Social imagination, abused memory, and the political place of history in Memory, History, Forgetting
- Autores
- Lythgoe, Esteban
- Año de publicación
- 2014
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- In this paper we intend to show that in Memory, History, Forgetting Paul Ricoeur articulates memory and history through imagination. This philosopher distinguishes two main functions of imagination: a poetical one, associated with the interpretation and discourse, and a practical and projective one that clarifies and guides our actions. In Memory, History, Forgetting both functions of imagination are present but they are associated with different aspects of memory. The first one is present especially in the phenomenology of the cogni-tive dimension of memory, the second one is developed in the analysis of the abuses of the artificial memory, while the articulation between both of them is described in the section of the abuses of natural memory. Besides the similarities in the way these functions of imagination operate in Oneself as Another and in Memory, History, Forgetting, we will show some important differences between these two works and we will try to propose their reasons.
Dans cet article nous souhaiterions montrer que, dans La mémoire, l’histoire, l’oubli, l’imagination productrice est ce qui permet d’articuler la mémoire et l´histoire. Ricœur distingue deux principales fonctions de l’imagination: l’une, poétique, associée à l’interprétation et au discours ; l’autre pratique et projective, qui éclaire et oriente nos actions. Dans La mémoire, l’histoire, l’oubli, ces deux fonctions de l’imagination sont présentes mais elles sont associées à des aspects différents de la mémoire. La première est surtout présente dans la phénoménologie de la dimension cognitive de la mémoire, la seconde apparaît dans l’analyse des abus de la mémoire artificielle, et l’articulation entre ces deux fonctions se trouve enfin décrite dans la section concernant l’abus de la mémoire naturelle. Outre les similitudes dans la façon dont ces fonctions de l’imagination opèrent dans Soi-même comme un autre et dans La mémoire, l’histoire, l’oubli, nous essaierons de montrer qu’il existe cependant certaines différences importantes entre ces deux œuvres en tentant d’en expliciter les raisons
Fil: Lythgoe, Esteban. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina - Materia
-
POETICAL IMAGINATION
PRACTICAL IMAGINATION
ABUSED MEMORY
IDEOLOGY - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/51266
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_f43fec07bde60d1c2405955443c31cd5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/51266 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Social imagination, abused memory, and the political place of history in Memory, History, ForgettingLythgoe, EstebanPOETICAL IMAGINATIONPRACTICAL IMAGINATIONABUSED MEMORYIDEOLOGYhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6In this paper we intend to show that in Memory, History, Forgetting Paul Ricoeur articulates memory and history through imagination. This philosopher distinguishes two main functions of imagination: a poetical one, associated with the interpretation and discourse, and a practical and projective one that clarifies and guides our actions. In Memory, History, Forgetting both functions of imagination are present but they are associated with different aspects of memory. The first one is present especially in the phenomenology of the cogni-tive dimension of memory, the second one is developed in the analysis of the abuses of the artificial memory, while the articulation between both of them is described in the section of the abuses of natural memory. Besides the similarities in the way these functions of imagination operate in Oneself as Another and in Memory, History, Forgetting, we will show some important differences between these two works and we will try to propose their reasons.Dans cet article nous souhaiterions montrer que, dans La mémoire, l’histoire, l’oubli, l’imagination productrice est ce qui permet d’articuler la mémoire et l´histoire. Ricœur distingue deux principales fonctions de l’imagination: l’une, poétique, associée à l’interprétation et au discours ; l’autre pratique et projective, qui éclaire et oriente nos actions. Dans La mémoire, l’histoire, l’oubli, ces deux fonctions de l’imagination sont présentes mais elles sont associées à des aspects différents de la mémoire. La première est surtout présente dans la phénoménologie de la dimension cognitive de la mémoire, la seconde apparaît dans l’analyse des abus de la mémoire artificielle, et l’articulation entre ces deux fonctions se trouve enfin décrite dans la section concernant l’abus de la mémoire naturelle. Outre les similitudes dans la façon dont ces fonctions de l’imagination opèrent dans Soi-même comme un autre et dans La mémoire, l’histoire, l’oubli, nous essaierons de montrer qu’il existe cependant certaines différences importantes entre ces deux œuvres en tentant d’en expliciter les raisonsFil: Lythgoe, Esteban. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaUniversity of Pittsburgh Press2014-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/51266Lythgoe, Esteban; Social imagination, abused memory, and the political place of history in Memory, History, Forgetting; University of Pittsburgh Press; Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies; 5; 2; 12-2014; 35-472156-7808CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5195/errs.2014.249info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://ricoeur.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/ricoeur/article/view/249info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:31:06Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/51266instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:31:06.909CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Social imagination, abused memory, and the political place of history in Memory, History, Forgetting |
