The Top 1 Percent in International and Historical Perspective

Autores
Gonzalez Alvaredo, Facundo; Atkinson Abutridy, John Anthony; Piketty, Thomas; Saez, Emmanuel
Año de publicación
2013
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The top 1 percent income share has more than doubled in the United States over the last 30 years, drawing much public attention in recent years. While other English-speaking countries have also experienced sharp increases in the top 1 percent income share, many high-income countries such as Japan, France, or Germany have seen much less increase in top income shares. Hence, the explanation cannot rely solely on forces common to advanced countries, such as the impact of new technologies and globalization on the supply and demand for skills. Moreover, the explanations have to accommodate the falls in top income shares earlier in the twentieth century experienced in virtually all high-income countries. We highlight four main factors. The first is the impact of tax policy, which has varied over time and differs across countries. Top tax rates have moved in the opposite direction from top income shares. The effects of top rate cuts can operate in conjunction with other mechanisms. The second factor is a richer view of the labor market, where we contrast the standard supply-side model with one where pay is determined by bargaining and the reactions to top rate cuts may lead simply to a redistribution of surplus. Indeed, top rate cuts may lead managerial energies to be diverted to increasing their remuneration at the expense of enterprise growth and employment. The third factor is capital income. Overall, private wealth (relative to income) has followed a U-shaped path over time, particularly in Europe, where inherited wealth is, in Europe if not in the United States, making a return. The fourth, little investigated, element is the correlation between earned income and capital income, which has substantially increased in recent decades in the United States.
Fil: Gonzalez Alvaredo, Facundo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. University of Oxford; Reino Unido
Fil: Atkinson Abutridy, John Anthony. The London School of Economics and Political Sc.; Reino Unido
Fil: Piketty, Thomas. Paris School of Economics; Francia
Fil: Saez, Emmanuel. University of California at Berkeley; Estados Unidos
Materia
Altos ingresos
Impuestos
Riqueza
Herencia
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/27462

id CONICETDig_8449d919dcdffd65de017657342ce538
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/27462
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling The Top 1 Percent in International and Historical PerspectiveGonzalez Alvaredo, FacundoAtkinson Abutridy, John AnthonyPiketty, ThomasSaez, EmmanuelAltos ingresosImpuestosRiquezaHerenciahttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5The top 1 percent income share has more than doubled in the United States over the last 30 years, drawing much public attention in recent years. While other English-speaking countries have also experienced sharp increases in the top 1 percent income share, many high-income countries such as Japan, France, or Germany have seen much less increase in top income shares. Hence, the explanation cannot rely solely on forces common to advanced countries, such as the impact of new technologies and globalization on the supply and demand for skills. Moreover, the explanations have to accommodate the falls in top income shares earlier in the twentieth century experienced in virtually all high-income countries. We highlight four main factors. The first is the impact of tax policy, which has varied over time and differs across countries. Top tax rates have moved in the opposite direction from top income shares. The effects of top rate cuts can operate in conjunction with other mechanisms. The second factor is a richer view of the labor market, where we contrast the standard supply-side model with one where pay is determined by bargaining and the reactions to top rate cuts may lead simply to a redistribution of surplus. Indeed, top rate cuts may lead managerial energies to be diverted to increasing their remuneration at the expense of enterprise growth and employment. The third factor is capital income. Overall, private wealth (relative to income) has followed a U-shaped path over time, particularly in Europe, where inherited wealth is, in Europe if not in the United States, making a return. The fourth, little investigated, element is the correlation between earned income and capital income, which has substantially increased in recent decades in the United States.Fil: Gonzalez Alvaredo, Facundo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. University of Oxford; Reino UnidoFil: Atkinson Abutridy, John Anthony. The London School of Economics and Political Sc.; Reino UnidoFil: Piketty, Thomas. Paris School of Economics; FranciaFil: Saez, Emmanuel. University of California at Berkeley; Estados UnidosAmerican Economic Association2013-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/27462Gonzalez Alvaredo, Facundo; Atkinson Abutridy, John Anthony; Piketty, Thomas; Saez, Emmanuel; The Top 1 Percent in International and Historical Perspective; American Economic Association; Journal of Economic Perspectives; 27; 3; 7-2013; 3-200895-3309CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.27.3.3info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1257/jep.27.3.3info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:59:46Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/27462instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:59:47.23CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Top 1 Percent in International and Historical Perspective
title The Top 1 Percent in International and Historical Perspective
spellingShingle The Top 1 Percent in International and Historical Perspective
Gonzalez Alvaredo, Facundo
