Hayden White and Conversational Pluralism
- Autores
- Tozzi, María Verónica
- Año de publicación
- 2014
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- In 1973 Hayden White proposed a theory of historical work through a classification, which not only showed different ways to research and write history, but also explained why these differences are irreducible, and therefore pluralism is inevitable and controversial. The controversial pluralism that Metahistory bequeathed was not well received. It was interpreted, and still is in some sectors, as a celebration of ‘anything goes’ and an ‘attack’ on academic history. In this article I focus on two alternative and critical readings of White’s work, which I call ‘experiential foundationalism’ and ‘metahistorical conceptualism’. While criticizing aspects of these two reading strategies, I propose to reconsider these critical interventions by suggesting a reading of Whitean tropology in combination with figural realism and in the context of a ‘conversational pluralism’ oriented towards the emplotment and reconstruction of past controversies. I conclude by suggesting that to appreciate tropology in terms of a heuristic discipline helps us bring to light irreconcilable differences, but also enables us to refigure in a democratic and dialogic way ‘challenges’ to history arising from public representations of the ‘practical past’.
Fil: Tozzi, María Verónica. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina - Materia
-
Metahistory
Experience
Narration - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/35876
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_8c5e0bc0131ff044fefb5a09b43243cf |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/35876 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Hayden White and Conversational PluralismTozzi, María VerónicaMetahistoryExperienceNarrationhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6In 1973 Hayden White proposed a theory of historical work through a classification, which not only showed different ways to research and write history, but also explained why these differences are irreducible, and therefore pluralism is inevitable and controversial. The controversial pluralism that Metahistory bequeathed was not well received. It was interpreted, and still is in some sectors, as a celebration of ‘anything goes’ and an ‘attack’ on academic history. In this article I focus on two alternative and critical readings of White’s work, which I call ‘experiential foundationalism’ and ‘metahistorical conceptualism’. While criticizing aspects of these two reading strategies, I propose to reconsider these critical interventions by suggesting a reading of Whitean tropology in combination with figural realism and in the context of a ‘conversational pluralism’ oriented towards the emplotment and reconstruction of past controversies. I conclude by suggesting that to appreciate tropology in terms of a heuristic discipline helps us bring to light irreconcilable differences, but also enables us to refigure in a democratic and dialogic way ‘challenges’ to history arising from public representations of the ‘practical past’.Fil: Tozzi, María Verónica. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFabrizio Serra editore2014-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/zipapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/35876Tozzi, María Verónica; Hayden White and Conversational Pluralism; Fabrizio Serra editore; Storia della storiografia; 65; 1; 6-2014; 171-1820392-8926CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:00:09Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/35876instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:00:09.93CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Hayden White and Conversational Pluralism |
title |
Hayden White and Conversational Pluralism |
spellingShingle |
Hayden White and Conversational Pluralism Tozzi, María Verónica Metahistory Experience Narration |
title_short |
Hayden White and Conversational Pluralism |
title_full |
Hayden White and Conversational Pluralism |
title_fullStr |
Hayden White and Conversational Pluralism |
title_full_unstemmed |
Hayden White and Conversational Pluralism |
title_sort |
Hayden White and Conversational Pluralism |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Tozzi, María Verónica |
author |
Tozzi, María Verónica |
author_facet |
Tozzi, María Verónica |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Metahistory Experience Narration |
topic |
Metahistory Experience Narration |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
In 1973 Hayden White proposed a theory of historical work through a classification, which not only showed different ways to research and write history, but also explained why these differences are irreducible, and therefore pluralism is inevitable and controversial. The controversial pluralism that Metahistory bequeathed was not well received. It was interpreted, and still is in some sectors, as a celebration of ‘anything goes’ and an ‘attack’ on academic history. In this article I focus on two alternative and critical readings of White’s work, which I call ‘experiential foundationalism’ and ‘metahistorical conceptualism’. While criticizing aspects of these two reading strategies, I propose to reconsider these critical interventions by suggesting a reading of Whitean tropology in combination with figural realism and in the context of a ‘conversational pluralism’ oriented towards the emplotment and reconstruction of past controversies. I conclude by suggesting that to appreciate tropology in terms of a heuristic discipline helps us bring to light irreconcilable differences, but also enables us to refigure in a democratic and dialogic way ‘challenges’ to history arising from public representations of the ‘practical past’. Fil: Tozzi, María Verónica. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina |
description |
In 1973 Hayden White proposed a theory of historical work through a classification, which not only showed different ways to research and write history, but also explained why these differences are irreducible, and therefore pluralism is inevitable and controversial. The controversial pluralism that Metahistory bequeathed was not well received. It was interpreted, and still is in some sectors, as a celebration of ‘anything goes’ and an ‘attack’ on academic history. In this article I focus on two alternative and critical readings of White’s work, which I call ‘experiential foundationalism’ and ‘metahistorical conceptualism’. While criticizing aspects of these two reading strategies, I propose to reconsider these critical interventions by suggesting a reading of Whitean tropology in combination with figural realism and in the context of a ‘conversational pluralism’ oriented towards the emplotment and reconstruction of past controversies. I conclude by suggesting that to appreciate tropology in terms of a heuristic discipline helps us bring to light irreconcilable differences, but also enables us to refigure in a democratic and dialogic way ‘challenges’ to history arising from public representations of the ‘practical past’. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-06 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/35876 Tozzi, María Verónica; Hayden White and Conversational Pluralism; Fabrizio Serra editore; Storia della storiografia; 65; 1; 6-2014; 171-182 0392-8926 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/35876 |
identifier_str_mv |
Tozzi, María Verónica; Hayden White and Conversational Pluralism; Fabrizio Serra editore; Storia della storiografia; 65; 1; 6-2014; 171-182 0392-8926 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/zip application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fabrizio Serra editore |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fabrizio Serra editore |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844613780028260352 |
score |
13.070432 |