title |
Social imagination, abused memory, and the political place of history in Memory, History, Forgetting |
spellingShingle |
Social imagination, abused memory, and the political place of history in Memory, History, Forgetting Lythgoe, Esteban POETICAL IMAGINATION PRACTICAL IMAGINATION ABUSED MEMORY IDEOLOGY |
title_short |
Social imagination, abused memory, and the political place of history in Memory, History, Forgetting |
title_full |
Social imagination, abused memory, and the political place of history in Memory, History, Forgetting |
title_fullStr |
Social imagination, abused memory, and the political place of history in Memory, History, Forgetting |
title_full_unstemmed |
Social imagination, abused memory, and the political place of history in Memory, History, Forgetting |
title_sort |
Social imagination, abused memory, and the political place of history in Memory, History, Forgetting |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Lythgoe, Esteban |
author |
Lythgoe, Esteban |
author_facet |
Lythgoe, Esteban |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
POETICAL IMAGINATION PRACTICAL IMAGINATION ABUSED MEMORY IDEOLOGY |
topic |
POETICAL IMAGINATION PRACTICAL IMAGINATION ABUSED MEMORY IDEOLOGY |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
In this paper we intend to show that in Memory, History, Forgetting Paul Ricoeur articulates memory and history through imagination. This philosopher distinguishes two main functions of imagination: a poetical one, associated with the interpretation and discourse, and a practical and projective one that clarifies and guides our actions. In Memory, History, Forgetting both functions of imagination are present but they are associated with different aspects of memory. The first one is present especially in the phenomenology of the cogni-tive dimension of memory, the second one is developed in the analysis of the abuses of the artificial memory, while the articulation between both of them is described in the section of the abuses of natural memory. Besides the similarities in the way these functions of imagination operate in Oneself as Another and in Memory, History, Forgetting, we will show some important differences between these two works and we will try to propose their reasons. Dans cet article nous souhaiterions montrer que, dans La mémoire, l’histoire, l’oubli, l’imagination productrice est ce qui permet d’articuler la mémoire et l´histoire. Ricœur distingue deux principales fonctions de l’imagination: l’une, poétique, associée à l’interprétation et au discours ; l’autre pratique et projective, qui éclaire et oriente nos actions. Dans La mémoire, l’histoire, l’oubli, ces deux fonctions de l’imagination sont présentes mais elles sont associées à des aspects différents de la mémoire. La première est surtout présente dans la phénoménologie de la dimension cognitive de la mémoire, la seconde apparaît dans l’analyse des abus de la mémoire artificielle, et l’articulation entre ces deux fonctions se trouve enfin décrite dans la section concernant l’abus de la mémoire naturelle. Outre les similitudes dans la façon dont ces fonctions de l’imagination opèrent dans Soi-même comme un autre et dans La mémoire, l’histoire, l’oubli, nous essaierons de montrer qu’il existe cependant certaines différences importantes entre ces deux œuvres en tentant d’en expliciter les raisons Fil: Lythgoe, Esteban. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina |
description |
In this paper we intend to show that in Memory, History, Forgetting Paul Ricoeur articulates memory and history through imagination. This philosopher distinguishes two main functions of imagination: a poetical one, associated with the interpretation and discourse, and a practical and projective one that clarifies and guides our actions. In Memory, History, Forgetting both functions of imagination are present but they are associated with different aspects of memory. The first one is present especially in the phenomenology of the cogni-tive dimension of memory, the second one is developed in the analysis of the abuses of the artificial memory, while the articulation between both of them is described in the section of the abuses of natural memory. Besides the similarities in the way these functions of imagination operate in Oneself as Another and in Memory, History, Forgetting, we will show some important differences between these two works and we will try to propose their reasons. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-12 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/51266 Lythgoe, Esteban; Social imagination, abused memory, and the political place of history in Memory, History, Forgetting; University of Pittsburgh Press; Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies; 5; 2; 12-2014; 35-47 2156-7808 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/51266 |
identifier_str_mv |
Lythgoe, Esteban; Social imagination, abused memory, and the political place of history in Memory, History, Forgetting; University of Pittsburgh Press; Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies; 5; 2; 12-2014; 35-47 2156-7808 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5195/errs.2014.249 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://ricoeur.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/ricoeur/article/view/249 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
University of Pittsburgh Press |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
University of Pittsburgh Press |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844614320898441216 |
score |
13.070432 |