Relationship between bone mineral density changes with denosumab treatment and risk reduction for vertebral and nonvertebral fractures

Autores
Austin, Matthew; Yang, Yu Ching; Vittinghoff, Eric; Adami, Silvano; Boonen, Steven; Bauer, Douglas C; Bianchi, Gerolamo; Bolognese, Michael A.; Christiansen, Claus Bohn; Eastell, Richard; Grauer, Andreas; Hawkins, Federico; Kendler, David L.; Oliveri, María Beatriz; McClung, Michael R.; Reid, Ian R.; Siris, Ethel S.; Zanchetta, Jose; Zerbini, Cristiano A.F.; Libanati, Cesar; Cummings, Steven R.
Año de publicación
2012
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric bone mineral density (DXA BMD) is a strong predictor of fracture risk in untreated patients. However, previous patient-level studies suggest that BMD changes explain little of the fracture risk reduction observed with osteoporosis treatment. We investigated the relevance of DXA BMD changes as a predictor for fracture risk reduction using data from the FREEDOM trial, which randomly assigned placebo or denosumab 60 mg every 6 months to 7808 women aged 60 to 90 years with a spine or total hip BMD T-score < -2.5 and not < -4.0. We took a standard approach to estimate the percent of treatment effect explained using percent changes in BMD at a single visit (months 12, 24, or 36). We also applied a novel approach using estimated percent changes in BMD from baseline at the time of fracture occurrence (time-dependent models). Denosumab significantly increased total hip BMD by 3.2%, 4.4%, and 5.0% at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. Denosumab decreased the risk of new vertebral fractures by 68% (p < 0.0001) and nonvertebral fracture by 20% (p = 0.01) over 36 months. Regardless of the method used, the change in total hip BMD explained a considerable proportion of the effect of denosumab in reducing new or worsening vertebral fracture risk (35% [95% confidence interval (CI): 20%-61%] and 51% [95% CI: 39%-66%] accounted for by percent change at month 36 and change in time-dependent BMD, respectively) and explained a considerable amount of the reduction in nonvertebral fracture risk (87% [95% CI: 35% - >100%] and 72% [95% CI: 24% - >100%], respectively). Previous patient-level studies may have underestimated the strength of the relationship between BMD change and the effect of treatment on fracture risk or this relationship may be unique to denosumab. Copyright © 2012 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
Fil: Austin, Matthew. Amgen Incorporated; Estados Unidos
Fil: Yang, Yu Ching. Amgen Incorporated; Estados Unidos
Fil: Vittinghoff, Eric. University of California; Estados Unidos
Fil: Adami, Silvano. Universita di Verona; Italia
Fil: Boonen, Steven. Katholikie Universiteit Leuven; Bélgica
Fil: Bauer, Douglas C. University of California; Estados Unidos
Fil: Bianchi, Gerolamo. Azienda Sanitaria Genovese; Italia
Fil: Bolognese, Michael A.. Bethesda Health Research Center; Estados Unidos
Fil: Christiansen, Claus Bohn. Center For Clinical And Basic Research As; Estados Unidos
Fil: Eastell, Richard. University Of Sheffield; Reino Unido
Fil: Grauer, Andreas. Amgen Incorporated; Estados Unidos
Fil: Hawkins, Federico. Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre; España
Fil: Kendler, David L.. University of British Columbia; Canadá
Fil: Oliveri, María Beatriz. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Hospital de Clínicas General San Martín; Argentina
Fil: McClung, Michael R.. Oregon Osteoporosis Center; Estados Unidos
Fil: Reid, Ian R.. The University of Auckland; Nueva Zelanda
Fil: Siris, Ethel S.. Columbia University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Zanchetta, Jose. Universidad del Salvador; Argentina
Fil: Zerbini, Cristiano A.F.. Centro Paulista de Investigação Clinica; Brasil
