Relacionalidades humano-artefactuales: lecturas de otra filosofía de la técnica

Autores
Fischetti, Natalia Beatriz
Año de publicación
2022
Idioma
español castellano
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Every epistemology refers to ontology. Relational ontologies question disciplinary knowledge and bet on multi-agential overlaps and entanglements between human beings and artifacts. This article interlinks some bets arising from a feminist, neomaterialist and posthumanist philosophy of technics, which I regard as a dialogical compost for technoscience: I connect Karen Barad’s agential realism and its category of intra-action with Lucy Suchman’s notion of interdependence, Judy Wajcman’s proposal of a technofeminist co-constitution with María Puig de la Bellacasa’s matters of care, and all, of course, with Donna Haraway’s response-ability. That is, I regard all these bets as sympoietically intertwined, and generative of each other. Far from being static, apparatuses reconfigure the world given by Barad’s material-discursive intra-actions, performativities open to rearticulations, relationalities that produce phenomena in the dynamic agency of the world. Suchman aims to understand this mutual constitution of agency between humans and artifacts in their dynamic and interdependent relationships, while identifying the differences and particularities that distinguish the specific assemblages of humans and non-humans. Aware to these sociomaterial practices, Wajcman sustains the mutual constitution of gender and technoscience from what she calls technofeminism. For Puig de la Bellacasa, the interdependence between humans and artifacts is assumed from a commitment to care practices coupled with the sociotechnical relationships of things, human and non-human. Haraway exhorts us to response-ability in practices attending to situated technological projects and their people. In a relational material-semiotic world it is necessary to think with situated relational categories. In any case, it is about feminist epistemological policies committed to the present, of intertwined configurations, affinities and articulations to continue with the problem of thinking about technoscience for other possible worlds.
Fil: Fischetti, Natalia Beatriz. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Ciencias Humanas, Sociales y Ambientales; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo; Argentina
Materia
FEMINISMOS
ONTOLOGÍAS RELACIONALES
EPISTEMOLOGÍA
TECNOCIENCIA
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/203692
Acceder
id CONICETDig_c58c0e657870dd19731bc790933c3ff3
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/203692
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Relacionalidades humano-artefactuales: lecturas de otra filosofía de la técnicaFischetti, Natalia BeatrizFEMINISMOSONTOLOGÍAS RELACIONALESEPISTEMOLOGÍATECNOCIENCIAhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6Every epistemology refers to ontology. Relational ontologies question disciplinary knowledge and bet on multi-agential overlaps and entanglements between human beings and artifacts. This article interlinks some bets arising from a feminist, neomaterialist and posthumanist philosophy of technics, which I regard as a dialogical compost for technoscience: I connect Karen Barad’s agential realism and its category of intra-action with Lucy Suchman’s notion of interdependence, Judy Wajcman’s proposal of a technofeminist co-constitution with María Puig de la Bellacasa’s matters of care, and all, of course, with Donna Haraway’s response-ability. That is, I regard all these bets as sympoietically intertwined, and generative of each other. Far from being static, apparatuses reconfigure the world given by Barad’s material-discursive intra-actions, performativities open to rearticulations, relationalities that produce phenomena in the dynamic agency of the world. Suchman aims to understand this mutual constitution of agency between humans and artifacts in their dynamic and interdependent relationships, while identifying the differences and particularities that distinguish the specific assemblages of humans and non-humans. Aware to these sociomaterial practices, Wajcman sustains the mutual constitution of gender and technoscience from what she calls technofeminism. For Puig de la Bellacasa, the interdependence between humans and artifacts is assumed from a commitment to care practices coupled with the sociotechnical relationships of things, human and non-human. Haraway exhorts us to response-ability in practices attending to situated technological projects and their people. In a relational material-semiotic world it is necessary to think with situated relational categories. In any case, it is about feminist epistemological policies committed to the present, of intertwined configurations, affinities and articulations to continue with the problem of thinking about technoscience for other possible worlds.Fil: Fischetti, Natalia Beatriz. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Ciencias Humanas, Sociales y Ambientales; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo; ArgentinaRadical Open Access Collective2022-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/203692Fischetti, Natalia Beatriz; Relacionalidades humano-artefactuales: lecturas de otra filosofía de la técnica; Radical Open Access Collective; Culture Machine; 21; 10-2022; 1-131465-4121CONICET DigitalCONICETspainfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://culturemachine.net/vol-21-antropoficciones/relacionalidades-humano-artefactuales-lecturas-de-otra-filosofia-de-la-tecnica-natalia-fischetti/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:45:24Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/203692instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:45:24.396CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Relacionalidades humano-artefactuales: lecturas de otra filosofía de la técnica
title Relacionalidades humano-artefactuales: lecturas de otra filosofía de la técnica
spellingShingle Relacionalidades humano-artefactuales: lecturas de otra filosofía de la técnica
Fischetti, Natalia Beatriz
FEMINISMOS
