An Analysis of Mendel's Two Hybridist Theories and their Intertheoretical Relationships

Autores
Lorenzano, Pablo Julio
Año de publicación
2022
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Based on a statistical analysis of his experiments, which was a novelty for the tradition of “horticulturalists” (or “plant breeders”) as well as for the tradition of “hybridists”, and seeking a “generally applicable law governing the formation and development of hybrids” (MENDEL 1865: 3), Mendel states “the law of development/evolution found for Pisum” (MENDEL 1865: 32). When he tries to provide the “foundation and explanation” (MENDEL 1865: 32) of the law of formation and development of hybrids, he does it in terms of the production and behavior of egg cells and pollen cells, and, ultimately, in terms of the nature and behavior of what he calls “elements” (MENDEL 1865: 41) or “cell elements” (MENDEL 1865: 42). Moreover, Mendel recognizes the existence not just of hybrids that behave like those of Pisum – i.e., of “variable hybrids” – but also of hybrids that “remain perfectly like the hybrid and continue constant in their offspring” (MENDEL 1865: 38) and “acquire the status of new species” (MENDEL 1865: 40) – i.e., of “constant hybrids” (MENDEL 1869: 27–28, 31). The law that would govern the behavior of constant hybrids would also find its foundation and explanation in terms of the nature and behavior of elements (or cell elements). Mendel’s hybridism consists of two theories: a theory that moves on a more “empirical” level, according to Schleiden’s first “special guiding maxim”, the “Maxim of the history of development/evolution” (SCHLEIDEN 1849: 141, 142, 146), which can be called “Mendel’s theory of the development/evolution of hybrids” (DEH), and a theory that moves on a more “theoretical” level, according to Schleiden’s second “special guiding maxim”, the “Maxim of the autonomy of cells in plants” (SCHLEIDEN 1849: 146, 148), which can be called “Mendel’s theory of the cellular foundation of the development/evolution of hybrids” (CFH). The paper aims to present an analysis of these two theories and their intertheoretical relationships, carried out within the framework of the so-called Metatheoretical Structuralism (BALZER, MOULINES & SNEED 1987).
Fil: Lorenzano, Pablo Julio. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes. Departamento de Ciencias Sociales. Instituto de Estudios sobre la Ciencia y la Tecnología. Centro de Estudios de Filosofía e Historia de la Ciencia; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Materia
MENDEL
HYBRIDIST THEORIES
INTERTHEORETICAL RELATIONSHIPS
METATHEORETICAL STRUCTURALISM
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/200714

id CONICETDig_a4641949a2c3df0108bb66b4fc03e138
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/200714
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling An Analysis of Mendel's Two Hybridist Theories and their Intertheoretical RelationshipsLorenzano, Pablo JulioMENDELHYBRIDIST THEORIESINTERTHEORETICAL RELATIONSHIPSMETATHEORETICAL STRUCTURALISMhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6Based on a statistical analysis of his experiments, which was a novelty for the tradition of “horticulturalists” (or “plant breeders”) as well as for the tradition of “hybridists”, and seeking a “generally applicable law governing the formation and development of hybrids” (MENDEL 1865: 3), Mendel states “the law of development/evolution found for Pisum” (MENDEL 1865: 32). When he tries to provide the “foundation and explanation” (MENDEL 1865: 32) of the law of formation and development of hybrids, he does it in terms of the production and behavior of egg cells and pollen cells, and, ultimately, in terms of the nature and behavior of what he calls “elements” (MENDEL 1865: 41) or “cell elements” (MENDEL 1865: 42). Moreover, Mendel recognizes the existence not just of hybrids that behave like those of Pisum – i.e., of “variable hybrids” – but also of hybrids that “remain perfectly like the hybrid and continue constant in their offspring” (MENDEL 1865: 38) and “acquire the status of new species” (MENDEL 1865: 40) – i.e., of “constant hybrids” (MENDEL 1869: 27–28, 31). The law that would govern the behavior of constant hybrids would also find its foundation and explanation in terms of the nature and behavior of elements (or cell elements). Mendel’s hybridism consists of two theories: a theory that moves on a more “empirical” level, according to Schleiden’s first “special guiding maxim”, the “Maxim of the history of development/evolution” (SCHLEIDEN 1849: 141, 142, 146), which can be called “Mendel’s theory of the development/evolution of hybrids” (DEH), and a theory that moves on a more “theoretical” level, according to Schleiden’s second “special guiding maxim”, the “Maxim of the autonomy of cells in plants” (SCHLEIDEN 1849: 146, 148), which can be called “Mendel’s theory of the cellular foundation of the development/evolution of hybrids” (CFH). The paper aims to present an analysis of these two theories and their intertheoretical relationships, carried out within the framework of the so-called Metatheoretical Structuralism (BALZER, MOULINES & SNEED 1987).Fil: Lorenzano, Pablo Julio. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes. Departamento de Ciencias Sociales. Instituto de Estudios sobre la Ciencia y la Tecnología. Centro de Estudios de Filosofía e Historia de la Ciencia; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaMoravian Museum Brno2022-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/200714Lorenzano, Pablo Julio; An Analysis of Mendel's Two Hybridist Theories and their Intertheoretical Relationships; Moravian Museum Brno; Folia Mendeliana; 58; 2; 12-2022; 45-720085-07480085-0748CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-10T13:04:36Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/200714instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-10 13:04:37.16CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv An Analysis of Mendel's Two Hybridist Theories and their Intertheoretical Relationships
title An Analysis of Mendel's Two Hybridist Theories and their Intertheoretical Relationships
spellingShingle An Analysis of Mendel's Two Hybridist Theories and their Intertheoretical Relationships
