Labeled bipolar argumentation frameworks

Autores
Escañuela Gonzalez, Melisa Gisselle; Budan, Maximiliano Celmo David; Simari, Gerardo; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
Año de publicación
2021
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
An essential part of argumentation-based reasoning is to identify arguments in favor and against a statement or query, select the acceptable ones, and then determine whether or not the original statement should be accepted. We present here an abstract framework that considers two independent forms of argument interaction-support and conflict-and is able to represent distinctive information associated with these arguments. This information can enable additional actions such as: (i) a more in-depth analysis of the relations between the arguments; (ii) a representation of the user's posture to help in focusing the argumentative process, optimizing the values of attributes associated with certain arguments; and (iii) an enhancement of the semantics taking advantage of the availability of richer information about argument acceptability. Thus, the classical semantic definitions are enhanced by analyzing a set of postulates they satisfy. Finally, a polynomial-time algorithm to perform the labeling process is introduced, in which the argument interactions are considered.
Fil: Escañuela Gonzalez, Melisa Gisselle. Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán; Argentina
Fil: Budan, Maximiliano Celmo David. Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán; Argentina
Fil: Simari, Gerardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación. Instituto de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación; Argentina
Fil: Simari, Guillermo Ricardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación. Instituto de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación; Argentina
Materia
ABSTRACT ARGUMENTATION
BIPOLAR ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORK
ARGUMENT FEATURES
RANKING AND CLASSIC SEMANTICS
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/167508
Acceder
id CONICETDig_cffe13d92fa9c3d36033e8ae16ec2e91
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/167508
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Labeled bipolar argumentation frameworksEscañuela Gonzalez, Melisa GisselleBudan, Maximiliano Celmo DavidSimari, GerardoSimari, Guillermo RicardoABSTRACT ARGUMENTATIONBIPOLAR ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORKARGUMENT FEATURESRANKING AND CLASSIC SEMANTICSQUANTITATIVE ANALYSIShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1An essential part of argumentation-based reasoning is to identify arguments in favor and against a statement or query, select the acceptable ones, and then determine whether or not the original statement should be accepted. We present here an abstract framework that considers two independent forms of argument interaction-support and conflict-and is able to represent distinctive information associated with these arguments. This information can enable additional actions such as: (i) a more in-depth analysis of the relations between the arguments; (ii) a representation of the user's posture to help in focusing the argumentative process, optimizing the values of attributes associated with certain arguments; and (iii) an enhancement of the semantics taking advantage of the availability of richer information about argument acceptability. Thus, the classical semantic definitions are enhanced by analyzing a set of postulates they satisfy. Finally, a polynomial-time algorithm to perform the labeling process is introduced, in which the argument interactions are considered.Fil: Escañuela Gonzalez, Melisa Gisselle. Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán; ArgentinaFil: Budan, Maximiliano Celmo David. Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán; ArgentinaFil: Simari, Gerardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación. Instituto de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación; ArgentinaFil: Simari, Guillermo Ricardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación. Instituto de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación; ArgentinaAI Access Foundation2021-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/167508Escañuela Gonzalez, Melisa Gisselle; Budan, Maximiliano Celmo David; Simari, Gerardo; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo; Labeled bipolar argumentation frameworks; AI Access Foundation; Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research; 70; 4-2021; 1557-16361076-9757CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://jair.org/index.php/jair/article/view/12394/26681info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1613/JAIR.1.12394info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:03:04Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/167508instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:03:04.706CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Labeled bipolar argumentation frameworks
title Labeled bipolar argumentation frameworks
spellingShingle Labeled bipolar argumentation frameworks
Escañuela Gonzalez, Melisa Gisselle
ABSTRACT ARGUMENTATION
BIPOLAR ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORK
ARGUMENT FEATURES
RANKING AND CLASSIC SEMANTICS
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS
title_short Labeled bipolar argumentation frameworks
title_full Labeled bipolar argumentation frameworks
title_fullStr Labeled bipolar argumentation frameworks
title_full_unstemmed Labeled bipolar argumentation frameworks
title_sort Labeled bipolar argumentation frameworks
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Escañuela Gonzalez, Melisa Gisselle
Budan, Maximiliano Celmo David
Simari, Gerardo
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author Escañuela Gonzalez, Melisa Gisselle
author_facet Escañuela Gonzalez, Melisa Gisselle
Budan, Maximiliano Celmo David
Simari, Gerardo
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author_role author
author2 Budan, Maximiliano Celmo David
Simari, Gerardo
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv ABSTRACT ARGUMENTATION
BIPOLAR ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORK
ARGUMENT FEATURES
RANKING AND CLASSIC SEMANTICS
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS
topic ABSTRACT ARGUMENTATION
BIPOLAR ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORK
ARGUMENT FEATURES
RANKING AND CLASSIC SEMANTICS
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv An essential part of argumentation-based reasoning is to identify arguments in favor and against a statement or query, select the acceptable ones, and then determine whether or not the original statement should be accepted. We present here an abstract framework that considers two independent forms of argument interaction-support and conflict-and is able to represent distinctive information associated with these arguments. This information can enable additional actions such as: (i) a more in-depth analysis of the relations between the arguments; (ii) a representation of the user's posture to help in focusing the argumentative process, optimizing the values of attributes associated with certain arguments; and (iii) an enhancement of the semantics taking advantage of the availability of richer information about argument acceptability. Thus, the classical semantic definitions are enhanced by analyzing a set of postulates they satisfy. Finally, a polynomial-time algorithm to perform the labeling process is introduced, in which the argument interactions are considered.
Fil: Escañuela Gonzalez, Melisa Gisselle. Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán; Argentina
Fil: Budan, Maximiliano Celmo David. Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán; Argentina
Fil: Simari, Gerardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación. Instituto de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación; Argentina
Fil: Simari, Guillermo Ricardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación. Instituto de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación; Argentina
description An essential part of argumentation-based reasoning is to identify arguments in favor and against a statement or query, select the acceptable ones, and then determine whether or not the original statement should be accepted. We present here an abstract framework that considers two independent forms of argument interaction-support and conflict-and is able to represent distinctive information associated with these arguments. This information can enable additional actions such as: (i) a more in-depth analysis of the relations between the arguments; (ii) a representation of the user's posture to help in focusing the argumentative process, optimizing the values of attributes associated with certain arguments; and (iii) an enhancement of the semantics taking advantage of the availability of richer information about argument acceptability. Thus, the classical semantic definitions are enhanced by analyzing a set of postulates they satisfy. Finally, a polynomial-time algorithm to perform the labeling process is introduced, in which the argument interactions are considered.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-04
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/167508
Escañuela Gonzalez, Melisa Gisselle; Budan, Maximiliano Celmo David; Simari, Gerardo; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo; Labeled bipolar argumentation frameworks; AI Access Foundation; Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research; 70; 4-2021; 1557-1636
1076-9757
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/167508
identifier_str_mv Escañuela Gonzalez, Melisa Gisselle; Budan, Maximiliano Celmo David; Simari, Gerardo; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo; Labeled bipolar argumentation frameworks; AI Access Foundation; Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research; 70; 4-2021; 1557-1636
1076-9757
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://jair.org/index.php/jair/article/view/12394/26681
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1613/JAIR.1.12394
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv AI Access Foundation
publisher.none.fl_str_mv AI Access Foundation
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269781338619904
score 12.885934

Publicaciones similares