Does AI Think?

Autores
Crespo, Ricardo Fernando
Año de publicación
2024
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
This article raises a very relevant question today: “Does AI think?” To come up with an answer, it explores several conceptions of knowledge, from classical Aristotelian notions to modern philosophers’ takes on it. For Aristotle, knowledge starts with the senses, and, through epagoge and nous, it grows into an understanding of the nature of the thing known, which is something that does not happen with AI. Modern schools of thoughts are either rationalist or empiricist. For rationalists, knowledge is innate, while empiricists believe all knowledge comes from the senses. As Kant views it, knowledge is “built” on sensorial data with the use of theoretical reason categories. Based on these approaches, it is harder to claim that AI does not think by itself. The article also reviews current philosophers’ views on AI and AI thinking. Summing up, the answer to the initial question depends on the concept of knowledge adopted. As this article shares the classical notion of thinking, it concludes that AI does not think.
Fil: Crespo, Ricardo Fernando. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Austral. Instituto de Altos Estudios; Argentina
Materia
ARISTOTLE ON KNOWLEDGE
MODERN AND CONTEMPORARY VISION OF KNOWLEDGE
PHILOSOPHERS EXPERTS ON AI NOTION OF KNOWLEDGE
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/247771

id CONICETDig_b53b7296e25b85dcc2cb360d902d9583
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/247771
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Does AI Think?Crespo, Ricardo FernandoARISTOTLE ON KNOWLEDGEMODERN AND CONTEMPORARY VISION OF KNOWLEDGEPHILOSOPHERS EXPERTS ON AI NOTION OF KNOWLEDGEhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6This article raises a very relevant question today: “Does AI think?” To come up with an answer, it explores several conceptions of knowledge, from classical Aristotelian notions to modern philosophers’ takes on it. For Aristotle, knowledge starts with the senses, and, through epagoge and nous, it grows into an understanding of the nature of the thing known, which is something that does not happen with AI. Modern schools of thoughts are either rationalist or empiricist. For rationalists, knowledge is innate, while empiricists believe all knowledge comes from the senses. As Kant views it, knowledge is “built” on sensorial data with the use of theoretical reason categories. Based on these approaches, it is harder to claim that AI does not think by itself. The article also reviews current philosophers’ views on AI and AI thinking. Summing up, the answer to the initial question depends on the concept of knowledge adopted. As this article shares the classical notion of thinking, it concludes that AI does not think.Fil: Crespo, Ricardo Fernando. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Austral. Instituto de Altos Estudios; ArgentinaUniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika2024-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/247771Crespo, Ricardo Fernando; Does AI Think?; Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika; Scientia et Fides; 12; 2; 10-2024; 37-472300-76482353-5636CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://apcz.umk.pl/SetF/article/view/49499info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.12775/SetF.2024.014info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:10:15Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/247771instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:10:16.156CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Does AI Think?
title Does AI Think?
spellingShingle Does AI Think?
Crespo, Ricardo Fernando
ARISTOTLE ON KNOWLEDGE
MODERN AND CONTEMPORARY VISION OF KNOWLEDGE
PHILOSOPHERS EXPERTS ON AI NOTION OF KNOWLEDGE
title_short Does AI Think?
title_full Does AI Think?
title_fullStr Does AI Think?
title_full_unstemmed Does AI Think?
title_sort Does AI Think?
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Crespo, Ricardo Fernando
author Crespo, Ricardo Fernando
author_facet Crespo, Ricardo Fernando
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv ARISTOTLE ON KNOWLEDGE
MODERN AND CONTEMPORARY VISION OF KNOWLEDGE
PHILOSOPHERS EXPERTS ON AI NOTION OF KNOWLEDGE
topic ARISTOTLE ON KNOWLEDGE
MODERN AND CONTEMPORARY VISION OF KNOWLEDGE
PHILOSOPHERS EXPERTS ON AI NOTION OF KNOWLEDGE
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv This article raises a very relevant question today: “Does AI think?” To come up with an answer, it explores several conceptions of knowledge, from classical Aristotelian notions to modern philosophers’ takes on it. For Aristotle, knowledge starts with the senses, and, through epagoge and nous, it grows into an understanding of the nature of the thing known, which is something that does not happen with AI. Modern schools of thoughts are either rationalist or empiricist. For rationalists, knowledge is innate, while empiricists believe all knowledge comes from the senses. As Kant views it, knowledge is “built” on sensorial data with the use of theoretical reason categories. Based on these approaches, it is harder to claim that AI does not think by itself. The article also reviews current philosophers’ views on AI and AI thinking. Summing up, the answer to the initial question depends on the concept of knowledge adopted. As this article shares the classical notion of thinking, it concludes that AI does not think.
Fil: Crespo, Ricardo Fernando. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Austral. Instituto de Altos Estudios; Argentina
description This article raises a very relevant question today: “Does AI think?” To come up with an answer, it explores several conceptions of knowledge, from classical Aristotelian notions to modern philosophers’ takes on it. For Aristotle, knowledge starts with the senses, and, through epagoge and nous, it grows into an understanding of the nature of the thing known, which is something that does not happen with AI. Modern schools of thoughts are either rationalist or empiricist. For rationalists, knowledge is innate, while empiricists believe all knowledge comes from the senses. As Kant views it, knowledge is “built” on sensorial data with the use of theoretical reason categories. Based on these approaches, it is harder to claim that AI does not think by itself. The article also reviews current philosophers’ views on AI and AI thinking. Summing up, the answer to the initial question depends on the concept of knowledge adopted. As this article shares the classical notion of thinking, it concludes that AI does not think.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-10
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/247771
Crespo, Ricardo Fernando; Does AI Think?; Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika; Scientia et Fides; 12; 2; 10-2024; 37-47
2300-7648
2353-5636
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/247771
identifier_str_mv Crespo, Ricardo Fernando; Does AI Think?; Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika; Scientia et Fides; 12; 2; 10-2024; 37-47
2300-7648
2353-5636
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://apcz.umk.pl/SetF/article/view/49499
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.12775/SetF.2024.014
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613989782257664
score 13.069144