Fil: Libanati, Cesar. Amgen Incorporated; Estados Unidos
Fil: Cummings, Steven R.. University of California; Estados Unidos
Materia
Bone Mineral Density
Denosumab
Fracture
Percent of Treatment Effect Explained
Surrogate
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/67431

id CONICETDig_8426ff562c358abe4cfebc3487486abd
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/67431
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Relationship between bone mineral density changes with denosumab treatment and risk reduction for vertebral and nonvertebral fracturesAustin, MatthewYang, Yu ChingVittinghoff, EricAdami, SilvanoBoonen, StevenBauer, Douglas CBianchi, GerolamoBolognese, Michael A.Christiansen, Claus BohnEastell, RichardGrauer, AndreasHawkins, FedericoKendler, David L.Oliveri, María BeatrizMcClung, Michael R.Reid, Ian R.Siris, Ethel S.Zanchetta, JoseZerbini, Cristiano A.F.Libanati, CesarCummings, Steven R.Bone Mineral DensityDenosumabFracturePercent of Treatment Effect ExplainedSurrogatehttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric bone mineral density (DXA BMD) is a strong predictor of fracture risk in untreated patients. However, previous patient-level studies suggest that BMD changes explain little of the fracture risk reduction observed with osteoporosis treatment. We investigated the relevance of DXA BMD changes as a predictor for fracture risk reduction using data from the FREEDOM trial, which randomly assigned placebo or denosumab 60 mg every 6 months to 7808 women aged 60 to 90 years with a spine or total hip BMD T-score < -2.5 and not < -4.0. We took a standard approach to estimate the percent of treatment effect explained using percent changes in BMD at a single visit (months 12, 24, or 36). We also applied a novel approach using estimated percent changes in BMD from baseline at the time of fracture occurrence (time-dependent models). Denosumab significantly increased total hip BMD by 3.2%, 4.4%, and 5.0% at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. Denosumab decreased the risk of new vertebral fractures by 68% (p < 0.0001) and nonvertebral fracture by 20% (p = 0.01) over 36 months. Regardless of the method used, the change in total hip BMD explained a considerable proportion of the effect of denosumab in reducing new or worsening vertebral fracture risk (35% [95% confidence interval (CI): 20%-61%] and 51% [95% CI: 39%-66%] accounted for by percent change at month 36 and change in time-dependent BMD, respectively) and explained a considerable amount of the reduction in nonvertebral fracture risk (87% [95% CI: 35% - >100%] and 72% [95% CI: 24% - >100%], respectively). Previous patient-level studies may have underestimated the strength of the relationship between BMD change and the effect of treatment on fracture risk or this relationship may be unique to denosumab. Copyright © 2012 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.Fil: Austin, Matthew. Amgen Incorporated; Estados UnidosFil: Yang, Yu Ching. Amgen Incorporated; Estados UnidosFil: Vittinghoff, Eric. University of California; Estados UnidosFil: Adami, Silvano. Universita di Verona; ItaliaFil: Boonen, Steven. Katholikie Universiteit Leuven; BélgicaFil: Bauer, Douglas C. University of California; Estados UnidosFil: Bianchi, Gerolamo. Azienda Sanitaria Genovese; ItaliaFil: Bolognese, Michael A.. Bethesda Health Research Center; Estados UnidosFil: Christiansen, Claus Bohn. Center For Clinical And Basic Research As; Estados UnidosFil: Eastell, Richard. University Of Sheffield; Reino UnidoFil: Grauer, Andreas. Amgen Incorporated; Estados UnidosFil: Hawkins, Federico. Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre; EspañaFil: Kendler, David L.. University of British Columbia; CanadáFil: Oliveri, María Beatriz. