Some Unsettled Issues in a Second Phase of the Cambridge-Cambridge Controversy

Autores
Lazzarini, Andrés Lucas Rodrigo
Año de publicación
2015
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The aim of this paper is to clear up some issues in a second phase of the Cambridge-Cambridge capital theory controversies, when the neoclassical argument was chiefly conducted in terms of the Walrasian specification of capital in intertemporal and temporary general equilibrium models. It is held that the response by the neoclassical side in that phase has not been as satisfactory to rebut the implications of reswitching and capital reversing as some neoclassical scholars have argued. The reason for this can be traced in the overlooking of the implications of the redefinition of equilibrium implied in those models.
Fil: Lazzarini, Andrés Lucas Rodrigo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de San Martín; Argentina
Materia
Cambridge Controversy
Capital
Equilibrium
Marginalist Theory
Neo-Walrasian Models
Walras
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/55028
Acceder
id CONICETDig_ecf1a7547d1c47728c190e1f60c36d53
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/55028
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Some Unsettled Issues in a Second Phase of the Cambridge-Cambridge ControversyLazzarini, Andrés Lucas RodrigoCambridge ControversyCapitalEquilibriumMarginalist TheoryNeo-Walrasian ModelsWalrashttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5The aim of this paper is to clear up some issues in a second phase of the Cambridge-Cambridge capital theory controversies, when the neoclassical argument was chiefly conducted in terms of the Walrasian specification of capital in intertemporal and temporary general equilibrium models. It is held that the response by the neoclassical side in that phase has not been as satisfactory to rebut the implications of reswitching and capital reversing as some neoclassical scholars have argued. The reason for this can be traced in the overlooking of the implications of the redefinition of equilibrium implied in those models.Fil: Lazzarini, Andrés Lucas Rodrigo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de San Martín; ArgentinaSAGE Publications2015-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/55028Lazzarini, Andrés Lucas Rodrigo; Some Unsettled Issues in a Second Phase of the Cambridge-Cambridge Controversy; SAGE Publications; Review of Radical Political Economics; 47; 2; 6-2015; 256-2731552-8502CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1177/0486613414557916info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0486613414557916info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:32:31Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/55028instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:32:31.472CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Some Unsettled Issues in a Second Phase of the Cambridge-Cambridge Controversy
title Some Unsettled Issues in a Second Phase of the Cambridge-Cambridge Controversy
spellingShingle Some Unsettled Issues in a Second Phase of the Cambridge-Cambridge Controversy
Lazzarini, Andrés Lucas Rodrigo
Cambridge Controversy
Capital
Equilibrium
Marginalist Theory
Neo-Walrasian Models
Walras
title_short Some Unsettled Issues in a Second Phase of the Cambridge-Cambridge Controversy
title_full Some Unsettled Issues in a Second Phase of the Cambridge-Cambridge Controversy
title_fullStr Some Unsettled Issues in a Second Phase of the Cambridge-Cambridge Controversy
title_full_unstemmed Some Unsettled Issues in a Second Phase of the Cambridge-Cambridge Controversy
title_sort Some Unsettled Issues in a Second Phase of the Cambridge-Cambridge Controversy
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Lazzarini, Andrés Lucas Rodrigo
author Lazzarini, Andrés Lucas Rodrigo
author_facet Lazzarini, Andrés Lucas Rodrigo
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Cambridge Controversy
Capital
Equilibrium
Marginalist Theory
Neo-Walrasian Models
Walras
topic Cambridge Controversy
Capital
Equilibrium
Marginalist Theory
Neo-Walrasian Models
Walras
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The aim of this paper is to clear up some issues in a second phase of the Cambridge-Cambridge capital theory controversies, when the neoclassical argument was chiefly conducted in terms of the Walrasian specification of capital in intertemporal and temporary general equilibrium models. It is held that the response by the neoclassical side in that phase has not been as satisfactory to rebut the implications of reswitching and capital reversing as some neoclassical scholars have argued. The reason for this can be traced in the overlooking of the implications of the redefinition of equilibrium implied in those models.
Fil: Lazzarini, Andrés Lucas Rodrigo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de San Martín; Argentina
description The aim of this paper is to clear up some issues in a second phase of the Cambridge-Cambridge capital theory controversies, when the neoclassical argument was chiefly conducted in terms of the Walrasian specification of capital in intertemporal and temporary general equilibrium models. It is held that the response by the neoclassical side in that phase has not been as satisfactory to rebut the implications of reswitching and capital reversing as some neoclassical scholars have argued. The reason for this can be traced in the overlooking of the implications of the redefinition of equilibrium implied in those models.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-06
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/55028
Lazzarini, Andrés Lucas Rodrigo; Some Unsettled Issues in a Second Phase of the Cambridge-Cambridge Controversy; SAGE Publications; Review of Radical Political Economics; 47; 2; 6-2015; 256-273
1552-8502
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/55028
identifier_str_mv Lazzarini, Andrés Lucas Rodrigo; Some Unsettled Issues in a Second Phase of the Cambridge-Cambridge Controversy; SAGE Publications; Review of Radical Political Economics; 47; 2; 6-2015; 256-273
1552-8502
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1177/0486613414557916
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0486613414557916
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SAGE Publications
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SAGE Publications
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844612992112525312
score 13.070432

Publicaciones similares