Cipo-César en las Metamorfosis de Ovidio: ¿una reivindicación de la monarquía?

Autores
Martinez Astorino, Pablo Leandro
Año de publicación
2017
Idioma
español castellano
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The Cipus episode must be understood in literary terms as a mythologization of Julius Caesar previous to his apotheosis, just as the Aesculapius episode constitutes a mythologization of Augustus. The purpose is to allude in a mythologized way to two episodes of Caesar´s political life: the rejection of the royal emblems first from the Senate and then from Antonius in the Lupercalia (Suet. Iul. 79, 2). But, although the most central aspect of this representation of history is the device per se, it is possible to see also a reflection on monarchy in the history of Rome, which functions as a significant interpretation of the recent history: the monarchic legacy, which evokes not only Tarquinus but also Numa, should not be understood as a mistake and Cipus and Caesar, unlike Augustus, failed to assume it, even though Ovidian (Numan) conception of monarchy is problematically applied to Augustus.
The Cipus episode must be understood in literary terms as a mythologization of Julius Caesar previous to his apotheosis, just as the Aesculapius episode constitutes a mythologization of Augustus. The purpose is to allude in a mythologized way to two episodes of Caesar’s political life: the rejection of the royal emblems fi rst from the Senate and then from Antonius in the Lupercalia (Suet. Iul. 79.2). But, although the most central aspect of this representation of history is the device per se, it is possible to see also a refl ection on monarchy in the history of Rome, which functions as a signifi cant interpretation of the recent history: the monarchic legacy, which evokes not only Tarquinus but also Numa, should not be understood as a mistake and Cipus and Caesar, unlike Augustus, failed to assume it, even though Ovidian (Numan) conception of monarchy is problematically applied to Augustus.
Fil: Martinez Astorino, Pablo Leandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales; Argentina
Materia
CIPO
CÉSAR
MITOLOGIZACIÓN
MONARQUÍA
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/52292
Acceder
id CONICETDig_f61486823a110533f149e7d438014945
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/52292
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Cipo-César en las Metamorfosis de Ovidio: ¿una reivindicación de la monarquía?Martinez Astorino, Pablo LeandroCIPOCÉSARMITOLOGIZACIÓNMONARQUÍAhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6The Cipus episode must be understood in literary terms as a mythologization of Julius Caesar previous to his apotheosis, just as the Aesculapius episode constitutes a mythologization of Augustus. The purpose is to allude in a mythologized way to two episodes of Caesar´s political life: the rejection of the royal emblems first from the Senate and then from Antonius in the Lupercalia (Suet. Iul. 79, 2). But, although the most central aspect of this representation of history is the device per se, it is possible to see also a reflection on monarchy in the history of Rome, which functions as a significant interpretation of the recent history: the monarchic legacy, which evokes not only Tarquinus but also Numa, should not be understood as a mistake and Cipus and Caesar, unlike Augustus, failed to assume it, even though Ovidian (Numan) conception of monarchy is problematically applied to Augustus.The Cipus episode must be understood in literary terms as a mythologization of Julius Caesar previous to his apotheosis, just as the Aesculapius episode constitutes a mythologization of Augustus. The purpose is to allude in a mythologized way to two episodes of Caesar’s political life: the rejection of the royal emblems fi rst from the Senate and then from Antonius in the Lupercalia (Suet. Iul. 79.2). But, although the most central aspect of this representation of history is the device per se, it is possible to see also a refl ection on monarchy in the history of Rome, which functions as a signifi cant interpretation of the recent history: the monarchic legacy, which evokes not only Tarquinus but also Numa, should not be understood as a mistake and Cipus and Caesar, unlike Augustus, failed to assume it, even though Ovidian (Numan) conception of monarchy is problematically applied to Augustus.Fil: Martinez Astorino, Pablo Leandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales; ArgentinaUniversidade de Lisboa. Faculdade de Letras. Centro de Estudos Clássicos2017-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/52292Martinez Astorino, Pablo Leandro; Cipo-César en las Metamorfosis de Ovidio: ¿una reivindicación de la monarquía?; Universidade de Lisboa. Faculdade de Letras. Centro de Estudos Clássicos; Euphrosyne: Revista de Filologia Classica; 45; 12-2017; 259-2700870-0133CONICET DigitalCONICETspainfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.tmp.letras.ulisboa.pt/cec-publicacoes/2693-euphrosyne-volume-xlv-2017info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:07:26Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/52292instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:07:27.215CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Cipo-César en las Metamorfosis de Ovidio: ¿una reivindicación de la monarquía?
title Cipo-César en las Metamorfosis de Ovidio: ¿una reivindicación de la monarquía?
spellingShingle Cipo-César en las Metamorfosis de Ovidio: ¿una reivindicación de la monarquía?