Altos ingresos
Impuestos
Riqueza
Herencia
title_short The Top 1 Percent in International and Historical Perspective
title_full The Top 1 Percent in International and Historical Perspective
title_fullStr The Top 1 Percent in International and Historical Perspective
title_full_unstemmed The Top 1 Percent in International and Historical Perspective
title_sort The Top 1 Percent in International and Historical Perspective
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Gonzalez Alvaredo, Facundo
Atkinson Abutridy, John Anthony
Piketty, Thomas
Saez, Emmanuel
author Gonzalez Alvaredo, Facundo
author_facet Gonzalez Alvaredo, Facundo
Atkinson Abutridy, John Anthony
Piketty, Thomas
Saez, Emmanuel
author_role author
author2 Atkinson Abutridy, John Anthony
Piketty, Thomas
Saez, Emmanuel
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Altos ingresos
Impuestos
Riqueza
Herencia
topic Altos ingresos
Impuestos
Riqueza
Herencia
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The top 1 percent income share has more than doubled in the United States over the last 30 years, drawing much public attention in recent years. While other English-speaking countries have also experienced sharp increases in the top 1 percent income share, many high-income countries such as Japan, France, or Germany have seen much less increase in top income shares. Hence, the explanation cannot rely solely on forces common to advanced countries, such as the impact of new technologies and globalization on the supply and demand for skills. Moreover, the explanations have to accommodate the falls in top income shares earlier in the twentieth century experienced in virtually all high-income countries. We highlight four main factors. The first is the impact of tax policy, which has varied over time and differs across countries. Top tax rates have moved in the opposite direction from top income shares. The effects of top rate cuts can operate in conjunction with other mechanisms. The second factor is a richer view of the labor market, where we contrast the standard supply-side model with one where pay is determined by bargaining and the reactions to top rate cuts may lead simply to a redistribution of surplus. Indeed, top rate cuts may lead managerial energies to be diverted to increasing their remuneration at the expense of enterprise growth and employment. The third factor is capital income. Overall, private wealth (relative to income) has followed a U-shaped path over time, particularly in Europe, where inherited wealth is, in Europe if not in the United States, making a return. The fourth, little investigated, element is the correlation between earned income and capital income, which has substantially increased in recent decades in the United States.
Fil: Gonzalez Alvaredo, Facundo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. University of Oxford; Reino Unido
Fil: Atkinson Abutridy, John Anthony. The London School of Economics and Political Sc.; Reino Unido
Fil: Piketty, Thomas. Paris School of Economics; Francia
Fil: Saez, Emmanuel. University of California at Berkeley; Estados Unidos
description The top 1 percent income share has more than doubled in the United States over the last 30 years, drawing much public attention in recent years. While other English-speaking countries have also experienced sharp increases in the top 1 percent income share, many high-income countries such as Japan, France, or Germany have seen much less increase in top income shares. Hence, the explanation cannot rely solely on forces common to advanced countries, such as the impact of new technologies and globalization on the supply and demand for skills. Moreover, the explanations have to accommodate the falls in top income shares earlier in the twentieth century experienced in virtually all high-income countries. We highlight four main factors. The first is the impact of tax policy, which has varied over time and differs across countries. Top tax rates have moved in the opposite direction from top income shares. The effects of top rate cuts can operate in conjunction with other mechanisms. The second factor is a richer view of the labor market, where we contrast the standard supply-side model with one where pay is determined by bargaining and the reactions to top rate cuts may lead simply to a redistribution of surplus. Indeed, top rate cuts may lead managerial energies to be diverted to increasing their remuneration at the expense of enterprise growth and employment. The third factor is capital income. Overall, private wealth (relative to income) has followed a U-shaped path over time, particularly in Europe, where inherited wealth is, in Europe if not in the United States, making a return. The fourth, little investigated, element is the correlation between earned income and capital income, which has substantially increased in recent decades in the United States.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-07
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/27462
Gonzalez Alvaredo, Facundo; Atkinson Abutridy, John Anthony; Piketty, Thomas; Saez, Emmanuel; The Top 1 Percent in International and Historical Perspective; American Economic Association; Journal of Economic Perspectives; 27; 3; 7-2013; 3-20
0895-3309
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/27462
identifier_str_mv Gonzalez Alvaredo, Facundo; Atkinson Abutridy, John Anthony; Piketty, Thomas; Saez, Emmanuel; The Top 1 Percent in International and Historical Perspective; American Economic Association; Journal of Economic Perspectives; 27; 3; 7-2013; 3-20
0895-3309
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.27.3.3
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1257/jep.27.3.3
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv American Economic Association
publisher.none.fl_str_mv American Economic Association
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269600500154368
score 13.13397