Review: Radicalizing Enactivism: Basic Minds without content
- Autores
- Satne, Glenda Lucila
- Año de publicación
- 2013
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Until very recently, the field of cognitive science was (almost) in complete agreement in characterizing the mind as a computational mechanism dealing with brain-based representations to produce actions. Accordingly, cognition was defined as always involving represented information and neurally-based computational processes operating on it. In the last decade or so, an alternative to the representational brain paradigm started to emerge, especially from those who defend a conception of human minds as embodied and embedded in physical and social environments (systems in which brain, bodies, and the world are thought to form an indivisible whole). Is this emerging paradigm—enactivism—a genuine alternative to the representational–computational model of the mind or just an extension of it? Answering this question is the...
Fil: Satne, Glenda Lucila. Universidad de Copenhagen; Dinamarca. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina - Materia
-
Enactivism
Intentionality
Teleosemiotics - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/28519
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_961153e0b1c35fd99cf9fbefa0ef5843 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/28519 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Review: Radicalizing Enactivism: Basic Minds without contentSatne, Glenda LucilaEnactivismIntentionalityTeleosemioticshttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6Until very recently, the field of cognitive science was (almost) in complete agreement in characterizing the mind as a computational mechanism dealing with brain-based representations to produce actions. Accordingly, cognition was defined as always involving represented information and neurally-based computational processes operating on it. In the last decade or so, an alternative to the representational brain paradigm started to emerge, especially from those who defend a conception of human minds as embodied and embedded in physical and social environments (systems in which brain, bodies, and the world are thought to form an indivisible whole). Is this emerging paradigm—enactivism—a genuine alternative to the representational–computational model of the mind or just an extension of it? Answering this question is the...Fil: Satne, Glenda Lucila. Universidad de Copenhagen; Dinamarca. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaOxford University Press2013-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/28519Satne, Glenda Lucila; Review: Radicalizing Enactivism: Basic Minds without content; Oxford University Press; The Philosophical Quarterly; 64; 254; 11-2013; 202-2040031-80941467-9213CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1093/pq/pqt032info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://academic.oup.com/pq/article-abstract/64/254/202/1540008?redirectedFrom=fulltextinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:00:13Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/28519instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:00:13.595CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Review: Radicalizing Enactivism: Basic Minds without content |
title |
Review: Radicalizing Enactivism: Basic Minds without content |
spellingShingle |
Review: Radicalizing Enactivism: Basic Minds without content Satne, Glenda Lucila Enactivism Intentionality Teleosemiotics |
title_short |
Review: Radicalizing Enactivism: Basic Minds without content |
title_full |
Review: Radicalizing Enactivism: Basic Minds without content |
title_fullStr |
Review: Radicalizing Enactivism: Basic Minds without content |
title_full_unstemmed |
Review: Radicalizing Enactivism: Basic Minds without content |
title_sort |
Review: Radicalizing Enactivism: Basic Minds without content |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Satne, Glenda Lucila |
author |
Satne, Glenda Lucila |
author_facet |
Satne, Glenda Lucila |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Enactivism Intentionality Teleosemiotics |
topic |
Enactivism Intentionality Teleosemiotics |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Until very recently, the field of cognitive science was (almost) in complete agreement in characterizing the mind as a computational mechanism dealing with brain-based representations to produce actions. Accordingly, cognition was defined as always involving represented information and neurally-based computational processes operating on it. In the last decade or so, an alternative to the representational brain paradigm started to emerge, especially from those who defend a conception of human minds as embodied and embedded in physical and social environments (systems in which brain, bodies, and the world are thought to form an indivisible whole). Is this emerging paradigm—enactivism—a genuine alternative to the representational–computational model of the mind or just an extension of it? Answering this question is the... Fil: Satne, Glenda Lucila. Universidad de Copenhagen; Dinamarca. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina |
description |
Until very recently, the field of cognitive science was (almost) in complete agreement in characterizing the mind as a computational mechanism dealing with brain-based representations to produce actions. Accordingly, cognition was defined as always involving represented information and neurally-based computational processes operating on it. In the last decade or so, an alternative to the representational brain paradigm started to emerge, especially from those who defend a conception of human minds as embodied and embedded in physical and social environments (systems in which brain, bodies, and the world are thought to form an indivisible whole). Is this emerging paradigm—enactivism—a genuine alternative to the representational–computational model of the mind or just an extension of it? Answering this question is the... |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-11 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/28519 Satne, Glenda Lucila; Review: Radicalizing Enactivism: Basic Minds without content; Oxford University Press; The Philosophical Quarterly; 64; 254; 11-2013; 202-204 0031-8094 1467-9213 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/28519 |
identifier_str_mv |
Satne, Glenda Lucila; Review: Radicalizing Enactivism: Basic Minds without content; Oxford University Press; The Philosophical Quarterly; 64; 254; 11-2013; 202-204 0031-8094 1467-9213 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1093/pq/pqt032 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://academic.oup.com/pq/article-abstract/64/254/202/1540008?redirectedFrom=fulltext |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Oxford University Press |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Oxford University Press |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842269625962725376 |
score |
13.13397 |