Regulatory initiatives to reduce sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) in Latin America
- Autores
- Bergallo, Paola; Castagnari, Valentina; Fernández, Alicia; Mejia, Raul Mariano
- Año de publicación
- 2018
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Background and objectives Latin American (LA) countries have begun to adopt a variety of regulations targeting sugarsweetened beverages (SSBs) for public health reasons. Our objective was to characterize the regulatory strategies designed to reduce SSB consumption over the last decade, and assess the available evidence on their enforcement and impact. Methods We searched legal and public health databases for public and private SSBs regulations in 14 LA countries and then conducted a systematic review of the available literature. We tracked comparative variations in the type of body issuing the regulations, their scope, and binding status. We present data following a 5-category framework we named NUTRE that classifies SSBs regulations as: (1) restrictions to SSB availability in schools (N), (2) taxes and other economic incentives to discourage consumption (U), (3) restrictions on advertising and marketing (T), (4) regulations on government procurement and subsidies (R), and (5) product labeling rules (E). Results Since 2006, 14 LA countries have adopted at least 39 public and private SSB regulatory initiatives across the NUTRE framework. Comprehensive efforts have only been approved by Chile, México and Ecuador, while the rest have comparatively few initiatives. 28 out of the 39 regulatory initiatives were passed by legislative and executive bodies; 11 initiatives represent self-regulatory undertakings by the beverage industries. An 86% (24/28) of public sector regulations are binding; 56% (22/39) contain explicit monitoring or evaluation methods; and 62% (24/39) provide for sanctions. Moreover, 23 regulations specify the body in charge of monitoring the new rules and standards. Conclusions LA countries are targeting SSB consumption through a variety of mechanisms, particularly via restrictions to availability in schools and through taxes. Interdisciplinary evidence comparing alternative regulatory strategies is scarce, and few studies offer data on impact and implementation challenges. More evidence and further comparative assessments are needed to support future decision-making.
Fil: Bergallo, Paola. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella; Argentina
Fil: Castagnari, Valentina. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella; Argentina
Fil: Fernández, Alicia. University of California; Estados Unidos
Fil: Mejia, Raul Mariano. Centro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad; Argentina - Materia
-
Bebidas Azucaradas
Regulación
América Latina - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/98370
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_eed637495f8d8609e56e8c15232981aa |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/98370 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Regulatory initiatives to reduce sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) in Latin AmericaBergallo, PaolaCastagnari, ValentinaFernández, AliciaMejia, Raul MarianoBebidas AzucaradasRegulaciónAmérica Latinahttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Background and objectives Latin American (LA) countries have begun to adopt a variety of regulations targeting sugarsweetened beverages (SSBs) for public health reasons. Our objective was to characterize the regulatory strategies designed to reduce SSB consumption over the last decade, and assess the available evidence on their enforcement and impact. Methods We searched legal and public health databases for public and private SSBs regulations in 14 LA countries and then conducted a systematic review of the available literature. We tracked comparative variations in the type of body issuing the regulations, their scope, and binding status. We present data following a 5-category framework we named NUTRE that classifies SSBs regulations as: (1) restrictions to SSB availability in schools (N), (2) taxes and other economic incentives to discourage consumption (U), (3) restrictions on advertising and marketing (T), (4) regulations on government procurement and subsidies (R), and (5) product labeling rules (E). Results Since 2006, 14 LA countries have adopted at least 39 public and private SSB regulatory initiatives across the NUTRE framework. Comprehensive efforts have only been approved by Chile, México and Ecuador, while the rest have comparatively few initiatives. 28 out of the 39 regulatory initiatives were passed by legislative and executive bodies; 11 initiatives represent self-regulatory undertakings by the beverage industries. An 86% (24/28) of public sector regulations are binding; 56% (22/39) contain explicit monitoring or evaluation methods; and 62% (24/39) provide for sanctions. Moreover, 23 regulations specify the body in charge of monitoring the new rules and standards. Conclusions LA countries are targeting SSB consumption through a variety of mechanisms, particularly via restrictions to availability in schools and through taxes. Interdisciplinary evidence comparing alternative regulatory strategies is scarce, and few studies offer data on impact and implementation challenges. More evidence and further comparative assessments are needed to support future decision-making.Fil: Bergallo, Paola. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella; ArgentinaFil: Castagnari, Valentina. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella; ArgentinaFil: Fernández, Alicia. University of California; Estados UnidosFil: Mejia, Raul Mariano. Centro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad; ArgentinaPublic Library of Science2018-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/98370Bergallo, Paola; Castagnari, Valentina; Fernández, Alicia; Mejia, Raul Mariano; Regulatory initiatives to reduce sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) in Latin America; Public Library of Science; Plos One; 13; 10; 10-2018; 1-17; e02056941932-6203CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0205694info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0205694info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T14:35:55Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/98370instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 14:35:55.798CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Regulatory initiatives to reduce sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) in Latin America |
title |
Regulatory initiatives to reduce sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) in Latin America |
spellingShingle |
Regulatory initiatives to reduce sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) in Latin America Bergallo, Paola Bebidas Azucaradas Regulación América Latina |
