Retinoblastoma seeds: Impact on American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical staging

Autores
Tomar, Ankit Singh; Finger, Paul T.; Gallie, Brenda; Kivelä, Tero; Mallipatna, Ashwin; Zhang, Chengyue; Zhao, Junyang; Wilson, Matthew; Brennan, Rachel; Burges, Michala; Kim, Jonathan; Berry, Jesse L.; Jubran, Rima; Khetan, Vikas; Ganeshan, Suganeswari; Yarovoy, Andrey; Yarovaya, Vera; Kotova, Elena; Volodin, Denis; Yousef, Yacoub; Nummi, Kalle; Ushakova, Tatiana L.; Yugay, Olga V.; Polyakov, Vladimir G; Ramirez Ortiz, Marco Antonio; Esparza Aguiar, Elizabeth; Chantada, Guillermo Luis; Schaiquevich, Paula Susana; Fandiño, Adriana Cristina; Yam, Jason C.
Año de publicación
2021
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Aim To investigate whether the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) clinical category cT2b needs to be subclassified by the type and distribution of retinoblastoma (RB) seeding. Methods Multicentre, international registry-based data were collected from RB centres enrolled between January 2001 and December 2013. 1054 RB eyes with vitreous or subretinal seeds from 18 ophthalmic oncology centres, in 13 countries within six continents were analysed. Local treatment failure was defined as the use of secondary enucleation or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Clinical category cT2b included 1054 eyes. Median age at presentation was 16.0 months. Of these, 428 (40.6%) eyes were salvaged, and 430 (40.8%) were treated with primary and 196 (18.6%) with secondary enucleation. Of the 592 eyes that had complete data for globe salvage analysis, the distribution of seeds was focal in 143 (24.2%) and diffuse in 449 (75.8%). The 5-year Kaplan-Meier cumulative globe-salvage (without EBRT) was 78% and 49% for eyes with focal and diffuse RB seeding, respectively. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis confirmed a higher local treatment failure risk with diffuse seeds as compared with focal seeds (hazard rate: 2.8; p<0.001). There was insufficient evidence to prove or disprove an association between vitreous seed type and local treatment failure risk(p=0.06). Conclusion This international, multicentre, registry-based analysis of RB eyes affirmed that eyes with diffuse intraocular distribution of RB seeds at diagnosis had a higher risk of local treatment failure when compared with focal seeds. Subclassification of AJCC RB category cT2b into focal vs diffuse seeds will improve prognostication for eye salvage.
Fil: Tomar, Ankit Singh. New York Eye Cancer Center; Estados Unidos
Fil: Finger, Paul T.. New York Eye Cancer Center; Estados Unidos
Fil: Gallie, Brenda. University Of Toronto. Hospital For Sick Children; Canadá
Fil: Kivelä, Tero. University of Helsinki; Finlandia. Helsinki University Hospital; Finlandia
Fil: Mallipatna, Ashwin. University Of Toronto. Hospital For Sick Children; Canadá. Narayana Nethralaya; India
Fil: Zhang, Chengyue. Beijing Children's Hospital; China
Fil: Zhao, Junyang. Beijing Children's Hospital; China
Fil: Wilson, Matthew. University of Tennessee; Estados Unidos
Fil: Brennan, Rachel. St Jude Children's Research Hospital; Estados Unidos
Fil: Burges, Michala. University of Tennessee; Estados Unidos
Fil: Kim, Jonathan. Keck Medical School of the University of Southern California; Estados Unidos
Fil: Berry, Jesse L.. Children's Hospital Los Angeles; Estados Unidos
Fil: Jubran, Rima. Childrens Hospital Society of Los Angeles; Estados Unidos
Fil: Khetan, Vikas. Vitreo Retinal Services; India
Fil: Ganeshan, Suganeswari. Vitreo Retinal Services; India
Fil: Yarovoy, Andrey. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution; Rusia
Fil: Yarovaya, Vera. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution; Rusia
Fil: Kotova, Elena. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution; Rusia
Fil: Volodin, Denis. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution; Rusia
Fil: Yousef, Yacoub. King Hussein Cancer Center; Jordania
Fil: Nummi, Kalle. University of Helsinki; Finlandia. Helsinki University Hospital; Finlandia
Fil: Ushakova, Tatiana L.. N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center; Rusia. Russian Academy of Postgraduate Medical Education; Rusia
Fil: Yugay, Olga V.. N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center; Rusia