Martinez Astorino, Pablo Leandro
CIPO
CÉSAR
MITOLOGIZACIÓN
MONARQUÍA
title_short Cipo-César en las Metamorfosis de Ovidio: ¿una reivindicación de la monarquía?
title_full Cipo-César en las Metamorfosis de Ovidio: ¿una reivindicación de la monarquía?
title_fullStr Cipo-César en las Metamorfosis de Ovidio: ¿una reivindicación de la monarquía?
title_full_unstemmed Cipo-César en las Metamorfosis de Ovidio: ¿una reivindicación de la monarquía?
title_sort Cipo-César en las Metamorfosis de Ovidio: ¿una reivindicación de la monarquía?
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Martinez Astorino, Pablo Leandro
author Martinez Astorino, Pablo Leandro
author_facet Martinez Astorino, Pablo Leandro
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv CIPO
CÉSAR
MITOLOGIZACIÓN
MONARQUÍA
topic CIPO
CÉSAR
MITOLOGIZACIÓN
MONARQUÍA
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The Cipus episode must be understood in literary terms as a mythologization of Julius Caesar previous to his apotheosis, just as the Aesculapius episode constitutes a mythologization of Augustus. The purpose is to allude in a mythologized way to two episodes of Caesar´s political life: the rejection of the royal emblems first from the Senate and then from Antonius in the Lupercalia (Suet. Iul. 79, 2). But, although the most central aspect of this representation of history is the device per se, it is possible to see also a reflection on monarchy in the history of Rome, which functions as a significant interpretation of the recent history: the monarchic legacy, which evokes not only Tarquinus but also Numa, should not be understood as a mistake and Cipus and Caesar, unlike Augustus, failed to assume it, even though Ovidian (Numan) conception of monarchy is problematically applied to Augustus.
The Cipus episode must be understood in literary terms as a mythologization of Julius Caesar previous to his apotheosis, just as the Aesculapius episode constitutes a mythologization of Augustus. The purpose is to allude in a mythologized way to two episodes of Caesar’s political life: the rejection of the royal emblems fi rst from the Senate and then from Antonius in the Lupercalia (Suet. Iul. 79.2). But, although the most central aspect of this representation of history is the device per se, it is possible to see also a refl ection on monarchy in the history of Rome, which functions as a signifi cant interpretation of the recent history: the monarchic legacy, which evokes not only Tarquinus but also Numa, should not be understood as a mistake and Cipus and Caesar, unlike Augustus, failed to assume it, even though Ovidian (Numan) conception of monarchy is problematically applied to Augustus.
Fil: Martinez Astorino, Pablo Leandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales; Argentina
description The Cipus episode must be understood in literary terms as a mythologization of Julius Caesar previous to his apotheosis, just as the Aesculapius episode constitutes a mythologization of Augustus. The purpose is to allude in a mythologized way to two episodes of Caesar´s political life: the rejection of the royal emblems first from the Senate and then from Antonius in the Lupercalia (Suet. Iul. 79, 2). But, although the most central aspect of this representation of history is the device per se, it is possible to see also a reflection on monarchy in the history of Rome, which functions as a significant interpretation of the recent history: the monarchic legacy, which evokes not only Tarquinus but also Numa, should not be understood as a mistake and Cipus and Caesar, unlike Augustus, failed to assume it, even though Ovidian (Numan) conception of monarchy is problematically applied to Augustus.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/52292
Martinez Astorino, Pablo Leandro; Cipo-César en las Metamorfosis de Ovidio: ¿una reivindicación de la monarquía?; Universidade de Lisboa. Faculdade de Letras. Centro de Estudos Clássicos; Euphrosyne: Revista de Filologia Classica; 45; 12-2017; 259-270
0870-0133
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/52292
identifier_str_mv Martinez Astorino, Pablo Leandro; Cipo-César en las Metamorfosis de Ovidio: ¿una reivindicación de la monarquía?; Universidade de Lisboa. Faculdade de Letras. Centro de Estudos Clássicos; Euphrosyne: Revista de Filologia Classica; 45; 12-2017; 259-270
0870-0133
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.tmp.letras.ulisboa.pt/cec-publicacoes/2693-euphrosyne-volume-xlv-2017
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Lisboa. Faculdade de Letras. Centro de Estudos Clássicos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Lisboa. Faculdade de Letras. Centro de Estudos Clássicos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842270004218691584
score 13.13397

Publicaciones similares