Toward an Enactive Conception of Productive Practices: Beyond Material Agency

Autores
Di Paolo, Ezequiel; Lawler, Diego; Vaccari, Andrés
Año de publicación
2023
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
We examine the question of material agency as raised in material engagement theory (MET). Insofar as MET tends to highlight the causal roles played by extra-bodily material flows in human practices, the term “material agency” does not sufficiently distinguish cases in which these flows are part of an agentive engagement from cases in which they are not. We propose an operational criterion to effect such a distinction. We claim this criterion is organizational, i.e., systemic, and not causal. In the enactive account, agency requires three organizational conditions: self-individuation, interactional asymmetry, and normativity. These conditions can have organic, sensorimotor, and sociomaterial realizations. The dance of human productive practices is indeed spread between brains, bodies, and the world, as MET claims, but it is distributed in an organized manner that involves constraints and norms at various scales. We put forward a relational and non-anthropocentric perspective toward an enactive approach to productive practices. We discuss some aspects of agentive ensembles rendered more intelligible by our proposal, including incorporation, soft assembly and non-decomposability, and the grounding of teleology normative processes at multiple scales. In this manner, we seek to continue the dialog between MET and enactive theory, beginning with the view that a situated system must realize certain minimal organizational conditions to be called an agent.
Fil: Di Paolo, Ezequiel. Universidad del País Vasco; España. University of Sussex; Reino Unido
Fil: Lawler, Diego. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas. - Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas; Argentina
Fil: Vaccari, Andrés. Universidad Nacional de Río Negro. Sede Andina. Centro de Estudios en Ciencia, Tecnología, Cultura y Desarrollo; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Materia
AGENCY
MATERIAL ENGAGEMENT THEORY
PRODUCTIVE PRACTICE
ENACTIVISM
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/229306

id CONICETDig_9b4e3f24855f44741da5f38a23af616f
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/229306
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Toward an Enactive Conception of Productive Practices: Beyond Material AgencyDi Paolo, EzequielLawler, DiegoVaccari, AndrésAGENCYMATERIAL ENGAGEMENT THEORYPRODUCTIVE PRACTICEENACTIVISMhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6We examine the question of material agency as raised in material engagement theory (MET). Insofar as MET tends to highlight the causal roles played by extra-bodily material flows in human practices, the term “material agency” does not sufficiently distinguish cases in which these flows are part of an agentive engagement from cases in which they are not. We propose an operational criterion to effect such a distinction. We claim this criterion is organizational, i.e., systemic, and not causal. In the enactive account, agency requires three organizational conditions: self-individuation, interactional asymmetry, and normativity. These conditions can have organic, sensorimotor, and sociomaterial realizations. The dance of human productive practices is indeed spread between brains, bodies, and the world, as MET claims, but it is distributed in an organized manner that involves constraints and norms at various scales. We put forward a relational and non-anthropocentric perspective toward an enactive approach to productive practices. We discuss some aspects of agentive ensembles rendered more intelligible by our proposal, including incorporation, soft assembly and non-decomposability, and the grounding of teleology normative processes at multiple scales. In this manner, we seek to continue the dialog between MET and enactive theory, beginning with the view that a situated system must realize certain minimal organizational conditions to be called an agent.Fil: Di Paolo, Ezequiel. Universidad del País Vasco; España. University of Sussex; Reino UnidoFil: Lawler, Diego. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas. - Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas; ArgentinaFil: Vaccari, Andrés. Universidad Nacional de Río Negro. Sede Andina. Centro de Estudios en Ciencia, Tecnología, Cultura y Desarrollo; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaSpringer2023-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/229306Di Paolo, Ezequiel; Lawler, Diego; Vaccari, Andrés; Toward an Enactive Conception of Productive Practices: Beyond Material Agency; Springer; Philosophy and Technology; 36; 2; 4-2023; 1-112210-5441CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13347-023-00632-9info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s13347-023-00632-9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-10T13:25:18Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/229306instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-10 13:25:19.176CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Toward an Enactive Conception of Productive Practices: Beyond Material Agency
title Toward an Enactive Conception of Productive Practices: Beyond Material Agency