Fil: Polyakov, Vladimir G. N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center; Rusia. Russian Academy of Sciences; Rusia
Fil: Ramirez Ortiz, Marco Antonio. Hospital Infantil de Mexico Federico Gomez; México
Fil: Esparza Aguiar, Elizabeth. Hospital Infantil de Mexico Federico Gomez; México
Fil: Chantada, Guillermo Luis. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital de Pediatría "Juan P. Garrahan"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Schaiquevich, Paula Susana. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital de Pediatría "Juan P. Garrahan"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Fandiño, Adriana Cristina. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital de Pediatría "Juan P. Garrahan"; Argentina
Fil: Yam, Jason C.. The Chinese University of Hong Kong Faculty of Medicine; Hong Kong
Materia
retinoblastoma
vitreous seeds
treatment
AJCC
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/166903

id CONICETDig_c5e7ec72f72425d2bef7d78cdea51e7e
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/166903
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Retinoblastoma seeds: Impact on American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical stagingTomar, Ankit SinghFinger, Paul T.Gallie, BrendaKivelä, TeroMallipatna, AshwinZhang, ChengyueZhao, JunyangWilson, MatthewBrennan, RachelBurges, MichalaKim, JonathanBerry, Jesse L.Jubran, RimaKhetan, VikasGaneshan, SuganeswariYarovoy, AndreyYarovaya, VeraKotova, ElenaVolodin, DenisYousef, YacoubNummi, KalleUshakova, Tatiana L.Yugay, Olga V.Polyakov, Vladimir GRamirez Ortiz, Marco AntonioEsparza Aguiar, ElizabethChantada, Guillermo LuisSchaiquevich, Paula SusanaFandiño, Adriana CristinaYam, Jason C.retinoblastomavitreous seedstreatmentAJCChttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3Aim To investigate whether the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) clinical category cT2b needs to be subclassified by the type and distribution of retinoblastoma (RB) seeding. Methods Multicentre, international registry-based data were collected from RB centres enrolled between January 2001 and December 2013. 1054 RB eyes with vitreous or subretinal seeds from 18 ophthalmic oncology centres, in 13 countries within six continents were analysed. Local treatment failure was defined as the use of secondary enucleation or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Clinical category cT2b included 1054 eyes. Median age at presentation was 16.0 months. Of these, 428 (40.6%) eyes were salvaged, and 430 (40.8%) were treated with primary and 196 (18.6%) with secondary enucleation. Of the 592 eyes that had complete data for globe salvage analysis, the distribution of seeds was focal in 143 (24.2%) and diffuse in 449 (75.8%). The 5-year Kaplan-Meier cumulative globe-salvage (without EBRT) was 78% and 49% for eyes with focal and diffuse RB seeding, respectively. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis confirmed a higher local treatment failure risk with diffuse seeds as compared with focal seeds (hazard rate: 2.8; p<0.001). There was insufficient evidence to prove or disprove an association between vitreous seed type and local treatment failure risk(p=0.06). Conclusion This international, multicentre, registry-based analysis of RB eyes affirmed that eyes with diffuse intraocular distribution of RB seeds at diagnosis had a higher risk of local treatment failure when compared with focal seeds. Subclassification of AJCC RB category cT2b into focal vs diffuse seeds will improve prognostication for eye salvage.Fil: Tomar, Ankit Singh. New York Eye Cancer Center; Estados UnidosFil: Finger, Paul T.. New York Eye Cancer Center; Estados UnidosFil: Gallie, Brenda. University Of Toronto. Hospital For Sick Children; CanadáFil: Kivelä, Tero. University of Helsinki; Finlandia. Helsinki University Hospital; FinlandiaFil: Mallipatna, Ashwin. University Of Toronto. Hospital For Sick Children; Canadá. Narayana Nethralaya; IndiaFil: Zhang, Chengyue. Beijing Children's Hospital; ChinaFil: Zhao, Junyang. Beijing Children's Hospital; ChinaFil: Wilson, Matthew. University of Tennessee; Estados UnidosFil: Brennan, Rachel. St Jude Children's Research Hospital; Estados UnidosFil: Burges, Michala. University of Tennessee; Estados UnidosFil: Kim, Jonathan. Keck Medical School of the University of Southern California; Estados UnidosFil: Berry, Jesse L.. Children's Hospital Los Angeles; Estados UnidosFil: Jubran, Rima. Childrens Hospital Society of Los Angeles; Estados UnidosFil: Khetan, Vikas. Vitreo Retinal Services; IndiaFil: Ganeshan, Suganeswari. Vitreo Retinal Services; IndiaFil: Yarovoy, Andrey. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution; RusiaFil: Yarovaya, Vera. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution; RusiaFil: Kotova, Elena. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution; RusiaFil: Volodin, Denis. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution; RusiaFil: Yousef, Yacoub. King Hussein Cancer Center; JordaniaFil: Nummi, Kalle. University of Helsinki; Finlandia. Helsinki University Hospital; FinlandiaFil: Ushakova, Tatiana L.. N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center; Rusia. Russian Academy of Postgraduate Medical Education; RusiaFil: Yugay, Olga V.. N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center; RusiaFil: Polyakov, Vladimir G. N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center; Rusia. Russian Academy of Sciences; RusiaFil: Ramirez Ortiz, Marco Antonio. Hospital Infantil de Mexico Federico Gomez; MéxicoFil: Esparza Aguiar, Elizabeth. Hospital Infantil de Mexico Federico Gomez; MéxicoFil: Chantada, Guillermo Luis. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital de Pediatría "Juan P. Garrahan"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Schaiquevich, Paula Susana. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital de Pediatría "Juan P. Garrahan"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Fandiño, Adriana Cristina. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital de Pediatría "Juan P. Garrahan"; ArgentinaFil: Yam, Jason C.. The Chinese University of Hong Kong Faculty of Medicine; Hong KongB M J Publishing Group2021-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/166903Tomar, Ankit Singh; Finger, Paul T.; Gallie, Brenda; Kivelä, Tero; Mallipatna, Ashwin; et al.; Retinoblastoma seeds: Impact on American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical staging; B M J Publishing Group; British Journal Of Ophthalmology; 2021; 8-2021; 1-60007-1161CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-318892info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://bjo.bmj.com/content/early/2021/08/01/bjophthalmol-2021-318892info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:01:53Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/166903instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:01:53.509CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Retinoblastoma seeds: Impact on American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical staging
title Retinoblastoma seeds: Impact on American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical staging
spellingShingle Retinoblastoma seeds: Impact on American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical staging
Tomar, Ankit Singh
retinoblastoma
vitreous seeds
treatment
AJCC
title_short Retinoblastoma seeds: Impact on American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical staging
title_full Retinoblastoma seeds: Impact on American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical staging
title_fullStr Retinoblastoma seeds: Impact on American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical staging
title_full_unstemmed Retinoblastoma seeds: Impact on American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical staging
title_sort Retinoblastoma seeds: Impact on American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical staging
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Tomar, Ankit Singh
Finger, Paul T.
Gallie, Brenda
Kivelä, Tero
Mallipatna, Ashwin
Zhang, Chengyue
Zhao, Junyang
Wilson, Matthew
Brennan, Rachel
Burges, Michala
Kim, Jonathan
Berry, Jesse L.
Jubran, Rima
Khetan, Vikas
Ganeshan, Suganeswari
Yarovoy, Andrey
Yarovaya, Vera
Kotova, Elena
Volodin, Denis
Yousef, Yacoub
Nummi, Kalle
Ushakova, Tatiana L.
Yugay, Olga V.
Polyakov, Vladimir G
Ramirez Ortiz, Marco Antonio
Esparza Aguiar, Elizabeth
Chantada, Guillermo Luis
Schaiquevich, Paula Susana
Fandiño, Adriana Cristina
Yam, Jason C.
author Tomar, Ankit Singh
author_facet Tomar, Ankit Singh
Finger, Paul T.
