Fodor's non-conceptual representations and the computational theory of mind
- Autores
- Destéfano, Mariela Natalia
- Año de publicación
- 2013
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Fodor (2007; 2008) holds that the very early stages of perceptual processing operate upon non-conceptual representations. In my view, this position is incompatible with the main tenets that Fodor himself (1975; 1998a; 1998b; 2001a) has largely defended in his computational theory of mind (CTM). My aim in this paper is to present the problems CTM would face if the modules involved in perceptual processing computed non-conceptual representations. To achieve this, I will offer a trilemma whose first horn consists of the possibility that perceptual modules operate on both non-conceptual representations and representations of the language of thought (LOT). Since non-conceptual representations do not have the necessary properties to figure in a classical computational process, Fodor would have to accept that part of the perceptual modules is not explained in classical computational terms. The second horn of the trilemma is the possibility that perceptual modules may only compute nonconceptual representations. This would be a worst-case scenario, since CTM would then not explain how perceptual modules work. Finally, the last horn of the trilemma presents a third possibility in which perceptual modules operate on both non-conceptual representations and representations that are not fullblown LOT. I will argue that this position is inadequate in that it presents the same difficulties mentioned in the first and second horns of the trilemma.
Fil: Destéfano, Mariela Natalia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina - Materia
-
LANGUAGE OF THOUGHT
COMPUTATIONAL THEORY OF MIND
NON-CONCEPTUAL REPRESENTATIONS
ICONIC REPRESENTATIONS
PERCEPTUAL MODULES - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/26463
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_ffce43bc7376a9ae272fed6ab95b8c8d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/26463 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Fodor's non-conceptual representations and the computational theory of mindDestéfano, Mariela NataliaLANGUAGE OF THOUGHTCOMPUTATIONAL THEORY OF MINDNON-CONCEPTUAL REPRESENTATIONSICONIC REPRESENTATIONSPERCEPTUAL MODULEShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6Fodor (2007; 2008) holds that the very early stages of perceptual processing operate upon non-conceptual representations. In my view, this position is incompatible with the main tenets that Fodor himself (1975; 1998a; 1998b; 2001a) has largely defended in his computational theory of mind (CTM). My aim in this paper is to present the problems CTM would face if the modules involved in perceptual processing computed non-conceptual representations. To achieve this, I will offer a trilemma whose first horn consists of the possibility that perceptual modules operate on both non-conceptual representations and representations of the language of thought (LOT). Since non-conceptual representations do not have the necessary properties to figure in a classical computational process, Fodor would have to accept that part of the perceptual modules is not explained in classical computational terms. The second horn of the trilemma is the possibility that perceptual modules may only compute nonconceptual representations. This would be a worst-case scenario, since CTM would then not explain how perceptual modules work. Finally, the last horn of the trilemma presents a third possibility in which perceptual modules operate on both non-conceptual representations and representations that are not fullblown LOT. I will argue that this position is inadequate in that it presents the same difficulties mentioned in the first and second horns of the trilemma.Fil: Destéfano, Mariela Natalia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaSeoul National University. Institute for Cognitive Science2013-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/26463Destéfano, Mariela Natalia; Fodor's non-conceptual representations and the computational theory of mind; Seoul National University. Institute for Cognitive Science; Journal of Cognitive Science; 14; 2; 5-2013; 183-2141598-2327CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://cogsci.snu.ac.kr/jcs/index.php/issues/?pageid=6&uid=149&mod=documentinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:58:59Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/26463instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:58:59.74CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Fodor's non-conceptual representations and the computational theory of mind |
title |
Fodor's non-conceptual representations and the computational theory of mind |
spellingShingle |
Fodor's non-conceptual representations and the computational theory of mind Destéfano, Mariela Natalia LANGUAGE OF THOUGHT COMPUTATIONAL THEORY OF MIND NON-CONCEPTUAL REPRESENTATIONS ICONIC REPRESENTATIONS PERCEPTUAL MODULES |
title_short |
