Molecular and serological detection of Babesia bovis- and Babesia bigemina-infection in bovines and water buffaloes raised jointly in an endemic field
- Autores
- Romero-Salas, Dora; Mira, Anabela; Mosqueda, Juan; García Vázquez, Zeferino; Hidalgo Ruiz, Mario; Vela, Noot Aditya Ortiz; de León, Adalberto Ángel Pérez; Florín Christensen, Monica; Schnittger, Leonhard
- Año de publicación
- 2016
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina are causative agents of bovine babesiosis, a tick-borne disease of cattle in tropical and subtropical regions. Babesia spp. infection adversely affects cattle health and can be fatal resulting in considerable economic loss worldwide. Under endemic stability conditions, herds contain high numbers of chronically infected, asymptomatic carrier animals, in which no parasitemia is detected by microscopic blood smear examination. In addition to bovines, also water buffaloes are infected by both Babesia spp. commonly leading to a subclinical infection. The infection rate (by nPCR) and herd exposure (by IFAT) of bovines and water buffaloes reared under similar field conditions in an area of endemic stability were determined and compared. In order to optimize direct parasite detection, highly sensitive nPCR assays were developed and applied, allowing the detection of as little as 0.1 fg DNA of each Babesia pathogen. Significantly lower percentages (p < 0.001) of seropositive water buffaloes compared to bovines were observed for B. bovis (71.4% vs. 98%) and B. bigemina (85% vs. 100%). Interestingly, in comparison, differences noticed between water buffaloes and bovines were considerably larger with direct parasite detection by nPCR (16.2% vs. 82.3% and 24% vs. 94.1% for B. bovis and B. bigemina, respectively).As expected, bovines subjected to monthly acaricide applications exhibited a significant lower infection rate as determined by nPCR than bovines not subjected to these measures (B. bovis 33.3% vs. 90.7%, p < 0.001; B. bigemina 80% vs. 96.5%, p < 0.001, for treated vs. untreated animals). Interestingly no differences between these groups were observed with respect to seropositivity, suggesting similar rates of parasite exposure (B. bovis 100% vs. 97.7%, p < 0.001; B. bigemina 100% vs. 100%, p < 0.001). Importantly, a significantly higher number of water buffaloes as determined by nPCR were infected when reared jointly with bovines not subjected to tick control than when reared jointly with bovines subjected to tick control (B. bovis 31.6% vs. 9.5%, p < 0.01; B. bigemina 42.1% vs. 9.5%, p < 0.01, for water buffaloes reared with untreated vs. treated bovines) and/or when reared without bovines (B. bovis 31.6% vs. 11.6%, p < 0.01; B. bigemina 42.1% vs. 20%, p < 0.01). An accumulation of seropositivity and a decline of infection rates were observed in older animals, while differences observed with regard to gender may warrant further investigation. In summary, our findings suggest that water buffaloes are much more capable to limit or eliminate Babesia infection, possibly due to a more capable immune defense. Furthermore, an increased Babesia spp. parasite reservoir of bovines seems to increase the infection rate of water buffaloes when both are reared on the same pasture.
Fil: Romero-Salas, Dora. Universidad Veracruzana; México
Fil: Mira, Anabela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas. Instituto de Patobiología; Argentina
Fil: Mosqueda, Juan. Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro; México
Fil: García Vázquez, Zeferino. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias. Centro Nacional de Investigación Disciplinaria en Parasitología Veterinaria; México
Fil: Hidalgo Ruiz, Mario. Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro; México
Fil: Vela, Noot Aditya Ortiz. Universidad Veracruzana; México
Fil: de León, Adalberto Ángel Pérez. United States Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Research Service; Argentina
Fil: Florín Christensen, Monica. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias. Centro Nacional de Investigación Disciplinaria en Parasitología Veterinaria; México
Fil: Schnittger, Leonhard. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias. Centro Nacional de Investigación Disciplinaria en Parasitología Veterinaria; México - Materia
-
BABESIA BIGEMINA
BABESIA BOVIS
BOVINES
EPIDEMIOLOGY
INDIRECT FLUORESCENT-ANTIBODY TEST (IFAT)
NESTED PCR
WATER BUFFALOES - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/72886