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Hospital de Clínicas General San Martín; ArgentinaFil: McClung, Michael R.. Oregon Osteoporosis Center; Estados UnidosFil: Reid, Ian R.. The University of Auckland; Nueva ZelandaFil: Siris, Ethel S.. Columbia University; Estados UnidosFil: Zanchetta, Jose. Universidad del Salvador; ArgentinaFil: Zerbini, Cristiano A.F.. Centro Paulista de Investigação Clinica; BrasilFil: Libanati, Cesar. Amgen Incorporated; Estados UnidosFil: Cummings, Steven R.. University of California; Estados UnidosAmerican Society for Bone and Mineral Research2012-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/67431Austin, Matthew; Yang, Yu Ching; Vittinghoff, Eric; Adami, Silvano; Boonen, Steven; et al.; Relationship between bone mineral density changes with denosumab treatment and risk reduction for vertebral and nonvertebral fractures; American Society for Bone and Mineral Research; Journal of Bone and Mineral Research; 27; 3; 3-2012; 687-6930884-0431CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1002/jbmr.1472info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jbmr.1472info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:43:44Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/67431instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:43:45.069CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Relationship between bone mineral density changes with denosumab treatment and risk reduction for vertebral and nonvertebral fractures
title Relationship between bone mineral density changes with denosumab treatment and risk reduction for vertebral and nonvertebral fractures
spellingShingle Relationship between bone mineral density changes with denosumab treatment and risk reduction for vertebral and nonvertebral fractures
Austin, Matthew
Bone Mineral Density
Denosumab
Fracture
Percent of Treatment Effect Explained
Surrogate
title_short Relationship between bone mineral density changes with denosumab treatment and risk reduction for vertebral and nonvertebral fractures
title_full Relationship between bone mineral density changes with denosumab treatment and risk reduction for vertebral and nonvertebral fractures
title_fullStr Relationship between bone mineral density changes with denosumab treatment and risk reduction for vertebral and nonvertebral fractures
title_full_unstemmed Relationship between bone mineral density changes with denosumab treatment and risk reduction for vertebral and nonvertebral fractures
title_sort Relationship between bone mineral density changes with denosumab treatment and risk reduction for vertebral and nonvertebral fractures
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Austin, Matthew
Yang, Yu Ching
Vittinghoff, Eric
Adami, Silvano
Boonen, Steven
Bauer, Douglas C
Bianchi, Gerolamo
Bolognese, Michael A.
Christiansen, Claus Bohn
Eastell, Richard
Grauer, Andreas
Hawkins, Federico
Kendler, David L.
Oliveri, María Beatriz
McClung, Michael R.
Reid, Ian R.
Siris, Ethel S.
Zanchetta, Jose
Zerbini, Cristiano A.F.
Libanati, Cesar
Cummings, Steven R.
author Austin, Matthew
author_facet Austin, Matthew
Yang, Yu Ching
Vittinghoff, Eric
Adami, Silvano
Boonen, Steven
Bauer, Douglas C
Bianchi, Gerolamo
Bolognese, Michael A.
Christiansen, Claus Bohn
Eastell, Richard
Grauer, Andreas
Hawkins, Federico
Kendler, David L.
Oliveri, María Beatriz
McClung, Michael R.
Reid, Ian R.
Siris, Ethel S.
Zanchetta, Jose
Zerbini, Cristiano A.F.
Libanati, Cesar
Cummings, Steven R.
author_role author
author2 Yang, Yu Ching
Vittinghoff, Eric
Adami, Silvano
Boonen, Steven
Bauer, Douglas C
Bianchi, Gerolamo
Bolognese, Michael A.
Christiansen, Claus Bohn
Eastell, Richard
Grauer, Andreas
Hawkins, Federico
Kendler, David L.
Oliveri, María Beatriz
McClung, Michael R.
Reid, Ian R.
Siris, Ethel S.
Zanchetta, Jose
Zerbini, Cristiano A.F.
