Determination of glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate in honey: Comparative tests on the sample preparation stage
- Autores
- Demonte, Luisina Delma; Magni, Florencia Valentina; Michlig, Melina Paola; Michlig, Nicolás; Repetti, María Rosa
- Año de publicación
- 2021
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- documento de conferencia
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Beekeeping is an activity of great economic and eco-systemic importance, and Argentina is a major country in the world in this activity. Regarding the cleaning and safety of honey, residues and chemical contaminants´ unwanted presence is of great concern, both by residues originated in the treatments applied to the hive and by the use of agrochemicals in agriculture that potentially contaminate the beekeeping chain. To meet today´s quality and safety requirements is necessary to realize more pesticide control analysis.Argentina, The United States and Brazil use 80% of glyphosate´s world total. In our country since 1996 has been applied to various transgenic crops headed by soy, with a significant annual load (200 thousand tons). Therefore, the main objective was to develop an analytical methodology to determine glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate in honey and related matrices such as nectar. Based on the pre-column derivatization strategy with FMOC-Cl and analysis by UHPLC-MS/MS. Different alternatives were evaluated and adapted to the objective. For methodology optimization: extraction solvents, volume and concentration of the derivatizing reagent, volume and concentration of the borate buffer, different reagents to achieve the optimum pH (pH 9), reaction time and cleaning alternatives of the extracts also were evaluated (L-L partition and SPE).Recovery tests at two concentration levels (10 and 100 ug kg-1) in triplicate were performed to evaluate the methodology. First, honey samples weighed in 50 mL centrifuge tubes were placed in a thermostated bath at 40-50°C for 5 min to achieve fluidity. They were then spiked with the standard mixture (glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate) and vortexed to homogenize. After that, the extraction, derivatization and cleaning stage were performed for each of the evaluated alternatives. The final methodology involves an extraction step with water and mechanical agitation for 30 min followed by the derivatization reaction and finally L-L partition with dichloromethane as a clean-up stage1. Satisfactory results have been obtained, showing that this method is consistent and reliable, with RSDs < 20% and recoveries between 70-105% at 5, 10, 25 and 50 ug kg-1.Also, together with the optimization of the sample preparation, to achieve a better response of the analytes as a whole, the instrumental conditions were optimized based on experiments´ statistical designs to increase detection sensitivity to obtain low detection and quantification limits.In this way, it was possible to achieve an acceptable analytical method for determining glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate that was applied to analyze raw and commercial honey samples.
Fil: Demonte, Luisina Delma. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Fisicoquímicas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología; Argentina
Fil: Magni, Florencia Valentina. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina
Fil: Michlig, Melina Paola. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe; Argentina
Fil: Michlig, Nicolás. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina
Fil: Repetti, María Rosa. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina
8th Latin American Pesticide Residue Workshop
Panamá
Panamá
Universidad Nacional del Litoral
Gobierno de la República de Panamá. Ministerio de Desarrollo Agropecuario
Sociedad Latinoamericana sobre Residuos de Plaguicidas - Materia
-
GLYPHOSATE
HONEY
CHROMATOGRAPHY
SPECTROMETRY - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/228684
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_a655f6d700dfc12a166ec091b33a872a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/228684 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Determination of glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate in honey: Comparative tests on the sample preparation stageDemonte, Luisina DelmaMagni, Florencia ValentinaMichlig, Melina PaolaMichlig, NicolásRepetti, María RosaGLYPHOSATEHONEYCHROMATOGRAPHYSPECTROMETRYhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Beekeeping is an activity of great economic and eco-systemic importance, and Argentina is a major country in the world in this activity. Regarding the cleaning and safety of honey, residues and chemical contaminants´ unwanted presence is of great concern, both by residues originated in the treatments applied to the hive and by the use of agrochemicals in agriculture that potentially contaminate the beekeeping chain. To meet today´s quality and safety requirements is necessary to realize more pesticide control analysis.Argentina, The United States and Brazil use 80% of glyphosate´s world total. In our country since 1996 has been applied to various transgenic crops headed by soy, with a significant annual load (200 thousand tons). Therefore, the main objective was to develop an analytical methodology to determine glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate in honey and related matrices such as nectar. Based on the pre-column derivatization strategy with FMOC-Cl and analysis by UHPLC-MS/MS. Different alternatives were evaluated and adapted to the objective. For methodology optimization: extraction solvents, volume and concentration of the derivatizing reagent, volume and concentration of the borate buffer, different reagents to achieve the optimum pH (pH 9), reaction time and cleaning alternatives of the extracts also were evaluated (L-L partition and SPE).Recovery tests at two concentration levels (10 and 100 ug kg-1) in triplicate were performed to evaluate the methodology. First, honey samples weighed in 50 mL centrifuge tubes