Differences in the semen quality of Apis mellifera drones of selected lines along reproductive season in Balcarce district, Southeastern Buenos Aires Province, Argentina
- Autores
- Meroi Arcerito, Facundo René; Martinez, Analía; Bedascarrasbure, Belén; Lobo, Juan; Hozbor, Federico; Palacio, Alejandra
- Año de publicación
- 2023
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- documento de conferencia
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Sperm quality in Apis mellifera drones plays a central role in colony reproduction. Several authors claimed that semen quality varies according to intrinsic and extrinsic factors. However, paramount and basic issues are unresolved in disentangling the factors affecting sperm quality. Here we explored if different dates within the reproductive season exhibit variation in sperm quality of drones from colonies selected under a template climate. Drones come from colonies of the Honeybee genetic program (MEGA-INTA), where lineages of brood disease tolerances are reared along with other features sought by the apiculture sector. The essay consists of three sampling times (T1, T2, T3) involving the whole reproductive season (from November to February), where T1 represents the beginning, T2 the middle, and T3 the ending reproductive season. Eight hives were assessed twice per sampling time. The techniques used were Eosina-Nigrosina for viability, Osmotic Swelling test (HOST) to test cell membrane function by using distilled water 100 OSM at 22°C and 35°C, concentration (number of spermatic cells estimation per volume of semen) through a Newbauer chamber, the number of drones matures with semen (total drones evaluated/drones with ejection of semen under abdomen stimulation), and the obtained sperm volume per drone (obtained volume/number of drone with semen) per colony. Results suggest T2 has better viability than T1 and T3 (Mann-Whitney: p= 0,00189 and p=0,005264, respectively). In HOST with distilled water, T2 differs from T3 (Mann-Whitney: p=0,01344). At 100 OSM at 22°C, there were no differences (all P>0.05), and at 100 OSM at 35°C, we only registered differences between T2 and T3 (Mann-Whitney: p=0,01639). In Concentration, T2 had more sperm cells than T1 and T3 (Mann-Whitney: p=1,05E-05 and p= 2,25E-06, respectively). In semen volume per drone and the number of mature drones with semen, there were no differences (all P>0.05). Our results suggest variation in semen quality through the reproductive season. Hence, in the sampling region, we recommend using reproductive techniques involving semen manipulation, preferably in January (T2), involving better quality semen.
Fil: Meroi Arcerito, Facundo René. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones En Produccion, Sanidad y Ambiente. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas. Centro Cientifico Tecnologico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones En Produccion, Sanidad y Ambiente.; Argentina
Fil: Martinez, Analía. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata; Argentina
Fil: Bedascarrasbure, Belén. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina
Fil: Lobo, Juan. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata; Argentina
Fil: Hozbor, Federico. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina
Fil: Palacio, Alejandra. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina
48th International Apicultural Congress
Santiago de Chile
Chile
Federación Internacional de Organizaciones de Apicultura - Materia
-
Semen
Apis mellifera
quality - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/250675
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_bbb8e933a89eb15e82fc665ae529e695 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/250675 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Differences in the semen quality of Apis mellifera drones of selected lines along reproductive season in Balcarce district, Southeastern Buenos Aires Province, ArgentinaMeroi Arcerito, Facundo RenéMartinez, AnalíaBedascarrasbure, BelénLobo, JuanHozbor, FedericoPalacio, AlejandraSemenApis melliferaqualityhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Sperm quality in Apis mellifera drones plays a central role in colony reproduction. Several authors claimed that semen quality varies according to intrinsic and extrinsic factors. However, paramount and basic issues are unresolved in disentangling the factors affecting sperm quality. Here we explored if different dates within the reproductive season exhibit variation in sperm quality of drones from colonies selected under a template climate. Drones come from colonies of the Honeybee genetic program (MEGA-INTA), where lineages of brood disease tolerances are reared along with other features sought by the apiculture sector. The essay consists of three sampling times (T1, T2, T3) involving the whole reproductive season (from November to February), where T1 represents the beginning, T2 the middle, and T3 the ending reproductive season. Eight hives were assessed twice per sampling time. The techniques used were Eosina-Nigrosina for viability, Osmotic Swelling test (HOST) to test cell membrane function by using distilled water 100 OSM at 22°C and 35°C, concentration (number of spermatic cells estimation per volume of semen) through a Newbauer chamber, the number of drones matures with semen (total drones evaluated/drones with ejection of semen under abdomen stimulation), and the obtained sperm volume per drone (obtained volume/number of drone with