Evaluation of three methods for preservation of Azotobacter chroococcum and Azotobacter vinelandii
- Autores
- Rojas Tapias, Daniel; Ortíz Vera, Mabel; Rivera Botia, Diego Mauricio; Kloepper, Joseph; Bonilla, Ruth
- Año de publicación
- 2013
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Because the use of bacteria for biotechnological processes requires maintaining their viability and genetic stability, preserving them becomes essential. Here, we evaluated three preservation methods for A. chroococcum C26 and A. vinelandii C27; preservation methods: cryopreservation and immobilization in dry polymers for 60 days, and freeze-drying for 30. We evaluated their efficiency by counting viable cells and measuring nitrogen fixation activity. Additionally, we assessed the effect of three protective agents for freeze-drying, three for cryopreservation, and four polymers. Freeze-drying proved the best technique to maintain viability and activity, followed by immobilization and cryopreservation. Bacterial nitrogen fixing ability remained unchanged using the freeze-drying method, and bacterial survival exceeded 80%; S/BSA was the best protective agent. Immobilization maintained bacterial survival over 80%, but nitrogen fixation was decreased by 20%. Lastly, cryopreservation resulted in a dramatic loss of viability for C26 (BSR approx. 70%), whereas C27 was well preserved. Nitrogen fixation for both strains decreased regardless of the cryoprotective agent used (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the success of Azotobacter preservation methods depend on the technique, the protective agent, and the strain used. Our results also indicated that freeze- drying using S/BSA is the best technique to preserve bacteria of this genus.
Fil: Rojas Tapias, Daniel. Corporación Colombia de Investigación Agropecuaria; Colombia
Fil: Ortíz Vera, Mabel. Corporación Colombia de Investigación Agropecuaria; Colombia
Fil: Rivera Botia, Diego Mauricio. Corporación Colombia de Investigación Agropecuaria; Colombia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Kloepper, Joseph. Auburn University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Bonilla, Ruth. Corporación Colombia de Investigación Agropecuaria; Colombia - Materia
-
Azotobacter
Bacterial preservation
Cryopreservation
Freeze-drying - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/23697
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_c03a20057fd6e508055e474eaa587cc1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/23697 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Evaluation of three methods for preservation of Azotobacter chroococcum and Azotobacter vinelandiiRojas Tapias, DanielOrtíz Vera, MabelRivera Botia, Diego MauricioKloepper, JosephBonilla, RuthAzotobacterBacterial preservationCryopreservationFreeze-dryinghttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.9https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2Because the use of bacteria for biotechnological processes requires maintaining their viability and genetic stability, preserving them becomes essential. Here, we evaluated three preservation methods for A. chroococcum C26 and A. vinelandii C27; preservation methods: cryopreservation and immobilization in dry polymers for 60 days, and freeze-drying for 30. We evaluated their efficiency by counting viable cells and measuring nitrogen fixation activity. Additionally, we assessed the effect of three protective agents for freeze-drying, three for cryopreservation, and four polymers. Freeze-drying proved the best technique to maintain viability and activity, followed by immobilization and cryopreservation. Bacterial nitrogen fixing ability remained unchanged using the freeze-drying method, and bacterial survival exceeded 80%; S/BSA was the best protective agent. Immobilization maintained bacterial survival over 80%, but nitrogen fixation was decreased by 20%. Lastly, cryopreservation resulted in a dramatic loss of viability for C26 (BSR approx. 70%), whereas C27 was well preserved. Nitrogen fixation for both strains decreased regardless of the cryoprotective agent used (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the success of Azotobacter preservation methods depend on the technique, the protective agent, and the strain used. Our results also indicated that freeze- drying using S/BSA is the best technique to preserve bacteria of this genus.Fil: Rojas Tapias, Daniel. Corporación Colombia de Investigación Agropecuaria; ColombiaFil: Ortíz Vera, Mabel. Corporación Colombia de Investigación Agropecuaria; ColombiaFil: Rivera Botia, Diego Mauricio. Corporación Colombia de Investigación Agropecuaria; Colombia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Kloepper, Joseph. Auburn University; Estados UnidosFil: Bonilla, Ruth. Corporación Colombia de Investigación Agropecuaria; ColombiaPontificia Universidad Javeriana. Facultad de Ciencias2013-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/23697Rojas Tapias, Daniel; Ortíz Vera, Mabel; Rivera Botia, Diego Mauricio; Kloepper, Joseph; Bonilla, Ruth; Evaluation of three methods for preservation of Azotobacter chroococcum and Azotobacter vinelandii; Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Facultad de Ciencias; Universitas Scientiarum; 18; 2; 6-2013; 129-1392027-1352CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.11144/Javeriana.SC18-2.etmpinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/scientarium/article/view/4404info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:06:04Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/23697instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:06:04.476CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of three methods for preservation of Azotobacter chroococcum and Azotobacter vinelandii |
title |
Evaluation of three methods for preservation of Azotobacter chroococcum and Azotobacter vinelandii |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of three methods for preservation of Azotobacter chroococcum and Azotobacter vinelandii Rojas Tapias, Daniel Azotobacter Bacterial preservation Cryopreservation Freeze-drying |
