Global research priorities related to the World Health Organization Labour Care Guide: results of a global consultation

• Autores: Abalos, Edgardo; Adanu, Richard; Bernitz, Stine; Binfa, Lorena; Dao, Blami; Downe, Soo; Hofmeyr, Justus G.; Homer, Caroline S. E.; Hundley, Vanora; GaladanciGogoi, Hadiza Aparajita; Lavender, Tina; Lissauer, David; Lumbiganon, Pisake; Pattinson, Robert; Qureshi, Zahida; Stringer, Jeffrey S. A.; Pujar, Yeshita V.; Vogel, Joshua P.; Yunis, Khalid; Nkurunziza, Triphonie; De Mucio, Bremen; Gholbzouri, Karima; Jayathilaka, Anoma; Aderoba, Adeniyi Kolade; Pingray, Veronica; Althabe, Fernando; Betran, Ana Pilar; Bonet, Mercedes; Bucagu, Maurice; Oladapo, Olufemi; Souza, João Paulo
• Año de publicación: 2023
• Idioma: inglés
• Tipo de recurso: artículo
• Materia: CHILDBIRTH; CHILDBIRTH EXPERIENCE; EVIDENCE-BASED LABOUR AND CHILDBIRTH CARE; INTRAPARTUM CARE; RESEARCH PRIORITY SETTING; WHO LABOUR CARE GUIDE; WOMEN-CENTRED CARE
• Institución: Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas

Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) published the WHO Labour Care Guide (LCG) in 2020 to support the implementation of its 2018 recommendations on intrapartum care. The WHO LCG promotes evidence-based labour monitoring and stimulates shared decision-making between maternity care providers and labouring women. There is a need to identify critical questions that will contribute to defining the research agenda relating to implementation of the WHO LCG. Methods: This mixed-methods prioritization exercise, adapted from the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) and James Lind Alliance (JLA) methods, combined a metrics-based design with a qualitative, consensus-building consultation in three phases. The exercise followed the reporting guideline for priority setting of health research (REPRISE). First, 30 stakeholders were invited to submit online ideas or questions (generation of research ideas). Then, 220 stakeholders were invited to score "research avenues" (i.e., broad research ideas that could be answered through a set of research questions) against six independent and equally weighted criteria (scoring of research avenues). Finally, a technical working group (TWG) of 20 purposively selected stakeholders reviewed the scoring, and refined and ranked the research avenues (consensus-building meeting). Results: Initially, 24 stakeholders submitted 89 research ideas or questions. A list of 10 consolidated research avenues was scored by 75/220 stakeholders. During the virtual consensus-building meeting, research avenues were refined, and the top three priorities agreed upon were: (1) optimize implementation strategies of WHO LCG, (2) improve understanding of the effect of WHO LCG on maternal and perinatal outcomes, and the process and experience of labour and childbirth care, and (3) assess the effect of the WHO LCG in special situations or settings. Research avenues related to the organization of care and resource utilization ranked lowest during both the scoring and consensus-building process. Conclusion: This systematic and transparent process should encourage researchers, program implementers, and funders to support research aligned with the identified priorities related to WHO LCG. An international collaborative platform is recommended to implement prioritized research by using harmonized research tools, establishing a repository of research priorities studies, and scaling-up successful research results.
Fil: Abalos, Edgardo. Organizacion Mundial de la Salud; Argentina
Fil: Adanu, Richard. Organizacion Mundial de la Salud; Argentina
Fil: Bernitz, Stine. Organizacion Mundial de la Salud; Argentina
Fil: Binfa, Lorena. Organizacion Mundial de la Salud; Argentina
Fil: Dao, Blami. Organizacion Mundial de la Salud; Argentina
Fil: Downe, Soo. Organizacion Mundial de la Salud; Argentina
Fil: Hofmeyr, Justus G.. Organizacion Mundial de la Salud; Argentina
Fil: Homer, Caroline S. E.. Organizacion Mundial de la Salud; Argentina
Fil: Hundley, Vanora. Organizacion Mundial de la Salud; Argentina
Fil: GaladanciGogoi, Hadiza Aparajita. Organizacion Mundial de la Salud; Argentina
Fil: Lavender, Tina. Organizacion Mundial de la Salud; Argentina
Fil: Lissauer, David. Organizacion Mundial de la Salud; Argentina
Fil: Lumbiganon, Pisake. Organizacion Mundial de la Salud; Argentina
Fil: Pattinson, Robert. Organizacion Mundial de la Salud; Argentina
Fil: Qureshi, Zahida. Organizacion Mundial de la Salud; Argentina
Fil: Stringer, Jeffrey S. A.. Organizacion Mundial de la Salud; Argentina
Fil: Pujar, Yeshita V.. Organizacion Mundial de la Salud; Argentina
Fil: Vogel, Joshua P.. Organizacion Mundial de la Salud; Argentina
Fil: Yunis, Khalid. Organizacion Mundial de la Salud; Argentina
Fil: Nkurunziza, Triphonie. Organizacion Mundial de la Salud; Argentina
Fil: De Mucio, Bremen. Organizacion Mundial de la Salud; Argentina
Fil: Gholbzouri, Karima. Organizacion Mundial de la Salud; Argentina
Fil: Jayathilaka, Anoma. Organizacion Mundial de la Salud; Argentina
Fil: Aderoba, Adeniyi Kolade. Organizacion Mundial de la Salud; Argentina
Fil: Pingray, Veronica. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina. Organizacion Mundial de la Salud; Argentina
Fil: Althabe, Fernando. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Centro de Investigaciones en Epidemiología y Salud Pública. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria. Centro de Investigaciones en Epidemiología y Salud Pública; Argentina. Organizacion Mundial de la Salud; Argentina
Fil: Betran, Ana Pilar. Organizacion Mundial de la Salud; Argentina
Fil: Bonet, Mercedes. Organizacion Mundial de la Salud; Argentina
Fil: Bucagu, Maurice. Organizacion Mundial de la Salud; Argentina
Fil: Oladapo, Olufemi. Organizacion Mundial de la Salud; Argentina
Fil: Souza, João Paulo. Organizacion Mundial de la Salud; Argentina