Hayden White and Conversational Pluralism

Autores
Tozzi, María Verónica
Año de publicación
2014
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
In 1973 Hayden White proposed a theory of historical work through a classification, which not only showed different ways to research and write history, but also explained why these differences are irreducible, and therefore pluralism is inevitable and controversial. The controversial pluralism that Metahistory bequeathed was not well received. It was interpreted, and still is in some sectors, as a celebration of ‘anything goes’ and an ‘attack’ on academic history. In this article I focus on two alternative and critical readings of White’s work, which I call ‘experiential foundationalism’ and ‘metahistorical conceptualism’. While criticizing aspects of these two reading strategies, I propose to reconsider these critical interventions by suggesting a reading of Whitean tropology in combination with figural realism and in the context of a ‘conversational pluralism’ oriented towards the emplotment and reconstruction of past controversies. I conclude by suggesting that to appreciate tropology in terms of a heuristic discipline helps us bring to light irreconcilable differences, but also enables us to refigure in a democratic and dialogic way ‘challenges’ to history arising from public representations of the ‘practical past’.
Fil: Tozzi, María Verónica. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Materia
Metahistory
Experience
Narration
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/35876

id CONICETDig_8c5e0bc0131ff044fefb5a09b43243cf
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/35876
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Hayden White and Conversational PluralismTozzi, María VerónicaMetahistoryExperienceNarrationhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6In 1973 Hayden White proposed a theory of historical work through a classification, which not only showed different ways to research and write history, but also explained why these differences are irreducible, and therefore pluralism is inevitable and controversial. The controversial pluralism that Metahistory bequeathed was not well received. It was interpreted, and still is in some sectors, as a celebration of ‘anything goes’ and an ‘attack’ on academic history. In this article I focus on two alternative and critical readings of White’s work, which I call ‘experiential foundationalism’ and ‘metahistorical conceptualism’. While criticizing aspects of these two reading strategies, I propose to reconsider these critical interventions by suggesting a reading of Whitean tropology in combination with figural realism and in the context of a ‘conversational pluralism’ oriented towards the emplotment and reconstruction of past controversies. I conclude by suggesting that to appreciate tropology in terms of a heuristic discipline helps us bring to light irreconcilable differences, but also enables us to refigure in a democratic and dialogic way ‘challenges’ to history arising from public representations of the ‘practical past’.Fil: Tozzi, María Verónica. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFabrizio Serra editore2014-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/zipapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/35876Tozzi, María Verónica; Hayden White and Conversational Pluralism; Fabrizio Serra editore; Storia della storiografia; 65; 1; 6-2014; 171-1820392-8926CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:00:09Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/35876instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:00:09.93CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Hayden White and Conversational Pluralism
title Hayden White and Conversational Pluralism
spellingShingle Hayden White and Conversational Pluralism
Tozzi, María Verónica
Metahistory
Experience
Narration
title_short Hayden White and Conversational Pluralism
title_full Hayden White and Conversational Pluralism
title_fullStr Hayden White and Conversational Pluralism
title_full_unstemmed Hayden White and Conversational Pluralism
title_sort Hayden White and Conversational Pluralism
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Tozzi, María Verónica
author Tozzi, María Verónica
author_facet Tozzi, María Verónica
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Metahistory
Experience
Narration
topic Metahistory
Experience
Narration
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv In 1973 Hayden White proposed a theory of historical work through a classification, which not only showed different ways to research and write history, but also explained why these differences are irreducible, and therefore pluralism is inevitable and controversial. The controversial pluralism that Metahistory bequeathed was not well received. It was interpreted, and still is in some sectors, as a celebration of ‘anything goes’ and an ‘attack’ on academic history. In this article I focus on two alternative and critical readings of White’s work, which I call ‘experiential foundationalism’ and ‘metahistorical conceptualism’. While criticizing aspects of these two reading strategies, I propose to reconsider these critical interventions by suggesting a reading of Whitean tropology in combination with figural realism and in the context of a ‘conversational pluralism’ oriented towards the emplotment and reconstruction of past controversies. I conclude by suggesting that to appreciate tropology in terms of a heuristic discipline helps us bring to light irreconcilable differences, but also enables us to refigure in a democratic and dialogic way ‘challenges’ to history arising from public representations of the ‘practical past’.
Fil: Tozzi, María Verónica. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
description In 1973 Hayden White proposed a theory of historical work through a classification, which not only showed different ways to research and write history, but also explained why these differences are irreducible, and therefore pluralism is inevitable and controversial. The controversial pluralism that Metahistory bequeathed was not well received. It was interpreted, and still is in some sectors, as a celebration of ‘anything goes’ and an ‘attack’ on academic history. In this article I focus on two alternative and critical readings of White’s work, which I call ‘experiential foundationalism’ and ‘metahistorical conceptualism’. While criticizing aspects of these two reading strategies, I propose to reconsider these critical interventions by suggesting a reading of Whitean tropology in combination with figural realism and in the context of a ‘conversational pluralism’ oriented towards the emplotment and reconstruction of past controversies. I conclude by suggesting that to appreciate tropology in terms of a heuristic discipline helps us bring to light irreconcilable differences, but also enables us to refigure in a democratic and dialogic way ‘challenges’ to history arising from public representations of the ‘practical past’.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-06
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/35876
Tozzi, María Verónica; Hayden White and Conversational Pluralism; Fabrizio Serra editore; Storia della storiografia; 65; 1; 6-2014; 171-182
0392-8926
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/35876
identifier_str_mv Tozzi, María Verónica; Hayden White and Conversational Pluralism; Fabrizio Serra editore; Storia della storiografia; 65; 1; 6-2014; 171-182
0392-8926
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/zip
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fabrizio Serra editore
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fabrizio Serra editore
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613780028260352
score 13.070432