Interactions among resource partitioning, sampling effect, and facilitation on the biodiversity effect: A modeling approach
- Autores
- Flombaum, Pedro; Sala, Osvaldo Esteban; Rastetter, Edward B.
- Año de publicación
- 2014
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Resource partitioning, facilitation, and sampling effect are the three mechanisms behind the biodiversity effect, which is depicted usually as the effect of plant-species richness on aboveground net primary production. These mechanisms operate simultaneously but their relative importance and interactions are difficult to unravel experimentally. Thus, niche differentiation and facilitation have been lumped together and separated from the sampling effect. Here, we propose three hypotheses about interactions among the three mechanisms and test them using a simulation model. The model simulated water movement through soil and vegetation, and net primary production mimicking the Patagonian steppe. Using the model, we created grass and shrub monocultures and mixtures, controlled root overlap and grass water-use efficiency (WUE) to simulate gradients of biodiversity, resource partitioning and facilitation. The presence of shrubs facilitated grass growth by increasing its WUE and in turn increased the sampling effect whereas root overlap (resource partitioning) had, on average, no effect on sampling effect. Interestingly, resource partitioning and facilitation interacted so the effect of facilitation on sampling effect decreased as resource partitioning increased. Sampling effect was enhanced by the difference between the two functional groups in their efficiency in using resources. Morphological and physiological differences make one group outperform the other, once those differences were established further differences did not enhance the sampling effect. In addition, grass WUE and root overlap positively influence the biodiversity effect but showed no interactions.
Fil: Flombaum, Pedro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinacion Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Centro de Investigaciones del Mar y la Atmósfera; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Ciencias de la Atmósfera y los Océanos; Argentina
Fil: Sala, Osvaldo Esteban. Arizona State University. School of Life Sciences and School of Sustainability; Estados Unidos
Fil: Rastetter, Edward B.. Marine Biological Laboratory. The Ecosystem Center; Estados Unidos - Materia
-
Efecto de Muestreo
Biodiversidad
Facilitación
Partición de Recursos - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/4476
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_934d5c0f6883bf537ebaf87595b0ca05 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/4476 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Interactions among resource partitioning, sampling effect, and facilitation on the biodiversity effect: A modeling approachFlombaum, PedroSala, Osvaldo EstebanRastetter, Edward B.Efecto de MuestreoBiodiversidadFacilitaciónPartición de Recursoshttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Resource partitioning, facilitation, and sampling effect are the three mechanisms behind the biodiversity effect, which is depicted usually as the effect of plant-species richness on aboveground net primary production. These mechanisms operate simultaneously but their relative importance and interactions are difficult to unravel experimentally. Thus, niche differentiation and facilitation have been lumped together and separated from the sampling effect. Here, we propose three hypotheses about interactions among the three mechanisms and test them using a simulation model. The model simulated water movement through soil and vegetation, and net primary production mimicking the Patagonian steppe. Using the model, we created grass and shrub monocultures and mixtures, controlled root overlap and grass water-use efficiency (WUE) to simulate gradients of biodiversity, resource partitioning and facilitation. The presence of shrubs facilitated grass growth by increasing its WUE and in turn increased the sampling effect whereas root overlap (resource partitioning) had, on average, no effect on sampling effect. Interestingly, resource partitioning and facilitation interacted so the effect of facilitation on sampling effect decreased as resource partitioning increased. Sampling effect was enhanced by the difference between the two functional groups in their efficiency in using resources. Morphological and physiological differences make one group outperform the other, once those differences were established further differences did not enhance the sampling effect. In addition, grass WUE and root overlap positively influence the biodiversity effect but showed no interactions.Fil: Flombaum, Pedro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinacion Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Centro de Investigaciones del Mar y la Atmósfera; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Ciencias de la Atmósfera y los Océanos; ArgentinaFil: Sala, Osvaldo Esteban. Arizona State University. School of Life Sciences and School of Sustainability; Estados UnidosFil: Rastetter, Edward B.. Marine Biological Laboratory. The Ecosystem Center; Estados UnidosSpringer2014-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/4476Flombaum, Pedro; Sala, Osvaldo Esteban; Rastetter, Edward B.; Interactions among resource partitioning, sampling effect, and facilitation on the biodiversity effect: A modeling approach; Springer; Oecologia; 174; 2; 1-2014; 559-5660029-8549enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00442-013-2775-8info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s00442-013-2775-8info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/0029-8549info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:44:22Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/4476instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:44:23.186CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Interactions among resource partitioning, sampling effect, and facilitation on the biodiversity effect: A modeling approach |
title |
Interactions among resource partitioning, sampling effect, and facilitation on the biodiversity effect: A modeling approach |
spellingShingle |