Gallie, Brenda
Kivelä, Tero
Mallipatna, Ashwin
Zhang, Chengyue
Zhao, Junyang
Wilson, Matthew
Brennan, Rachel
Burges, Michala
Kim, Jonathan
Berry, Jesse L.
Jubran, Rima
Khetan, Vikas
Ganeshan, Suganeswari
Yarovoy, Andrey
Yarovaya, Vera
Kotova, Elena
Volodin, Denis
Yousef, Yacoub
Nummi, Kalle
Ushakova, Tatiana L.
Yugay, Olga V.
Polyakov, Vladimir G
Ramirez Ortiz, Marco Antonio
Esparza Aguiar, Elizabeth
Chantada, Guillermo Luis
Schaiquevich, Paula Susana
Fandiño, Adriana Cristina
Yam, Jason C.
author_role author
author2 Finger, Paul T.
Gallie, Brenda
Kivelä, Tero
Mallipatna, Ashwin
Zhang, Chengyue
Zhao, Junyang
Wilson, Matthew
Brennan, Rachel
Burges, Michala
Kim, Jonathan
Berry, Jesse L.
Jubran, Rima
Khetan, Vikas
Ganeshan, Suganeswari
Yarovoy, Andrey
Yarovaya, Vera
Kotova, Elena
Volodin, Denis
Yousef, Yacoub
Nummi, Kalle
Ushakova, Tatiana L.
Yugay, Olga V.
Polyakov, Vladimir G
Ramirez Ortiz, Marco Antonio
Esparza Aguiar, Elizabeth
Chantada, Guillermo Luis
Schaiquevich, Paula Susana
Fandiño, Adriana Cristina
Yam, Jason C.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv retinoblastoma
vitreous seeds
treatment
AJCC
topic retinoblastoma
vitreous seeds
treatment
AJCC
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Aim To investigate whether the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) clinical category cT2b needs to be subclassified by the type and distribution of retinoblastoma (RB) seeding. Methods Multicentre, international registry-based data were collected from RB centres enrolled between January 2001 and December 2013. 1054 RB eyes with vitreous or subretinal seeds from 18 ophthalmic oncology centres, in 13 countries within six continents were analysed. Local treatment failure was defined as the use of secondary enucleation or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Clinical category cT2b included 1054 eyes. Median age at presentation was 16.0 months. Of these, 428 (40.6%) eyes were salvaged, and 430 (40.8%) were treated with primary and 196 (18.6%) with secondary enucleation. Of the 592 eyes that had complete data for globe salvage analysis, the distribution of seeds was focal in 143 (24.2%) and diffuse in 449 (75.8%). The 5-year Kaplan-Meier cumulative globe-salvage (without EBRT) was 78% and 49% for eyes with focal and diffuse RB seeding, respectively. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis confirmed a higher local treatment failure risk with diffuse seeds as compared with focal seeds (hazard rate: 2.8; p<0.001). There was insufficient evidence to prove or disprove an association between vitreous seed type and local treatment failure risk(p=0.06). Conclusion This international, multicentre, registry-based analysis of RB eyes affirmed that eyes with diffuse intraocular distribution of RB seeds at diagnosis had a higher risk of local treatment failure when compared with focal seeds. Subclassification of AJCC RB category cT2b into focal vs diffuse seeds will improve prognostication for eye salvage.