were placed in a thermostated bath at 40-50°C for 5 min to achieve fluidity. They were then spiked with the standard mixture (glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate) and vortexed to homogenize. After that, the extraction, derivatization and cleaning stage were performed for each of the evaluated alternatives. The final methodology involves an extraction step with water and mechanical agitation for 30 min followed by the derivatization reaction and finally L-L partition with dichloromethane as a clean-up stage1. Satisfactory results have been obtained, showing that this method is consistent and reliable, with RSDs < 20% and recoveries between 70-105% at 5, 10, 25 and 50 ug kg-1.Also, together with the optimization of the sample preparation, to achieve a better response of the analytes as a whole, the instrumental conditions were optimized based on experiments´ statistical designs to increase detection sensitivity to obtain low detection and quantification limits.In this way, it was possible to achieve an acceptable analytical method for determining glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate that was applied to analyze raw and commercial honey samples.Fil: Demonte, Luisina Delma. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Fisicoquímicas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología; ArgentinaFil: Magni, Florencia Valentina. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; ArgentinaFil: Michlig, Melina Paola. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe; ArgentinaFil: Michlig, Nicolás. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; ArgentinaFil: Repetti, María Rosa. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina8th Latin American Pesticide Residue WorkshopPanamáPanamáUniversidad Nacional del LitoralGobierno de la República de Panamá. Ministerio de Desarrollo AgropecuarioSociedad Latinoamericana sobre Residuos de PlaguicidasGobierno de la República de Panamá. Ministerio de Desarrollo Agropecuario2021info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectWorkshopBookhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/228684Determination of glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate in honey: Comparative tests on the sample preparation stage; 8th Latin American Pesticide Residue Workshop; Panamá; Panamá; 2021; 42-42CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://heyzine.com/flip-book/7316f9aa59.html#page/12Internacionalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:09:23Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/228684instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:09:23.445CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Determination of glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate in honey: Comparative tests on the sample preparation stage |
title |
Determination of glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate in honey: Comparative tests on the sample preparation stage |
spellingShingle |
Determination of glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate in honey: Comparative tests on the sample preparation stage Demonte, Luisina Delma GLYPHOSATE HONEY CHROMATOGRAPHY SPECTROMETRY |
title_short |
Determination of glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate in honey: Comparative tests on the sample preparation stage |
title_full |
Determination of glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate in honey: Comparative tests on the sample preparation stage |
title_fullStr |
Determination of glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate in honey: Comparative tests on the sample preparation stage |
title_full_unstemmed |
Determination of glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate in honey: Comparative tests on the sample preparation stage |
title_sort |
Determination of glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate in honey: Comparative tests on the sample preparation stage |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Demonte, Luisina Delma Magni, Florencia Valentina Michlig, Melina Paola Michlig, Nicolás Repetti, María Rosa |
author |
Demonte, Luisina Delma |
author_facet |
Demonte, Luisina Delma Magni, Florencia Valentina Michlig, Melina Paola Michlig, Nicolás Repetti, María Rosa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Magni, Florencia Valentina Michlig, Melina Paola Michlig, Nicolás Repetti, María Rosa |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
GLYPHOSATE HONEY CHROMATOGRAPHY SPECTROMETRY |
topic |
GLYPHOSATE HONEY CHROMATOGRAPHY SPECTROMETRY |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.4 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Beekeeping is an activity of great economic and eco-systemic importance, and Argentina is a major country in the world in this activity. Regarding the cleaning and safety of honey, residues and chemical contaminants´ unwanted presence is of great concern, both by residues originated in the treatments applied to the hive and by the use of agrochemicals in agriculture that potentially contaminate the beekeeping chain. To meet today´s quality and safety requirements is necessary to realize more pesticide control analysis.Argentina, The United States and Brazil use 80% of glyphosate´s world total. In our country since 1996 has been applied to various transgenic crops headed by soy, with a significant annual load (200 thousand tons). Therefore, the main objective was to develop an analytical methodology to determine glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate in honey and related matrices such as nectar. Based on the pre-column derivatization strategy with FMOC-Cl and analysis by UHPLC-MS/MS. Different alternatives were evaluated and adapted to the objective. For methodology optimization: extraction solvents, volume and concentration of the derivatizing reagent, volume and concentration of the borate buffer, different reagents to achieve the optimum pH (pH 9), reaction time and cleaning alternatives of the extracts also were evaluated (L-L partition and SPE).Recovery tests at two concentration