semen) per colony. Results suggest T2 has better viability than T1 and T3 (Mann-Whitney: p= 0,00189 and p=0,005264, respectively). In HOST with distilled water, T2 differs from T3 (Mann-Whitney: p=0,01344). At 100 OSM at 22°C, there were no differences (all P>0.05), and at 100 OSM at 35°C, we only registered differences between T2 and T3 (Mann-Whitney: p=0,01639). In Concentration, T2 had more sperm cells than T1 and T3 (Mann-Whitney: p=1,05E-05 and p= 2,25E-06, respectively). In semen volume per drone and the number of mature drones with semen, there were no differences (all P>0.05). Our results suggest variation in semen quality through the reproductive season. Hence, in the sampling region, we recommend using reproductive techniques involving semen manipulation, preferably in January (T2), involving better quality semen.Fil: Meroi Arcerito, Facundo René. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones En Produccion, Sanidad y Ambiente. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas. Centro Cientifico Tecnologico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones En Produccion, Sanidad y Ambiente.; ArgentinaFil: Martinez, Analía. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata; ArgentinaFil: Bedascarrasbure, Belén. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; ArgentinaFil: Lobo, Juan. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata; ArgentinaFil: Hozbor, Federico. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; ArgentinaFil: Palacio, Alejandra. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina48th International Apicultural CongressSantiago de ChileChileFederación Internacional de Organizaciones de ApiculturaConmark Tourism & Event Management Company2023info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectCongresoBookhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/250675Differences in the semen quality of Apis mellifera drones of selected lines along reproductive season in Balcarce district, Southeastern Buenos Aires Province, Argentina; 48th International Apicultural Congress; Santiago de Chile; Chile; 2023; 144-144CONICET DigitalCONICETengInternacionalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:43:00Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/250675instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:43:00.507CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Differences in the semen quality of Apis mellifera drones of selected lines along reproductive season in Balcarce district, Southeastern Buenos Aires Province, Argentina |
title |
Differences in the semen quality of Apis mellifera drones of selected lines along reproductive season in Balcarce district, Southeastern Buenos Aires Province, Argentina |
spellingShingle |
Differences in the semen quality of Apis mellifera drones of selected lines along reproductive season in Balcarce district, Southeastern Buenos Aires Province, Argentina Meroi Arcerito, Facundo René Semen Apis mellifera quality |
title_short |
Differences in the semen quality of Apis mellifera drones of selected lines along reproductive season in Balcarce district, Southeastern Buenos Aires Province, Argentina |
title_full |
Differences in the semen quality of Apis mellifera drones of selected lines along reproductive season in Balcarce district, Southeastern Buenos Aires Province, Argentina |
title_fullStr |
Differences in the semen quality of Apis mellifera drones of selected lines along reproductive season in Balcarce district, Southeastern Buenos Aires Province, Argentina |
title_full_unstemmed |
Differences in the semen quality of Apis mellifera drones of selected lines along reproductive season in Balcarce district, Southeastern Buenos Aires Province, Argentina |
title_sort |
Differences in the semen quality of Apis mellifera drones of selected lines along reproductive season in Balcarce district, Southeastern Buenos Aires Province, Argentina |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Meroi Arcerito, Facundo René Martinez, Analía Bedascarrasbure, Belén Lobo, Juan Hozbor, Federico Palacio, Alejandra |
author |
Meroi Arcerito, Facundo René |
author_facet |
Meroi Arcerito, Facundo René Martinez, Analía Bedascarrasbure, Belén Lobo, Juan Hozbor, Federico Palacio, Alejandra |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Martinez, Analía Bedascarrasbure, Belén Lobo, Juan Hozbor, Federico Palacio, Alejandra |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Semen Apis mellifera quality |
topic |
Semen Apis mellifera quality |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Sperm quality in Apis mellifera drones plays a central role in colony reproduction. Several authors claimed that semen quality varies according to intrinsic and extrinsic factors. However, paramount and basic issues are unresolved in disentangling the factors affecting sperm quality. Here we explored if different dates within the reproductive season exhibit variation in sperm quality of drones from colonies selected under a template climate. Drones come from colonies of the Honeybee genetic program (MEGA-INTA), where lineages of brood disease tolerances are reared along with other features sought by the apiculture sector. The essay consists of three sampling times (T1, T2, T3) involving the whole reproductive season (from November to February), where T1 represents the beginning, T2 the middle, and T3 the ending reproductive season. Eight hives were assessed twice per sampling time. The techniques used were Eosina-Nigrosina for