Comparison of two protocols for field immobilization of white-eared opossums (Didelphis albiventris)

Autores
Waxman Dova, Samanta; Orozco, Maria Marcela; Argibay, Hernán Darío; Rodriguez, Casilda; Otero, Pablo Ezequiel
Año de publicación
2018
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of two protocols for field immobilization of white-eared opossums (Didelphis albiventris) and compare their effects on immobilization, cardiopulmonary variables, and recovery times. Twenty one opossums were randomly divided into two groups; G1 received ketamine (15 mg kg−1)-dexmedetomidine (0.15 mg kg−1) intramuscularly (IM) and G2 received the ketamine-dexmedetomidine combination and isoflurane once induction was achieved. Oxygen was delivered by face mask (1.5 L minute−1). Thirty minutes after induction, isoflurane was discontinued (G2) and both groups were administered atipamezole (1.5 mg kg−1) IM. Respiratory (ƒR) and heart rate (HR), oxyhemoglobin saturation (SpO2), and rectal temperature (T) were recorded every 5 min. Induction time, time to first movement (RT1), and time to achieve standing (RT2) were recorded. ANOVA and non-parametric tests were used. Level of immobilization was assessed by observation of movements and evaluation of muscle relaxation. The mean induction time was 4.71 min. RT1 and RT2 were significantly longer in G2. No significant differences were found in SpO2 or ƒR. HR did not vary significantly along time, but was higher in G2. Rectal temperature did not show differences between treatments, but decreased significantly with time in G2. Four of nine animals in G1 showed movements, while no animals in G2 did and muscle relaxation was determined to be better in this latter group. Both protocols were adequate for short-term field immobilization, with minimal alterations of HR and T and relatively short recovery times. Isoflurane provided better immobilization with statistically significant prolongation of recovery times.
Fil: Waxman Dova, Samanta. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Cs.veterinarias. Cátedra de Anestesiología y Algiologia; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Orozco, Maria Marcela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Fil: Argibay, Hernán Darío. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Fil: Rodriguez, Casilda. Universidad Complutense de Madrid; España
Fil: Otero, Pablo Ezequiel. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Cs.veterinarias. Cátedra de Anestesiología y Algiologia; Argentina
Materia
DEXMEDETOMIDINE
FIELD IMMOBILIZATION
ISOFLURANE
KETAMINE
OPOSSUM
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/96159
Acceder
id CONICETDig_dd377f623bfdd80dabd1baa7aadc887d
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/96159
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Comparison of two protocols for field immobilization of white-eared opossums (Didelphis albiventris)Waxman Dova, SamantaOrozco, Maria MarcelaArgibay, Hernán DaríoRodriguez, CasildaOtero, Pablo EzequielDEXMEDETOMIDINEFIELD IMMOBILIZATIONISOFLURANEKETAMINEOPOSSUMhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of two protocols for field immobilization of white-eared opossums (Didelphis albiventris) and compare their effects on immobilization, cardiopulmonary variables, and recovery times. Twenty one opossums were randomly divided into two groups; G1 received ketamine (15 mg kg−1)-dexmedetomidine (0.15 mg kg−1) intramuscularly (IM) and G2 received the ketamine-dexmedetomidine combination and isoflurane once induction was achieved. Oxygen was delivered by face mask (1.5 L minute−1). Thirty minutes after induction, isoflurane was discontinued (G2) and both groups were administered atipamezole (1.5 mg kg−1) IM. Respiratory (ƒR) and heart rate (HR), oxyhemoglobin saturation (SpO2), and rectal temperature (T) were recorded every 5 min. Induction time, time to first movement (RT1), and time to achieve standing (RT2) were recorded. ANOVA and non-parametric tests were used. Level of immobilization was assessed by observation of movements and evaluation of muscle relaxation. The mean induction time was 4.71 min. RT1 and RT2 were significantly longer in G2. No significant differences were found in SpO2 or ƒR. HR did not vary significantly along time, but was higher in G2. Rectal temperature did not show differences between treatments, but decreased significantly with time in G2. Four of nine animals in G1 showed movements, while no animals in G2 did and muscle relaxation was determined to be better in this latter group. Both protocols were adequate for short-term field immobilization, with minimal alterations of HR and T and relatively short recovery times. Isoflurane provided better immobilization with statistically significant prolongation of recovery times.Fil: Waxman Dova, Samanta. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Cs.veterinarias. Cátedra de Anestesiología y Algiologia; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Orozco, Maria Marcela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaFil: Argibay, Hernán Darío. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaFil: Rodriguez, Casilda. Universidad Complutense de Madrid; EspañaFil: Otero, Pablo Ezequiel. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Cs.veterinarias. Cátedra de Anestesiología y Algiologia; ArgentinaSpringer2018-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/96159Waxman Dova, Samanta; Orozco, Maria Marcela; Argibay, Hernán Darío; Rodriguez, Casilda; Otero, Pablo Ezequiel; Comparison of two protocols for field immobilization of white-eared opossums (Didelphis albiventris); Springer; European Journal of Wildlife Research; 64; 4; 8-2018; 1-41612-4642CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10344-018-1210-1info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s10344-018-1210-1info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:47:47Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/96159instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:47:47.628CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of two protocols for field immobilization of white-eared opossums (Didelphis albiventris)
title Comparison of two protocols for field immobilization of white-eared opossums (Didelphis albiventris)
spellingShingle Comparison of two protocols for field immobilization of white-eared opossums (Didelphis albiventris)