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_b1cc202249ac04adb19eaa04c2dcf744 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/72886 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Molecular and serological detection of Babesia bovis- and Babesia bigemina-infection in bovines and water buffaloes raised jointly in an endemic fieldRomero-Salas, DoraMira, AnabelaMosqueda, JuanGarcía Vázquez, ZeferinoHidalgo Ruiz, MarioVela, Noot Aditya Ortizde León, Adalberto Ángel PérezFlorín Christensen, MonicaSchnittger, LeonhardBABESIA BIGEMINABABESIA BOVISBOVINESEPIDEMIOLOGYINDIRECT FLUORESCENT-ANTIBODY TEST (IFAT)NESTED PCRWATER BUFFALOEShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina are causative agents of bovine babesiosis, a tick-borne disease of cattle in tropical and subtropical regions. Babesia spp. infection adversely affects cattle health and can be fatal resulting in considerable economic loss worldwide. Under endemic stability conditions, herds contain high numbers of chronically infected, asymptomatic carrier animals, in which no parasitemia is detected by microscopic blood smear examination. In addition to bovines, also water buffaloes are infected by both Babesia spp. commonly leading to a subclinical infection. The infection rate (by nPCR) and herd exposure (by IFAT) of bovines and water buffaloes reared under similar field conditions in an area of endemic stability were determined and compared. In order to optimize direct parasite detection, highly sensitive nPCR assays were developed and applied, allowing the detection of as little as 0.1 fg DNA of each Babesia pathogen. Significantly lower percentages (p < 0.001) of seropositive water buffaloes compared to bovines were observed for B. bovis (71.4% vs. 98%) and B. bigemina (85% vs. 100%). Interestingly, in comparison, differences noticed between water buffaloes and bovines were considerably larger with direct parasite detection by nPCR (16.2% vs. 82.3% and 24% vs. 94.1% for B. bovis and B. bigemina, respectively).As expected, bovines subjected to monthly acaricide applications exhibited a significant lower infection rate as determined by nPCR than bovines not subjected to these measures (B. bovis 33.3% vs. 90.7%, p < 0.001; B. bigemina 80% vs. 96.5%, p < 0.001, for treated vs. untreated animals). Interestingly no differences between these groups were observed with respect to seropositivity, suggesting similar rates of parasite exposure (B. bovis 100% vs. 97.7%, p < 0.001; B. bigemina 100% vs. 100%, p < 0.001). Importantly, a significantly higher number of water buffaloes as determined by nPCR were infected when reared jointly with bovines not subjected to tick control than when reared jointly with bovines subjected to tick control (B. bovis 31.6% vs. 9.5%, p < 0.01; B. bigemina 42.1% vs. 9.5%, p < 0.01, for water buffaloes reared with untreated vs. treated bovines) and/or when reared without bovines (B. bovis 31.6% vs. 11.6%, p < 0.01; B. bigemina 42.1% vs. 20%, p < 0.01). An accumulation of seropositivity and a decline of infection rates were observed in older animals, while differences observed with regard to gender may warrant further investigation. In summary, our findings suggest that water buffaloes are much more capable to limit or eliminate Babesia infection, possibly due to a more capable immune defense. Furthermore, an increased Babesia spp. parasite reservoir of bovines seems to increase the infection rate of water buffaloes when both are reared on the same pasture.Fil: Romero-Salas, Dora. Universidad Veracruzana; MéxicoFil: Mira, Anabela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas. Instituto de Patobiología; ArgentinaFil: Mosqueda, Juan. Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro; MéxicoFil: García Vázquez, Zeferino. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias. Centro Nacional de Investigación Disciplinaria en Parasitología Veterinaria; MéxicoFil: Hidalgo Ruiz, Mario. Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro; MéxicoFil: Vela, Noot Aditya Ortiz. Universidad Veracruzana; MéxicoFil: de León, Adalberto Ángel Pérez. United States Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Research Service; ArgentinaFil: Florín Christensen, Monica. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias. Centro Nacional de Investigación Disciplinaria en Parasitología Veterinaria; MéxicoFil: Schnittger, Leonhard. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias. Centro Nacional de Investigación Disciplinaria en Parasitología Veterinaria; MéxicoElsevier Science2016-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/72886Romero-Salas, Dora; Mira, Anabela; Mosqueda, Juan; García Vázquez, Zeferino; Hidalgo Ruiz, Mario; et al.; Molecular and serological detection of Babesia bovis- and Babesia bigemina-infection in bovines and water buffaloes raised jointly in an endemic field; Elsevier Science; Veterinary Parasitology; 217; 2-2016; 101-1070304-4017CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030440171530114Xinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.12.030info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-10T13:14:04Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/72886instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-10 13:14:05.231CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Molecular and serological detection of Babesia bovis- and Babesia bigemina-infection in bovines and water buffaloes raised jointly in an endemic field |
title |
Molecular and serological detection of Babesia bovis- and Babesia bigemina-infection in bovines and water buffaloes raised jointly in an endemic field |
spellingShingle |
