Spatial patterns of cultural ecosystem services provision in Southern Patagonia

Autores
Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José; Peri, Pablo Luis; Lencinas, María Vanessa; García Llorente, Marina; Martín López, Berta
Año de publicación
2016
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
CONTEXT: Although there is a need to develop a spatially explicit methodological approach that addresses the social importance of cultural ecosystem services for regional planning, few studies have analysed the spatial distribution on the cultural ecosystem services based on social perceptions. OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to identify cultural ecosystem service hot-spots, and factors that characterize such hot-spots and define the spatial associations between cultural ecosystem services in Southern Patagonia (Argentina). METHODS: The study was carried out in Southern Patagonia (243.9 thousand km2) located between 46° and 55° SL with the Andes mountains on the western fringe and the Atlantic Ocean on the eastern fringe of the study area. The study region has a range of different vegetation types (grasslands, shrub-lands, peat-lands and forests) though the cold arid steppe is the main vegetation type. We used geo-tagged digital images that local people and visitors posted in the Panoramio web platform to identify hot-spots of four cultural ecosystem services (aesthetic value, existence value, recreation and local identity) and relate these hot-spots with social and biophysical landscape features. RESULTS: Aesthetic value was the main cultural service tagged by people, followed by the existence value for biodiversity conservation, followed by local identity and then recreational activity. The spatial distribution of these cultural ecosystem services are associated with different social and biophysical characteristics, such as the presence of water bodies, vegetation types, marine and terrestrial fauna, protected areas, urbanization, accessibility and tourism offer. The most important factors are the presence of water in Santa Cruz and tourism offer in Tierra del Fuego. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that this methodology is useful for assessing cultural ecosystem services at the regional scale, especially in areas with low data availability and field accessibility, such as Southern Patagonia. We also identify new research challenges that can be addressed in cultural ecosystem services research through the use of this method.
Fil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; Argentina
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina
Fil: Lencinas, María Vanessa. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; Argentina
Fil: García Llorente, Marina. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; España. Instituto Madrileño de Investigación y Desarrollo Rural, Agrario y Alimentario; España
Fil: Martín López, Berta. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; España. University of Oxford; Reino Unido
Materia
Servicios Ecosistémicos
Servicios Culturales
Ecología de Paisajes
Patagonia
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/43242

id CONICETDig_b4a121622f6fdeff57f02236989827ef
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/43242
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Spatial patterns of cultural ecosystem services provision in Southern PatagoniaMartínez Pastur, Guillermo JoséPeri, Pablo LuisLencinas, María VanessaGarcía Llorente, MarinaMartín López, BertaServicios EcosistémicosServicios CulturalesEcología de PaisajesPatagoniahttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.7https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5CONTEXT: Although there is a need to develop a spatially explicit methodological approach that addresses the social importance of cultural ecosystem services for regional planning, few studies have analysed the spatial distribution on the cultural ecosystem services based on social perceptions. OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to identify cultural ecosystem service hot-spots, and factors that characterize such hot-spots and define the spatial associations between cultural ecosystem services in Southern Patagonia (Argentina). METHODS: The study was carried out in Southern Patagonia (243.9 thousand km2) located between 46° and 55° SL with the Andes mountains on the western fringe and the Atlantic Ocean on the eastern fringe of the study area. The study region has a range of different vegetation types (grasslands, shrub-lands, peat-lands and forests) though the cold arid steppe is the main vegetation type. We used geo-tagged digital images that local people and visitors posted in the Panoramio web platform to identify hot-spots of four cultural ecosystem services (aesthetic value, existence value, recreation and local identity) and relate these hot-spots with social and biophysical landscape features. RESULTS: Aesthetic value was the main cultural service tagged by people, followed by the existence value for biodiversity conservation, followed by local identity and then recreational activity. The spatial distribution of these cultural ecosystem services are associated with different social and biophysical characteristics, such as the presence of water bodies, vegetation types, marine and terrestrial fauna, protected areas, urbanization, accessibility and tourism offer. The most important factors are the presence of water in Santa Cruz and tourism offer in Tierra del Fuego. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that this methodology is useful for assessing cultural ecosystem services at the regional scale, especially in areas with low data availability and field accessibility, such as Southern Patagonia. We also identify new research challenges that can be addressed in cultural ecosystem services research through the use of this method.Fil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; ArgentinaFil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; ArgentinaFil: Lencinas, María Vanessa. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; ArgentinaFil: García Llorente, Marina. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; España. Instituto Madrileño de Investigación y Desarrollo Rural, Agrario y Alimentario; EspañaFil: Martín López, Berta. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; España. University of Oxford; Reino UnidoSpringer2016-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/43242Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José; Peri, Pablo Luis; Lencinas, María Vanessa; García Llorente, Marina; Martín López, Berta; Spatial patterns of cultural ecosystem services provision in Southern Patagonia; Springer; Landscape Ecology; 31; 2; 2-2016; 383-3990921-2973CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s10980-015-0254-9info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10980-015-0254-9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:36:02Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/43242instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:36:03.214CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Spatial patterns of cultural ecosystem services provision in Southern Patagonia
title Spatial patterns of cultural ecosystem services provision in Southern Patagonia
