Quality improvement intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening at the primary care setting: a cluster-randomised controlled trial
- Autores
- Irazola, Vilma; Santero, Marilina; Sanchez, Mario; Tristao, Ignez; Ruiz, Juan Ignacio; Spira, Cintia; Ismael, Julia; Cavallo, Ana Soledad; Gutierrez, Laura; Mazzaresi, Yanina; Nadal, Ana Maria; Garcia Elorrio, Ezequiel
- Año de publicación
- 2023
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Background Approximately 81% of deaths in Argentina are from chronic non-communicable diseases and 21% caused by cancer. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most frequent cancer in Argentina. Even though CRC screening has been recommended for adults from 50 to 75 years old by using a faecal immunochemical test (FIT) annually, screening rates remain below 20% in the country.Methods We conducted an 18-month, two-arm, pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial evaluating the effect of a quality improvement intervention, based on the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, considering barriers andcatalysts to articulate theory and practice, to increase CRC screening rates using FITs at primary care level. The study involved ten public primary health centres in Mendoza province, Argentina. The primary outcome measure was the rate of effective CRC screening. Secondary outcomes were the rate of participants with a positive FIT, tests with invalid results and the rate of participants referred for colonoscopy.Results Screening was effective in 75% of the participants in the intervention arm vs 54.2% in the control arm, OR 2.5 (95% CI 1.4 to 4.4, p=0.001). These results remained unchanged after adjusting for individual demographic and socioeconomic characteristics.Regarding secondary outcomes, the overall prevalence of positive tests was 17.7% (21.1% in the control arm and 14.7% in the intervention arm, p=0.3648). The overall proportion of participants with inadequate test results was5.2% (4.9% in the control arm vs 5.5% in the intervention arm, p=0.8516). All the participants with positive tests were referred for colonoscopy in both groups.Conclusions An intervention based on quality improvement strategies proved to be highly successful in increasing effective CRC screening in Argentina’s primary care setting within the public healthcare system.
Fil: Irazola, Vilma. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Centro de Investigaciones en Epidemiología y Salud Pública. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria. Centro de Investigaciones en Epidemiología y Salud Pública; Argentina
Fil: Santero, Marilina. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina
Fil: Sanchez, Mario. Inter-American Development Bank; Estados Unidos
Fil: Tristao, Ignez. Inter-American Development Bank; Estados Unidos
Fil: Ruiz, Juan Ignacio. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina
Fil: Spira, Cintia. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina
Fil: Ismael, Julia. Ministerio de Salud. Instituto Nacional del Cáncer; Argentina
Fil: Cavallo, Ana Soledad. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina
Fil: Gutierrez, Laura. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina
Fil: Mazzaresi, Yanina. Gobierno de la Provincia de Mendoza. Ministerio de Salud Desarrollo Social y Deportes.; Argentina
Fil: Nadal, Ana Maria. Gobierno de la Provincia de Mendoza. Ministerio de Salud Desarrollo Social y Deportes.; Argentina
Fil: Garcia Elorrio, Ezequiel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina - Materia
-
Early Detection of Cancer
Colorectal Neoplasms
Cluster trials - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/237640
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_cfe25c18b931f819d38f2c910fe27d0d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/237640 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Quality improvement intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening at the primary care setting: a cluster-randomised controlled trialIrazola, VilmaSantero, MarilinaSanchez, MarioTristao, IgnezRuiz, Juan IgnacioSpira, CintiaIsmael, JuliaCavallo, Ana SoledadGutierrez, LauraMazzaresi, YaninaNadal, Ana MariaGarcia Elorrio, EzequielEarly Detection of CancerColorectal NeoplasmsCluster trialshttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3Background Approximately 81% of deaths in Argentina are from chronic non-communicable diseases and 21% caused by cancer. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most frequent cancer in Argentina. Even though CRC screening has been recommended for adults from 50 to 75 years old by using a faecal immunochemical test (FIT) annually, screening rates remain below 20% in the country.Methods We conducted an 18-month, two-arm, pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial evaluating the effect of a quality improvement intervention, based on the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, considering barriers andcatalysts to articulate theory and practice, to increase CRC screening rates using FITs at primary care level. The study involved ten public primary health centres in Mendoza province, Argentina. The primary outcome measure was the rate of effective CRC screening. Secondary outcomes were the rate of participants with a positive FIT, tests with invalid results and the rate of participants referred for colonoscopy.Results Screening was effective in 75% of the participants in the intervention arm vs 54.2% in the control arm, OR 2.5 (95% CI 1.4 to 4.4, p=0.001). These results remained unchanged after adjusting for individual demographic and socioeconomic characteristics.Regarding secondary outcomes, the overall prevalence of positive tests was 17.7% (21.1% in the control arm and 14.7% in the intervention arm, p=0.3648). The overall proportion of participants with inadequate test results was5.2% (4.9% in the control arm vs 5.5% in the intervention arm, p=0.8516). All the participants with positive tests were referred for colonoscopy in both groups.Conclusions An intervention based on quality improvement strategies proved to be highly successful in increasing effective CRC screening in Argentina’s primary care setting within the public healthcare system.Fil: Irazola, Vilma. