Accuracy of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Depression subscale (HADS-D) to screen for major depression: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis

Autores
Wu, Yin; Levis, Brooke; Sun, Ying; He, Chen; Krishnan, Ankur; Neupane, Dipika; Bhandari, Parash Mani; Negeri, Zelalem; Benedetti, Andrea; Thombs, Brett D.; Daray, Federico Manuel
Año de publicación
2021
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Objective To evaluate the accuracy of the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D) to screen for major depression among people with physical health problems. Design Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. Data sources Medline, Medline In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, PsycInfo, and Web of Science (from inception to 25 October 2018). Review methods Eligible datasets included HADS-D scores and major depression status based on a validated diagnostic interview. Primary study data and study level data extracted from primary reports were combined. For HADS-D cut-off thresholds of 5-15, a bivariate random effects meta-analysis was used to estimate pooled sensitivity and specificity, separately, in studies that used semi-structured diagnostic interviews (eg, Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders), fully structured interviews (eg, Composite International Diagnostic Interview), and the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview. One stage meta-regression was used to examine whether accuracy was associated with reference standard categories and the characteristics of participants. Sensitivity analyses were done to assess whether including published results from studies that did not provide raw data influenced the results. Results Individual participant data were obtained from 101 of 168 eligible studies (60%; 25 574 participants (72% of eligible participants), 2549 with major depression). Combined sensitivity and specificity was maximised at a cut-off value of seven or higher for semi-structured interviews, fully structured interviews, and the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Among studies with a semi-structured interview (57 studies, 10 664 participants, 1048 with major depression), sensitivity and specificity were 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.76 to 0.87) and 0.78 (0.74 to 0.81) for a cut-off value of seven or higher, 0.74 (0.68 to 0.79) and 0.84 (0.81 to 0.87) for a cut-off value of eight or higher, and 0.44 (0.38 to 0.51) and 0.95 (0.93 to 0.96) for a cut-off value of 11 or higher. Accuracy was similar across reference standards and subgroups and when published results from studies that did not contribute data were included. Conclusions When screening for major depression, a HADS-D cut-off value of seven or higher maximised combined sensitivity and specificity. A cut-off value of eight or higher generated similar combined sensitivity and specificity but was less sensitive and more specific. To identify medically ill patients with depression with the HADS-D, lower cut-off values could be used to avoid false negatives and higher cut-off values to reduce false positives and identify people with higher symptom levels.
Fil: Wu, Yin. School Of Medicine; Canadá. Lady Davis Institute For Medical Research; Canadá
Fil: Levis, Brooke. Keele University; Reino Unido
Fil: Sun, Ying. Lady Davis Institute For Medical Research; Canadá
Fil: He, Chen. Lady Davis Institute For Medical Research; Canadá
Fil: Krishnan, Ankur. Lady Davis Institute For Medical Research; Canadá
Fil: Neupane, Dipika. Lady Davis Institute For Medical Research; Canadá
Fil: Bhandari, Parash Mani. Lady Davis Institute For Medical Research; Canadá
Fil: Negeri, Zelalem. Université Mcgill; Canadá. Lady Davis Institute For Medical Research; Canadá
Fil: Benedetti, Andrea. Centre Universitaire de Santé Mcgill; Canadá
Fil: Thombs, Brett D.. Mcgill Faculty Of Medicine And Health Sciences; Canadá. Lady Davis Institute For Medical Research; Canadá
Fil: Daray, Federico Manuel. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Farmacologia; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay; Argentina
Materia
HADS-D
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/148371

id CONICETDig_b52ab26a21c4e4e22d205739cff48690
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/148371
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Accuracy of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Depression subscale (HADS-D) to screen for major depression: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysisWu, YinLevis, BrookeSun, YingHe, ChenKrishnan, AnkurNeupane, DipikaBhandari, Parash ManiNegeri, ZelalemBenedetti, AndreaThombs, Brett D.Daray, Federico ManuelHADS-Dhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3Objective To evaluate the accuracy of the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D) to screen for major depression among people with physical health problems. Design Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. Data sources Medline, Medline In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, PsycInfo, and Web of Science (from inception to 25 October 2018). Review methods Eligible datasets included HADS-D scores and major depression status based on a validated diagnostic interview. Primary study data and study level data extracted from primary reports were combined. For HADS-D cut-off thresholds of 5-15, a bivariate random effects meta-analysis was used to estimate pooled sensitivity and specificity, separately, in studies that used semi-structured diagnostic interviews (eg, Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders), fully structured interviews (eg, Composite International Diagnostic Interview), and the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview. One stage meta-regression was used to examine whether accuracy was associated with reference standard categories and the characteristics of participants. Sensitivity analyses were done to assess whether including published results from studies that did not provide raw data influenced the results. Results Individual participant data were obtained from 101 of 168 eligible studies (60%; 25 574 participants (72% of eligible participants), 2549 with major depression). Combined sensitivity and specificity was maximised at a cut-off value of seven or higher for semi-structured interviews, fully structured interviews, and the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Among studies with a semi-structured interview (57 studies, 10 664 participants, 1048 with major depression), sensitivity and specificity were 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.76 to 0.87) and 0.78 (0.74 to 0.81) for a cut-off value of seven or higher, 0.74 (0.68 to 0.79) and 0.84 (0.81 to 0.87) for a cut-off value of eight or higher, and 0.44 (0.38 to 0.51) and 0.95 (0.93 to 0.96) for a cut-off value of 11 or higher. Accuracy was similar across reference standards and subgroups and when published results from studies that did not contribute data were included. Conclusions When screening for major depression, a HADS-D cut-off value of seven or higher maximised combined sensitivity and specificity. A cut-off value of eight or higher generated similar combined sensitivity and specificity but was less sensitive and more specific. To identify medically ill patients with depression with the HADS-D, lower cut-off values could be used to avoid false negatives and higher cut-off values to reduce false positives and identify people with higher symptom levels.Fil: Wu, Yin. School Of Medicine; Canadá. Lady Davis Institute For Medical Research; CanadáFil: Levis, Brooke. Keele University; Reino UnidoFil: Sun, Ying. Lady Davis Institute For Medical Research; CanadáFil: He, Chen. Lady Davis Institute For Medical Research; CanadáFil: Krishnan, Ankur. Lady Davis Institute For Medical Research; CanadáFil: Neupane, Dipika. Lady Davis Institute For Medical Research; CanadáFil: Bhandari, Parash Mani. Lady Davis Institute For Medical Research; CanadáFil: Negeri, Zelalem. Université Mcgill; Canadá. Lady Davis Institute For Medical Research; CanadáFil: Benedetti, Andrea. Centre Universitaire de Santé Mcgill; CanadáFil: Thombs, Brett D.. Mcgill Faculty Of Medicine And Health Sciences; Canadá. Lady Davis Institute For Medical Research; CanadáFil: Daray, Federico Manuel. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Farmacologia; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay; ArgentinaBMJ Publishing Group2021-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/148371Wu, Yin; Levis, Brooke; Sun, Ying; He, Chen; Krishnan, Ankur; et al.; Accuracy of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Depression subscale (HADS-D) to screen for major depression: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis; BMJ Publishing Group; The BMJ; 373; 5-2021; 1-121756-1833CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1136/bmj.n972info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.bmj.com/content/373/bmj.n972info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:43:04Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/148371instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:43:04.472CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Accuracy of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Depression subscale (HADS-D) to screen for major depression: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis
title Accuracy of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Depression subscale (HADS-D) to screen for major depression: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis
spellingShingle Accuracy of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Depression subscale (HADS-D) to screen for major depression: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis
Wu, Yin
HADS-D
title_short Accuracy of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Depression subscale (HADS-D) to screen for major depression: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis
title_full Accuracy of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Depression subscale (HADS-D) to screen for major depression: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis
title_fullStr Accuracy of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Depression subscale (HADS-D) to screen for major depression: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Depression subscale (HADS-D) to screen for major depression: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis
title_sort Accuracy of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Depression subscale (HADS-D) to screen for major depression: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Wu, Yin
Levis, Brooke
Sun, Ying
He, Chen
Krishnan, Ankur
Neupane, Dipika
Bhandari, Parash Mani
Negeri, Zelalem
Benedetti, Andrea
Thombs, Brett D.
Daray, Federico Manuel
author Wu, Yin
author_facet Wu, Yin
Levis, Brooke
Sun, Ying
He, Chen
Krishnan, Ankur
Neupane, Dipika
Bhandari, Parash Mani
Negeri, Zelalem
Benedetti, Andrea
Thombs, Brett D.
Daray, Federico Manuel
author_role author
author2 Levis, Brooke
Sun, Ying
He, Chen
Krishnan, Ankur
Neupane, Dipika
Bhandari, Parash Mani
Negeri, Zelalem
Benedetti, Andrea
Thombs, Brett D.
