Determination of glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate in honey: Comparative tests on the sample preparation stage

Autores
Demonte, Luisina Delma; Magni, Florencia Valentina; Michlig, Melina Paola; Michlig, Nicolás; Repetti, María Rosa
Año de publicación
2021
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Beekeeping is an activity of great economic and eco-systemic importance, and Argentina is a major country in the world in this activity. Regarding the cleaning and safety of honey, residues and chemical contaminants´ unwanted presence is of great concern, both by residues originated in the treatments applied to the hive and by the use of agrochemicals in agriculture that potentially contaminate the beekeeping chain. To meet today´s quality and safety requirements is necessary to realize more pesticide control analysis.Argentina, The United States and Brazil use 80% of glyphosate´s world total. In our country since 1996 has been applied to various transgenic crops headed by soy, with a significant annual load (200 thousand tons). Therefore, the main objective was to develop an analytical methodology to determine glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate in honey and related matrices such as nectar. Based on the pre-column derivatization strategy with FMOC-Cl and analysis by UHPLC-MS/MS. Different alternatives were evaluated and adapted to the objective. For methodology optimization: extraction solvents, volume and concentration of the derivatizing reagent, volume and concentration of the borate buffer, different reagents to achieve the optimum pH (pH 9), reaction time and cleaning alternatives of the extracts also were evaluated (L-L partition and SPE).Recovery tests at two concentration levels (10 and 100 ug kg-1) in triplicate were performed to evaluate the methodology. First, honey samples weighed in 50 mL centrifuge tubes were placed in a thermostated bath at 40-50°C for 5 min to achieve fluidity. They were then spiked with the standard mixture (glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate) and vortexed to homogenize. After that, the extraction, derivatization and cleaning stage were performed for each of the evaluated alternatives. The final methodology involves an extraction step with water and mechanical agitation for 30 min followed by the derivatization reaction and finally L-L partition with dichloromethane as a clean-up stage1. Satisfactory results have been obtained, showing that this method is consistent and reliable, with RSDs < 20% and recoveries between 70-105% at 5, 10, 25 and 50 ug kg-1.Also, together with the optimization of the sample preparation, to achieve a better response of the analytes as a whole, the instrumental conditions were optimized based on experiments´ statistical designs to increase detection sensitivity to obtain low detection and quantification limits.In this way, it was possible to achieve an acceptable analytical method for determining glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate that was applied to analyze raw and commercial honey samples.
Fil: Demonte, Luisina Delma. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Fisicoquímicas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología; Argentina
Fil: Magni, Florencia Valentina. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina
Fil: Michlig, Melina Paola. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe; Argentina
Fil: Michlig, Nicolás. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina
Fil: Repetti, María Rosa. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina
8th Latin American Pesticide Residue Workshop
Panamá
Panamá
Universidad Nacional del Litoral
Gobierno de la República de Panamá. Ministerio de Desarrollo Agropecuario
Sociedad Latinoamericana sobre Residuos de Plaguicidas
Materia
GLYPHOSATE
HONEY
CHROMATOGRAPHY
SPECTROMETRY
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/228684

id CONICETDig_a655f6d700dfc12a166ec091b33a872a
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/228684
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Determination of glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate in honey: Comparative tests on the sample preparation stageDemonte, Luisina DelmaMagni, Florencia ValentinaMichlig, Melina PaolaMichlig, NicolásRepetti, María RosaGLYPHOSATEHONEYCHROMATOGRAPHYSPECTROMETRYhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Beekeeping is an activity of great economic and eco-systemic importance, and Argentina is a major country in the world in this activity. Regarding the cleaning and safety of honey, residues and chemical contaminants´ unwanted presence is of great concern, both by residues originated in the treatments applied to the hive and by the use of agrochemicals in agriculture that potentially contaminate the beekeeping chain. To meet today´s quality and safety requirements is necessary to realize more pesticide control analysis.Argentina, The United States and Brazil use 80% of glyphosate´s world total. In our country since 1996 has been applied to various transgenic crops headed by soy, with a significant annual load (200 thousand tons). Therefore, the main objective was to develop an analytical methodology to determine glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate in honey and related matrices such as nectar. Based on the pre-column derivatization strategy with FMOC-Cl and analysis by UHPLC-MS/MS. Different alternatives were evaluated and adapted to the objective. For methodology optimization: extraction solvents, volume and concentration of the derivatizing reagent, volume and concentration of the borate buffer, different reagents to achieve the optimum pH (pH 9), reaction time and cleaning alternatives of the extracts also were evaluated (L-L partition and SPE).Recovery tests at two concentration levels (10 and 100 ug kg-1) in triplicate were performed to evaluate the methodology. First, honey samples weighed in 50 mL centrifuge tubes were placed in a thermostated bath at 40-50°C for 5 min to achieve fluidity. They were then spiked with the standard mixture (glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate) and vortexed to homogenize. After that, the extraction, derivatization and cleaning stage were performed for each of the evaluated alternatives. The final methodology involves an extraction step with water and mechanical agitation for 30 min followed by the derivatization reaction and finally L-L partition with dichloromethane as a clean-up stage1. Satisfactory results have been obtained, showing that this method is consistent and reliable, with RSDs < 20% and recoveries between 70-105% at 5, 10, 25 and 50 ug kg-1.Also, together with the optimization of the sample preparation, to achieve a better response of the analytes as a whole, the instrumental conditions were optimized based on experiments´ statistical designs to increase detection sensitivity to obtain low detection and quantification limits.In this way, it was possible to achieve an acceptable analytical method for determining glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate that was applied to analyze raw and commercial honey samples.Fil: Demonte, Luisina Delma. