A survey of different approaches to support in argumentation systems

Autores
Cohen, Andrea; Gottifredi, Sebastián; García, Alejandro Javier; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
Año de publicación
2013
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
In the last decades, most works in the literature have been devoted to study argumentation formalisms that focus on a defeat relation among arguments. Recently, the study of a support relation between arguments regained attention among researchers; the bulk of the research has been centered on the study of support within the context of abstract argumentation by considering support as an explicit interaction between arguments. However, there exist other approaches that take support into account in a different setting. This article surveys several interpretations of the notion of support as proposed in the literature, such as deductive support, necessary support, evidential support, subargument, and backing, among others. The aim is to provide a comprehensive study where similarities and differences among these interpretations are highlighted, as well as discuss how they are addressed by different argumentation formalisms.
Fil: Cohen, Andrea. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computacion; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Gottifredi, Sebastián. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computacion; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: García, Alejandro Javier. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computacion; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Simari, Guillermo Ricardo. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computacion; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Materia
Argumentation
Abstract Argumentation
Argument Support
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/21611
Acceder
id CONICETDig_a28d0c12594b64553e7566169af54a8b
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/21611
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling A survey of different approaches to support in argumentation systemsCohen, AndreaGottifredi, SebastiánGarcía, Alejandro JavierSimari, Guillermo RicardoArgumentationAbstract ArgumentationArgument Supporthttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1In the last decades, most works in the literature have been devoted to study argumentation formalisms that focus on a defeat relation among arguments. Recently, the study of a support relation between arguments regained attention among researchers; the bulk of the research has been centered on the study of support within the context of abstract argumentation by considering support as an explicit interaction between arguments. However, there exist other approaches that take support into account in a different setting. This article surveys several interpretations of the notion of support as proposed in the literature, such as deductive support, necessary support, evidential support, subargument, and backing, among others. The aim is to provide a comprehensive study where similarities and differences among these interpretations are highlighted, as well as discuss how they are addressed by different argumentation formalisms.Fil: Cohen, Andrea. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computacion; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Gottifredi, Sebastián. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computacion; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: García, Alejandro Javier. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computacion; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Simari, Guillermo Ricardo. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computacion; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaCambridge University Press2013-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/21611Cohen, Andrea; Gottifredi, Sebastián; García, Alejandro Javier; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo; A survey of different approaches to support in argumentation systems; Cambridge University Press; Knowledge Engineering Review; 29; 5; 11-2013; 513-5500269-8889CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1017/S0269888913000325info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/knowledge-engineering-review/article/a-survey-of-different-approaches-to-support-in-argumentation-systems/FB2BCF2F29B88594F1B8570075D17D38info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-10T13:14:28Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/21611instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-10 13:14:28.507CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A survey of different approaches to support in argumentation systems
title A survey of different approaches to support in argumentation systems
spellingShingle A survey of different approaches to support in argumentation systems
Cohen, Andrea
Argumentation
Abstract Argumentation
Argument Support
title_short A survey of different approaches to support in argumentation systems
title_full A survey of different approaches to support in argumentation systems
title_fullStr A survey of different approaches to support in argumentation systems
title_full_unstemmed A survey of different approaches to support in argumentation systems
title_sort A survey of different approaches to support in argumentation systems
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Cohen, Andrea
Gottifredi, Sebastián
García, Alejandro Javier
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author Cohen, Andrea
author_facet Cohen, Andrea
Gottifredi, Sebastián
García, Alejandro Javier
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author_role author
author2 Gottifredi, Sebastián
García, Alejandro Javier
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Argumentation
Abstract Argumentation
Argument Support
topic Argumentation
Abstract Argumentation
Argument Support
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv In the last decades, most works in the literature have been devoted to study argumentation formalisms that focus on a defeat relation among arguments. Recently, the study of a support relation between arguments regained attention among researchers; the bulk of the research has been centered on the study of support within the context of abstract argumentation by considering support as an explicit interaction between arguments. However, there exist other approaches that take support into account in a different setting. This article surveys several interpretations of the notion of support as proposed in the literature, such as deductive support, necessary support, evidential support, subargument, and backing, among others. The aim is to provide a comprehensive study where similarities and differences among these interpretations are highlighted, as well as discuss how they are addressed by different argumentation formalisms.
Fil: Cohen, Andrea. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computacion; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Gottifredi, Sebastián. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computacion; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: García, Alejandro Javier. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computacion; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Simari, Guillermo Ricardo. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computacion; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
description In the last decades, most works in the literature have been devoted to study argumentation formalisms that focus on a defeat relation among arguments. Recently, the study of a support relation between arguments regained attention among researchers; the bulk of the research has been centered on the study of support within the context of abstract argumentation by considering support as an explicit interaction between arguments. However, there exist other approaches that take support into account in a different setting. This article surveys several interpretations of the notion of support as proposed in the literature, such as deductive support, necessary support, evidential support, subargument, and backing, among others. The aim is to provide a comprehensive study where similarities and differences among these interpretations are highlighted, as well as discuss how they are addressed by different argumentation formalisms.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-11
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/21611
Cohen, Andrea; Gottifredi, Sebastián; García, Alejandro Javier; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo; A survey of different approaches to support in argumentation systems; Cambridge University Press; Knowledge Engineering Review; 29; 5; 11-2013; 513-550
0269-8889
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/21611
identifier_str_mv Cohen, Andrea; Gottifredi, Sebastián; García, Alejandro Javier; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo; A survey of different approaches to support in argumentation systems; Cambridge University Press; Knowledge Engineering Review; 29; 5; 11-2013; 513-550
0269-8889
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1017/S0269888913000325
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/knowledge-engineering-review/article/a-survey-of-different-approaches-to-support-in-argumentation-systems/FB2BCF2F29B88594F1B8570075D17D38
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cambridge University Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cambridge University Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842980773345361920
score 12.993085

Publicaciones similares