title_short |
Evaluation of three methods for preservation of Azotobacter chroococcum and Azotobacter vinelandii |
title_full |
Evaluation of three methods for preservation of Azotobacter chroococcum and Azotobacter vinelandii |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of three methods for preservation of Azotobacter chroococcum and Azotobacter vinelandii |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of three methods for preservation of Azotobacter chroococcum and Azotobacter vinelandii |
title_sort |
Evaluation of three methods for preservation of Azotobacter chroococcum and Azotobacter vinelandii |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Rojas Tapias, Daniel Ortíz Vera, Mabel Rivera Botia, Diego Mauricio Kloepper, Joseph Bonilla, Ruth |
author |
Rojas Tapias, Daniel |
author_facet |
Rojas Tapias, Daniel Ortíz Vera, Mabel Rivera Botia, Diego Mauricio Kloepper, Joseph Bonilla, Ruth |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ortíz Vera, Mabel Rivera Botia, Diego Mauricio Kloepper, Joseph Bonilla, Ruth |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Azotobacter Bacterial preservation Cryopreservation Freeze-drying |
topic |
Azotobacter Bacterial preservation Cryopreservation Freeze-drying |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.9 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Because the use of bacteria for biotechnological processes requires maintaining their viability and genetic stability, preserving them becomes essential. Here, we evaluated three preservation methods for A. chroococcum C26 and A. vinelandii C27; preservation methods: cryopreservation and immobilization in dry polymers for 60 days, and freeze-drying for 30. We evaluated their efficiency by counting viable cells and measuring nitrogen fixation activity. Additionally, we assessed the effect of three protective agents for freeze-drying, three for cryopreservation, and four polymers. Freeze-drying proved the best technique to maintain viability and activity, followed by immobilization and cryopreservation. Bacterial nitrogen fixing ability remained unchanged using the freeze-drying method, and bacterial survival exceeded 80%; S/BSA was the best protective agent. Immobilization maintained bacterial survival over 80%, but nitrogen fixation was decreased by 20%. Lastly, cryopreservation resulted in a dramatic loss of viability for C26 (BSR approx. 70%), whereas C27 was well preserved. Nitrogen fixation for both strains decreased regardless of the cryoprotective agent used (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the success of Azotobacter preservation methods depend on the technique, the protective agent, and the strain used. Our results also indicated that freeze- drying using S/BSA is the best technique to preserve bacteria of this genus. Fil: Rojas Tapias, Daniel. Corporación Colombia de Investigación Agropecuaria; Colombia Fil: Ortíz Vera, Mabel. Corporación Colombia de Investigación Agropecuaria; Colombia Fil: Rivera Botia, Diego Mauricio. Corporación Colombia de Investigación Agropecuaria; Colombia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Kloepper, Joseph. Auburn University; Estados Unidos Fil: Bonilla, Ruth. Corporación Colombia de Investigación Agropecuaria; Colombia |
description |
Because the use of bacteria for biotechnological processes requires maintaining their viability and genetic stability, preserving them becomes essential. Here, we evaluated three preservation methods for A. chroococcum C26 and A. vinelandii C27; preservation methods: cryopreservation and immobilization in dry polymers for 60 days, and freeze-drying for 30. We evaluated their efficiency by counting viable cells and measuring nitrogen fixation activity. Additionally, we assessed the effect of three protective agents for freeze-drying, three for cryopreservation, and four polymers. Freeze-drying proved the best technique to maintain viability and activity, followed by immobilization and cryopreservation. Bacterial nitrogen fixing ability remained unchanged using the freeze-drying method, and bacterial survival exceeded 80%; S/BSA was the best protective agent. Immobilization maintained bacterial survival over 80%, but nitrogen fixation was decreased by 20%. Lastly, cryopreservation resulted in a dramatic loss of viability for C26 (BSR approx. 70%), whereas C27 was well preserved. Nitrogen fixation for both strains decreased regardless of the cryoprotective agent used (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the success of Azotobacter preservation methods depend on the technique, the protective agent, and the strain used. Our results also indicated that freeze- drying using S/BSA is the best technique to preserve bacteria of this genus. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-06 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/23697 Rojas Tapias, Daniel; Ortíz Vera, Mabel; Rivera Botia, Diego Mauricio; Kloepper, Joseph; Bonilla, Ruth; Evaluation of three methods for preservation of Azotobacter chroococcum and Azotobacter vinelandii; Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Facultad de Ciencias; Universitas Scientiarum; 18; 2; 6-2013; 129-139 2027-1352 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/23697 |
identifier_str_mv |
Rojas Tapias, Daniel; Ortíz Vera, Mabel; Rivera Botia, Diego Mauricio; Kloepper, Joseph; Bonilla, Ruth; Evaluation of three methods for preservation of Azotobacter chroococcum and Azotobacter vinelandii; Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Facultad de Ciencias; Universitas Scientiarum; 18; 2; 6-2013; 129-139 2027-1352 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.11144/Javeriana.SC18-2.etmp info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/scientarium/article/view/4404 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Facultad de Ciencias |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Facultad de Ciencias |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842269941201371136 |
score |
13.13397 |