levels (10 and 100 ug kg-1) in triplicate were performed to evaluate the methodology. First, honey samples weighed in 50 mL centrifuge tubes were placed in a thermostated bath at 40-50°C for 5 min to achieve fluidity. They were then spiked with the standard mixture (glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate) and vortexed to homogenize. After that, the extraction, derivatization and cleaning stage were performed for each of the evaluated alternatives. The final methodology involves an extraction step with water and mechanical agitation for 30 min followed by the derivatization reaction and finally L-L partition with dichloromethane as a clean-up stage1. Satisfactory results have been obtained, showing that this method is consistent and reliable, with RSDs < 20% and recoveries between 70-105% at 5, 10, 25 and 50 ug kg-1.Also, together with the optimization of the sample preparation, to achieve a better response of the analytes as a whole, the instrumental conditions were optimized based on experiments´ statistical designs to increase detection sensitivity to obtain low detection and quantification limits.In this way, it was possible to achieve an acceptable analytical method for determining glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate that was applied to analyze raw and commercial honey samples. Fil: Demonte, Luisina Delma. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Fisicoquímicas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología; Argentina Fil: Magni, Florencia Valentina. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina Fil: Michlig, Melina Paola. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe; Argentina Fil: Michlig, Nicolás. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina Fil: Repetti, María Rosa. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina 8th Latin American Pesticide Residue Workshop Panamá Panamá Universidad Nacional del Litoral Gobierno de la República de Panamá. Ministerio de Desarrollo Agropecuario Sociedad Latinoamericana sobre Residuos de Plaguicidas |
description |
Beekeeping is an activity of great economic and eco-systemic importance, and Argentina is a major country in the world in this activity. Regarding the cleaning and safety of honey, residues and chemical contaminants´ unwanted presence is of great concern, both by residues originated in the treatments applied to the hive and by the use of agrochemicals in agriculture that potentially contaminate the beekeeping chain. To meet today´s quality and safety requirements is necessary to realize more pesticide control analysis.Argentina, The United States and Brazil use 80% of glyphosate´s world total. In our country since 1996 has been applied to various transgenic crops headed by soy, with a significant annual load (200 thousand tons). Therefore, the main objective was to develop an analytical methodology to determine glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate in honey and related matrices such as nectar. Based on the pre-column derivatization strategy with FMOC-Cl and analysis by UHPLC-MS/MS. Different alternatives were evaluated and adapted to the objective. For methodology optimization: extraction solvents, volume and concentration of the derivatizing reagent, volume and concentration of the borate buffer, different reagents to achieve the optimum pH (pH 9), reaction time and cleaning alternatives of the extracts also were evaluated (L-L partition and SPE).Recovery tests at two concentration levels (10 and 100 ug kg-1) in triplicate were performed to evaluate the methodology. First, honey samples weighed in 50 mL centrifuge tubes were placed in a thermostated bath at 40-50°C for 5 min to achieve fluidity. They were then spiked with the standard mixture (glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate) and vortexed to homogenize. After that, the extraction, derivatization and cleaning stage were performed for each of the evaluated alternatives. The final methodology involves an extraction step with water and mechanical agitation for 30 min followed by the derivatization reaction and finally L-L partition with dichloromethane as a clean-up stage1. Satisfactory results have been obtained, showing that this method is consistent and reliable, with RSDs < 20% and recoveries between 70-105% at 5, 10, 25 and 50 ug kg-1.Also, together with the optimization of the sample preparation, to achieve a better response of the analytes as a whole, the instrumental conditions were optimized based on experiments´ statistical designs to increase detection sensitivity to obtain low detection and quantification limits.In this way, it was possible to achieve an acceptable analytical method for determining glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate that was applied to analyze raw and commercial honey samples. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject Workshop Book http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794 info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
format |
conferenceObject |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/228684 Determination of glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate in honey: Comparative tests on the sample preparation stage; 8th Latin American Pesticide Residue Workshop; Panamá; Panamá; 2021; 42-42 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/228684 |
identifier_str_mv |
Determination of glyphosate, AMPA and glufosinate in honey: Comparative tests on the sample preparation stage; 8th Latin American Pesticide Residue Workshop; Panamá; Panamá; 2021; 42-42 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://heyzine.com/flip-book/7316f9aa59.html#page/12 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Internacional |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Gobierno de la República de Panamá. Ministerio de Desarrollo Agropecuario |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Gobierno de la República de Panamá. Ministerio de Desarrollo Agropecuario |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842270078675976192 |
score |
13.13397 |