Daray, Federico Manuel
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv HADS-D
topic HADS-D
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Objective To evaluate the accuracy of the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D) to screen for major depression among people with physical health problems. Design Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. Data sources Medline, Medline In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, PsycInfo, and Web of Science (from inception to 25 October 2018). Review methods Eligible datasets included HADS-D scores and major depression status based on a validated diagnostic interview. Primary study data and study level data extracted from primary reports were combined. For HADS-D cut-off thresholds of 5-15, a bivariate random effects meta-analysis was used to estimate pooled sensitivity and specificity, separately, in studies that used semi-structured diagnostic interviews (eg, Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders), fully structured interviews (eg, Composite International Diagnostic Interview), and the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview. One stage meta-regression was used to examine whether accuracy was associated with reference standard categories and the characteristics of participants. Sensitivity analyses were done to assess whether including published results from studies that did not provide raw data influenced the results. Results Individual participant data were obtained from 101 of 168 eligible studies (60%; 25 574 participants (72% of eligible participants), 2549 with major depression). Combined sensitivity and specificity was maximised at a cut-off value of seven or higher for semi-structured interviews, fully structured interviews, and the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Among studies with a semi-structured interview (57 studies, 10 664 participants, 1048 with major depression), sensitivity and specificity were 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.76 to 0.87) and 0.78 (0.74 to 0.81) for a cut-off value of seven or higher, 0.74 (0.68 to 0.79) and 0.84 (0.81 to 0.87) for a cut-off value of eight or higher, and 0.44 (0.38 to 0.51) and 0.95 (0.93 to 0.96) for a cut-off value of 11 or higher. Accuracy was similar across reference standards and subgroups and when published results from studies that did not contribute data were included. Conclusions When screening for major depression, a HADS-D cut-off value of seven or higher maximised combined sensitivity and specificity. A cut-off value of eight or higher generated similar combined sensitivity and specificity but was less sensitive and more specific. To identify medically ill patients with depression with the HADS-D, lower cut-off values could be used to avoid false negatives and higher cut-off values to reduce false positives and identify people with higher symptom levels.
Fil: Wu, Yin. School Of Medicine; Canadá. Lady Davis Institute For Medical Research; Canadá
Fil: Levis, Brooke. Keele University; Reino Unido
Fil: Sun, Ying. Lady Davis Institute For Medical Research; Canadá
Fil: He, Chen. Lady Davis Institute For Medical Research; Canadá
Fil: Krishnan, Ankur. Lady Davis Institute For Medical Research; Canadá
Fil: Neupane, Dipika. Lady Davis Institute For Medical Research; Canadá
Fil: Bhandari, Parash Mani. Lady Davis Institute For Medical Research; Canadá
Fil: Negeri, Zelalem. Université Mcgill; Canadá. Lady Davis Institute For Medical Research; Canadá
Fil: Benedetti, Andrea. Centre Universitaire de Santé Mcgill; Canadá
Fil: Thombs, Brett D.. Mcgill Faculty Of Medicine And Health Sciences; Canadá. Lady Davis Institute For Medical Research; Canadá
Fil: Daray, Federico Manuel. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Farmacologia; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay; Argentina
description Objective To evaluate the accuracy of the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D) to screen for major depression among people with physical health problems. Design Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. Data sources Medline, Medline In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, PsycInfo, and Web of Science (from inception to 25 October 2018). Review methods Eligible datasets included HADS-D scores and major depression status based on a validated diagnostic interview. Primary study data and study level data extracted from primary reports were combined. For HADS-D cut-off thresholds of 5-15, a bivariate random effects meta-analysis was used to estimate pooled sensitivity and specificity, separately, in studies that used semi-structured diagnostic interviews (eg, Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders), fully structured interviews (eg, Composite International Diagnostic Interview), and the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview. One stage meta-regression was used to examine whether accuracy was associated with reference standard categories and the characteristics of participants. Sensitivity analyses were done to assess whether including published results from studies that did not provide raw data influenced the results. Results Individual participant data were obtained from 101 of 168 eligible studies (60%; 25 574 participants (72% of eligible participants), 2549 with major depression). Combined sensitivity and specificity was maximised at a cut-off value of seven or higher for semi-structured interviews, fully structured interviews, and the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Among studies with a semi-structured interview (57 studies, 10 664 participants, 1048 with major depression), sensitivity and specificity were 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.76 to 0.87) and 0.78 (0.74 to 0.81) for a cut-off value of seven or higher, 0.74 (0.68 to 0.79) and 0.84 (0.81 to 0.87) for a cut-off value of eight or higher, and 0.44 (0.38 to 0.51) and 0.95 (0.93 to 0.96) for a cut-off value of 11 or higher. Accuracy was similar across reference standards and subgroups and when published results from studies that did not contribute data were included. Conclusions When screening for major depression, a HADS-D cut-off value of seven or higher maximised combined sensitivity and specificity. A cut-off value of eight or higher generated similar combined sensitivity and specificity but was less sensitive and more specific. To identify medically ill patients with depression with the HADS-D, lower cut-off values could be used to avoid false negatives and higher cut-off values to reduce false positives and identify people with higher symptom levels.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-05
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/148371
Wu, Yin; Levis, Brooke; Sun, Ying; He, Chen; Krishnan, Ankur; et al.; Accuracy of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Depression subscale (HADS-D) to screen for major depression: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis; BMJ Publishing Group; The BMJ; 373; 5-2021; 1-12
1756-1833
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/148371
identifier_str_mv Wu, Yin; Levis, Brooke; Sun, Ying; He, Chen; Krishnan, Ankur; et al.; Accuracy of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Depression subscale (HADS-D) to screen for major depression: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis; BMJ Publishing Group; The BMJ; 373; 5-2021; 1-12
1756-1833
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1136/bmj.n972
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.bmj.com/content/373/bmj.n972
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv BMJ Publishing Group
publisher.none.fl_str_mv BMJ Publishing Group
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613355625512960
score 13.069144