view, this position is incompatible with the main tenets that Fodor himself (1975; 1998a; 1998b; 2001a) has largely defended in his computational theory of mind (CTM). My aim in this paper is to present the problems CTM would face if the modules involved in perceptual processing computed non-conceptual representations. To achieve this, I will offer a trilemma whose first horn consists of the possibility that perceptual modules operate on both non-conceptual representations and representations of the language of thought (LOT). Since non-conceptual representations do not have the necessary properties to figure in a classical computational process, Fodor would have to accept that part of the perceptual modules is not explained in classical computational terms. The second horn of the trilemma is the possibility that perceptual modules may only compute nonconceptual representations. This would be a worst-case scenario, since CTM would then not explain how perceptual modules work. Finally, the last horn of the trilemma presents a third possibility in which perceptual modules operate on both non-conceptual representations and representations that are not fullblown LOT. I will argue that this position is inadequate in that it presents the same difficulties mentioned in the first and second horns of the trilemma.Fil: Destéfano, Mariela Natalia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaSeoul National University. Institute for Cognitive Science2013-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/26463Destéfano, Mariela Natalia; Fodor's non-conceptual representations and the computational theory of mind; Seoul National University. Institute for Cognitive Science; Journal of Cognitive Science; 14; 2; 5-2013; 183-2141598-2327CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://cogsci.snu.ac.kr/jcs/index.php/issues/?pageid=6&uid=149&mod=documentinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:58:59Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/26463instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:58:59.74CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Fodor's non-conceptual representations and the computational theory of mind
title Fodor's non-conceptual representations and the computational theory of mind
spellingShingle Fodor's non-conceptual representations and the computational theory of mind
Destéfano, Mariela Natalia
LANGUAGE OF THOUGHT
COMPUTATIONAL THEORY OF MIND
NON-CONCEPTUAL REPRESENTATIONS
ICONIC REPRESENTATIONS
PERCEPTUAL MODULES
title_short Fodor's non-conceptual representations and the computational theory of mind
title_full Fodor's non-conceptual representations and the computational theory of mind
title_fullStr Fodor's non-conceptual representations and the computational theory of mind
title_full_unstemmed Fodor's non-conceptual representations and the computational theory of mind
title_sort Fodor's non-conceptual representations and the computational theory of mind
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Destéfano, Mariela Natalia
author Destéfano, Mariela Natalia
author_facet Destéfano, Mariela Natalia
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv LANGUAGE OF THOUGHT
COMPUTATIONAL THEORY OF MIND
NON-CONCEPTUAL REPRESENTATIONS
ICONIC REPRESENTATIONS
PERCEPTUAL MODULES
topic LANGUAGE OF THOUGHT
COMPUTATIONAL THEORY OF MIND
NON-CONCEPTUAL REPRESENTATIONS
ICONIC REPRESENTATIONS
PERCEPTUAL MODULES
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Fodor (2007; 2008) holds that the very early stages of perceptual processing operate upon non-conceptual representations. In my view, this position is incompatible with the main tenets that Fodor himself (1975; 1998a; 1998b; 2001a) has largely defended in his computational theory of mind (CTM). My aim in this paper is to present the problems CTM would face if the modules involved in perceptual processing computed non-conceptual representations. To achieve this, I will offer a trilemma whose first horn consists of the possibility that perceptual modules operate on both non-conceptual representations and representations of the language of thought (LOT). Since non-conceptual representations do not have the necessary properties to figure in a classical computational process, Fodor would have to accept that part of the perceptual modules is not explained in classical computational terms. The second horn of the trilemma is the possibility that perceptual modules may only compute nonconceptual representations. This would be a worst-case scenario, since CTM would then not explain how perceptual modules work. Finally, the last horn of the trilemma presents a third possibility in which perceptual modules operate on both non-conceptual representations and representations that are not fullblown LOT. I will argue that this position is inadequate in that it presents the same difficulties mentioned in the first and second horns of the trilemma.
Fil: Destéfano, Mariela Natalia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina
description Fodor (2007; 2008) holds that the very early stages of perceptual processing operate upon non-conceptual representations. In my view, this position is incompatible with the main tenets that Fodor himself (1975; 1998a; 1998b; 2001a) has largely defended in his computational theory of mind (CTM). My aim in this paper is to present the problems CTM would face if the modules involved in perceptual processing computed non-conceptual representations. To achieve this, I will offer a trilemma whose first horn consists of the possibility that perceptual modules operate on both non-conceptual representations and representations of the language of thought (LOT). Since non-conceptual representations do not have the necessary properties to figure in a classical computational process, Fodor would have to accept that part of the perceptual modules is not explained in classical computational terms. The second horn of the trilemma is the possibility that perceptual modules may only compute nonconceptual representations. This would be a worst-case scenario, since CTM would then not explain how perceptual modules work. Finally, the last horn of the trilemma presents a third possibility in which perceptual modules operate on both non-conceptual representations and representations that are not fullblown LOT. I will argue that this position is inadequate in that it presents the same difficulties mentioned in the first and second horns of the trilemma.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-05
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/26463
Destéfano, Mariela Natalia; Fodor's non-conceptual representations and the computational theory of mind; Seoul National University. Institute for Cognitive Science; Journal of Cognitive Science; 14; 2; 5-2013; 183-214
1598-2327
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/26463
identifier_str_mv Destéfano, Mariela Natalia; Fodor's non-conceptual representations and the computational theory of mind; Seoul National University. Institute for Cognitive Science; Journal of Cognitive Science; 14; 2; 5-2013; 183-214
1598-2327
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://cogsci.snu.ac.kr/jcs/index.php/issues/?pageid=6&uid=149&mod=document
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Seoul National University. Institute for Cognitive Science
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Seoul National University. Institute for Cognitive Science
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269554578817024
score 13.13397