Critique and System: Early and Late Natorp's Philosophy

Autores
Pringe, Hernan Bruno
Año de publicación
2025
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
This paper presents an interpretation of the connection between Natorp´s early and late philosophy. An analysis of two versions of Natorp´s deduction of categories shows the consistent development of Natorp´s thought. Each deduction expresses, in Natorp´s words, a direction of movement between the centre and the periphery. The early deduction moves from the periphery to the centre by means of the transcendental method. The critical investigation of the conditions of possibility of mathematical-physical science reveals the structure of thought itself. The late deduction is oriented in the opposite direction, from the centre to the periphery. Thought now develops freely and establishes the systematic character of philosophy. We argue that the two deductions complement each other in a single coherent position that accounts for the relationship between critique and system. Philosophical systematics is conceived as the necessary sequel and culmination of an inquiry, the first part of which is developed according to the transcendental method.
Fil: Pringe, Hernan Bruno. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Universidad Diego Portales; Chile
Materia
CATEGORY
CRITIQUE
NATORP
SYSTEM
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/270876

id CONICETDig_f01922f21a266d793fecaa77acc358aa
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/270876
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Critique and System: Early and Late Natorp's PhilosophyPringe, Hernan BrunoCATEGORYCRITIQUENATORPSYSTEMhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6This paper presents an interpretation of the connection between Natorp´s early and late philosophy. An analysis of two versions of Natorp´s deduction of categories shows the consistent development of Natorp´s thought. Each deduction expresses, in Natorp´s words, a direction of movement between the centre and the periphery. The early deduction moves from the periphery to the centre by means of the transcendental method. The critical investigation of the conditions of possibility of mathematical-physical science reveals the structure of thought itself. The late deduction is oriented in the opposite direction, from the centre to the periphery. Thought now develops freely and establishes the systematic character of philosophy. We argue that the two deductions complement each other in a single coherent position that accounts for the relationship between critique and system. Philosophical systematics is conceived as the necessary sequel and culmination of an inquiry, the first part of which is developed according to the transcendental method.Fil: Pringe, Hernan Bruno. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Universidad Diego Portales; ChilePeople Friendship University of Russia2025-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/270876Pringe, Hernan Bruno; Critique and System: Early and Late Natorp's Philosophy; People Friendship University of Russia; RUDN Journal of Philosophy; 29; 3-2025; 105-1182313-23022408-8900CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/43533/en_USinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.22363/2313-2302-2025-29-1-105-118info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:40:49Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/270876instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:40:49.716CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Critique and System: Early and Late Natorp's Philosophy
title Critique and System: Early and Late Natorp's Philosophy
spellingShingle Critique and System: Early and Late Natorp's Philosophy
Pringe, Hernan Bruno
CATEGORY
CRITIQUE
NATORP
SYSTEM
title_short Critique and System: Early and Late Natorp's Philosophy
title_full Critique and System: Early and Late Natorp's Philosophy
title_fullStr Critique and System: Early and Late Natorp's Philosophy
title_full_unstemmed Critique and System: Early and Late Natorp's Philosophy
title_sort Critique and System: Early and Late Natorp's Philosophy
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Pringe, Hernan Bruno
author Pringe, Hernan Bruno
author_facet Pringe, Hernan Bruno
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv CATEGORY
CRITIQUE
NATORP
SYSTEM
topic CATEGORY
CRITIQUE
NATORP
SYSTEM
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv This paper presents an interpretation of the connection between Natorp´s early and late philosophy. An analysis of two versions of Natorp´s deduction of categories shows the consistent development of Natorp´s thought. Each deduction expresses, in Natorp´s words, a direction of movement between the centre and the periphery. The early deduction moves from the periphery to the centre by means of the transcendental method. The critical investigation of the conditions of possibility of mathematical-physical science reveals the structure of thought itself. The late deduction is oriented in the opposite direction, from the centre to the periphery. Thought now develops freely and establishes the systematic character of philosophy. We argue that the two deductions complement each other in a single coherent position that accounts for the relationship between critique and system. Philosophical systematics is conceived as the necessary sequel and culmination of an inquiry, the first part of which is developed according to the transcendental method.
Fil: Pringe, Hernan Bruno. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Universidad Diego Portales; Chile
description This paper presents an interpretation of the connection between Natorp´s early and late philosophy. An analysis of two versions of Natorp´s deduction of categories shows the consistent development of Natorp´s thought. Each deduction expresses, in Natorp´s words, a direction of movement between the centre and the periphery. The early deduction moves from the periphery to the centre by means of the transcendental method. The critical investigation of the conditions of possibility of mathematical-physical science reveals the structure of thought itself. The late deduction is oriented in the opposite direction, from the centre to the periphery. Thought now develops freely and establishes the systematic character of philosophy. We argue that the two deductions complement each other in a single coherent position that accounts for the relationship between critique and system. Philosophical systematics is conceived as the necessary sequel and culmination of an inquiry, the first part of which is developed according to the transcendental method.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-03
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/270876
Pringe, Hernan Bruno; Critique and System: Early and Late Natorp's Philosophy; People Friendship University of Russia; RUDN Journal of Philosophy; 29; 3-2025; 105-118
2313-2302
2408-8900
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/270876
identifier_str_mv Pringe, Hernan Bruno; Critique and System: Early and Late Natorp's Philosophy; People Friendship University of Russia; RUDN Journal of Philosophy; 29; 3-2025; 105-118
2313-2302
2408-8900
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/43533/en_US
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.22363/2313-2302-2025-29-1-105-118
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv People Friendship University of Russia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv People Friendship University of Russia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613292216025088
score 13.069144