Interactions among resource partitioning, sampling effect, and facilitation on the biodiversity effect: A modeling approach Flombaum, Pedro Efecto de Muestreo Biodiversidad Facilitación Partición de Recursos |
title_short |
Interactions among resource partitioning, sampling effect, and facilitation on the biodiversity effect: A modeling approach |
title_full |
Interactions among resource partitioning, sampling effect, and facilitation on the biodiversity effect: A modeling approach |
title_fullStr |
Interactions among resource partitioning, sampling effect, and facilitation on the biodiversity effect: A modeling approach |
title_full_unstemmed |
Interactions among resource partitioning, sampling effect, and facilitation on the biodiversity effect: A modeling approach |
title_sort |
Interactions among resource partitioning, sampling effect, and facilitation on the biodiversity effect: A modeling approach |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Flombaum, Pedro Sala, Osvaldo Esteban Rastetter, Edward B. |
author |
Flombaum, Pedro |
author_facet |
Flombaum, Pedro Sala, Osvaldo Esteban Rastetter, Edward B. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sala, Osvaldo Esteban Rastetter, Edward B. |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Efecto de Muestreo Biodiversidad Facilitación Partición de Recursos |
topic |
Efecto de Muestreo Biodiversidad Facilitación Partición de Recursos |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Resource partitioning, facilitation, and sampling effect are the three mechanisms behind the biodiversity effect, which is depicted usually as the effect of plant-species richness on aboveground net primary production. These mechanisms operate simultaneously but their relative importance and interactions are difficult to unravel experimentally. Thus, niche differentiation and facilitation have been lumped together and separated from the sampling effect. Here, we propose three hypotheses about interactions among the three mechanisms and test them using a simulation model. The model simulated water movement through soil and vegetation, and net primary production mimicking the Patagonian steppe. Using the model, we created grass and shrub monocultures and mixtures, controlled root overlap and grass water-use efficiency (WUE) to simulate gradients of biodiversity, resource partitioning and facilitation. The presence of shrubs facilitated grass growth by increasing its WUE and in turn increased the sampling effect whereas root overlap (resource partitioning) had, on average, no effect on sampling effect. Interestingly, resource partitioning and facilitation interacted so the effect of facilitation on sampling effect decreased as resource partitioning increased. Sampling effect was enhanced by the difference between the two functional groups in their efficiency in using resources. Morphological and physiological differences make one group outperform the other, once those differences were established further differences did not enhance the sampling effect. In addition, grass WUE and root overlap positively influence the biodiversity effect but showed no interactions. Fil: Flombaum, Pedro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinacion Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Centro de Investigaciones del Mar y la Atmósfera; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Ciencias de la Atmósfera y los Océanos; Argentina Fil: Sala, Osvaldo Esteban. Arizona State University. School of Life Sciences and School of Sustainability; Estados Unidos Fil: Rastetter, Edward B.. Marine Biological Laboratory. The Ecosystem Center; Estados Unidos |
description |
Resource partitioning, facilitation, and sampling effect are the three mechanisms behind the biodiversity effect, which is depicted usually as the effect of plant-species richness on aboveground net primary production. These mechanisms operate simultaneously but their relative importance and interactions are difficult to unravel experimentally. Thus, niche differentiation and facilitation have been lumped together and separated from the sampling effect. Here, we propose three hypotheses about interactions among the three mechanisms and test them using a simulation model. The model simulated water movement through soil and vegetation, and net primary production mimicking the Patagonian steppe. Using the model, we created grass and shrub monocultures and mixtures, controlled root overlap and grass water-use efficiency (WUE) to simulate gradients of biodiversity, resource partitioning and facilitation. The presence of shrubs facilitated grass growth by increasing its WUE and in turn increased the sampling effect whereas root overlap (resource partitioning) had, on average, no effect on sampling effect. Interestingly, resource partitioning and facilitation interacted so the effect of facilitation on sampling effect decreased as resource partitioning increased. Sampling effect was enhanced by the difference between the two functional groups in their efficiency in using resources. Morphological and physiological differences make one group outperform the other, once those differences were established further differences did not enhance the sampling effect. In addition, grass WUE and root overlap positively influence the biodiversity effect but showed no interactions. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-01 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/4476 Flombaum, Pedro; Sala, Osvaldo Esteban; Rastetter, Edward B.; Interactions among resource partitioning, sampling effect, and facilitation on the biodiversity effect: A modeling approach; Springer; Oecologia; 174; 2; 1-2014; 559-566 0029-8549 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/4476 |
identifier_str_mv |
Flombaum, Pedro; Sala, Osvaldo Esteban; Rastetter, Edward B.; Interactions among resource partitioning, sampling effect, and facilitation on the biodiversity effect: A modeling approach; Springer; Oecologia; 174; 2; 1-2014; 559-566 0029-8549 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00442-013-2775-8 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s00442-013-2775-8 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/0029-8549 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844613397129199616 |
score |
13.069144 |