Reform of abortion law in Uruguay: context, process and lessons learned
- Autores
- Wood, Susan; Abracinskas, Lilián; Correa, Sonia; Pecheny, Mario Martín
- Año de publicación
- 2016
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- In October 2012, a new law was approved in Uruguay that allows abortion on demand during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy, 14 weeks in the case of rape, and without a time limit when the woman's health is at risk or in the case of foetal anomalies. This paper analyses this legal reform. It is based on 27 individual and group interviews with key informants, and on review of primary documents and the literature. The factors explaining the reform include: secular values in society, favourable public opinion, a persistent feminist movement, effective coalition building, particular party politics, and a vocal public health sector. The content of the new law reflects the tensions between a feminist perspective of women's rights and public health arguments that stop short of fully recognizing women's autonomy. The Uruguayan reform shows that, even in Latin America, abortion can be addressed politically without electoral cost to the parties that promote it. On the other hand, the prevailing public health rationale and conditionalities built into the law during the negotiation process resulted in a law that cannot be interpreted as a full recognition of women's rights, but rather as a modified protectionist approach that circumscribes women's autonomy.
Fil: Wood, Susan. Program Learning and Evaluation; Estados Unidos
Fil: Abracinskas, Lilián. Mujer y Salud Uruguay; Uruguay
Fil: Correa, Sonia. Sexuality Policy Watch; Brasil
Fil: Pecheny, Mario Martín. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales. Instituto de Investigaciones "Gino Germani"; Argentina - Materia
-
Abortion
Uruguay
feminism
health - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/90810
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_e3e616adcac423d14256ababc99fb246 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/90810 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Reform of abortion law in Uruguay: context, process and lessons learnedWood, SusanAbracinskas, LiliánCorrea, SoniaPecheny, Mario MartínAbortionUruguayfeminismhealthhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5In October 2012, a new law was approved in Uruguay that allows abortion on demand during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy, 14 weeks in the case of rape, and without a time limit when the woman's health is at risk or in the case of foetal anomalies. This paper analyses this legal reform. It is based on 27 individual and group interviews with key informants, and on review of primary documents and the literature. The factors explaining the reform include: secular values in society, favourable public opinion, a persistent feminist movement, effective coalition building, particular party politics, and a vocal public health sector. The content of the new law reflects the tensions between a feminist perspective of women's rights and public health arguments that stop short of fully recognizing women's autonomy. The Uruguayan reform shows that, even in Latin America, abortion can be addressed politically without electoral cost to the parties that promote it. On the other hand, the prevailing public health rationale and conditionalities built into the law during the negotiation process resulted in a law that cannot be interpreted as a full recognition of women's rights, but rather as a modified protectionist approach that circumscribes women's autonomy.Fil: Wood, Susan. Program Learning and Evaluation; Estados UnidosFil: Abracinskas, Lilián. Mujer y Salud Uruguay; UruguayFil: Correa, Sonia. Sexuality Policy Watch; BrasilFil: Pecheny, Mario Martín. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales. Instituto de Investigaciones "Gino Germani"; ArgentinaElsevier2016-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/90810Wood, Susan; Abracinskas, Lilián; Correa, Sonia; Pecheny, Mario Martín; Reform of abortion law in Uruguay: context, process and lessons learned; Elsevier; Reproductive Health Matters (print); 24; 48; 11-2016; 102-1100968-8080CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1016/j.rhm.2016.11.006info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.rhm.2016.11.006info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:32:38Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/90810instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:32:38.69CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Reform of abortion law in Uruguay: context, process and lessons learned |
title |
Reform of abortion law in Uruguay: context, process and lessons learned |
spellingShingle |
Reform of abortion law in Uruguay: context, process and lessons learned Wood, Susan Abortion Uruguay feminism health |
title_short |
Reform of abortion law in Uruguay: context, process and lessons learned |
title_full |
Reform of abortion law in Uruguay: context, process and lessons learned |
title_fullStr |
Reform of abortion law in Uruguay: context, process and lessons learned |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reform of abortion law in Uruguay: context, process and lessons learned |
title_sort |
Reform of abortion law in Uruguay: context, process and lessons learned |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Wood, Susan Abracinskas, Lilián Correa, Sonia Pecheny, Mario Martín |
author |
Wood, Susan |
author_facet |
Wood, Susan Abracinskas, Lilián Correa, Sonia Pecheny, Mario Martín |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Abracinskas, Lilián Correa, Sonia Pecheny, Mario Martín |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Abortion Uruguay feminism health |
topic |
Abortion Uruguay feminism health |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
In October 2012, a new law was approved in Uruguay that allows abortion on demand during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy, 14 weeks in the case of rape, and without a time limit when the woman's health is at risk or in the case of foetal anomalies. This paper analyses this legal reform. It is based on 27 individual and group interviews with key informants, and on review of primary documents and the literature. The factors explaining the reform include: secular values in society, favourable public opinion, a persistent feminist movement, effective coalition building, particular party politics, and a vocal public health sector. The content of the new law reflects the tensions between a feminist perspective of women's rights and public health arguments that stop short of fully recognizing women's autonomy. The Uruguayan reform shows that, even in Latin America, abortion can be addressed politically without electoral cost to the parties that promote it. On the other hand, the prevailing public health rationale and conditionalities built into the law during the negotiation process resulted in a law that cannot be interpreted as a full recognition of women's rights, but rather as a modified protectionist approach that circumscribes women's autonomy. Fil: Wood, Susan. Program Learning and Evaluation; Estados Unidos Fil: Abracinskas, Lilián. Mujer y Salud Uruguay; Uruguay Fil: Correa, Sonia. Sexuality Policy Watch; Brasil Fil: Pecheny, Mario Martín. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales. Instituto de Investigaciones "Gino Germani"; Argentina |
description |
In October 2012, a new law was approved in Uruguay that allows abortion on demand during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy, 14 weeks in the case of rape, and without a time limit when the woman's health is at risk or in the case of foetal anomalies. This paper analyses this legal reform. It is based on 27 individual and group interviews with key informants, and on review of primary documents and the literature. The factors explaining the reform include: secular values in society, favourable public opinion, a persistent feminist movement, effective coalition building, particular party politics, and a vocal public health sector. The content of the new law reflects the tensions between a feminist perspective of women's rights and public health arguments that stop short of fully recognizing women's autonomy. The Uruguayan reform shows that, even in Latin America, abortion can be addressed politically without electoral cost to the parties that promote it. On the other hand, the prevailing public health rationale and conditionalities built into the law during the negotiation process resulted in a law that cannot be interpreted as a full recognition of women's rights, but rather as a modified protectionist approach that circumscribes women's autonomy. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-11 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/90810 Wood, Susan; Abracinskas, Lilián; Correa, Sonia; Pecheny, Mario Martín; Reform of abortion law in Uruguay: context, process and lessons learned; Elsevier; Reproductive Health Matters (print); 24; 48; 11-2016; 102-110 0968-8080 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/90810 |
identifier_str_mv |
Wood, Susan; Abracinskas, Lilián; Correa, Sonia; Pecheny, Mario Martín; Reform of abortion law in Uruguay: context, process and lessons learned; Elsevier; Reproductive Health Matters (print); 24; 48; 11-2016; 102-110 0968-8080 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1016/j.rhm.2016.11.006 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.rhm.2016.11.006 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844612996691656704 |
score |
13.069144 |