spellingShingle Toward an Enactive Conception of Productive Practices: Beyond Material Agency
Di Paolo, Ezequiel
AGENCY
MATERIAL ENGAGEMENT THEORY
PRODUCTIVE PRACTICE
ENACTIVISM
title_short Toward an Enactive Conception of Productive Practices: Beyond Material Agency
title_full Toward an Enactive Conception of Productive Practices: Beyond Material Agency
title_fullStr Toward an Enactive Conception of Productive Practices: Beyond Material Agency
title_full_unstemmed Toward an Enactive Conception of Productive Practices: Beyond Material Agency
title_sort Toward an Enactive Conception of Productive Practices: Beyond Material Agency
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Di Paolo, Ezequiel
Lawler, Diego
Vaccari, Andrés
author Di Paolo, Ezequiel
author_facet Di Paolo, Ezequiel
Lawler, Diego
Vaccari, Andrés
author_role author
author2 Lawler, Diego
Vaccari, Andrés
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv AGENCY
MATERIAL ENGAGEMENT THEORY
PRODUCTIVE PRACTICE
ENACTIVISM
topic AGENCY
MATERIAL ENGAGEMENT THEORY
PRODUCTIVE PRACTICE
ENACTIVISM
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv We examine the question of material agency as raised in material engagement theory (MET). Insofar as MET tends to highlight the causal roles played by extra-bodily material flows in human practices, the term “material agency” does not sufficiently distinguish cases in which these flows are part of an agentive engagement from cases in which they are not. We propose an operational criterion to effect such a distinction. We claim this criterion is organizational, i.e., systemic, and not causal. In the enactive account, agency requires three organizational conditions: self-individuation, interactional asymmetry, and normativity. These conditions can have organic, sensorimotor, and sociomaterial realizations. The dance of human productive practices is indeed spread between brains, bodies, and the world, as MET claims, but it is distributed in an organized manner that involves constraints and norms at various scales. We put forward a relational and non-anthropocentric perspective toward an enactive approach to productive practices. We discuss some aspects of agentive ensembles rendered more intelligible by our proposal, including incorporation, soft assembly and non-decomposability, and the grounding of teleology normative processes at multiple scales. In this manner, we seek to continue the dialog between MET and enactive theory, beginning with the view that a situated system must realize certain minimal organizational conditions to be called an agent.
Fil: Di Paolo, Ezequiel. Universidad del País Vasco; España. University of Sussex; Reino Unido
Fil: Lawler, Diego. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas. - Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas; Argentina
Fil: Vaccari, Andrés. Universidad Nacional de Río Negro. Sede Andina. Centro de Estudios en Ciencia, Tecnología, Cultura y Desarrollo; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
description We examine the question of material agency as raised in material engagement theory (MET). Insofar as MET tends to highlight the causal roles played by extra-bodily material flows in human practices, the term “material agency” does not sufficiently distinguish cases in which these flows are part of an agentive engagement from cases in which they are not. We propose an operational criterion to effect such a distinction. We claim this criterion is organizational, i.e., systemic, and not causal. In the enactive account, agency requires three organizational conditions: self-individuation, interactional asymmetry, and normativity. These conditions can have organic, sensorimotor, and sociomaterial realizations. The dance of human productive practices is indeed spread between brains, bodies, and the world, as MET claims, but it is distributed in an organized manner that involves constraints and norms at various scales. We put forward a relational and non-anthropocentric perspective toward an enactive approach to productive practices. We discuss some aspects of agentive ensembles rendered more intelligible by our proposal, including incorporation, soft assembly and non-decomposability, and the grounding of teleology normative processes at multiple scales. In this manner, we seek to continue the dialog between MET and enactive theory, beginning with the view that a situated system must realize certain minimal organizational conditions to be called an agent.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-04
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/229306
Di Paolo, Ezequiel; Lawler, Diego; Vaccari, Andrés; Toward an Enactive Conception of Productive Practices: Beyond Material Agency; Springer; Philosophy and Technology; 36; 2; 4-2023; 1-11
2210-5441
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/229306
identifier_str_mv Di Paolo, Ezequiel; Lawler, Diego; Vaccari, Andrés; Toward an Enactive Conception of Productive Practices: Beyond Material Agency; Springer; Philosophy and Technology; 36; 2; 4-2023; 1-11
2210-5441
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13347-023-00632-9
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s13347-023-00632-9
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842981403747155968
score 12.48226