When we cannot have it all: Ecosystem services trade-offs in the context of spatial planning

• Autores: Turkelboom, Francis; Leone, Michael; Jacobs, Sander; Kelemen, Eszter; García-Llorente, Marina; Baró, Francesc; Termansen, Mette; Barton, David N.; Berry, Pam; Stange, Erik; Thoonen, Marijke; Kalóczkai, Ágnes; Vadineanu, Angheluta; Castro, Antonio J.; Czúcz, Bálint; Röckmann, Christine; Wurbs, Daniel; Odee, David; Preda, Elena; Gómez-Baggethun, Erik; Rusch, Graciela M.; Martinez Pastur, Guillermo José; Palomo, Ignacio; Dick, Jan; Casaer, Jim; van Dijk, Jiska; Priess, Joerg A.; Langemeyer, Johannes; Mustajoki, Jyri; Kopperoinen, Leena; Baptist, Martin J.; Peri, Pablo Luis; Rusch, Veronica Elena; Mukhopadhyay, Raktima; Aszalós, Réka; Roy, S.B.; Luque, Sandra
• Año de publicación: 2017
• Idioma: inglés
• Tipo de recurso: artículo
• Fuente: Ecosystem services 29 Part C : 566-578. (February 2018)
• Materia: Agroecosistemas; Valores Culturales; Agroecosystems; Cultural Values; Servicios Ecosistémicos
• Institución: Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria

Spatial planning has to deal with trade-offs between various stakeholders’ wishes and needs as part of planning and management of landscapes, natural resources and/or biodiversity. To make ecosystem services (ES) trade-off research more relevant for spatial planning, we propose an analytical framework, which puts stakeholders, their land-use/management choices, their impact on ES and responses at the centre. Based on 24 cases from around the world, we used this framing to analyse the appearance and diversity of real-world ES trade-offs. They cover a wide range of trade-offs related to ecosystem use, including: land-use change, management regimes, technical versus nature-based solutions, natural resource use, and management of species. The ES trade-offs studied featured a complexity that was far greater than what is often described in the ES literature. Influential users and context setters are at the core of the trade-off decision-making, but most of the impact is felt by non-influential users. Provisioning and cultural ES were the most targeted in the studied trade-offs, but regulating ES were the most impacted. Stakeholders’ characteristics, such as influence, impact faced, and concerns can partially explain their position and response in relation to trade-offs. Based on the research findings, we formulate recommendations for spatial planning.
EEA Bariloche
Fil: Turkelboom, Francis. Research Institute for Nature and Forest; Bélgica
Fil: Leone, Michael. Research Institute for Nature and Forest; Bélgica
Fil: Jacobs, Sander. Research Institute for Nature and Forest; Bélgica
Fil: Kelemen, Eszter. Environmental Social Science Research Group; Hungría. University of Budapest. Department of Decision Sciences; Hungría
Fil: García-Llorente, Marina. Madrid Institute for Rural, Agricultural and Food Research and Development. Department of Applied Research and Agricultural Extension; España. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Department of Ecology. Social-Ecological Systems Laboratory; España
Fil: Baró, Francesc. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Institute of Environmental Science and Technology; España
Fil: Termansen, Mette. Aarhus University. Environmental Science; Dinamarca
Fil: Barton, David N. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research NINA; Noruega
Fil: Berry, Pam. University of Oxford. Environmental Change Institute; Gran Bretaña
Fil: Stange, Erik. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research NINA; Noruega
Fil: Thoonen, Marijke. Research Institute for Nature and Forest; Bélgica
Fil: Kalóczkai, Ágnes. Institute of Ecology and Botany, MTA Centre for Ecological Research; Hungría
Fil: Vadineanu, Angheluta. University of Bucharest. Research Center in Systems Ecology and Sustainability; Rumania
Fil: Castro, Antonio J. Idaho State University. Department of Biological Sciences. Social-Ecological Research Laboratory; Estados Unidos. University of Almería. Andalusian Center for the Assessment and Monitoring of Global Change; España
Fil: Czúcz, Bálint. Institute of Ecology and Botany, MTA Centre for Ecological Research; Hungría. Muséum National d’ Histoire Naturelle. European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity; Francia
Fil: Röckmann, Christine. Wageningen University & Research – Wageningen Marine Research; Holanda
Fil: Wurbs, Daniel. Geoflux GbR; Alemania
Fil: Odee, David. Kenya Forestry Research Institute; Kenia
Fil: Preda, Elena. University of Bucharest. Research Center in Systems Ecology and Sustainability; Rumania
Fil: Gómez-Baggethun, Erik. Norwegian University of Life Sciences. Department of International Environment and Development Studies; Noruega. University of Oxford. Environmental Change Institute; Gran Bretaña
Fil: Rusch, Graciela M. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research NINA; Noruega
Fil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Cientificas; Argentina
Fil: Palomo, Ignacio. University of the Basque Country. Basque Centre for Climate Change; España. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Department of Ecology. Social-Ecological Systems Laboratory; España
Fil: Dick, Jan. Center for Ecology and Hydrology; Gran Bretaña
Fil: Casaer, Jim. Research Institute for Nature and Forest; Bélgica
Fil: van Dijk, Jiska. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research NINA; Noruega
Fil: Priess, Joerg A. Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research; Alemania
Fil: Langemeyer, Johannes. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Institute of Environmental Science and Technology; España. Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute. Barcelona Lab for Urban Environmental Justice and Sustainability; España
Fil: Mustajoki, Jyri. Finnish Environment Institute; Finlandia
Fil: Kopperoinen, Leena. Finnish Environment Institute; Finlandia
Fil: Baptist, Martin J. Wageningen University & Research – Wageningen Marine Research; Holanda
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina. Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica; Argentina
Fil: Rusch, Veronica Elena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche; Argentina
Fil: Mukhopadhyay, Raktima. Indian Institute of Bio Social Research and Development, India
Fil: Aszalós, Réka. Institute of Ecology and Botany, MTA Centre for Ecological Research; Hungría
Fil: Roy, S.B. Indian Institute of Bio Social Research and Development, India
Fil: Luque, Sandra. National Research Institute of Science and Technology for Environment and Agriculture; Francia