Waxman Dova, Samanta
DEXMEDETOMIDINE
FIELD IMMOBILIZATION
ISOFLURANE
KETAMINE
OPOSSUM
title_short Comparison of two protocols for field immobilization of white-eared opossums (Didelphis albiventris)
title_full Comparison of two protocols for field immobilization of white-eared opossums (Didelphis albiventris)
title_fullStr Comparison of two protocols for field immobilization of white-eared opossums (Didelphis albiventris)
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two protocols for field immobilization of white-eared opossums (Didelphis albiventris)
title_sort Comparison of two protocols for field immobilization of white-eared opossums (Didelphis albiventris)
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Waxman Dova, Samanta
Orozco, Maria Marcela
Argibay, Hernán Darío
Rodriguez, Casilda
Otero, Pablo Ezequiel
author Waxman Dova, Samanta
author_facet Waxman Dova, Samanta
Orozco, Maria Marcela
Argibay, Hernán Darío
Rodriguez, Casilda
Otero, Pablo Ezequiel
author_role author
author2 Orozco, Maria Marcela
Argibay, Hernán Darío
Rodriguez, Casilda
Otero, Pablo Ezequiel
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv DEXMEDETOMIDINE
FIELD IMMOBILIZATION
ISOFLURANE
KETAMINE
OPOSSUM
topic DEXMEDETOMIDINE
FIELD IMMOBILIZATION
ISOFLURANE
KETAMINE
OPOSSUM
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of two protocols for field immobilization of white-eared opossums (Didelphis albiventris) and compare their effects on immobilization, cardiopulmonary variables, and recovery times. Twenty one opossums were randomly divided into two groups; G1 received ketamine (15 mg kg−1)-dexmedetomidine (0.15 mg kg−1) intramuscularly (IM) and G2 received the ketamine-dexmedetomidine combination and isoflurane once induction was achieved. Oxygen was delivered by face mask (1.5 L minute−1). Thirty minutes after induction, isoflurane was discontinued (G2) and both groups were administered atipamezole (1.5 mg kg−1) IM. Respiratory (ƒR) and heart rate (HR), oxyhemoglobin saturation (SpO2), and rectal temperature (T) were recorded every 5 min. Induction time, time to first movement (RT1), and time to achieve standing (RT2) were recorded. ANOVA and non-parametric tests were used. Level of immobilization was assessed by observation of movements and evaluation of muscle relaxation. The mean induction time was 4.71 min. RT1 and RT2 were significantly longer in G2. No significant differences were found in SpO2 or ƒR. HR did not vary significantly along time, but was higher in G2. Rectal temperature did not show differences between treatments, but decreased significantly with time in G2. Four of nine animals in G1 showed movements, while no animals in G2 did and muscle relaxation was determined to be better in this latter group. Both protocols were adequate for short-term field immobilization, with minimal alterations of HR and T and relatively short recovery times. Isoflurane provided better immobilization with statistically significant prolongation of recovery times.
Fil: Waxman Dova, Samanta. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Cs.veterinarias. Cátedra de Anestesiología y Algiologia; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Orozco, Maria Marcela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Fil: Argibay, Hernán Darío. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Fil: Rodriguez, Casilda. Universidad Complutense de Madrid; España
Fil: Otero, Pablo Ezequiel. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Cs.veterinarias. Cátedra de Anestesiología y Algiologia; Argentina
description The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of two protocols for field immobilization of white-eared opossums (Didelphis albiventris) and compare their effects on immobilization, cardiopulmonary variables, and recovery times. Twenty one opossums were randomly divided into two groups; G1 received ketamine (15 mg kg−1)-dexmedetomidine (0.15 mg kg−1) intramuscularly (IM) and G2 received the ketamine-dexmedetomidine combination and isoflurane once induction was achieved. Oxygen was delivered by face mask (1.5 L minute−1). Thirty minutes after induction, isoflurane was discontinued (G2) and both groups were administered atipamezole (1.5 mg kg−1) IM. Respiratory (ƒR) and heart rate (HR), oxyhemoglobin saturation (SpO2), and rectal temperature (T) were recorded every 5 min. Induction time, time to first movement (RT1), and time to achieve standing (RT2) were recorded. ANOVA and non-parametric tests were used. Level of immobilization was assessed by observation of movements and evaluation of muscle relaxation. The mean induction time was 4.71 min. RT1 and RT2 were significantly longer in G2. No significant differences were found in SpO2 or ƒR. HR did not vary significantly along time, but was higher in G2. Rectal temperature did not show differences between treatments, but decreased significantly with time in G2. Four of nine animals in G1 showed movements, while no animals in G2 did and muscle relaxation was determined to be better in this latter group. Both protocols were adequate for short-term field immobilization, with minimal alterations of HR and T and relatively short recovery times. Isoflurane provided better immobilization with statistically significant prolongation of recovery times.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-08
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/96159
Waxman Dova, Samanta; Orozco, Maria Marcela; Argibay, Hernán Darío; Rodriguez, Casilda; Otero, Pablo Ezequiel; Comparison of two protocols for field immobilization of white-eared opossums (Didelphis albiventris); Springer; European Journal of Wildlife Research; 64; 4; 8-2018; 1-4
1612-4642
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/96159
identifier_str_mv Waxman Dova, Samanta; Orozco, Maria Marcela; Argibay, Hernán Darío; Rodriguez, Casilda; Otero, Pablo Ezequiel; Comparison of two protocols for field immobilization of white-eared opossums (Didelphis albiventris); Springer; European Journal of Wildlife Research; 64; 4; 8-2018; 1-4
1612-4642
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10344-018-1210-1
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s10344-018-1210-1
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613488022913024
score 13.070432

Publicaciones similares