Scientific Culture Organisational and Professional Identity: A Systemic Game of Contexts and Subjects

Autores
Aparicio, Miriam Teresita
Año de publicación
2024
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
In theory, a scientific stratification (branches and disciplines) is frequently associated with the effectiveness of research groups but not professional mobility and other psychosocial factors. The study analyses the relationship among the organisational cultures specific to each field of speciality (human-social sciences versus exactnatural sciences), the satisfaction of researchers and the homogenisation of psychosocial behaviours with the mediation of the professional mobility variable; that is to say, the construction of organisational/disciplinary identities within the scientific system. Quantitative and qualitative techniques were used. Among the first, two questionnaires were used; among the latter, we used nonobstructive observation and interviews. This research concluded that Scientists' psychosocial responses and achievement levels vary according to their speciality areas, highlighting distinct disciplinary and organisational cultures within the scientific community. Dissatisfaction with team leadership is widespread across scientific disciplines, driven by factors such as effort, expectations, and societal influences, necessitating the development of transformative competencies, particularly leadership skills, to address these issues and promote well-being among scientists.
Fil: Aparicio, Miriam Teresita. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza; Argentina
Materia
Leadership Internationalization
Professional Mobility
Internationalization
Education
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/240266

id CONICETDig_c32dc63489a805131f1bd41bd1273c41
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/240266
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Scientific Culture Organisational and Professional Identity: A Systemic Game of Contexts and SubjectsAparicio, Miriam TeresitaLeadership InternationalizationProfessional MobilityInternationalizationEducationhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5In theory, a scientific stratification (branches and disciplines) is frequently associated with the effectiveness of research groups but not professional mobility and other psychosocial factors. The study analyses the relationship among the organisational cultures specific to each field of speciality (human-social sciences versus exactnatural sciences), the satisfaction of researchers and the homogenisation of psychosocial behaviours with the mediation of the professional mobility variable; that is to say, the construction of organisational/disciplinary identities within the scientific system. Quantitative and qualitative techniques were used. Among the first, two questionnaires were used; among the latter, we used nonobstructive observation and interviews. This research concluded that Scientists' psychosocial responses and achievement levels vary according to their speciality areas, highlighting distinct disciplinary and organisational cultures within the scientific community. Dissatisfaction with team leadership is widespread across scientific disciplines, driven by factors such as effort, expectations, and societal influences, necessitating the development of transformative competencies, particularly leadership skills, to address these issues and promote well-being among scientists.Fil: Aparicio, Miriam Teresita. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza; ArgentinaArif Muchyidin2024-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/240266Aparicio, Miriam Teresita; Scientific Culture Organisational and Professional Identity: A Systemic Game of Contexts and Subjects; Arif Muchyidin; Journal of General Education and Humanities; 3; 2; 6-2024; 143-1562963-7147CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://journal-gehu.com/index.php/gehu/article/view/195info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:55:42Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/240266instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:55:42.502CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Scientific Culture Organisational and Professional Identity: A Systemic Game of Contexts and Subjects
title Scientific Culture Organisational and Professional Identity: A Systemic Game of Contexts and Subjects
spellingShingle Scientific Culture Organisational and Professional Identity: A Systemic Game of Contexts and Subjects
Aparicio, Miriam Teresita
Leadership Internationalization
Professional Mobility
Internationalization
Education
title_short Scientific Culture Organisational and Professional Identity: A Systemic Game of Contexts and Subjects
title_full Scientific Culture Organisational and Professional Identity: A Systemic Game of Contexts and Subjects
title_fullStr Scientific Culture Organisational and Professional Identity: A Systemic Game of Contexts and Subjects
title_full_unstemmed Scientific Culture Organisational and Professional Identity: A Systemic Game of Contexts and Subjects
title_sort Scientific Culture Organisational and Professional Identity: A Systemic Game of Contexts and Subjects
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Aparicio, Miriam Teresita
author Aparicio, Miriam Teresita
author_facet Aparicio, Miriam Teresita
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Leadership Internationalization
Professional Mobility
Internationalization
Education
topic Leadership Internationalization
Professional Mobility
Internationalization
Education
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv In theory, a scientific stratification (branches and disciplines) is frequently associated with the effectiveness of research groups but not professional mobility and other psychosocial factors. The study analyses the relationship among the organisational cultures specific to each field of speciality (human-social sciences versus exactnatural sciences), the satisfaction of researchers and the homogenisation of psychosocial behaviours with the mediation of the professional mobility variable; that is to say, the construction of organisational/disciplinary identities within the scientific system. Quantitative and qualitative techniques were used. Among the first, two questionnaires were used; among the latter, we used nonobstructive observation and interviews. This research concluded that Scientists' psychosocial responses and achievement levels vary according to their speciality areas, highlighting distinct disciplinary and organisational cultures within the scientific community. Dissatisfaction with team leadership is widespread across scientific disciplines, driven by factors such as effort, expectations, and societal influences, necessitating the development of transformative competencies, particularly leadership skills, to address these issues and promote well-being among scientists.
Fil: Aparicio, Miriam Teresita. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza; Argentina
description In theory, a scientific stratification (branches and disciplines) is frequently associated with the effectiveness of research groups but not professional mobility and other psychosocial factors. The study analyses the relationship among the organisational cultures specific to each field of speciality (human-social sciences versus exactnatural sciences), the satisfaction of researchers and the homogenisation of psychosocial behaviours with the mediation of the professional mobility variable; that is to say, the construction of organisational/disciplinary identities within the scientific system. Quantitative and qualitative techniques were used. Among the first, two questionnaires were used; among the latter, we used nonobstructive observation and interviews. This research concluded that Scientists' psychosocial responses and achievement levels vary according to their speciality areas, highlighting distinct disciplinary and organisational cultures within the scientific community. Dissatisfaction with team leadership is widespread across scientific disciplines, driven by factors such as effort, expectations, and societal influences, necessitating the development of transformative competencies, particularly leadership skills, to address these issues and promote well-being among scientists.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-06
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/240266
Aparicio, Miriam Teresita; Scientific Culture Organisational and Professional Identity: A Systemic Game of Contexts and Subjects; Arif Muchyidin; Journal of General Education and Humanities; 3; 2; 6-2024; 143-156
2963-7147
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/240266
identifier_str_mv Aparicio, Miriam Teresita; Scientific Culture Organisational and Professional Identity: A Systemic Game of Contexts and Subjects; Arif Muchyidin; Journal of General Education and Humanities; 3; 2; 6-2024; 143-156
2963-7147
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://journal-gehu.com/index.php/gehu/article/view/195
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Arif Muchyidin
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Arif Muchyidin
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269361513955328
score 13.13397