Against normative judgement internalism

Autores
del Corral de Felipe, Miranda
Año de publicación
2013
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Normative judgement internalism claims that enkrasia is an ideal of rational agency that poses a necessary link between making a normative judgement, and forming an intention to act according to that judgement. Against this view, I argue that enkrasia does not require the formation of new intentional states; instead, it requires that the agent´s intentions do not contravene her normative judgements. The main argument for considering that an intention ought to follow from a normative judgement is the claim that the conclusion of practical reasoning is an intention. I will argue that this account is mistaken: practical reasoning aims at justifying certain actions or intentions, and thus its conclusion is a normative judgement. Defenders of NJI might argue, though, that intentions ought to follow from our normative judgements, because of certain requirements affecting not only practical reasoning, but rational agency. I argue that this conception of enkrasia is too demanding. Enkrasia, I suggest, is better understood as a restriction over our intentions: they ought not enter into conflict with our judgements.
Fil: del Corral de Felipe, Miranda. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras; Argentina
Materia
AKRASIA
ENKRASIA
NORMATIVE JUDGEMENTS
NORMATIVE REQUIREMENTS
PRACTICAL REASONING
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/26526

id CONICETDig_bef4243f27d01a0f565f62b811d6a5d5
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/26526
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Against normative judgement internalismdel Corral de Felipe, MirandaAKRASIAENKRASIANORMATIVE JUDGEMENTSNORMATIVE REQUIREMENTSPRACTICAL REASONINGhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6Normative judgement internalism claims that enkrasia is an ideal of rational agency that poses a necessary link between making a normative judgement, and forming an intention to act according to that judgement. Against this view, I argue that enkrasia does not require the formation of new intentional states; instead, it requires that the agent´s intentions do not contravene her normative judgements. The main argument for considering that an intention ought to follow from a normative judgement is the claim that the conclusion of practical reasoning is an intention. I will argue that this account is mistaken: practical reasoning aims at justifying certain actions or intentions, and thus its conclusion is a normative judgement. Defenders of NJI might argue, though, that intentions ought to follow from our normative judgements, because of certain requirements affecting not only practical reasoning, but rational agency. I argue that this conception of enkrasia is too demanding. Enkrasia, I suggest, is better understood as a restriction over our intentions: they ought not enter into conflict with our judgements.Fil: del Corral de Felipe, Miranda. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras; ArgentinaInstitute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciences2013-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/26526del Corral de Felipe, Miranda; Against normative judgement internalism; Institute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciences; Organon F; 20; 4; 4-2013; 567-5871335-06682585-7150CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/organon/?q=en/against-normative-judgement-internalisminfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:08:25Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/26526instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:08:25.461CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Against normative judgement internalism
title Against normative judgement internalism
spellingShingle Against normative judgement internalism
del Corral de Felipe, Miranda
AKRASIA
ENKRASIA
NORMATIVE JUDGEMENTS
NORMATIVE REQUIREMENTS
PRACTICAL REASONING
title_short Against normative judgement internalism
title_full Against normative judgement internalism
title_fullStr Against normative judgement internalism
title_full_unstemmed Against normative judgement internalism
title_sort Against normative judgement internalism
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv del Corral de Felipe, Miranda
author del Corral de Felipe, Miranda
author_facet del Corral de Felipe, Miranda
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv AKRASIA
ENKRASIA
NORMATIVE JUDGEMENTS
NORMATIVE REQUIREMENTS
PRACTICAL REASONING
topic AKRASIA
ENKRASIA
NORMATIVE JUDGEMENTS
NORMATIVE REQUIREMENTS
PRACTICAL REASONING
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Normative judgement internalism claims that enkrasia is an ideal of rational agency that poses a necessary link between making a normative judgement, and forming an intention to act according to that judgement. Against this view, I argue that enkrasia does not require the formation of new intentional states; instead, it requires that the agent´s intentions do not contravene her normative judgements. The main argument for considering that an intention ought to follow from a normative judgement is the claim that the conclusion of practical reasoning is an intention. I will argue that this account is mistaken: practical reasoning aims at justifying certain actions or intentions, and thus its conclusion is a normative judgement. Defenders of NJI might argue, though, that intentions ought to follow from our normative judgements, because of certain requirements affecting not only practical reasoning, but rational agency. I argue that this conception of enkrasia is too demanding. Enkrasia, I suggest, is better understood as a restriction over our intentions: they ought not enter into conflict with our judgements.
Fil: del Corral de Felipe, Miranda. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras; Argentina
description Normative judgement internalism claims that enkrasia is an ideal of rational agency that poses a necessary link between making a normative judgement, and forming an intention to act according to that judgement. Against this view, I argue that enkrasia does not require the formation of new intentional states; instead, it requires that the agent´s intentions do not contravene her normative judgements. The main argument for considering that an intention ought to follow from a normative judgement is the claim that the conclusion of practical reasoning is an intention. I will argue that this account is mistaken: practical reasoning aims at justifying certain actions or intentions, and thus its conclusion is a normative judgement. Defenders of NJI might argue, though, that intentions ought to follow from our normative judgements, because of certain requirements affecting not only practical reasoning, but rational agency. I argue that this conception of enkrasia is too demanding. Enkrasia, I suggest, is better understood as a restriction over our intentions: they ought not enter into conflict with our judgements.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-04
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/26526
del Corral de Felipe, Miranda; Against normative judgement internalism; Institute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciences; Organon F; 20; 4; 4-2013; 567-587
1335-0668
2585-7150
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/26526
identifier_str_mv del Corral de Felipe, Miranda; Against normative judgement internalism; Institute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciences; Organon F; 20; 4; 4-2013; 567-587
1335-0668
2585-7150
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/organon/?q=en/against-normative-judgement-internalism
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Institute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciences
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Institute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciences
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842270044187262976
score 13.13397