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Fisicoquímicas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología; ArgentinaFil: Magni, Florencia Valentina. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; ArgentinaFil: Michlig, Melina Paola. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe; ArgentinaFil: Michlig, Nicolás. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; ArgentinaFil: Repetti, María Rosa. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina8th Latin American Pesticide Residue WorkshopPanamáPanamáUniversidad Nacional del LitoralGobierno de la República de Panamá. Ministerio de Desarrollo AgropecuarioSociedad Latinoamericana sobre Residuos de PlaguicidasGobierno de la República de Panamá. Ministerio de Desarrollo Agropecuario2021info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectWorkshopBookhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/228684Determination of glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate in honey: Comparative tests on the sample preparation stage; 8th Latin American Pesticide Residue Workshop; Panamá; Panamá; 2021; 42-42CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://heyzine.com/flip-book/7316f9aa59.html#page/12Internacionalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:09:23Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/228684instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:09:23.445CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Determination of glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate in honey: Comparative tests on the sample preparation stage
title Determination of glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate in honey: Comparative tests on the sample preparation stage
spellingShingle Determination of glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate in honey: Comparative tests on the sample preparation stage
Demonte, Luisina Delma
GLYPHOSATE
HONEY
CHROMATOGRAPHY
SPECTROMETRY
title_short Determination of glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate in honey: Comparative tests on the sample preparation stage
title_full Determination of glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate in honey: Comparative tests on the sample preparation stage
title_fullStr Determination of glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate in honey: Comparative tests on the sample preparation stage
title_full_unstemmed Determination of glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate in honey: Comparative tests on the sample preparation stage
title_sort Determination of glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate in honey: Comparative tests on the sample preparation stage
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Demonte, Luisina Delma
Magni, Florencia Valentina
Michlig, Melina Paola
Michlig, Nicolás
Repetti, María Rosa
author Demonte, Luisina Delma
author_facet Demonte, Luisina Delma
Magni, Florencia Valentina
Michlig, Melina Paola
Michlig, Nicolás
Repetti, María Rosa
author_role author
author2 Magni, Florencia Valentina
Michlig, Melina Paola
Michlig, Nicolás
Repetti, María Rosa
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv GLYPHOSATE
HONEY
CHROMATOGRAPHY
SPECTROMETRY
topic GLYPHOSATE
HONEY
CHROMATOGRAPHY
SPECTROMETRY
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.4
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Beekeeping is an activity of great economic and eco-systemic importance, and Argentina is a major country in the world in this activity. Regarding the cleaning and safety of honey, residues and chemical contaminants´ unwanted presence is of great concern, both by residues originated in the treatments applied to the hive and by the use of agrochemicals in agriculture that potentially contaminate the beekeeping chain. To meet today´s quality and safety requirements is necessary to realize more pesticide control analysis.Argentina, The United States and Brazil use 80% of glyphosate´s world total. In our country since 1996 has been applied to various transgenic crops headed by soy, with a significant annual load (200 thousand tons). Therefore, the main objective was to develop an analytical methodology to determine glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate in honey and related matrices such as nectar. Based on the pre-column derivatization strategy with FMOC-Cl and analysis by UHPLC-MS/MS. Different alternatives were evaluated and adapted to the objective. For methodology optimization: extraction solvents, volume and concentration of the derivatizing reagent, volume and concentration of the borate buffer, different reagents to achieve the optimum pH (pH 9), reaction time and cleaning alternatives of the extracts also were evaluated (L-L partition and SPE).Recovery tests at two concentration levels (10 and 100 ug kg-1) in triplicate were performed to evaluate the methodology. First, honey samples weighed in 50 mL centrifuge tubes were placed in a thermostated bath at 40-50°C for 5 min to achieve fluidity. They were then spiked with the standard mixture (glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate) and vortexed to homogenize. After that, the extraction, derivatization and cleaning stage were performed for each of the evaluated alternatives. The final methodology involves an extraction step with water and mechanical agitation for 30 min followed by the derivatization reaction and finally L-L partition with dichloromethane as a clean-up stage1. Satisfactory results have been obtained, showing that this method is consistent and reliable, with RSDs < 20% and recoveries between 70-105% at 5, 10, 25 and 50 ug kg-1.Also, together with the optimization of the sample preparation, to achieve a better response of the analytes as a whole, the instrumental conditions were optimized based on experiments´ statistical designs to increase detection sensitivity to obtain low detection and quantification limits.In this way, it was possible to achieve an acceptable analytical method for determining glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate that was applied to analyze raw and commercial honey samples.
