Are owl pellets good estimators of prey abundance?
- Autores
- Andrade, Analia; Menezes, Jorge Fernando Saraiva de; Monjeau, Jorge Adrian
- Año de publicación
- 2016
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Some ecologists have been skeptics about the use of owl pellets to estimate small mammal's fauna. This is due to the assumptions required by this method: (a) that owls hunt at random, and (b) that pellets represent a random sample from the environment. We performed statistical analysis to test these assumptions and to assess the effectiveness of Barn owl pellets as a useful estimator of field abundances of its preys. We used samples collected in the arid Extra-Andean Patagonia along an altitudinal environmental gradient from lower Monte ecoregion to upper Patagonian steppe ecoregion, with a mid-elevation ecotone. To test if owls hunt at random, we estimated expected pellet frequency by creating a distribution of random pellets, which we compared with data using a simulated chi-square. To test if pellets represent a random sample from the environment, differences between ecoregions were evaluated by PERMANOVAs with Bray–Curtis dissimilarities. We did not find evidence that owls foraged non-randomly. Therefore, we can assume that the proportions of the small mammal's species in the diet are representative of the proportions of the species in their communities. Only Monte is different from other ecoregions. The ecotone samples are grouped with those of Patagonian steppes. There are no real differences between localities in the small mammal's abundances in each of these ecoregions and/or Barn owl pellets cannot detect patterns at a smaller spatial scale. Therefore, we have no evidence to invalidate the use of owl pellets at an ecoregional scale.
Fil: Andrade, Analia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico; Argentina
Fil: Menezes, Jorge Fernando Saraiva de. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; Brasil
Fil: Monjeau, Jorge Adrian. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; Brasil. Fundación Bariloche; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina - Materia
-
Northern Patagonia
Pellet Contents
Prey Abundance
Random Hunt
Tyto Alba - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/81136
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_f553f790482cdeb278dd57658ececd76 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/81136 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Are owl pellets good estimators of prey abundance?Andrade, AnaliaMenezes, Jorge Fernando Saraiva deMonjeau, Jorge AdrianNorthern PatagoniaPellet ContentsPrey AbundanceRandom HuntTyto Albahttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Some ecologists have been skeptics about the use of owl pellets to estimate small mammal's fauna. This is due to the assumptions required by this method: (a) that owls hunt at random, and (b) that pellets represent a random sample from the environment. We performed statistical analysis to test these assumptions and to assess the effectiveness of Barn owl pellets as a useful estimator of field abundances of its preys. We used samples collected in the arid Extra-Andean Patagonia along an altitudinal environmental gradient from lower Monte ecoregion to upper Patagonian steppe ecoregion, with a mid-elevation ecotone. To test if owls hunt at random, we estimated expected pellet frequency by creating a distribution of random pellets, which we compared with data using a simulated chi-square. To test if pellets represent a random sample from the environment, differences between ecoregions were evaluated by PERMANOVAs with Bray–Curtis dissimilarities. We did not find evidence that owls foraged non-randomly. Therefore, we can assume that the proportions of the small mammal's species in the diet are representative of the proportions of the species in their communities. Only Monte is different from other ecoregions. The ecotone samples are grouped with those of Patagonian steppes. There are no real differences between localities in the small mammal's abundances in each of these ecoregions and/or Barn owl pellets cannot detect patterns at a smaller spatial scale. Therefore, we have no evidence to invalidate the use of owl pellets at an ecoregional scale.Fil: Andrade, Analia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico; ArgentinaFil: Menezes, Jorge Fernando Saraiva de. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; BrasilFil: Monjeau, Jorge Adrian. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; Brasil. Fundación Bariloche; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaElsevier B.V.2016-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/81136Andrade, Analia; Menezes, Jorge Fernando Saraiva de; Monjeau, Jorge Adrian; Are owl pellets good estimators of prey abundance?; Elsevier B.V.; Journal of King Saud University - Science; 28; 3; 7-2016; 239-2441018-3647CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.jksus.2015.10.007info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1018364715000993info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:50:55Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/81136instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:50:56.102CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Are owl pellets good estimators of prey abundance? |
title |
Are owl pellets good estimators of prey abundance? |
spellingShingle |
Are owl pellets good estimators of prey abundance? Andrade, Analia Northern Patagonia Pellet Contents Prey Abundance Random Hunt Tyto Alba |
