Further considerations regarding PANAS: Contributions from four studies with different Argentinean samples

Autores
Caicedo Cavagnis, Estefanía Elena; Michelini, Yanina Noelia; Belaus, Anabel; Mola, Débora Jeanette; Godoy, Juan Carlos; Reyna, Cecilia
Año de publicación
2018
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
In this research we analyzed the psychometric properties of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) in samples coming from four independent studies: university students (Study 1, n = 392; Study 2, n = 395), general adult population (Study 3, n = 316), and athletes (Study 4, n = 533). Through confirmatory analyses we evaluated the following models: a) two-factor model (Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988), b) three-factor model by Mehrabian (1997), c) three-factor model by Gaudreau, Sánchez and Blondin (2006) and d) bi-factor model (Leue & Beauducel, 2011), all of them in their oblique and orthogonal variants. Several models presented an acceptable ft, but only after allowing correlated errors and excluding the items alert and excited. While orthogonal solutions of the three models showed the best ft in Studies 2, 3 and 4, oblique solutions presented the best fit in Study 1. Cronbach?s alpha, composite reliability and omega indexes oscillated between .55 and .89. Considering the original theoretical model and the practical utility of the PANAS, we favorthe model of two orthogonal factors, excluding the aforementioned items.
Fil: Caicedo Cavagnis, Estefanía Elena. Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas (IIPsi), CONICET - Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; Argentina
Fil: Michelini, Yanina Noelia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; Argentina. Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas (IIPsi), CONICET - Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; Argentina
Fil: Belaus, Anabel. Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas (IIPsi), CONICET - Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; Argentina; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; Argentina
Fil: Mola, Débora Jeanette. Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas (IIPsi), CONICET - Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; Argentina; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; Argentina
Fil: Godoy, Juan Carlos. Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas (IIPsi), CONICET - Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; Argentina; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; Argentina
Fil: Reyna, Cecilia. Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas (IIPsi), CONICET - Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; Argentina; Argentina
Materia
CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS
NEGATIVE AFFECT
PANAS
POSITIVE AFFECT
PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/97265
Acceder
id CONICETDig_ff8f5423476064efcaff7bcbb5a58677
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/97265
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Further considerations regarding PANAS: Contributions from four studies with different Argentinean samplesConsideraciones adicionales sobre panas: Contribuciones de cuatro estudios con muestras argentinas distintasCaicedo Cavagnis, Estefanía ElenaMichelini, Yanina NoeliaBelaus, AnabelMola, Débora JeanetteGodoy, Juan CarlosReyna, CeciliaCONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSISNEGATIVE AFFECTPANASPOSITIVE AFFECTPSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIEShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5In this research we analyzed the psychometric properties of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) in samples coming from four independent studies: university students (Study 1, n = 392; Study 2, n = 395), general adult population (Study 3, n = 316), and athletes (Study 4, n = 533). Through confirmatory analyses we evaluated the following models: a) two-factor model (Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988), b) three-factor model by Mehrabian (1997), c) three-factor model by Gaudreau, Sánchez and Blondin (2006) and d) bi-factor model (Leue & Beauducel, 2011), all of them in their oblique and orthogonal variants. Several models presented an acceptable ft, but only after allowing correlated errors and excluding the items alert and excited. While orthogonal solutions of the three models showed the best ft in Studies 2, 3 and 4, oblique solutions presented the best fit in Study 1. Cronbach?s alpha, composite reliability and omega indexes oscillated between .55 and .89. Considering the original theoretical model and the practical utility of the PANAS, we favorthe model of two orthogonal factors, excluding the aforementioned items.Fil: Caicedo Cavagnis, Estefanía Elena. Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas (IIPsi), CONICET - Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; ArgentinaFil: Michelini, Yanina Noelia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; Argentina. Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas (IIPsi), CONICET - Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; ArgentinaFil: Belaus, Anabel. Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas (IIPsi), CONICET - Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; Argentina; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; ArgentinaFil: Mola, Débora Jeanette. Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas (IIPsi), CONICET - Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; Argentina; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; ArgentinaFil: Godoy, Juan Carlos. Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas (IIPsi), CONICET - Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; Argentina; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; ArgentinaFil: Reyna, Cecilia. Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas (IIPsi), CONICET - Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; Argentina; ArgentinaKonrad Lorenz2018-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/97265Caicedo Cavagnis, Estefanía Elena; Michelini, Yanina Noelia; Belaus, Anabel; Mola, Débora Jeanette; Godoy, Juan Carlos; et al.; Further considerations regarding PANAS: Contributions from four studies with different Argentinean samples; Konrad Lorenz; Suma Psicológica; 25; 2; 12-2018; 133-1450121-43812145-9797CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://editorial.konradlorenz.edu.co/2018/08/further-considerations-regarding-panas.htmlinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.14349/sumapsi.2018.v25.n2.5info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:28:58Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/97265instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:28:58.813CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Further considerations regarding PANAS: Contributions from four studies with different Argentinean samples