viability, Osmotic Swelling test (HOST) to test cell membrane function by using distilled water 100 OSM at 22°C and 35°C, concentration (number of spermatic cells estimation per volume of semen) through a Newbauer chamber, the number of drones matures with semen (total drones evaluated/drones with ejection of semen under abdomen stimulation), and the obtained sperm volume per drone (obtained volume/number of drone with semen) per colony. Results suggest T2 has better viability than T1 and T3 (Mann-Whitney: p= 0,00189 and p=0,005264, respectively). In HOST with distilled water, T2 differs from T3 (Mann-Whitney: p=0,01344). At 100 OSM at 22°C, there were no differences (all P>0.05), and at 100 OSM at 35°C, we only registered differences between T2 and T3 (Mann-Whitney: p=0,01639). In Concentration, T2 had more sperm cells than T1 and T3 (Mann-Whitney: p=1,05E-05 and p= 2,25E-06, respectively). In semen volume per drone and the number of mature drones with semen, there were no differences (all P>0.05). Our results suggest variation in semen quality through the reproductive season. Hence, in the sampling region, we recommend using reproductive techniques involving semen manipulation, preferably in January (T2), involving better quality semen. Fil: Meroi Arcerito, Facundo René. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones En Produccion, Sanidad y Ambiente. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas. Centro Cientifico Tecnologico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones En Produccion, Sanidad y Ambiente.; Argentina Fil: Martinez, Analía. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata; Argentina Fil: Bedascarrasbure, Belén. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina Fil: Lobo, Juan. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata; Argentina Fil: Hozbor, Federico. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina Fil: Palacio, Alejandra. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina 48th International Apicultural Congress Santiago de Chile Chile Federación Internacional de Organizaciones de Apicultura |
description |
Sperm quality in Apis mellifera drones plays a central role in colony reproduction. Several authors claimed that semen quality varies according to intrinsic and extrinsic factors. However, paramount and basic issues are unresolved in disentangling the factors affecting sperm quality. Here we explored if different dates within the reproductive season exhibit variation in sperm quality of drones from colonies selected under a template climate. Drones come from colonies of the Honeybee genetic program (MEGA-INTA), where lineages of brood disease tolerances are reared along with other features sought by the apiculture sector. The essay consists of three sampling times (T1, T2, T3) involving the whole reproductive season (from November to February), where T1 represents the beginning, T2 the middle, and T3 the ending reproductive season. Eight hives were assessed twice per sampling time. The techniques used were Eosina-Nigrosina for viability, Osmotic Swelling test (HOST) to test cell membrane function by using distilled water 100 OSM at 22°C and 35°C, concentration (number of spermatic cells estimation per volume of semen) through a Newbauer chamber, the number of drones matures with semen (total drones evaluated/drones with ejection of semen under abdomen stimulation), and the obtained sperm volume per drone (obtained volume/number of drone with semen) per colony. Results suggest T2 has better viability than T1 and T3 (Mann-Whitney: p= 0,00189 and p=0,005264, respectively). In HOST with distilled water, T2 differs from T3 (Mann-Whitney: p=0,01344). At 100 OSM at 22°C, there were no differences (all P>0.05), and at 100 OSM at 35°C, we only registered differences between T2 and T3 (Mann-Whitney: p=0,01639). In Concentration, T2 had more sperm cells than T1 and T3 (Mann-Whitney: p=1,05E-05 and p= 2,25E-06, respectively). In semen volume per drone and the number of mature drones with semen, there were no differences (all P>0.05). Our results suggest variation in semen quality through the reproductive season. Hence, in the sampling region, we recommend using reproductive techniques involving semen manipulation, preferably in January (T2), involving better quality semen. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject Congreso Book http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794 info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
format |
conferenceObject |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/250675 Differences in the semen quality of Apis mellifera drones of selected lines along reproductive season in Balcarce district, Southeastern Buenos Aires Province, Argentina; 48th International Apicultural Congress; Santiago de Chile; Chile; 2023; 144-144 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/250675 |
identifier_str_mv |
Differences in the semen quality of Apis mellifera drones of selected lines along reproductive season in Balcarce district, Southeastern Buenos Aires Province, Argentina; 48th International Apicultural Congress; Santiago de Chile; Chile; 2023; 144-144 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Internacional |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conmark Tourism & Event Management Company |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conmark Tourism & Event Management Company |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844613353745416192 |
score |
13.070432 |