title_short |
Are owl pellets good estimators of prey abundance? |
title_full |
Are owl pellets good estimators of prey abundance? |
title_fullStr |
Are owl pellets good estimators of prey abundance? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Are owl pellets good estimators of prey abundance? |
title_sort |
Are owl pellets good estimators of prey abundance? |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Andrade, Analia Menezes, Jorge Fernando Saraiva de Monjeau, Jorge Adrian |
author |
Andrade, Analia |
author_facet |
Andrade, Analia Menezes, Jorge Fernando Saraiva de Monjeau, Jorge Adrian |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Menezes, Jorge Fernando Saraiva de Monjeau, Jorge Adrian |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Northern Patagonia Pellet Contents Prey Abundance Random Hunt Tyto Alba |
topic |
Northern Patagonia Pellet Contents Prey Abundance Random Hunt Tyto Alba |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Some ecologists have been skeptics about the use of owl pellets to estimate small mammal's fauna. This is due to the assumptions required by this method: (a) that owls hunt at random, and (b) that pellets represent a random sample from the environment. We performed statistical analysis to test these assumptions and to assess the effectiveness of Barn owl pellets as a useful estimator of field abundances of its preys. We used samples collected in the arid Extra-Andean Patagonia along an altitudinal environmental gradient from lower Monte ecoregion to upper Patagonian steppe ecoregion, with a mid-elevation ecotone. To test if owls hunt at random, we estimated expected pellet frequency by creating a distribution of random pellets, which we compared with data using a simulated chi-square. To test if pellets represent a random sample from the environment, differences between ecoregions were evaluated by PERMANOVAs with Bray–Curtis dissimilarities. We did not find evidence that owls foraged non-randomly. Therefore, we can assume that the proportions of the small mammal's species in the diet are representative of the proportions of the species in their communities. Only Monte is different from other ecoregions. The ecotone samples are grouped with those of Patagonian steppes. There are no real differences between localities in the small mammal's abundances in each of these ecoregions and/or Barn owl pellets cannot detect patterns at a smaller spatial scale. Therefore, we have no evidence to invalidate the use of owl pellets at an ecoregional scale. Fil: Andrade, Analia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico; Argentina Fil: Menezes, Jorge Fernando Saraiva de. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; Brasil Fil: Monjeau, Jorge Adrian. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; Brasil. Fundación Bariloche; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina |
description |
Some ecologists have been skeptics about the use of owl pellets to estimate small mammal's fauna. This is due to the assumptions required by this method: (a) that owls hunt at random, and (b) that pellets represent a random sample from the environment. We performed statistical analysis to test these assumptions and to assess the effectiveness of Barn owl pellets as a useful estimator of field abundances of its preys. We used samples collected in the arid Extra-Andean Patagonia along an altitudinal environmental gradient from lower Monte ecoregion to upper Patagonian steppe ecoregion, with a mid-elevation ecotone. To test if owls hunt at random, we estimated expected pellet frequency by creating a distribution of random pellets, which we compared with data using a simulated chi-square. To test if pellets represent a random sample from the environment, differences between ecoregions were evaluated by PERMANOVAs with Bray–Curtis dissimilarities. We did not find evidence that owls foraged non-randomly. Therefore, we can assume that the proportions of the small mammal's species in the diet are representative of the proportions of the species in their communities. Only Monte is different from other ecoregions. The ecotone samples are grouped with those of Patagonian steppes. There are no real differences between localities in the small mammal's abundances in each of these ecoregions and/or Barn owl pellets cannot detect patterns at a smaller spatial scale. Therefore, we have no evidence to invalidate the use of owl pellets at an ecoregional scale. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-07 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/81136 Andrade, Analia; Menezes, Jorge Fernando Saraiva de; Monjeau, Jorge Adrian; Are owl pellets good estimators of prey abundance?; Elsevier B.V.; Journal of King Saud University - Science; 28; 3; 7-2016; 239-244 1018-3647 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/81136 |
identifier_str_mv |
Andrade, Analia; Menezes, Jorge Fernando Saraiva de; Monjeau, Jorge Adrian; Are owl pellets good estimators of prey abundance?; Elsevier B.V.; Journal of King Saud University - Science; 28; 3; 7-2016; 239-244 1018-3647 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.jksus.2015.10.007 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1018364715000993 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier B.V. |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier B.V. |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844613568791576576 |
score |
13.070432 |