Differences in the semen quality of Apis mellifera drones of selected lines along reproductive season in Balcarce district, Southeastern Buenos Aires Province, Argentina

Autores
Meroi Arcerito, Facundo René; Martinez, Analía; Bedascarrasbure, Belén; Lobo, Juan; Hozbor, Federico; Palacio, Alejandra
Año de publicación
2023
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Sperm quality in Apis mellifera drones plays a central role in colony reproduction. Several authors claimed that semen quality varies according to intrinsic and extrinsic factors. However, paramount and basic issues are unresolved in disentangling the factors affecting sperm quality. Here we explored if different dates within the reproductive season exhibit variation in sperm quality of drones from colonies selected under a template climate. Drones come from colonies of the Honeybee genetic program (MEGA-INTA), where lineages of brood disease tolerances are reared along with other features sought by the apiculture sector. The essay consists of three sampling times (T1, T2, T3) involving the whole reproductive season (from November to February), where T1 represents the beginning, T2 the middle, and T3 the ending reproductive season. Eight hives were assessed twice per sampling time. The techniques used were Eosina-Nigrosina for viability, Osmotic Swelling test (HOST) to test cell membrane function by using distilled water 100 OSM at 22°C and 35°C, concentration (number of spermatic cells estimation per volume of semen) through a Newbauer chamber, the number of drones matures with semen (total drones evaluated/drones with ejection of semen under abdomen stimulation), and the obtained sperm volume per drone (obtained volume/number of drone with semen) per colony. Results suggest T2 has better viability than T1 and T3 (Mann-Whitney: p= 0,00189 and p=0,005264, respectively). In HOST with distilled water, T2 differs from T3 (Mann-Whitney: p=0,01344). At 100 OSM at 22°C, there were no differences (all P>0.05), and at 100 OSM at 35°C, we only registered differences between T2 and T3 (Mann-Whitney: p=0,01639). In Concentration, T2 had more sperm cells than T1 and T3 (Mann-Whitney: p=1,05E-05 and p= 2,25E-06, respectively). In semen volume per drone and the number of mature drones with semen, there were no differences (all P>0.05). Our results suggest variation in semen quality through the reproductive season. Hence, in the sampling region, we recommend using reproductive techniques involving semen manipulation, preferably in January (T2), involving better quality semen.
Fil: Meroi Arcerito, Facundo René. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones En Produccion, Sanidad y Ambiente. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas. Centro Cientifico Tecnologico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones En Produccion, Sanidad y Ambiente.; Argentina
Fil: Martinez, Analía. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata; Argentina
Fil: Bedascarrasbure, Belén. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina
Fil: Lobo, Juan. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata; Argentina
Fil: Hozbor, Federico. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina
Fil: Palacio, Alejandra. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina
48th International Apicultural Congress
Santiago de Chile
Chile
Federación Internacional de Organizaciones de Apicultura
Materia
Semen
Apis mellifera
quality
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/250675

id CONICETDig_bbb8e933a89eb15e82fc665ae529e695
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/250675
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Differences in the semen quality of Apis mellifera drones of selected lines along reproductive season in Balcarce district, Southeastern Buenos Aires Province, ArgentinaMeroi Arcerito, Facundo RenéMartinez, AnalíaBedascarrasbure, BelénLobo, JuanHozbor, FedericoPalacio, AlejandraSemenApis melliferaqualityhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Sperm quality in Apis mellifera drones plays a central role in colony reproduction. Several authors claimed that semen quality varies according to intrinsic and extrinsic factors. However, paramount and basic issues are unresolved in disentangling the factors affecting sperm quality. Here we explored if different dates within the reproductive season exhibit variation in sperm quality of drones from colonies selected under a template climate. Drones come from colonies of the Honeybee genetic program (MEGA-INTA), where lineages of brood disease tolerances are reared along with other features sought by the apiculture sector. The essay consists of three sampling times (T1, T2, T3) involving the whole reproductive season (from November to February), where T1 represents the beginning, T2 the middle, and T3 the ending reproductive season. Eight hives were assessed twice per sampling time. The techniques used were Eosina-Nigrosina for viability, Osmotic Swelling test (HOST) to test cell membrane function by using distilled water 100 OSM at 22°C and 35°C, concentration (number of spermatic cells estimation per volume of semen) through a Newbauer chamber, the number of drones matures with semen (total drones evaluated/drones with ejection of semen under abdomen stimulation), and the obtained sperm volume per drone (obtained volume/number of drone with semen) per colony. Results suggest T2 has better viability than T1 and T3 (Mann-Whitney: p= 0,00189 and p=0,005264, respectively). In HOST with distilled water, T2 differs from T3 (Mann-Whitney: p=0,01344). At 100 OSM at 22°C, there were no differences (all P>0.05), and at 100 OSM at 35°C, we only registered differences between T2 and T3 (Mann-Whitney: p=0,01639). In Concentration, T2 had more sperm cells than T1 and T3 (Mann-Whitney: p=1,05E-05 and p= 2,25E-06, respectively). In semen volume per drone and the number of mature drones with semen, there were no differences (all P>0.05). Our results suggest variation in semen quality through the reproductive season. Hence, in the sampling region, we recommend using reproductive techniques involving semen manipulation, preferably in January (T2), involving better quality semen.Fil: Meroi Arcerito, Facundo René. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones En Produccion, Sanidad y Ambiente. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas. Centro Cientifico Tecnologico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones En Produccion, Sanidad y Ambiente.; ArgentinaFil: Martinez, Analía. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata; ArgentinaFil: Bedascarrasbure, Belén. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; ArgentinaFil: Lobo, Juan. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata; ArgentinaFil: Hozbor, Federico. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; ArgentinaFil: Palacio, Alejandra. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina48th International Apicultural CongressSantiago de ChileChileFederación Internacional de Organizaciones de ApiculturaConmark Tourism & Event Management Company2023info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectCongresoBookhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/250675Differences in the semen quality of Apis mellifera drones of selected lines along reproductive season in Balcarce district, Southeastern Buenos Aires Province, Argentina; 48th International Apicultural Congress; Santiago de Chile; Chile; 2023; 144-144CONICET DigitalCONICETengInternacionalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:43:00Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/250675instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:43:00.507CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Differences in the semen quality of Apis mellifera drones of selected lines along reproductive season in Balcarce district, Southeastern Buenos Aires Province, Argentina
title Differences in the semen quality of Apis mellifera drones of selected lines along reproductive season in Balcarce district, Southeastern Buenos Aires Province, Argentina
spellingShingle Differences in the semen quality of Apis mellifera drones of selected lines along reproductive season in Balcarce district, Southeastern Buenos Aires Province, Argentina
Meroi Arcerito, Facundo René
Semen
Apis mellifera
quality
title_short Differences in the semen quality of Apis mellifera drones of selected lines along reproductive season in Balcarce district, Southeastern Buenos Aires Province, Argentina
title_full Differences in the semen quality of Apis mellifera drones of selected lines along reproductive season in Balcarce district, Southeastern Buenos Aires Province, Argentina
title_fullStr Differences in the semen quality of Apis mellifera drones of selected lines along reproductive season in Balcarce district, Southeastern Buenos Aires Province, Argentina
title_full_unstemmed Differences in the semen quality of Apis mellifera drones of selected lines along reproductive season in Balcarce district, Southeastern Buenos Aires Province, Argentina
title_sort Differences in the semen quality of Apis mellifera drones of selected lines along reproductive season in Balcarce district, Southeastern Buenos Aires Province, Argentina
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Meroi Arcerito, Facundo René
Martinez, Analía
Bedascarrasbure, Belén
Lobo, Juan
Hozbor, Federico
Palacio, Alejandra
author Meroi Arcerito, Facundo René
author_facet Meroi Arcerito, Facundo René
Martinez, Analía
Bedascarrasbure, Belén
Lobo, Juan
Hozbor, Federico
Palacio, Alejandra
author_role author
author2 Martinez, Analía
Bedascarrasbure, Belén
Lobo, Juan
Hozbor, Federico
Palacio, Alejandra
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Semen
Apis mellifera
quality
topic Semen
Apis mellifera
quality
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Sperm quality in Apis mellifera drones plays a central role in colony reproduction. Several authors claimed that semen quality varies according to intrinsic and extrinsic factors. However, paramount and basic issues are unresolved in disentangling the factors affecting sperm quality. Here we explored if different dates within the reproductive season exhibit variation in sperm quality of drones from colonies selected under a template climate. Drones come from colonies of the Honeybee genetic program (MEGA-INTA), where lineages of brood disease tolerances are reared along with other features sought by the apiculture sector. The essay consists of three sampling times (T1, T2, T3) involving the whole reproductive season (from November to February), where T1 represents the beginning, T2 the middle, and T3 the ending reproductive season. Eight hives were assessed twice per sampling time. The techniques used were Eosina-Nigrosina for viability, Osmotic Swelling test (HOST) to test cell membrane function by using distilled water 100 OSM at 22°C and 35°C, concentration (number of spermatic cells estimation per volume of semen) through a Newbauer chamber, the number of drones matures with semen (total drones evaluated/drones with ejection of semen under abdomen stimulation), and the obtained sperm volume per drone (obtained volume/number of drone with semen) per colony. Results suggest T2 has better viability than T1 and T3 (Mann-Whitney: p= 0,00189 and p=0,005264, respectively). In HOST with distilled water, T2 differs from T3 (Mann-Whitney: p=0,01344). At 100 OSM at 22°C, there were no differences (all P>0.05), and at 100 OSM at 35°C, we only registered differences between T2 and T3 (Mann-Whitney: p=0,01639). In Concentration, T2 had more sperm cells than T1 and T3 (Mann-Whitney: p=1,05E-05 and p= 2,25E-06, respectively). In semen volume per drone and the number of mature drones with semen, there were no differences (all P>0.05). Our results suggest variation in semen quality through the reproductive season. Hence, in the sampling region, we recommend using reproductive techniques involving semen manipulation, preferably in January (T2), involving better quality semen.