Lorenzano, Pablo Julio
MENDEL
HYBRIDIST THEORIES
INTERTHEORETICAL RELATIONSHIPS
METATHEORETICAL STRUCTURALISM
title_short An Analysis of Mendel's Two Hybridist Theories and their Intertheoretical Relationships
title_full An Analysis of Mendel's Two Hybridist Theories and their Intertheoretical Relationships
title_fullStr An Analysis of Mendel's Two Hybridist Theories and their Intertheoretical Relationships
title_full_unstemmed An Analysis of Mendel's Two Hybridist Theories and their Intertheoretical Relationships
title_sort An Analysis of Mendel's Two Hybridist Theories and their Intertheoretical Relationships
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Lorenzano, Pablo Julio
author Lorenzano, Pablo Julio
author_facet Lorenzano, Pablo Julio
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv MENDEL
HYBRIDIST THEORIES
INTERTHEORETICAL RELATIONSHIPS
METATHEORETICAL STRUCTURALISM
topic MENDEL
HYBRIDIST THEORIES
INTERTHEORETICAL RELATIONSHIPS
METATHEORETICAL STRUCTURALISM
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Based on a statistical analysis of his experiments, which was a novelty for the tradition of “horticulturalists” (or “plant breeders”) as well as for the tradition of “hybridists”, and seeking a “generally applicable law governing the formation and development of hybrids” (MENDEL 1865: 3), Mendel states “the law of development/evolution found for Pisum” (MENDEL 1865: 32). When he tries to provide the “foundation and explanation” (MENDEL 1865: 32) of the law of formation and development of hybrids, he does it in terms of the production and behavior of egg cells and pollen cells, and, ultimately, in terms of the nature and behavior of what he calls “elements” (MENDEL 1865: 41) or “cell elements” (MENDEL 1865: 42). Moreover, Mendel recognizes the existence not just of hybrids that behave like those of Pisum – i.e., of “variable hybrids” – but also of hybrids that “remain perfectly like the hybrid and continue constant in their offspring” (MENDEL 1865: 38) and “acquire the status of new species” (MENDEL 1865: 40) – i.e., of “constant hybrids” (MENDEL 1869: 27–28, 31). The law that would govern the behavior of constant hybrids would also find its foundation and explanation in terms of the nature and behavior of elements (or cell elements). Mendel’s hybridism consists of two theories: a theory that moves on a more “empirical” level, according to Schleiden’s first “special guiding maxim”, the “Maxim of the history of development/evolution” (SCHLEIDEN 1849: 141, 142, 146), which can be called “Mendel’s theory of the development/evolution of hybrids” (DEH), and a theory that moves on a more “theoretical” level, according to Schleiden’s second “special guiding maxim”, the “Maxim of the autonomy of cells in plants” (SCHLEIDEN 1849: 146, 148), which can be called “Mendel’s theory of the cellular foundation of the development/evolution of hybrids” (CFH). The paper aims to present an analysis of these two theories and their intertheoretical relationships, carried out within the framework of the so-called Metatheoretical Structuralism (BALZER, MOULINES & SNEED 1987).
Fil: Lorenzano, Pablo Julio. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes. Departamento de Ciencias Sociales. Instituto de Estudios sobre la Ciencia y la Tecnología. Centro de Estudios de Filosofía e Historia de la Ciencia; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
description Based on a statistical analysis of his experiments, which was a novelty for the tradition of “horticulturalists” (or “plant breeders”) as well as for the tradition of “hybridists”, and seeking a “generally applicable law governing the formation and development of hybrids” (MENDEL 1865: 3), Mendel states “the law of development/evolution found for Pisum” (MENDEL 1865: 32). When he tries to provide the “foundation and explanation” (MENDEL 1865: 32) of the law of formation and development of hybrids, he does it in terms of the production and behavior of egg cells and pollen cells, and, ultimately, in terms of the nature and behavior of what he calls “elements” (MENDEL 1865: 41) or “cell elements” (MENDEL 1865: 42). Moreover, Mendel recognizes the existence not just of hybrids that behave like those of Pisum – i.e., of “variable hybrids” – but also of hybrids that “remain perfectly like the hybrid and continue constant in their offspring” (MENDEL 1865: 38) and “acquire the status of new species” (MENDEL 1865: 40) – i.e., of “constant hybrids” (MENDEL 1869: 27–28, 31). The law that would govern the behavior of constant hybrids would also find its foundation and explanation in terms of the nature and behavior of elements (or cell elements). Mendel’s hybridism consists of two theories: a theory that moves on a more “empirical” level, according to Schleiden’s first “special guiding maxim”, the “Maxim of the history of development/evolution” (SCHLEIDEN 1849: 141, 142, 146), which can be called “Mendel’s theory of the development/evolution of hybrids” (DEH), and a theory that moves on a more “theoretical” level, according to Schleiden’s second “special guiding maxim”, the “Maxim of the autonomy of cells in plants” (SCHLEIDEN 1849: 146, 148), which can be called “Mendel’s theory of the cellular foundation of the development/evolution of hybrids” (CFH). The paper aims to present an analysis of these two theories and their intertheoretical relationships, carried out within the framework of the so-called Metatheoretical Structuralism (BALZER, MOULINES & SNEED 1987).
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/200714
Lorenzano, Pablo Julio; An Analysis of Mendel's Two Hybridist Theories and their Intertheoretical Relationships; Moravian Museum Brno; Folia Mendeliana; 58; 2; 12-2022; 45-72
0085-0748
0085-0748
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/200714
identifier_str_mv Lorenzano, Pablo Julio; An Analysis of Mendel's Two Hybridist Theories and their Intertheoretical Relationships; Moravian Museum Brno; Folia Mendeliana; 58; 2; 12-2022; 45-72
0085-0748
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Moravian Museum Brno
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Moravian Museum Brno
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842980158703665152
score 12.993085