The Top 1 Percent in International and Historical Perspective
- Autores
- Gonzalez Alvaredo, Facundo; Atkinson Abutridy, John Anthony; Piketty, Thomas; Saez, Emmanuel
- Año de publicación
- 2013
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- The top 1 percent income share has more than doubled in the United States over the last 30 years, drawing much public attention in recent years. While other English-speaking countries have also experienced sharp increases in the top 1 percent income share, many high-income countries such as Japan, France, or Germany have seen much less increase in top income shares. Hence, the explanation cannot rely solely on forces common to advanced countries, such as the impact of new technologies and globalization on the supply and demand for skills. Moreover, the explanations have to accommodate the falls in top income shares earlier in the twentieth century experienced in virtually all high-income countries. We highlight four main factors. The first is the impact of tax policy, which has varied over time and differs across countries. Top tax rates have moved in the opposite direction from top income shares. The effects of top rate cuts can operate in conjunction with other mechanisms. The second factor is a richer view of the labor market, where we contrast the standard supply-side model with one where pay is determined by bargaining and the reactions to top rate cuts may lead simply to a redistribution of surplus. Indeed, top rate cuts may lead managerial energies to be diverted to increasing their remuneration at the expense of enterprise growth and employment. The third factor is capital income. Overall, private wealth (relative to income) has followed a U-shaped path over time, particularly in Europe, where inherited wealth is, in Europe if not in the United States, making a return. The fourth, little investigated, element is the correlation between earned income and capital income, which has substantially increased in recent decades in the United States.
Fil: Gonzalez Alvaredo, Facundo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. University of Oxford; Reino Unido
Fil: Atkinson Abutridy, John Anthony. The London School of Economics and Political Sc.; Reino Unido
Fil: Piketty, Thomas. Paris School of Economics; Francia
Fil: Saez, Emmanuel. University of California at Berkeley; Estados Unidos - Materia
-
Altos ingresos
Impuestos
Riqueza
Herencia - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/27462
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_8449d919dcdffd65de017657342ce538 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/27462 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
The Top 1 Percent in International and Historical PerspectiveGonzalez Alvaredo, FacundoAtkinson Abutridy, John AnthonyPiketty, ThomasSaez, EmmanuelAltos ingresosImpuestosRiquezaHerenciahttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5The top 1 percent income share has more than doubled in the United States over the last 30 years, drawing much public attention in recent years. While other English-speaking countries have also experienced sharp increases in the top 1 percent income share, many high-income countries such as Japan, France, or Germany have seen much less increase in top income shares. Hence, the explanation cannot rely solely on forces common to advanced countries, such as the impact of new technologies and globalization on the supply and demand for skills. Moreover, the explanations have to accommodate the falls in top income shares earlier in the twentieth century experienced in virtually all high-income countries. We highlight four main factors. The first is the impact of tax policy, which has varied over time and differs across countries. Top tax rates have moved in the opposite direction from top income shares. The effects of top rate cuts can operate in conjunction with other mechanisms. The second factor is a richer view of the labor market, where we contrast the standard supply-side model with one where pay is determined by bargaining and the reactions to top rate cuts may lead simply to a redistribution of surplus. Indeed, top rate cuts may lead managerial energies to be diverted to increasing their remuneration at the expense of enterprise growth and employment. The third factor is capital income. Overall, private wealth (relative to income) has followed a U-shaped path over time, particularly in Europe, where inherited wealth is, in Europe if not in the United States, making a return. The fourth, little investigated, element is the correlation between earned income and capital income, which has substantially increased in recent decades in the United States.Fil: Gonzalez Alvaredo, Facundo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. University of Oxford; Reino UnidoFil: Atkinson Abutridy, John Anthony. The London School of Economics and Political Sc.; Reino UnidoFil: Piketty, Thomas. Paris School of Economics; FranciaFil: Saez, Emmanuel. University of California at Berkeley; Estados UnidosAmerican Economic Association2013-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/27462Gonzalez Alvaredo, Facundo; Atkinson Abutridy, John Anthony; Piketty, Thomas; Saez, Emmanuel; The Top 1 Percent in International and Historical Perspective; American Economic Association; Journal of Economic Perspectives; 27; 3; 7-2013; 3-200895-3309CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.27.3.3info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1257/jep.27.3.3info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:59:46Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/27462instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:59:47.23CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Top 1 Percent in International and Historical Perspective |
title |
The Top 1 Percent in International and Historical Perspective |
spellingShingle |
The Top 1 Percent in International and Historical Perspective Gonzalez Alvaredo, Facundo Altos ingresos Impuestos Riqueza Herencia |
title_short |
