Permanent Revolution — But Without Socialism?

Autores
Day, Richard B.; Gaido, Daniel Fernando
Año de publicación
2013
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
In his criticism of Witnesses to Permanent Revolution Lars Lih argues that, except for Trotsky, all the other authors included in our volume were proponents of a bourgeois-democratic revolution in permanence. The problem with this idea is that it misses the whole point of the debate, which was precisely to what extent bourgeois (peasant) and socialist (proletarian) elements would be combined in the coming revolution. Philosophically, it displays a lack of dialectics in attempting to force the law of identity (either a socialist or a bourgeois democratic revolution) upon a historical event which was basically a combination of two diffferent historical phenomena: a jacquerie and a urban-based working-class revolution.
Fil: Day, Richard B.. University Of Toronto; Canadá
Fil: Gaido, Daniel Fernando. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones y Estudio sobre Cultura y Sociedad; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; Argentina
Materia
Russian Revolution
Social Democracy
Second International
Permanent Revolution
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/4113
Acceder
id CONICETDig_b9a898d177626c1a72beb30188e62d2a
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/4113
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Permanent Revolution — But Without Socialism?Day, Richard B.Gaido, Daniel FernandoRussian RevolutionSocial DemocracySecond InternationalPermanent Revolutionhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6In his criticism of Witnesses to Permanent Revolution Lars Lih argues that, except for Trotsky, all the other authors included in our volume were proponents of a bourgeois-democratic revolution in permanence. The problem with this idea is that it misses the whole point of the debate, which was precisely to what extent bourgeois (peasant) and socialist (proletarian) elements would be combined in the coming revolution. Philosophically, it displays a lack of dialectics in attempting to force the law of identity (either a socialist or a bourgeois democratic revolution) upon a historical event which was basically a combination of two diffferent historical phenomena: a jacquerie and a urban-based working-class revolution.Fil: Day, Richard B.. University Of Toronto; CanadáFil: Gaido, Daniel Fernando. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones y Estudio sobre Cultura y Sociedad; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; ArgentinaGuilford Press2013-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/4113Day, Richard B.; Gaido, Daniel Fernando; Permanent Revolution — But Without Socialism?; Guilford Press; Science & Society; 77; 3; 7-2013; 397-4040036-8237enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://guilfordjournals.com/doi/abs/10.1521/siso.2013.77.3.397info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/0036-8237info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1521/siso.2013.77.3.397info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:51:03Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/4113instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:51:03.484CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Permanent Revolution — But Without Socialism?
title Permanent Revolution — But Without Socialism?
spellingShingle Permanent Revolution — But Without Socialism?
Day, Richard B.
Russian Revolution
Social Democracy
Second International
Permanent Revolution
title_short Permanent Revolution — But Without Socialism?
title_full Permanent Revolution — But Without Socialism?
title_fullStr Permanent Revolution — But Without Socialism?
title_full_unstemmed Permanent Revolution — But Without Socialism?
title_sort Permanent Revolution — But Without Socialism?
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Day, Richard B.
Gaido, Daniel Fernando
author Day, Richard B.
author_facet Day, Richard B.
Gaido, Daniel Fernando
author_role author
author2 Gaido, Daniel Fernando
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Russian Revolution
Social Democracy
Second International
Permanent Revolution
topic Russian Revolution
Social Democracy
Second International
Permanent Revolution
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv In his criticism of Witnesses to Permanent Revolution Lars Lih argues that, except for Trotsky, all the other authors included in our volume were proponents of a bourgeois-democratic revolution in permanence. The problem with this idea is that it misses the whole point of the debate, which was precisely to what extent bourgeois (peasant) and socialist (proletarian) elements would be combined in the coming revolution. Philosophically, it displays a lack of dialectics in attempting to force the law of identity (either a socialist or a bourgeois democratic revolution) upon a historical event which was basically a combination of two diffferent historical phenomena: a jacquerie and a urban-based working-class revolution.
Fil: Day, Richard B.. University Of Toronto; Canadá
Fil: Gaido, Daniel Fernando. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones y Estudio sobre Cultura y Sociedad; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; Argentina
description In his criticism of Witnesses to Permanent Revolution Lars Lih argues that, except for Trotsky, all the other authors included in our volume were proponents of a bourgeois-democratic revolution in permanence. The problem with this idea is that it misses the whole point of the debate, which was precisely to what extent bourgeois (peasant) and socialist (proletarian) elements would be combined in the coming revolution. Philosophically, it displays a lack of dialectics in attempting to force the law of identity (either a socialist or a bourgeois democratic revolution) upon a historical event which was basically a combination of two diffferent historical phenomena: a jacquerie and a urban-based working-class revolution.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-07
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/4113
Day, Richard B.; Gaido, Daniel Fernando; Permanent Revolution — But Without Socialism?; Guilford Press; Science & Society; 77; 3; 7-2013; 397-404
0036-8237
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/4113
identifier_str_mv Day, Richard B.; Gaido, Daniel Fernando; Permanent Revolution — But Without Socialism?; Guilford Press; Science & Society; 77; 3; 7-2013; 397-404
0036-8237
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://guilfordjournals.com/doi/abs/10.1521/siso.2013.77.3.397
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/0036-8237
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1521/siso.2013.77.3.397
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Guilford Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Guilford Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269069939572736
score 13.13397

Publicaciones similares