Fil: Demonte, Luisina Delma. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Fisicoquímicas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología; Argentina
Fil: Magni, Florencia Valentina. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina
Fil: Michlig, Melina Paola. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe; Argentina
Fil: Michlig, Nicolás. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina
Fil: Repetti, María Rosa. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina
8th Latin American Pesticide Residue Workshop
Panamá
Panamá
Universidad Nacional del Litoral
Gobierno de la República de Panamá. Ministerio de Desarrollo Agropecuario
Sociedad Latinoamericana sobre Residuos de Plaguicidas
description Beekeeping is an activity of great economic and eco-systemic importance, and Argentina is a major country in the world in this activity. Regarding the cleaning and safety of honey, residues and chemical contaminants´ unwanted presence is of great concern, both by residues originated in the treatments applied to the hive and by the use of agrochemicals in agriculture that potentially contaminate the beekeeping chain. To meet today´s quality and safety requirements is necessary to realize more pesticide control analysis.Argentina, The United States and Brazil use 80% of glyphosate´s world total. In our country since 1996 has been applied to various transgenic crops headed by soy, with a significant annual load (200 thousand tons). Therefore, the main objective was to develop an analytical methodology to determine glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate in honey and related matrices such as nectar. Based on the pre-column derivatization strategy with FMOC-Cl and analysis by UHPLC-MS/MS. Different alternatives were evaluated and adapted to the objective. For methodology optimization: extraction solvents, volume and concentration of the derivatizing reagent, volume and concentration of the borate buffer, different reagents to achieve the optimum pH (pH 9), reaction time and cleaning alternatives of the extracts also were evaluated (L-L partition and SPE).Recovery tests at two concentration levels (10 and 100 ug kg-1) in triplicate were performed to evaluate the methodology. First, honey samples weighed in 50 mL centrifuge tubes were placed in a thermostated bath at 40-50°C for 5 min to achieve fluidity. They were then spiked with the standard mixture (glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate) and vortexed to homogenize. After that, the extraction, derivatization and cleaning stage were performed for each of the evaluated alternatives. The final methodology involves an extraction step with water and mechanical agitation for 30 min followed by the derivatization reaction and finally L-L partition with dichloromethane as a clean-up stage1. Satisfactory results have been obtained, showing that this method is consistent and reliable, with RSDs < 20% and recoveries between 70-105% at 5, 10, 25 and 50 ug kg-1.Also, together with the optimization of the sample preparation, to achieve a better response of the analytes as a whole, the instrumental conditions were optimized based on experiments´ statistical designs to increase detection sensitivity to obtain low detection and quantification limits.In this way, it was possible to achieve an acceptable analytical method for determining glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate that was applied to analyze raw and commercial honey samples.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
Workshop
Book
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
status_str publishedVersion
format conferenceObject
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/228684
Determination of glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate in honey: Comparative tests on the sample preparation stage; 8th Latin American Pesticide Residue Workshop; Panamá; Panamá; 2021; 42-42
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/228684
identifier_str_mv Determination of glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate in honey: Comparative tests on the sample preparation stage; 8th Latin American Pesticide Residue Workshop; Panamá; Panamá; 2021; 42-42
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://heyzine.com/flip-book/7316f9aa59.html#page/12
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Internacional
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Gobierno de la República de Panamá. Ministerio de Desarrollo Agropecuario
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Gobierno de la República de Panamá. Ministerio de Desarrollo Agropecuario
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842270078675976192
score 13.13397