spellingShingle Spatial patterns of cultural ecosystem services provision in Southern Patagonia
Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José
Servicios Ecosistémicos
Servicios Culturales
Ecología de Paisajes
Patagonia
title_short Spatial patterns of cultural ecosystem services provision in Southern Patagonia
title_full Spatial patterns of cultural ecosystem services provision in Southern Patagonia
title_fullStr Spatial patterns of cultural ecosystem services provision in Southern Patagonia
title_full_unstemmed Spatial patterns of cultural ecosystem services provision in Southern Patagonia
title_sort Spatial patterns of cultural ecosystem services provision in Southern Patagonia
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José
Peri, Pablo Luis
Lencinas, María Vanessa
García Llorente, Marina
Martín López, Berta
author Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José
author_facet Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José
Peri, Pablo Luis
Lencinas, María Vanessa
García Llorente, Marina
Martín López, Berta
author_role author
author2 Peri, Pablo Luis
Lencinas, María Vanessa
García Llorente, Marina
Martín López, Berta
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Servicios Ecosistémicos
Servicios Culturales
Ecología de Paisajes
Patagonia
topic Servicios Ecosistémicos
Servicios Culturales
Ecología de Paisajes
Patagonia
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.7
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv CONTEXT: Although there is a need to develop a spatially explicit methodological approach that addresses the social importance of cultural ecosystem services for regional planning, few studies have analysed the spatial distribution on the cultural ecosystem services based on social perceptions. OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to identify cultural ecosystem service hot-spots, and factors that characterize such hot-spots and define the spatial associations between cultural ecosystem services in Southern Patagonia (Argentina). METHODS: The study was carried out in Southern Patagonia (243.9 thousand km2) located between 46° and 55° SL with the Andes mountains on the western fringe and the Atlantic Ocean on the eastern fringe of the study area. The study region has a range of different vegetation types (grasslands, shrub-lands, peat-lands and forests) though the cold arid steppe is the main vegetation type. We used geo-tagged digital images that local people and visitors posted in the Panoramio web platform to identify hot-spots of four cultural ecosystem services (aesthetic value, existence value, recreation and local identity) and relate these hot-spots with social and biophysical landscape features. RESULTS: Aesthetic value was the main cultural service tagged by people, followed by the existence value for biodiversity conservation, followed by local identity and then recreational activity. The spatial distribution of these cultural ecosystem services are associated with different social and biophysical characteristics, such as the presence of water bodies, vegetation types, marine and terrestrial fauna, protected areas, urbanization, accessibility and tourism offer. The most important factors are the presence of water in Santa Cruz and tourism offer in Tierra del Fuego. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that this methodology is useful for assessing cultural ecosystem services at the regional scale, especially in areas with low data availability and field accessibility, such as Southern Patagonia. We also identify new research challenges that can be addressed in cultural ecosystem services research through the use of this method.
Fil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; Argentina
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina
Fil: Lencinas, María Vanessa. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; Argentina
Fil: García Llorente, Marina. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; España. Instituto Madrileño de Investigación y Desarrollo Rural, Agrario y Alimentario; España
Fil: Martín López, Berta. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; España. University of Oxford; Reino Unido
description CONTEXT: Although there is a need to develop a spatially explicit methodological approach that addresses the social importance of cultural ecosystem services for regional planning, few studies have analysed the spatial distribution on the cultural ecosystem services based on social perceptions. OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to identify cultural ecosystem service hot-spots, and factors that characterize such hot-spots and define the spatial associations between cultural ecosystem services in Southern Patagonia (Argentina). METHODS: The study was carried out in Southern Patagonia (243.9 thousand km2) located between 46° and 55° SL with the Andes mountains on the western fringe and the Atlantic Ocean on the eastern fringe of the study area. The study region has a range of different vegetation types (grasslands, shrub-lands, peat-lands and forests) though the cold arid steppe is the main vegetation type. We used geo-tagged digital images that local people and visitors posted in the Panoramio web platform to identify hot-spots of four cultural ecosystem services (aesthetic value, existence value, recreation and local identity) and relate these hot-spots with social and biophysical landscape features. RESULTS: Aesthetic value was the main cultural service tagged by people, followed by the existence value for biodiversity conservation, followed by local identity and then recreational activity. The spatial distribution of these cultural ecosystem services are associated with different social and biophysical characteristics, such as the presence of water bodies, vegetation types, marine and terrestrial fauna, protected areas, urbanization, accessibility and tourism offer. The most important factors are the presence of water in Santa Cruz and tourism offer in Tierra del Fuego. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that this methodology is useful for assessing cultural ecosystem services at the regional scale, especially in areas with low data availability and field accessibility, such as Southern Patagonia. We also identify new research challenges that can be addressed in cultural ecosystem services research through the use of this method.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-02
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/43242
Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José; Peri, Pablo Luis; Lencinas, María Vanessa; García Llorente, Marina; Martín López, Berta; Spatial patterns of cultural ecosystem services provision in Southern Patagonia; Springer; Landscape Ecology; 31; 2; 2-2016; 383-399
0921-2973
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/43242
identifier_str_mv Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José; Peri, Pablo Luis; Lencinas, María Vanessa; García Llorente, Marina; Martín López, Berta; Spatial patterns of cultural ecosystem services provision in Southern Patagonia; Springer; Landscape Ecology; 31; 2; 2-2016; 383-399
0921-2973
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s10980-015-0254-9
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10980-015-0254-9
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613128091860992
score 13.070432