Religion and Democracy in Argentina Religious Opposition to the Legalization of Abortion

Autores
Carbonelli, Marcos Andres; García Bossio, María Pilar
Año de publicación
2023
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
This article analyzes the ways in which religious actors opposing the legalization of abortion adjusted their arguments and public actions to the Argentine democratic culture between 2018 and 2020. Data were collected through a qualitative research approach by conducting in-depth interviews with activists, studying public position statements in secondary sources, and analyzing pronouncements and interactions on social media platforms. Religious agents conceived of democracy as the rule of the majority that they intended to promote by means of secular arguments, demonstrations in public spaces, and the construction of electoral alternatives. Marginally, the categorization of feminism through conspiracy theories and the use of dilatory legal maneuvers ran counter to the logic of the expansion of rights. According to the empirical evidence gathered, the religious agents showed increasing adjustments to the language and criteria inherent to democratic life.
Fil: Carbonelli, Marcos Andres. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Centro de Estudios e Investigaciones Laborales; Argentina
Fil: García Bossio, María Pilar. Pont. Universidad Catolica Arg."sta.maria de Los Bs.as.". Facultad de Cs. Sociales, Politicas y de la Comunicación. Instituto de Investigaciones; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Materia
ABORTION
ARGENTINA
DEMOCRACY
FEMINISM
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
RELIGION
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/225138
Acceder
id CONICETDig_b043d45e74567edc9e7eb0902628ddb5
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/225138
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Religion and Democracy in Argentina Religious Opposition to the Legalization of AbortionCarbonelli, Marcos AndresGarcía Bossio, María PilarABORTIONARGENTINADEMOCRACYFEMINISMQUALITATIVE RESEARCHRELIGIONhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5This article analyzes the ways in which religious actors opposing the legalization of abortion adjusted their arguments and public actions to the Argentine democratic culture between 2018 and 2020. Data were collected through a qualitative research approach by conducting in-depth interviews with activists, studying public position statements in secondary sources, and analyzing pronouncements and interactions on social media platforms. Religious agents conceived of democracy as the rule of the majority that they intended to promote by means of secular arguments, demonstrations in public spaces, and the construction of electoral alternatives. Marginally, the categorization of feminism through conspiracy theories and the use of dilatory legal maneuvers ran counter to the logic of the expansion of rights. According to the empirical evidence gathered, the religious agents showed increasing adjustments to the language and criteria inherent to democratic life.Fil: Carbonelli, Marcos Andres. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Centro de Estudios e Investigaciones Laborales; ArgentinaFil: García Bossio, María Pilar. Pont. Universidad Catolica Arg."sta.maria de Los Bs.as.". Facultad de Cs. Sociales, Politicas y de la Comunicación. Instituto de Investigaciones; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaMDPI2023-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/225138Carbonelli, Marcos Andres; García Bossio, María Pilar; Religion and Democracy in Argentina Religious Opposition to the Legalization of Abortion; MDPI; Religions; 14; 5; 4-2023; 1-142077-1444CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/14/5/563info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3390/rel14050563info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:03:49Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/225138instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:03:49.492CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Religion and Democracy in Argentina Religious Opposition to the Legalization of Abortion
title Religion and Democracy in Argentina Religious Opposition to the Legalization of Abortion
spellingShingle Religion and Democracy in Argentina Religious Opposition to the Legalization of Abortion
Carbonelli, Marcos Andres
ABORTION
ARGENTINA
DEMOCRACY
FEMINISM
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
RELIGION
title_short Religion and Democracy in Argentina Religious Opposition to the Legalization of Abortion
title_full Religion and Democracy in Argentina Religious Opposition to the Legalization of Abortion
title_fullStr Religion and Democracy in Argentina Religious Opposition to the Legalization of Abortion
title_full_unstemmed Religion and Democracy in Argentina Religious Opposition to the Legalization of Abortion
title_sort Religion and Democracy in Argentina Religious Opposition to the Legalization of Abortion
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Carbonelli, Marcos Andres
García Bossio, María Pilar
author Carbonelli, Marcos Andres
author_facet Carbonelli, Marcos Andres
García Bossio, María Pilar
author_role author
author2 García Bossio, María Pilar
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv ABORTION
ARGENTINA
DEMOCRACY
FEMINISM
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
RELIGION
topic ABORTION
ARGENTINA
DEMOCRACY
FEMINISM
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
RELIGION
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv This article analyzes the ways in which religious actors opposing the legalization of abortion adjusted their arguments and public actions to the Argentine democratic culture between 2018 and 2020. Data were collected through a qualitative research approach by conducting in-depth interviews with activists, studying public position statements in secondary sources, and analyzing pronouncements and interactions on social media platforms. Religious agents conceived of democracy as the rule of the majority that they intended to promote by means of secular arguments, demonstrations in public spaces, and the construction of electoral alternatives. Marginally, the categorization of feminism through conspiracy theories and the use of dilatory legal maneuvers ran counter to the logic of the expansion of rights. According to the empirical evidence gathered, the religious agents showed increasing adjustments to the language and criteria inherent to democratic life.
Fil: Carbonelli, Marcos Andres. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Centro de Estudios e Investigaciones Laborales; Argentina
Fil: García Bossio, María Pilar. Pont. Universidad Catolica Arg."sta.maria de Los Bs.as.". Facultad de Cs. Sociales, Politicas y de la Comunicación. Instituto de Investigaciones; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
description This article analyzes the ways in which religious actors opposing the legalization of abortion adjusted their arguments and public actions to the Argentine democratic culture between 2018 and 2020. Data were collected through a qualitative research approach by conducting in-depth interviews with activists, studying public position statements in secondary sources, and analyzing pronouncements and interactions on social media platforms. Religious agents conceived of democracy as the rule of the majority that they intended to promote by means of secular arguments, demonstrations in public spaces, and the construction of electoral alternatives. Marginally, the categorization of feminism through conspiracy theories and the use of dilatory legal maneuvers ran counter to the logic of the expansion of rights. According to the empirical evidence gathered, the religious agents showed increasing adjustments to the language and criteria inherent to democratic life.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-04
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/225138
Carbonelli, Marcos Andres; García Bossio, María Pilar; Religion and Democracy in Argentina Religious Opposition to the Legalization of Abortion; MDPI; Religions; 14; 5; 4-2023; 1-14
2077-1444
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/225138
identifier_str_mv Carbonelli, Marcos Andres; García Bossio, María Pilar; Religion and Democracy in Argentina Religious Opposition to the Legalization of Abortion; MDPI; Religions; 14; 5; 4-2023; 1-14
2077-1444
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/14/5/563
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3390/rel14050563
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269821402611712
score 13.13397

Publicaciones similares