title_short |
Regulatory initiatives to reduce sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) in Latin America |
title_full |
Regulatory initiatives to reduce sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) in Latin America |
title_fullStr |
Regulatory initiatives to reduce sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) in Latin America |
title_full_unstemmed |
Regulatory initiatives to reduce sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) in Latin America |
title_sort |
Regulatory initiatives to reduce sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) in Latin America |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Bergallo, Paola Castagnari, Valentina Fernández, Alicia Mejia, Raul Mariano |
author |
Bergallo, Paola |
author_facet |
Bergallo, Paola Castagnari, Valentina Fernández, Alicia Mejia, Raul Mariano |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Castagnari, Valentina Fernández, Alicia Mejia, Raul Mariano |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Bebidas Azucaradas Regulación América Latina |
topic |
Bebidas Azucaradas Regulación América Latina |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.5 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Background and objectives Latin American (LA) countries have begun to adopt a variety of regulations targeting sugarsweetened beverages (SSBs) for public health reasons. Our objective was to characterize the regulatory strategies designed to reduce SSB consumption over the last decade, and assess the available evidence on their enforcement and impact. Methods We searched legal and public health databases for public and private SSBs regulations in 14 LA countries and then conducted a systematic review of the available literature. We tracked comparative variations in the type of body issuing the regulations, their scope, and binding status. We present data following a 5-category framework we named NUTRE that classifies SSBs regulations as: (1) restrictions to SSB availability in schools (N), (2) taxes and other economic incentives to discourage consumption (U), (3) restrictions on advertising and marketing (T), (4) regulations on government procurement and subsidies (R), and (5) product labeling rules (E). Results Since 2006, 14 LA countries have adopted at least 39 public and private SSB regulatory initiatives across the NUTRE framework. Comprehensive efforts have only been approved by Chile, México and Ecuador, while the rest have comparatively few initiatives. 28 out of the 39 regulatory initiatives were passed by legislative and executive bodies; 11 initiatives represent self-regulatory undertakings by the beverage industries. An 86% (24/28) of public sector regulations are binding; 56% (22/39) contain explicit monitoring or evaluation methods; and 62% (24/39) provide for sanctions. Moreover, 23 regulations specify the body in charge of monitoring the new rules and standards. Conclusions LA countries are targeting SSB consumption through a variety of mechanisms, particularly via restrictions to availability in schools and through taxes. Interdisciplinary evidence comparing alternative regulatory strategies is scarce, and few studies offer data on impact and implementation challenges. More evidence and further comparative assessments are needed to support future decision-making. Fil: Bergallo, Paola. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella; Argentina Fil: Castagnari, Valentina. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella; Argentina Fil: Fernández, Alicia. University of California; Estados Unidos Fil: Mejia, Raul Mariano. Centro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad; Argentina |
description |
Background and objectives Latin American (LA) countries have begun to adopt a variety of regulations targeting sugarsweetened beverages (SSBs) for public health reasons. Our objective was to characterize the regulatory strategies designed to reduce SSB consumption over the last decade, and assess the available evidence on their enforcement and impact. Methods We searched legal and public health databases for public and private SSBs regulations in 14 LA countries and then conducted a systematic review of the available literature. We tracked comparative variations in the type of body issuing the regulations, their scope, and binding status. We present data following a 5-category framework we named NUTRE that classifies SSBs regulations as: (1) restrictions to SSB availability in schools (N), (2) taxes and other economic incentives to discourage consumption (U), (3) restrictions on advertising and marketing (T), (4) regulations on government procurement and subsidies (R), and (5) product labeling rules (E). Results Since 2006, 14 LA countries have adopted at least 39 public and private SSB regulatory initiatives across the NUTRE framework. Comprehensive efforts have only been approved by Chile, México and Ecuador, while the rest have comparatively few initiatives. 28 out of the 39 regulatory initiatives were passed by legislative and executive bodies; 11 initiatives represent self-regulatory undertakings by the beverage industries. An 86% (24/28) of public sector regulations are binding; 56% (22/39) contain explicit monitoring or evaluation methods; and 62% (24/39) provide for sanctions. Moreover, 23 regulations specify the body in charge of monitoring the new rules and standards. Conclusions LA countries are targeting SSB consumption through a variety of mechanisms, particularly via restrictions to availability in schools and through taxes. Interdisciplinary evidence comparing alternative regulatory strategies is scarce, and few studies offer data on impact and implementation challenges. More evidence and further comparative assessments are needed to support future decision-making. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-10 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/98370 Bergallo, Paola; Castagnari, Valentina; Fernández, Alicia; Mejia, Raul Mariano; Regulatory initiatives to reduce sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) in Latin America; Public Library of Science; Plos One; 13; 10; 10-2018; 1-17; e0205694 1932-6203 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/98370 |
identifier_str_mv |
Bergallo, Paola; Castagnari, Valentina; Fernández, Alicia; Mejia, Raul Mariano; Regulatory initiatives to reduce sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) in Latin America; Public Library of Science; Plos One; 13; 10; 10-2018; 1-17; e0205694 1932-6203 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0205694 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0205694 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Public Library of Science |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Public Library of Science |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1846082821749211136 |
score |
13.22299 |