Fodor's non-conceptual representations and the computational theory of mind |
title_full |
Fodor's non-conceptual representations and the computational theory of mind |
title_fullStr |
Fodor's non-conceptual representations and the computational theory of mind |
title_full_unstemmed |
Fodor's non-conceptual representations and the computational theory of mind |
title_sort |
Fodor's non-conceptual representations and the computational theory of mind |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Destéfano, Mariela Natalia |
author |
Destéfano, Mariela Natalia |
author_facet |
Destéfano, Mariela Natalia |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
LANGUAGE OF THOUGHT COMPUTATIONAL THEORY OF MIND NON-CONCEPTUAL REPRESENTATIONS ICONIC REPRESENTATIONS PERCEPTUAL MODULES |
topic |
LANGUAGE OF THOUGHT COMPUTATIONAL THEORY OF MIND NON-CONCEPTUAL REPRESENTATIONS ICONIC REPRESENTATIONS PERCEPTUAL MODULES |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Fodor (2007; 2008) holds that the very early stages of perceptual processing operate upon non-conceptual representations. In my view, this position is incompatible with the main tenets that Fodor himself (1975; 1998a; 1998b; 2001a) has largely defended in his computational theory of mind (CTM). My aim in this paper is to present the problems CTM would face if the modules involved in perceptual processing computed non-conceptual representations. To achieve this, I will offer a trilemma whose first horn consists of the possibility that perceptual modules operate on both non-conceptual representations and representations of the language of thought (LOT). Since non-conceptual representations do not have the necessary properties to figure in a classical computational process, Fodor would have to accept that part of the perceptual modules is not explained in classical computational terms. The second horn of the trilemma is the possibility that perceptual modules may only compute nonconceptual representations. This would be a worst-case scenario, since CTM would then not explain how perceptual modules work. Finally, the last horn of the trilemma presents a third possibility in which perceptual modules operate on both non-conceptual representations and representations that are not fullblown LOT. I will argue that this position is inadequate in that it presents the same difficulties mentioned in the first and second horns of the trilemma. Fil: Destéfano, Mariela Natalia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina |
description |
Fodor (2007; 2008) holds that the very early stages of perceptual processing operate upon non-conceptual representations. In my view, this position is incompatible with the main tenets that Fodor himself (1975; 1998a; 1998b; 2001a) has largely defended in his computational theory of mind (CTM). My aim in this paper is to present the problems CTM would face if the modules involved in perceptual processing computed non-conceptual representations. To achieve this, I will offer a trilemma whose first horn consists of the possibility that perceptual modules operate on both non-conceptual representations and representations of the language of thought (LOT). Since non-conceptual representations do not have the necessary properties to figure in a classical computational process, Fodor would have to accept that part of the perceptual modules is not explained in classical computational terms. The second horn of the trilemma is the possibility that perceptual modules may only compute nonconceptual representations. This would be a worst-case scenario, since CTM would then not explain how perceptual modules work. Finally, the last horn of the trilemma presents a third possibility in which perceptual modules operate on both non-conceptual representations and representations that are not fullblown LOT. I will argue that this position is inadequate in that it presents the same difficulties mentioned in the first and second horns of the trilemma. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-05 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/26463 Destéfano, Mariela Natalia; Fodor's non-conceptual representations and the computational theory of mind; Seoul National University. Institute for Cognitive Science; Journal of Cognitive Science; 14; 2; 5-2013; 183-214 1598-2327 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/26463 |
identifier_str_mv |
Destéfano, Mariela Natalia; Fodor's non-conceptual representations and the computational theory of mind; Seoul National University. Institute for Cognitive Science; Journal of Cognitive Science; 14; 2; 5-2013; 183-214 1598-2327 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://cogsci.snu.ac.kr/jcs/index.php/issues/?pageid=6&uid=149&mod=document |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Seoul National University. Institute for Cognitive Science |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Seoul National University. Institute for Cognitive Science |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842269554578817024 |
score |
13.13397 |