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Centro de Investigaciones en Epidemiología y Salud Pública. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria. Centro de Investigaciones en Epidemiología y Salud Pública; ArgentinaFil: Santero, Marilina. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; ArgentinaFil: Sanchez, Mario. Inter-American Development Bank; Estados UnidosFil: Tristao, Ignez. Inter-American Development Bank; Estados UnidosFil: Ruiz, Juan Ignacio. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; ArgentinaFil: Spira, Cintia. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; ArgentinaFil: Ismael, Julia. Ministerio de Salud. Instituto Nacional del Cáncer; ArgentinaFil: Cavallo, Ana Soledad. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; ArgentinaFil: Gutierrez, Laura. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; ArgentinaFil: Mazzaresi, Yanina. Gobierno de la Provincia de Mendoza. Ministerio de Salud Desarrollo Social y Deportes.; ArgentinaFil: Nadal, Ana Maria. Gobierno de la Provincia de Mendoza. Ministerio de Salud Desarrollo Social y Deportes.; ArgentinaFil: Garcia Elorrio, Ezequiel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; ArgentinaBMJ Publishing Group2023-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/237640Irazola, Vilma; Santero, Marilina; Sanchez, Mario; Tristao, Ignez; Ruiz, Juan Ignacio; et al.; Quality improvement intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening at the primary care setting: a cluster-randomised controlled trial; BMJ Publishing Group; BMJ Open Quality; 12; 2; 6-2023; 1-82399-6641CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/12/2/e002158info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002158info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:23:44Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/237640instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:23:44.329CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Quality improvement intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening at the primary care setting: a cluster-randomised controlled trial |
title |
Quality improvement intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening at the primary care setting: a cluster-randomised controlled trial |
spellingShingle |
Quality improvement intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening at the primary care setting: a cluster-randomised controlled trial Irazola, Vilma Early Detection of Cancer Colorectal Neoplasms Cluster trials |
title_short |
Quality improvement intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening at the primary care setting: a cluster-randomised controlled trial |
title_full |
Quality improvement intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening at the primary care setting: a cluster-randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr |
Quality improvement intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening at the primary care setting: a cluster-randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
Quality improvement intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening at the primary care setting: a cluster-randomised controlled trial |
title_sort |
Quality improvement intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening at the primary care setting: a cluster-randomised controlled trial |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Irazola, Vilma Santero, Marilina Sanchez, Mario Tristao, Ignez Ruiz, Juan Ignacio Spira, Cintia Ismael, Julia Cavallo, Ana Soledad Gutierrez, Laura Mazzaresi, Yanina Nadal, Ana Maria Garcia Elorrio, Ezequiel |
author |
Irazola, Vilma |
author_facet |
Irazola, Vilma Santero, Marilina Sanchez, Mario Tristao, Ignez Ruiz, Juan Ignacio Spira, Cintia Ismael, Julia Cavallo, Ana Soledad Gutierrez, Laura Mazzaresi, Yanina Nadal, Ana Maria Garcia Elorrio, Ezequiel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Santero, Marilina Sanchez, Mario Tristao, Ignez Ruiz, Juan Ignacio Spira, Cintia Ismael, Julia Cavallo, Ana Soledad Gutierrez, Laura Mazzaresi, Yanina Nadal, Ana Maria Garcia Elorrio, Ezequiel |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Early Detection of Cancer Colorectal Neoplasms Cluster trials |
topic |