Molecular and serological detection of Babesia bovis- and Babesia bigemina-infection in bovines and water buffaloes raised jointly in an endemic field Romero-Salas, Dora BABESIA BIGEMINA BABESIA BOVIS BOVINES EPIDEMIOLOGY INDIRECT FLUORESCENT-ANTIBODY TEST (IFAT) NESTED PCR WATER BUFFALOES |
title_short |
Molecular and serological detection of Babesia bovis- and Babesia bigemina-infection in bovines and water buffaloes raised jointly in an endemic field |
title_full |
Molecular and serological detection of Babesia bovis- and Babesia bigemina-infection in bovines and water buffaloes raised jointly in an endemic field |
title_fullStr |
Molecular and serological detection of Babesia bovis- and Babesia bigemina-infection in bovines and water buffaloes raised jointly in an endemic field |
title_full_unstemmed |
Molecular and serological detection of Babesia bovis- and Babesia bigemina-infection in bovines and water buffaloes raised jointly in an endemic field |
title_sort |
Molecular and serological detection of Babesia bovis- and Babesia bigemina-infection in bovines and water buffaloes raised jointly in an endemic field |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Romero-Salas, Dora Mira, Anabela Mosqueda, Juan García Vázquez, Zeferino Hidalgo Ruiz, Mario Vela, Noot Aditya Ortiz de León, Adalberto Ángel Pérez Florín Christensen, Monica Schnittger, Leonhard |
author |
Romero-Salas, Dora |
author_facet |
Romero-Salas, Dora Mira, Anabela Mosqueda, Juan García Vázquez, Zeferino Hidalgo Ruiz, Mario Vela, Noot Aditya Ortiz de León, Adalberto Ángel Pérez Florín Christensen, Monica Schnittger, Leonhard |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mira, Anabela Mosqueda, Juan García Vázquez, Zeferino Hidalgo Ruiz, Mario Vela, Noot Aditya Ortiz de León, Adalberto Ángel Pérez Florín Christensen, Monica Schnittger, Leonhard |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
BABESIA BIGEMINA BABESIA BOVIS BOVINES EPIDEMIOLOGY INDIRECT FLUORESCENT-ANTIBODY TEST (IFAT) NESTED PCR WATER BUFFALOES |
topic |
BABESIA BIGEMINA BABESIA BOVIS BOVINES EPIDEMIOLOGY INDIRECT FLUORESCENT-ANTIBODY TEST (IFAT) NESTED PCR WATER BUFFALOES |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina are causative agents of bovine babesiosis, a tick-borne disease of cattle in tropical and subtropical regions. Babesia spp. infection adversely affects cattle health and can be fatal resulting in considerable economic loss worldwide. Under endemic stability conditions, herds contain high numbers of chronically infected, asymptomatic carrier animals, in which no parasitemia is detected by microscopic blood smear examination. In addition to bovines, also water buffaloes are infected by both Babesia spp. commonly leading to a subclinical infection. The infection rate (by nPCR) and herd exposure (by IFAT) of bovines and water buffaloes reared under similar field conditions in an area of endemic stability were determined and compared. In order to optimize direct parasite detection, highly sensitive nPCR assays were developed and applied, allowing the detection of as little as 0.1 fg DNA of each Babesia pathogen. Significantly lower percentages (p < 0.001) of seropositive water buffaloes compared to bovines were observed for B. bovis (71.4% vs. 98%) and B. bigemina (85% vs. 100%). Interestingly, in comparison, differences noticed between water buffaloes and bovines were considerably larger with direct parasite detection by nPCR (16.2% vs. 82.3% and 24% vs. 94.1% for B. bovis and B. bigemina, respectively).As expected, bovines subjected to monthly acaricide applications exhibited a significant lower infection rate as determined by nPCR than bovines not subjected to these measures (B. bovis 33.3% vs. 90.7%, p < 0.001; B. bigemina 80% vs. 96.5%, p < 0.001, for treated vs. untreated animals). Interestingly no differences between these groups were observed with respect to seropositivity, suggesting similar rates of parasite exposure (B. bovis 100% vs. 97.7%, p < 0.001; B. bigemina 100% vs. 100%, p < 0.001). Importantly, a significantly higher number of water buffaloes as determined by nPCR were infected when reared jointly with bovines not subjected to tick control than when reared jointly with bovines subjected to tick control (B. bovis 31.6% vs. 9.5%, p < 0.01; B. bigemina 42.1% vs. 9.5%, p < 0.01, for water buffaloes reared with untreated vs. treated bovines) and/or when reared without bovines (B. bovis 31.6% vs. 11.6%, p < 0.01; B. bigemina 42.1% vs. 20%, p < 0.01). An accumulation of seropositivity and a decline of infection rates were observed in older animals, while differences observed with regard to gender may warrant further investigation. In summary, our findings suggest that water buffaloes are much more capable to limit or eliminate Babesia infection, possibly due to a more capable immune defense. Furthermore, an increased Babesia spp. parasite reservoir of bovines seems to increase the infection rate of water buffaloes when both are reared on the same pasture. Fil: Romero-Salas, Dora. Universidad Veracruzana; México Fil: Mira, Anabela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas. Instituto de Patobiología; Argentina Fil: Mosqueda, Juan. Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro; México Fil: García Vázquez, Zeferino. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias. Centro Nacional de Investigación Disciplinaria en Parasitología Veterinaria; México Fil: Hidalgo Ruiz, Mario. Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro; México Fil: Vela, Noot Aditya Ortiz. Universidad Veracruzana; México Fil: de León, Adalberto Ángel Pérez. United States Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Research Service; Argentina Fil: Florín Christensen, Monica. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias. Centro Nacional de Investigación Disciplinaria en Parasitología Veterinaria; México Fil: Schnittger, Leonhard. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias. Centro Nacional de Investigación Disciplinaria en Parasitología Veterinaria; México |
description |
Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina are causative agents of bovine babesiosis, a tick-borne disease of cattle in tropical and subtropical regions. Babesia spp. infection adversely affects cattle health and can be fatal resulting in considerable economic loss worldwide. Under endemic stability conditions, herds contain high numbers of chronically infected, asymptomatic carrier animals, in which no parasitemia is detected by microscopic blood smear examination. In addition to bovines, also water buffaloes are infected by both Babesia spp. commonly leading to a subclinical infection. The infection rate (by nPCR) and herd exposure (by IFAT) of bovines and water buffaloes reared under similar field conditions in an area of endemic stability were determined and compared. In order to optimize direct parasite detection, highly sensitive nPCR assays were developed and applied, allowing the detection of as little as 0.1 fg DNA of each Babesia pathogen. Significantly lower percentages (p < 0.001) of seropositive water buffaloes compared to bovines were observed for B. bovis (71.4% vs. 98%) and B. bigemina (85% vs. 100%). Interestingly, in comparison, differences noticed between water buffaloes and bovines were considerably larger with direct parasite detection by nPCR (16.2% vs. 82.3% and 24% vs. 94.1% for B. bovis and B. bigemina, respectively).As expected, bovines subjected to monthly acaricide applications exhibited a significant lower infection rate as determined by nPCR than bovines not subjected to these measures (B. bovis 33.3% vs. 90.7%, p < 0.001; B. bigemina 80% vs. 96.5%, p < 0.001, for treated vs. untreated animals). Interestingly no differences between these groups were observed with respect to seropositivity, suggesting similar rates of parasite exposure (B. bovis 100% vs. 97.7%, p < 0.001; B. bigemina 100% vs. 100%, p < 0.001). Importantly, a significantly higher number of water buffaloes as determined by nPCR were infected when reared jointly with bovines not subjected to tick control than when reared jointly with bovines subjected to tick control (B. bovis 31.6% vs. 9.5%, p < 0.01; B. bigemina 42.1% vs. 9.5%, p < 0.01, for water buffaloes reared with untreated vs. treated bovines) and/or when reared without bovines (B. bovis 31.6% vs. 11.6%, p < 0.01; B. bigemina 42.1% vs. 20%, p < 0.01). An accumulation of seropositivity and a decline of infection rates were observed in older animals, while differences observed with regard to gender may warrant further investigation. In summary, our findings suggest that water buffaloes are much more capable to limit or eliminate Babesia infection, possibly due to a more capable immune defense. Furthermore, an increased Babesia spp. parasite reservoir of bovines seems to increase the infection rate of water buffaloes when both are reared on the same pasture. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-02 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/72886 Romero-Salas, Dora; Mira, Anabela; Mosqueda, Juan; García Vázquez, Zeferino; Hidalgo Ruiz, Mario; et al.; Molecular and serological detection of Babesia bovis- and Babesia bigemina-infection in bovines and water buffaloes raised jointly in an endemic field; Elsevier Science; Veterinary Parasitology; 217; 2-2016; 101-107 0304-4017 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/72886 |
identifier_str_mv |
Romero-Salas, Dora; Mira, Anabela; Mosqueda, Juan; García Vázquez, Zeferino; Hidalgo Ruiz, Mario; et al.; Molecular and serological detection of Babesia bovis- and Babesia bigemina-infection in bovines and water buffaloes raised jointly in an endemic field; Elsevier Science; Veterinary Parasitology; 217; 2-2016; 101-107 0304-4017 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030440171530114X info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.12.030 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier Science |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier Science |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842980749725138944 |
score |
12.993085 |