ONTOLOGÍAS RELACIONALES
EPISTEMOLOGÍA
TECNOCIENCIA
title_short Relacionalidades humano-artefactuales: lecturas de otra filosofía de la técnica
title_full Relacionalidades humano-artefactuales: lecturas de otra filosofía de la técnica
title_fullStr Relacionalidades humano-artefactuales: lecturas de otra filosofía de la técnica
title_full_unstemmed Relacionalidades humano-artefactuales: lecturas de otra filosofía de la técnica
title_sort Relacionalidades humano-artefactuales: lecturas de otra filosofía de la técnica
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Fischetti, Natalia Beatriz
author Fischetti, Natalia Beatriz
author_facet Fischetti, Natalia Beatriz
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv FEMINISMOS
ONTOLOGÍAS RELACIONALES
EPISTEMOLOGÍA
TECNOCIENCIA
topic FEMINISMOS
ONTOLOGÍAS RELACIONALES
EPISTEMOLOGÍA
TECNOCIENCIA
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Every epistemology refers to ontology. Relational ontologies question disciplinary knowledge and bet on multi-agential overlaps and entanglements between human beings and artifacts. This article interlinks some bets arising from a feminist, neomaterialist and posthumanist philosophy of technics, which I regard as a dialogical compost for technoscience: I connect Karen Barad’s agential realism and its category of intra-action with Lucy Suchman’s notion of interdependence, Judy Wajcman’s proposal of a technofeminist co-constitution with María Puig de la Bellacasa’s matters of care, and all, of course, with Donna Haraway’s response-ability. That is, I regard all these bets as sympoietically intertwined, and generative of each other. Far from being static, apparatuses reconfigure the world given by Barad’s material-discursive intra-actions, performativities open to rearticulations, relationalities that produce phenomena in the dynamic agency of the world. Suchman aims to understand this mutual constitution of agency between humans and artifacts in their dynamic and interdependent relationships, while identifying the differences and particularities that distinguish the specific assemblages of humans and non-humans. Aware to these sociomaterial practices, Wajcman sustains the mutual constitution of gender and technoscience from what she calls technofeminism. For Puig de la Bellacasa, the interdependence between humans and artifacts is assumed from a commitment to care practices coupled with the sociotechnical relationships of things, human and non-human. Haraway exhorts us to response-ability in practices attending to situated technological projects and their people. In a relational material-semiotic world it is necessary to think with situated relational categories. In any case, it is about feminist epistemological policies committed to the present, of intertwined configurations, affinities and articulations to continue with the problem of thinking about technoscience for other possible worlds.
Fil: Fischetti, Natalia Beatriz. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Ciencias Humanas, Sociales y Ambientales; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo; Argentina
description Every epistemology refers to ontology. Relational ontologies question disciplinary knowledge and bet on multi-agential overlaps and entanglements between human beings and artifacts. This article interlinks some bets arising from a feminist, neomaterialist and posthumanist philosophy of technics, which I regard as a dialogical compost for technoscience: I connect Karen Barad’s agential realism and its category of intra-action with Lucy Suchman’s notion of interdependence, Judy Wajcman’s proposal of a technofeminist co-constitution with María Puig de la Bellacasa’s matters of care, and all, of course, with Donna Haraway’s response-ability. That is, I regard all these bets as sympoietically intertwined, and generative of each other. Far from being static, apparatuses reconfigure the world given by Barad’s material-discursive intra-actions, performativities open to rearticulations, relationalities that produce phenomena in the dynamic agency of the world. Suchman aims to understand this mutual constitution of agency between humans and artifacts in their dynamic and interdependent relationships, while identifying the differences and particularities that distinguish the specific assemblages of humans and non-humans. Aware to these sociomaterial practices, Wajcman sustains the mutual constitution of gender and technoscience from what she calls technofeminism. For Puig de la Bellacasa, the interdependence between humans and artifacts is assumed from a commitment to care practices coupled with the sociotechnical relationships of things, human and non-human. Haraway exhorts us to response-ability in practices attending to situated technological projects and their people. In a relational material-semiotic world it is necessary to think with situated relational categories. In any case, it is about feminist epistemological policies committed to the present, of intertwined configurations, affinities and articulations to continue with the problem of thinking about technoscience for other possible worlds.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-10
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/203692
Fischetti, Natalia Beatriz; Relacionalidades humano-artefactuales: lecturas de otra filosofía de la técnica; Radical Open Access Collective; Culture Machine; 21; 10-2022; 1-13
1465-4121
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/203692
identifier_str_mv Fischetti, Natalia Beatriz; Relacionalidades humano-artefactuales: lecturas de otra filosofía de la técnica; Radical Open Access Collective; Culture Machine; 21; 10-2022; 1-13
1465-4121
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://culturemachine.net/vol-21-antropoficciones/relacionalidades-humano-artefactuales-lecturas-de-otra-filosofia-de-la-tecnica-natalia-fischetti/
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Radical Open Access Collective
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Radical Open Access Collective
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613424128983040
score 13.070432

Publicaciones similares