Early Detection of Cancer Colorectal Neoplasms Cluster trials |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Background Approximately 81% of deaths in Argentina are from chronic non-communicable diseases and 21% caused by cancer. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most frequent cancer in Argentina. Even though CRC screening has been recommended for adults from 50 to 75 years old by using a faecal immunochemical test (FIT) annually, screening rates remain below 20% in the country.Methods We conducted an 18-month, two-arm, pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial evaluating the effect of a quality improvement intervention, based on the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, considering barriers andcatalysts to articulate theory and practice, to increase CRC screening rates using FITs at primary care level. The study involved ten public primary health centres in Mendoza province, Argentina. The primary outcome measure was the rate of effective CRC screening. Secondary outcomes were the rate of participants with a positive FIT, tests with invalid results and the rate of participants referred for colonoscopy.Results Screening was effective in 75% of the participants in the intervention arm vs 54.2% in the control arm, OR 2.5 (95% CI 1.4 to 4.4, p=0.001). These results remained unchanged after adjusting for individual demographic and socioeconomic characteristics.Regarding secondary outcomes, the overall prevalence of positive tests was 17.7% (21.1% in the control arm and 14.7% in the intervention arm, p=0.3648). The overall proportion of participants with inadequate test results was5.2% (4.9% in the control arm vs 5.5% in the intervention arm, p=0.8516). All the participants with positive tests were referred for colonoscopy in both groups.Conclusions An intervention based on quality improvement strategies proved to be highly successful in increasing effective CRC screening in Argentina’s primary care setting within the public healthcare system. Fil: Irazola, Vilma. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Centro de Investigaciones en Epidemiología y Salud Pública. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria. Centro de Investigaciones en Epidemiología y Salud Pública; Argentina Fil: Santero, Marilina. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina Fil: Sanchez, Mario. Inter-American Development Bank; Estados Unidos Fil: Tristao, Ignez. Inter-American Development Bank; Estados Unidos Fil: Ruiz, Juan Ignacio. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina Fil: Spira, Cintia. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina Fil: Ismael, Julia. Ministerio de Salud. Instituto Nacional del Cáncer; Argentina Fil: Cavallo, Ana Soledad. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina Fil: Gutierrez, Laura. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina Fil: Mazzaresi, Yanina. Gobierno de la Provincia de Mendoza. Ministerio de Salud Desarrollo Social y Deportes.; Argentina Fil: Nadal, Ana Maria. Gobierno de la Provincia de Mendoza. Ministerio de Salud Desarrollo Social y Deportes.; Argentina Fil: Garcia Elorrio, Ezequiel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina |
description |
Background Approximately 81% of deaths in Argentina are from chronic non-communicable diseases and 21% caused by cancer. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most frequent cancer in Argentina. Even though CRC screening has been recommended for adults from 50 to 75 years old by using a faecal immunochemical test (FIT) annually, screening rates remain below 20% in the country.Methods We conducted an 18-month, two-arm, pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial evaluating the effect of a quality improvement intervention, based on the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, considering barriers andcatalysts to articulate theory and practice, to increase CRC screening rates using FITs at primary care level. The study involved ten public primary health centres in Mendoza province, Argentina. The primary outcome measure was the rate of effective CRC screening. Secondary outcomes were the rate of participants with a positive FIT, tests with invalid results and the rate of participants referred for colonoscopy.Results Screening was effective in 75% of the participants in the intervention arm vs 54.2% in the control arm, OR 2.5 (95% CI 1.4 to 4.4, p=0.001). These results remained unchanged after adjusting for individual demographic and socioeconomic characteristics.Regarding secondary outcomes, the overall prevalence of positive tests was 17.7% (21.1% in the control arm and 14.7% in the intervention arm, p=0.3648). The overall proportion of participants with inadequate test results was5.2% (4.9% in the control arm vs 5.5% in the intervention arm, p=0.8516). All the participants with positive tests were referred for colonoscopy in both groups.Conclusions An intervention based on quality improvement strategies proved to be highly successful in increasing effective CRC screening in Argentina’s primary care setting within the public healthcare system. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-06 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/237640 Irazola, Vilma; Santero, Marilina; Sanchez, Mario; Tristao, Ignez; Ruiz, Juan Ignacio; et al.; Quality improvement intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening at the primary care setting: a cluster-randomised controlled trial; BMJ Publishing Group; BMJ Open Quality; 12; 2; 6-2023; 1-8 2399-6641 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/237640 |
identifier_str_mv |
Irazola, Vilma; Santero, Marilina; Sanchez, Mario; Tristao, Ignez; Ruiz, Juan Ignacio; et al.; Quality improvement intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening at the primary care setting: a cluster-randomised controlled trial; BMJ Publishing Group; BMJ Open Quality; 12; 2; 6-2023; 1-8 2399-6641 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/12/2/e002158 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002158 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
BMJ Publishing Group |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
BMJ Publishing Group |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844614233009946624 |
score |
13.070432 |