Fil: Tomar, Ankit Singh. New York Eye Cancer Center; Estados Unidos
Fil: Finger, Paul T.. New York Eye Cancer Center; Estados Unidos
Fil: Gallie, Brenda. University Of Toronto. Hospital For Sick Children; Canadá
Fil: Kivelä, Tero. University of Helsinki; Finlandia. Helsinki University Hospital; Finlandia
Fil: Mallipatna, Ashwin. University Of Toronto. Hospital For Sick Children; Canadá. Narayana Nethralaya; India
Fil: Zhang, Chengyue. Beijing Children's Hospital; China
Fil: Zhao, Junyang. Beijing Children's Hospital; China
Fil: Wilson, Matthew. University of Tennessee; Estados Unidos
Fil: Brennan, Rachel. St Jude Children's Research Hospital; Estados Unidos
Fil: Burges, Michala. University of Tennessee; Estados Unidos
Fil: Kim, Jonathan. Keck Medical School of the University of Southern California; Estados Unidos
Fil: Berry, Jesse L.. Children's Hospital Los Angeles; Estados Unidos
Fil: Jubran, Rima. Childrens Hospital Society of Los Angeles; Estados Unidos
Fil: Khetan, Vikas. Vitreo Retinal Services; India
Fil: Ganeshan, Suganeswari. Vitreo Retinal Services; India
Fil: Yarovoy, Andrey. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution; Rusia
Fil: Yarovaya, Vera. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution; Rusia
Fil: Kotova, Elena. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution; Rusia
Fil: Volodin, Denis. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution; Rusia
Fil: Yousef, Yacoub. King Hussein Cancer Center; Jordania
Fil: Nummi, Kalle. University of Helsinki; Finlandia. Helsinki University Hospital; Finlandia
Fil: Ushakova, Tatiana L.. N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center; Rusia. Russian Academy of Postgraduate Medical Education; Rusia
Fil: Yugay, Olga V.. N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center; Rusia
Fil: Polyakov, Vladimir G. N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center; Rusia. Russian Academy of Sciences; Rusia
Fil: Ramirez Ortiz, Marco Antonio. Hospital Infantil de Mexico Federico Gomez; México
Fil: Esparza Aguiar, Elizabeth. Hospital Infantil de Mexico Federico Gomez; México
Fil: Chantada, Guillermo Luis. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital de Pediatría "Juan P. Garrahan"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Schaiquevich, Paula Susana. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital de Pediatría "Juan P. Garrahan"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Fandiño, Adriana Cristina. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital de Pediatría "Juan P. Garrahan"; Argentina
Fil: Yam, Jason C.. The Chinese University of Hong Kong Faculty of Medicine; Hong Kong
description Aim To investigate whether the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) clinical category cT2b needs to be subclassified by the type and distribution of retinoblastoma (RB) seeding. Methods Multicentre, international registry-based data were collected from RB centres enrolled between January 2001 and December 2013. 1054 RB eyes with vitreous or subretinal seeds from 18 ophthalmic oncology centres, in 13 countries within six continents were analysed. Local treatment failure was defined as the use of secondary enucleation or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Clinical category cT2b included 1054 eyes. Median age at presentation was 16.0 months. Of these, 428 (40.6%) eyes were salvaged, and 430 (40.8%) were treated with primary and 196 (18.6%) with secondary enucleation. Of the 592 eyes that had complete data for globe salvage analysis, the distribution of seeds was focal in 143 (24.2%) and diffuse in 449 (75.8%). The 5-year Kaplan-Meier cumulative globe-salvage (without EBRT) was 78% and 49% for eyes with focal and diffuse RB seeding, respectively. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis confirmed a higher local treatment failure risk with diffuse seeds as compared with focal seeds (hazard rate: 2.8; p<0.001). There was insufficient evidence to prove or disprove an association between vitreous seed type and local treatment failure risk(p=0.06). Conclusion This international, multicentre, registry-based analysis of RB eyes affirmed that eyes with diffuse intraocular distribution of RB seeds at diagnosis had a higher risk of local treatment failure when compared with focal seeds. Subclassification of AJCC RB category cT2b into focal vs diffuse seeds will improve prognostication for eye salvage.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-08
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/166903
Tomar, Ankit Singh; Finger, Paul T.; Gallie, Brenda; Kivelä, Tero; Mallipatna, Ashwin; et al.; Retinoblastoma seeds: Impact on American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical staging; B M J Publishing Group; British Journal Of Ophthalmology; 2021; 8-2021; 1-6
0007-1161
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/166903
identifier_str_mv Tomar, Ankit Singh; Finger, Paul T.; Gallie, Brenda; Kivelä, Tero; Mallipatna, Ashwin; et al.; Retinoblastoma seeds: Impact on American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical staging; B M J Publishing Group; British Journal Of Ophthalmology; 2021; 8-2021; 1-6
0007-1161
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-318892
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://bjo.bmj.com/content/early/2021/08/01/bjophthalmol-2021-318892
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv B M J Publishing Group
publisher.none.fl_str_mv B M J Publishing Group
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269723459321856
score 13.13397