Critique and System: Early and Late Natorp's Philosophy
- Autores
- Pringe, Hernan Bruno
- Año de publicación
- 2025
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- This paper presents an interpretation of the connection between Natorp´s early and late philosophy. An analysis of two versions of Natorp´s deduction of categories shows the consistent development of Natorp´s thought. Each deduction expresses, in Natorp´s words, a direction of movement between the centre and the periphery. The early deduction moves from the periphery to the centre by means of the transcendental method. The critical investigation of the conditions of possibility of mathematical-physical science reveals the structure of thought itself. The late deduction is oriented in the opposite direction, from the centre to the periphery. Thought now develops freely and establishes the systematic character of philosophy. We argue that the two deductions complement each other in a single coherent position that accounts for the relationship between critique and system. Philosophical systematics is conceived as the necessary sequel and culmination of an inquiry, the first part of which is developed according to the transcendental method.
Fil: Pringe, Hernan Bruno. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Universidad Diego Portales; Chile - Materia
-
CATEGORY
CRITIQUE
NATORP
SYSTEM - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/270876
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_f01922f21a266d793fecaa77acc358aa |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/270876 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Critique and System: Early and Late Natorp's PhilosophyPringe, Hernan BrunoCATEGORYCRITIQUENATORPSYSTEMhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6This paper presents an interpretation of the connection between Natorp´s early and late philosophy. An analysis of two versions of Natorp´s deduction of categories shows the consistent development of Natorp´s thought. Each deduction expresses, in Natorp´s words, a direction of movement between the centre and the periphery. The early deduction moves from the periphery to the centre by means of the transcendental method. The critical investigation of the conditions of possibility of mathematical-physical science reveals the structure of thought itself. The late deduction is oriented in the opposite direction, from the centre to the periphery. Thought now develops freely and establishes the systematic character of philosophy. We argue that the two deductions complement each other in a single coherent position that accounts for the relationship between critique and system. Philosophical systematics is conceived as the necessary sequel and culmination of an inquiry, the first part of which is developed according to the transcendental method.Fil: Pringe, Hernan Bruno. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Universidad Diego Portales; ChilePeople Friendship University of Russia2025-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/270876Pringe, Hernan Bruno; Critique and System: Early and Late Natorp's Philosophy; People Friendship University of Russia; RUDN Journal of Philosophy; 29; 3-2025; 105-1182313-23022408-8900CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/43533/en_USinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.22363/2313-2302-2025-29-1-105-118info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:40:49Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/270876instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:40:49.716CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Critique and System: Early and Late Natorp's Philosophy |
title |
Critique and System: Early and Late Natorp's Philosophy |
spellingShingle |
Critique and System: Early and Late Natorp's Philosophy Pringe, Hernan Bruno CATEGORY CRITIQUE NATORP SYSTEM |
title_short |
Critique and System: Early and Late Natorp's Philosophy |
title_full |
Critique and System: Early and Late Natorp's Philosophy |
title_fullStr |
Critique and System: Early and Late Natorp's Philosophy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Critique and System: Early and Late Natorp's Philosophy |
title_sort |
Critique and System: Early and Late Natorp's Philosophy |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Pringe, Hernan Bruno |
author |
Pringe, Hernan Bruno |
author_facet |
Pringe, Hernan Bruno |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
CATEGORY CRITIQUE NATORP SYSTEM |
topic |
CATEGORY CRITIQUE NATORP SYSTEM |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
This paper presents an interpretation of the connection between Natorp´s early and late philosophy. An analysis of two versions of Natorp´s deduction of categories shows the consistent development of Natorp´s thought. Each deduction expresses, in Natorp´s words, a direction of movement between the centre and the periphery. The early deduction moves from the periphery to the centre by means of the transcendental method. The critical investigation of the conditions of possibility of mathematical-physical science reveals the structure of thought itself. The late deduction is oriented in the opposite direction, from the centre to the periphery. Thought now develops freely and establishes the systematic character of philosophy. We argue that the two deductions complement each other in a single coherent position that accounts for the relationship between critique and system. Philosophical systematics is conceived as the necessary sequel and culmination of an inquiry, the first part of which is developed according to the transcendental method. Fil: Pringe, Hernan Bruno. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Universidad Diego Portales; Chile |
description |
This paper presents an interpretation of the connection between Natorp´s early and late philosophy. An analysis of two versions of Natorp´s deduction of categories shows the consistent development of Natorp´s thought. Each deduction expresses, in Natorp´s words, a direction of movement between the centre and the periphery. The early deduction moves from the periphery to the centre by means of the transcendental method. The critical investigation of the conditions of possibility of mathematical-physical science reveals the structure of thought itself. The late deduction is oriented in the opposite direction, from the centre to the periphery. Thought now develops freely and establishes the systematic character of philosophy. We argue that the two deductions complement each other in a single coherent position that accounts for the relationship between critique and system. Philosophical systematics is conceived as the necessary sequel and culmination of an inquiry, the first part of which is developed according to the transcendental method. |
publishDate |
2025 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2025-03 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/270876 Pringe, Hernan Bruno; Critique and System: Early and Late Natorp's Philosophy; People Friendship University of Russia; RUDN Journal of Philosophy; 29; 3-2025; 105-118 2313-2302 2408-8900 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/270876 |
identifier_str_mv |
Pringe, Hernan Bruno; Critique and System: Early and Late Natorp's Philosophy; People Friendship University of Russia; RUDN Journal of Philosophy; 29; 3-2025; 105-118 2313-2302 2408-8900 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/43533/en_US info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.22363/2313-2302-2025-29-1-105-118 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
People Friendship University of Russia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
People Friendship University of Russia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844613292216025088 |
score |
13.069144 |