Fil: Meroi Arcerito, Facundo René. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones En Produccion, Sanidad y Ambiente. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas. Centro Cientifico Tecnologico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones En Produccion, Sanidad y Ambiente.; Argentina
Fil: Martinez, Analía. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata; Argentina
Fil: Bedascarrasbure, Belén. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina
Fil: Lobo, Juan. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata; Argentina
Fil: Hozbor, Federico. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina
Fil: Palacio, Alejandra. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina
48th International Apicultural Congress
Santiago de Chile
Chile
Federación Internacional de Organizaciones de Apicultura
description Sperm quality in Apis mellifera drones plays a central role in colony reproduction. Several authors claimed that semen quality varies according to intrinsic and extrinsic factors. However, paramount and basic issues are unresolved in disentangling the factors affecting sperm quality. Here we explored if different dates within the reproductive season exhibit variation in sperm quality of drones from colonies selected under a template climate. Drones come from colonies of the Honeybee genetic program (MEGA-INTA), where lineages of brood disease tolerances are reared along with other features sought by the apiculture sector. The essay consists of three sampling times (T1, T2, T3) involving the whole reproductive season (from November to February), where T1 represents the beginning, T2 the middle, and T3 the ending reproductive season. Eight hives were assessed twice per sampling time. The techniques used were Eosina-Nigrosina for viability, Osmotic Swelling test (HOST) to test cell membrane function by using distilled water 100 OSM at 22°C and 35°C, concentration (number of spermatic cells estimation per volume of semen) through a Newbauer chamber, the number of drones matures with semen (total drones evaluated/drones with ejection of semen under abdomen stimulation), and the obtained sperm volume per drone (obtained volume/number of drone with semen) per colony. Results suggest T2 has better viability than T1 and T3 (Mann-Whitney: p= 0,00189 and p=0,005264, respectively). In HOST with distilled water, T2 differs from T3 (Mann-Whitney: p=0,01344). At 100 OSM at 22°C, there were no differences (all P>0.05), and at 100 OSM at 35°C, we only registered differences between T2 and T3 (Mann-Whitney: p=0,01639). In Concentration, T2 had more sperm cells than T1 and T3 (Mann-Whitney: p=1,05E-05 and p= 2,25E-06, respectively). In semen volume per drone and the number of mature drones with semen, there were no differences (all P>0.05). Our results suggest variation in semen quality through the reproductive season. Hence, in the sampling region, we recommend using reproductive techniques involving semen manipulation, preferably in January (T2), involving better quality semen.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
Congreso
Book
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
status_str publishedVersion
format conferenceObject
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/250675
Differences in the semen quality of Apis mellifera drones of selected lines along reproductive season in Balcarce district, Southeastern Buenos Aires Province, Argentina; 48th International Apicultural Congress; Santiago de Chile; Chile; 2023; 144-144
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/250675
identifier_str_mv Differences in the semen quality of Apis mellifera drones of selected lines along reproductive season in Balcarce district, Southeastern Buenos Aires Province, Argentina; 48th International Apicultural Congress; Santiago de Chile; Chile; 2023; 144-144
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Internacional
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conmark Tourism & Event Management Company
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conmark Tourism & Event Management Company
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613353745416192
score 13.070432