Consideraciones adicionales sobre panas: Contribuciones de cuatro estudios con muestras argentinas distintas
title Further considerations regarding PANAS: Contributions from four studies with different Argentinean samples
spellingShingle Further considerations regarding PANAS: Contributions from four studies with different Argentinean samples
Caicedo Cavagnis, Estefanía Elena
CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS
NEGATIVE AFFECT
PANAS
POSITIVE AFFECT
PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES
title_short Further considerations regarding PANAS: Contributions from four studies with different Argentinean samples
title_full Further considerations regarding PANAS: Contributions from four studies with different Argentinean samples
title_fullStr Further considerations regarding PANAS: Contributions from four studies with different Argentinean samples
title_full_unstemmed Further considerations regarding PANAS: Contributions from four studies with different Argentinean samples
title_sort Further considerations regarding PANAS: Contributions from four studies with different Argentinean samples
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Caicedo Cavagnis, Estefanía Elena
Michelini, Yanina Noelia
Belaus, Anabel
Mola, Débora Jeanette
Godoy, Juan Carlos
Reyna, Cecilia
author Caicedo Cavagnis, Estefanía Elena
author_facet Caicedo Cavagnis, Estefanía Elena
Michelini, Yanina Noelia
Belaus, Anabel
Mola, Débora Jeanette
Godoy, Juan Carlos
Reyna, Cecilia
author_role author
author2 Michelini, Yanina Noelia
Belaus, Anabel
Mola, Débora Jeanette
Godoy, Juan Carlos
Reyna, Cecilia
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS
NEGATIVE AFFECT
PANAS
POSITIVE AFFECT
PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES
topic CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS
NEGATIVE AFFECT
PANAS
POSITIVE AFFECT
PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv In this research we analyzed the psychometric properties of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) in samples coming from four independent studies: university students (Study 1, n = 392; Study 2, n = 395), general adult population (Study 3, n = 316), and athletes (Study 4, n = 533). Through confirmatory analyses we evaluated the following models: a) two-factor model (Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988), b) three-factor model by Mehrabian (1997), c) three-factor model by Gaudreau, Sánchez and Blondin (2006) and d) bi-factor model (Leue & Beauducel, 2011), all of them in their oblique and orthogonal variants. Several models presented an acceptable ft, but only after allowing correlated errors and excluding the items alert and excited. While orthogonal solutions of the three models showed the best ft in Studies 2, 3 and 4, oblique solutions presented the best fit in Study 1. Cronbach?s alpha, composite reliability and omega indexes oscillated between .55 and .89. Considering the original theoretical model and the practical utility of the PANAS, we favorthe model of two orthogonal factors, excluding the aforementioned items.
Fil: Caicedo Cavagnis, Estefanía Elena. Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas (IIPsi), CONICET - Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; Argentina
Fil: Michelini, Yanina Noelia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; Argentina. Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas (IIPsi), CONICET - Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; Argentina
Fil: Belaus, Anabel. Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas (IIPsi), CONICET - Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; Argentina; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; Argentina
Fil: Mola, Débora Jeanette. Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas (IIPsi), CONICET - Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; Argentina; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; Argentina
Fil: Godoy, Juan Carlos. Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas (IIPsi), CONICET - Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; Argentina; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; Argentina
Fil: Reyna, Cecilia. Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas (IIPsi), CONICET - Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; Argentina; Argentina
description In this research we analyzed the psychometric properties of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) in samples coming from four independent studies: university students (Study 1, n = 392; Study 2, n = 395), general adult population (Study 3, n = 316), and athletes (Study 4, n = 533). Through confirmatory analyses we evaluated the following models: a) two-factor model (Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988), b) three-factor model by Mehrabian (1997), c) three-factor model by Gaudreau, Sánchez and Blondin (2006) and d) bi-factor model (Leue & Beauducel, 2011), all of them in their oblique and orthogonal variants. Several models presented an acceptable ft, but only after allowing correlated errors and excluding the items alert and excited. While orthogonal solutions of the three models showed the best ft in Studies 2, 3 and 4, oblique solutions presented the best fit in Study 1. Cronbach?s alpha, composite reliability and omega indexes oscillated between .55 and .89. Considering the original theoretical model and the practical utility of the PANAS, we favorthe model of two orthogonal factors, excluding the aforementioned items.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/97265
Caicedo Cavagnis, Estefanía Elena; Michelini, Yanina Noelia; Belaus, Anabel; Mola, Débora Jeanette; Godoy, Juan Carlos; et al.; Further considerations regarding PANAS: Contributions from four studies with different Argentinean samples; Konrad Lorenz; Suma Psicológica; 25; 2; 12-2018; 133-145
0121-4381
2145-9797
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/97265
identifier_str_mv Caicedo Cavagnis, Estefanía Elena; Michelini, Yanina Noelia; Belaus, Anabel; Mola, Débora Jeanette; Godoy, Juan Carlos; et al.; Further considerations regarding PANAS: Contributions from four studies with different Argentinean samples; Konrad Lorenz; Suma Psicológica; 25; 2; 12-2018; 133-145
0121-4381
2145-9797
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://editorial.konradlorenz.edu.co/2018/08/further-considerations-regarding-panas.html
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.14349/sumapsi.2018.v25.n2.5
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Konrad Lorenz
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Konrad Lorenz
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844614294552969216
score 13.070432

Publicaciones similares