A two-step theory of the evolution of human thinking: Joint and (various) collective forms of intentionality

Autores
Satne, Glenda Lucila
Año de publicación
2016
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Social accounts of objective content, like the one advanced by Tomasello (2014), are traditionally challenged by an 'essential tension' (Hutto and Satne 2015). The tension is the following: While sociality is deemed to be at the basis of thinking, in order to explain sociality, some form of thinking seems to be necessarily presupposed. In this contribution I analyse Tomasello's two-step theory of the evolution of human thinking vis-à-vis this challenge. While his theory is in principle suited to address it, I claim that the specifics of the first step and the notion of perspective that infuse it are problematic in this regard. I end by briefly sketching an alternative.
Fil: Satne, Glenda Lucila. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. University Of Wollongong; Australia. University Alberto Hurtado; Chile
Materia
COLLECTIVE INTENTIONALITY
JOINT INTENTIONALITY
NATURAL HISTORY
OBJECTIVE CONTENT
TOMASELLO
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/89474
Acceder
id CONICETDig_5cc6c364172200e8aa0afc4f310b153b
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/89474
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling A two-step theory of the evolution of human thinking: Joint and (various) collective forms of intentionalitySatne, Glenda LucilaCOLLECTIVE INTENTIONALITYJOINT INTENTIONALITYNATURAL HISTORYOBJECTIVE CONTENTTOMASELLOhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6Social accounts of objective content, like the one advanced by Tomasello (2014), are traditionally challenged by an 'essential tension' (Hutto and Satne 2015). The tension is the following: While sociality is deemed to be at the basis of thinking, in order to explain sociality, some form of thinking seems to be necessarily presupposed. In this contribution I analyse Tomasello's two-step theory of the evolution of human thinking vis-à-vis this challenge. While his theory is in principle suited to address it, I claim that the specifics of the first step and the notion of perspective that infuse it are problematic in this regard. I end by briefly sketching an alternative.Fil: Satne, Glenda Lucila. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. University Of Wollongong; Australia. University Alberto Hurtado; ChileDe Gruyter2016-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/89474Satne, Glenda Lucila; A two-step theory of the evolution of human thinking: Joint and (various) collective forms of intentionality; De Gruyter; Journal of Social Ontology; 2; 1; 3-2016; 105-1162196-9663CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/jso.2016.2.issue-1/jso-2015-0053/jso-2015-0053.xmlinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1515/jso-2015-0053info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-11-05T09:41:23Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/89474instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-11-05 09:41:24.098CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A two-step theory of the evolution of human thinking: Joint and (various) collective forms of intentionality
title A two-step theory of the evolution of human thinking: Joint and (various) collective forms of intentionality
spellingShingle A two-step theory of the evolution of human thinking: Joint and (various) collective forms of intentionality
Satne, Glenda Lucila
COLLECTIVE INTENTIONALITY
JOINT INTENTIONALITY
NATURAL HISTORY
OBJECTIVE CONTENT
TOMASELLO
title_short A two-step theory of the evolution of human thinking: Joint and (various) collective forms of intentionality
title_full A two-step theory of the evolution of human thinking: Joint and (various) collective forms of intentionality
title_fullStr A two-step theory of the evolution of human thinking: Joint and (various) collective forms of intentionality
title_full_unstemmed A two-step theory of the evolution of human thinking: Joint and (various) collective forms of intentionality
title_sort A two-step theory of the evolution of human thinking: Joint and (various) collective forms of intentionality
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Satne, Glenda Lucila
author Satne, Glenda Lucila
author_facet Satne, Glenda Lucila
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv COLLECTIVE INTENTIONALITY
JOINT INTENTIONALITY
NATURAL HISTORY
OBJECTIVE CONTENT
TOMASELLO
topic COLLECTIVE INTENTIONALITY
JOINT INTENTIONALITY
NATURAL HISTORY
OBJECTIVE CONTENT
TOMASELLO
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Social accounts of objective content, like the one advanced by Tomasello (2014), are traditionally challenged by an 'essential tension' (Hutto and Satne 2015). The tension is the following: While sociality is deemed to be at the basis of thinking, in order to explain sociality, some form of thinking seems to be necessarily presupposed. In this contribution I analyse Tomasello's two-step theory of the evolution of human thinking vis-à-vis this challenge. While his theory is in principle suited to address it, I claim that the specifics of the first step and the notion of perspective that infuse it are problematic in this regard. I end by briefly sketching an alternative.
Fil: Satne, Glenda Lucila. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. University Of Wollongong; Australia. University Alberto Hurtado; Chile
description Social accounts of objective content, like the one advanced by Tomasello (2014), are traditionally challenged by an 'essential tension' (Hutto and Satne 2015). The tension is the following: While sociality is deemed to be at the basis of thinking, in order to explain sociality, some form of thinking seems to be necessarily presupposed. In this contribution I analyse Tomasello's two-step theory of the evolution of human thinking vis-à-vis this challenge. While his theory is in principle suited to address it, I claim that the specifics of the first step and the notion of perspective that infuse it are problematic in this regard. I end by briefly sketching an alternative.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-03
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/89474
Satne, Glenda Lucila; A two-step theory of the evolution of human thinking: Joint and (various) collective forms of intentionality; De Gruyter; Journal of Social Ontology; 2; 1; 3-2016; 105-116
2196-9663
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/89474
identifier_str_mv Satne, Glenda Lucila; A two-step theory of the evolution of human thinking: Joint and (various) collective forms of intentionality; De Gruyter; Journal of Social Ontology; 2; 1; 3-2016; 105-116
2196-9663
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/jso.2016.2.issue-1/jso-2015-0053/jso-2015-0053.xml
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1515/jso-2015-0053
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv De Gruyter
publisher.none.fl_str_mv De Gruyter
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1847976965350359040
score 13.087074

Publicaciones similares