The Top 1 Percent in International and Historical Perspective |
title_full |
The Top 1 Percent in International and Historical Perspective |
title_fullStr |
The Top 1 Percent in International and Historical Perspective |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Top 1 Percent in International and Historical Perspective |
title_sort |
The Top 1 Percent in International and Historical Perspective |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Gonzalez Alvaredo, Facundo Atkinson Abutridy, John Anthony Piketty, Thomas Saez, Emmanuel |
author |
Gonzalez Alvaredo, Facundo |
author_facet |
Gonzalez Alvaredo, Facundo Atkinson Abutridy, John Anthony Piketty, Thomas Saez, Emmanuel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Atkinson Abutridy, John Anthony Piketty, Thomas Saez, Emmanuel |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Altos ingresos Impuestos Riqueza Herencia |
topic |
Altos ingresos Impuestos Riqueza Herencia |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.2 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
The top 1 percent income share has more than doubled in the United States over the last 30 years, drawing much public attention in recent years. While other English-speaking countries have also experienced sharp increases in the top 1 percent income share, many high-income countries such as Japan, France, or Germany have seen much less increase in top income shares. Hence, the explanation cannot rely solely on forces common to advanced countries, such as the impact of new technologies and globalization on the supply and demand for skills. Moreover, the explanations have to accommodate the falls in top income shares earlier in the twentieth century experienced in virtually all high-income countries. We highlight four main factors. The first is the impact of tax policy, which has varied over time and differs across countries. Top tax rates have moved in the opposite direction from top income shares. The effects of top rate cuts can operate in conjunction with other mechanisms. The second factor is a richer view of the labor market, where we contrast the standard supply-side model with one where pay is determined by bargaining and the reactions to top rate cuts may lead simply to a redistribution of surplus. Indeed, top rate cuts may lead managerial energies to be diverted to increasing their remuneration at the expense of enterprise growth and employment. The third factor is capital income. Overall, private wealth (relative to income) has followed a U-shaped path over time, particularly in Europe, where inherited wealth is, in Europe if not in the United States, making a return. The fourth, little investigated, element is the correlation between earned income and capital income, which has substantially increased in recent decades in the United States. Fil: Gonzalez Alvaredo, Facundo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. University of Oxford; Reino Unido Fil: Atkinson Abutridy, John Anthony. The London School of Economics and Political Sc.; Reino Unido Fil: Piketty, Thomas. Paris School of Economics; Francia Fil: Saez, Emmanuel. University of California at Berkeley; Estados Unidos |
description |
The top 1 percent income share has more than doubled in the United States over the last 30 years, drawing much public attention in recent years. While other English-speaking countries have also experienced sharp increases in the top 1 percent income share, many high-income countries such as Japan, France, or Germany have seen much less increase in top income shares. Hence, the explanation cannot rely solely on forces common to advanced countries, such as the impact of new technologies and globalization on the supply and demand for skills. Moreover, the explanations have to accommodate the falls in top income shares earlier in the twentieth century experienced in virtually all high-income countries. We highlight four main factors. The first is the impact of tax policy, which has varied over time and differs across countries. Top tax rates have moved in the opposite direction from top income shares. The effects of top rate cuts can operate in conjunction with other mechanisms. The second factor is a richer view of the labor market, where we contrast the standard supply-side model with one where pay is determined by bargaining and the reactions to top rate cuts may lead simply to a redistribution of surplus. Indeed, top rate cuts may lead managerial energies to be diverted to increasing their remuneration at the expense of enterprise growth and employment. The third factor is capital income. Overall, private wealth (relative to income) has followed a U-shaped path over time, particularly in Europe, where inherited wealth is, in Europe if not in the United States, making a return. The fourth, little investigated, element is the correlation between earned income and capital income, which has substantially increased in recent decades in the United States. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-07 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/27462 Gonzalez Alvaredo, Facundo; Atkinson Abutridy, John Anthony; Piketty, Thomas; Saez, Emmanuel; The Top 1 Percent in International and Historical Perspective; American Economic Association; Journal of Economic Perspectives; 27; 3; 7-2013; 3-20 0895-3309 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/27462 |
identifier_str_mv |
Gonzalez Alvaredo, Facundo; Atkinson Abutridy, John Anthony; Piketty, Thomas; Saez, Emmanuel; The Top 1 Percent in International and Historical Perspective; American Economic Association; Journal of Economic Perspectives; 27; 3; 7-2013; 3-20 0895-3309 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.27.3.3 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1257/jep.27.3.3 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
American Economic Association |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
American Economic Association |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842269600500154368 |
score |
13.13397 |