Against normative judgement internalism
- Autores
- del Corral de Felipe, Miranda
- Año de publicación
- 2013
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Normative judgement internalism claims that enkrasia is an ideal of rational agency that poses a necessary link between making a normative judgement, and forming an intention to act according to that judgement. Against this view, I argue that enkrasia does not require the formation of new intentional states; instead, it requires that the agent´s intentions do not contravene her normative judgements. The main argument for considering that an intention ought to follow from a normative judgement is the claim that the conclusion of practical reasoning is an intention. I will argue that this account is mistaken: practical reasoning aims at justifying certain actions or intentions, and thus its conclusion is a normative judgement. Defenders of NJI might argue, though, that intentions ought to follow from our normative judgements, because of certain requirements affecting not only practical reasoning, but rational agency. I argue that this conception of enkrasia is too demanding. Enkrasia, I suggest, is better understood as a restriction over our intentions: they ought not enter into conflict with our judgements.
Fil: del Corral de Felipe, Miranda. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras; Argentina - Materia
-
AKRASIA
ENKRASIA
NORMATIVE JUDGEMENTS
NORMATIVE REQUIREMENTS
PRACTICAL REASONING - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/26526
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_bef4243f27d01a0f565f62b811d6a5d5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/26526 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Against normative judgement internalismdel Corral de Felipe, MirandaAKRASIAENKRASIANORMATIVE JUDGEMENTSNORMATIVE REQUIREMENTSPRACTICAL REASONINGhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6Normative judgement internalism claims that enkrasia is an ideal of rational agency that poses a necessary link between making a normative judgement, and forming an intention to act according to that judgement. Against this view, I argue that enkrasia does not require the formation of new intentional states; instead, it requires that the agent´s intentions do not contravene her normative judgements. The main argument for considering that an intention ought to follow from a normative judgement is the claim that the conclusion of practical reasoning is an intention. I will argue that this account is mistaken: practical reasoning aims at justifying certain actions or intentions, and thus its conclusion is a normative judgement. Defenders of NJI might argue, though, that intentions ought to follow from our normative judgements, because of certain requirements affecting not only practical reasoning, but rational agency. I argue that this conception of enkrasia is too demanding. Enkrasia, I suggest, is better understood as a restriction over our intentions: they ought not enter into conflict with our judgements.Fil: del Corral de Felipe, Miranda. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras; ArgentinaInstitute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciences2013-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/26526del Corral de Felipe, Miranda; Against normative judgement internalism; Institute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciences; Organon F; 20; 4; 4-2013; 567-5871335-06682585-7150CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/organon/?q=en/against-normative-judgement-internalisminfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:08:25Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/26526instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:08:25.461CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Against normative judgement internalism |
title |
Against normative judgement internalism |
spellingShingle |
Against normative judgement internalism del Corral de Felipe, Miranda AKRASIA ENKRASIA NORMATIVE JUDGEMENTS NORMATIVE REQUIREMENTS PRACTICAL REASONING |
title_short |
Against normative judgement internalism |
title_full |
Against normative judgement internalism |
title_fullStr |
Against normative judgement internalism |
title_full_unstemmed |
Against normative judgement internalism |
title_sort |
Against normative judgement internalism |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
del Corral de Felipe, Miranda |
author |
del Corral de Felipe, Miranda |
author_facet |
del Corral de Felipe, Miranda |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
AKRASIA ENKRASIA NORMATIVE JUDGEMENTS NORMATIVE REQUIREMENTS PRACTICAL REASONING |
topic |
AKRASIA ENKRASIA NORMATIVE JUDGEMENTS NORMATIVE REQUIREMENTS PRACTICAL REASONING |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Normative judgement internalism claims that enkrasia is an ideal of rational agency that poses a necessary link between making a normative judgement, and forming an intention to act according to that judgement. Against this view, I argue that enkrasia does not require the formation of new intentional states; instead, it requires that the agent´s intentions do not contravene her normative judgements. The main argument for considering that an intention ought to follow from a normative judgement is the claim that the conclusion of practical reasoning is an intention. I will argue that this account is mistaken: practical reasoning aims at justifying certain actions or intentions, and thus its conclusion is a normative judgement. Defenders of NJI might argue, though, that intentions ought to follow from our normative judgements, because of certain requirements affecting not only practical reasoning, but rational agency. I argue that this conception of enkrasia is too demanding. Enkrasia, I suggest, is better understood as a restriction over our intentions: they ought not enter into conflict with our judgements. Fil: del Corral de Felipe, Miranda. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras; Argentina |
description |
Normative judgement internalism claims that enkrasia is an ideal of rational agency that poses a necessary link between making a normative judgement, and forming an intention to act according to that judgement. Against this view, I argue that enkrasia does not require the formation of new intentional states; instead, it requires that the agent´s intentions do not contravene her normative judgements. The main argument for considering that an intention ought to follow from a normative judgement is the claim that the conclusion of practical reasoning is an intention. I will argue that this account is mistaken: practical reasoning aims at justifying certain actions or intentions, and thus its conclusion is a normative judgement. Defenders of NJI might argue, though, that intentions ought to follow from our normative judgements, because of certain requirements affecting not only practical reasoning, but rational agency. I argue that this conception of enkrasia is too demanding. Enkrasia, I suggest, is better understood as a restriction over our intentions: they ought not enter into conflict with our judgements. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-04 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/26526 del Corral de Felipe, Miranda; Against normative judgement internalism; Institute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciences; Organon F; 20; 4; 4-2013; 567-587 1335-0668 2585-7150 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/26526 |
identifier_str_mv |
del Corral de Felipe, Miranda; Against normative judgement internalism; Institute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciences; Organon F; 20; 4; 4-2013; 567-587 1335-0668 2585-7150 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/organon/?q=en/against-normative-judgement-internalism |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Institute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciences |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Institute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciences |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842270044187262976 |
score |
13.13397 |