Libanati, Cesar
Cummings, Steven R.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Bone Mineral Density
Denosumab
Fracture
Percent of Treatment Effect Explained
Surrogate
topic Bone Mineral Density
Denosumab
Fracture
Percent of Treatment Effect Explained
Surrogate
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric bone mineral density (DXA BMD) is a strong predictor of fracture risk in untreated patients. However, previous patient-level studies suggest that BMD changes explain little of the fracture risk reduction observed with osteoporosis treatment. We investigated the relevance of DXA BMD changes as a predictor for fracture risk reduction using data from the FREEDOM trial, which randomly assigned placebo or denosumab 60 mg every 6 months to 7808 women aged 60 to 90 years with a spine or total hip BMD T-score < -2.5 and not < -4.0. We took a standard approach to estimate the percent of treatment effect explained using percent changes in BMD at a single visit (months 12, 24, or 36). We also applied a novel approach using estimated percent changes in BMD from baseline at the time of fracture occurrence (time-dependent models). Denosumab significantly increased total hip BMD by 3.2%, 4.4%, and 5.0% at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. Denosumab decreased the risk of new vertebral fractures by 68% (p < 0.0001) and nonvertebral fracture by 20% (p = 0.01) over 36 months. Regardless of the method used, the change in total hip BMD explained a considerable proportion of the effect of denosumab in reducing new or worsening vertebral fracture risk (35% [95% confidence interval (CI): 20%-61%] and 51% [95% CI: 39%-66%] accounted for by percent change at month 36 and change in time-dependent BMD, respectively) and explained a considerable amount of the reduction in nonvertebral fracture risk (87% [95% CI: 35% - >100%] and 72% [95% CI: 24% - >100%], respectively). Previous patient-level studies may have underestimated the strength of the relationship between BMD change and the effect of treatment on fracture risk or this relationship may be unique to denosumab. Copyright © 2012 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
Fil: Austin, Matthew. Amgen Incorporated; Estados Unidos
Fil: Yang, Yu Ching. Amgen Incorporated; Estados Unidos
Fil: Vittinghoff, Eric. University of California; Estados Unidos
Fil: Adami, Silvano. Universita di Verona; Italia
Fil: Boonen, Steven. Katholikie Universiteit Leuven; Bélgica
Fil: Bauer, Douglas C. University of California; Estados Unidos
Fil: Bianchi, Gerolamo. Azienda Sanitaria Genovese; Italia
Fil: Bolognese, Michael A.. Bethesda Health Research Center; Estados Unidos
Fil: Christiansen, Claus Bohn. Center For Clinical And Basic Research As; Estados Unidos
Fil: Eastell, Richard. University Of Sheffield; Reino Unido
Fil: Grauer, Andreas. Amgen Incorporated; Estados Unidos
Fil: Hawkins, Federico. Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre; España
Fil: Kendler, David L.. University of British Columbia; Canadá
Fil: Oliveri, María Beatriz. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Hospital de Clínicas General San Martín; Argentina
Fil: McClung, Michael R.. Oregon Osteoporosis Center; Estados Unidos
Fil: Reid, Ian R.. The University of Auckland; Nueva Zelanda
Fil: Siris, Ethel S.. Columbia University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Zanchetta, Jose. Universidad del Salvador; Argentina
Fil: Zerbini, Cristiano A.F.. Centro Paulista de Investigação Clinica; Brasil
Fil: Libanati, Cesar. Amgen Incorporated; Estados Unidos
Fil: Cummings, Steven R.. University of California; Estados Unidos
description Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric bone mineral density (DXA BMD) is a strong predictor of fracture risk in untreated patients. However, previous patient-level studies suggest that BMD changes explain little of the fracture risk reduction observed with osteoporosis treatment. We investigated the relevance of DXA BMD changes as a predictor for fracture risk reduction using data from the FREEDOM trial, which randomly assigned placebo or denosumab 60 mg every 6 months to 7808 women aged 60 to 90 years with a spine or total hip BMD T-score < -2.5 and not < -4.0. We took a standard approach to estimate the percent of treatment effect explained using percent changes in BMD at a single visit (months 12, 24, or 36). We also applied a novel approach using estimated percent changes in BMD from baseline at the time of fracture occurrence (time-dependent models). Denosumab significantly increased total hip BMD by 3.2%, 4.4%, and 5.0% at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. Denosumab decreased the risk of new vertebral fractures by 68% (p < 0.0001) and nonvertebral fracture by 20% (p = 0.01) over 36 months. Regardless of the method used, the change in total hip BMD explained a considerable proportion of the effect of denosumab in reducing new or worsening vertebral fracture risk (35% [95% confidence interval (CI): 20%-61%] and 51% [95% CI: 39%-66%] accounted for by percent change at month 36 and change in time-dependent BMD, respectively) and explained a considerable amount of the reduction in nonvertebral fracture risk (87% [95% CI: 35% - >100%] and 72% [95% CI: 24% - >100%], respectively). Previous patient-level studies may have underestimated the strength of the relationship between BMD change and the effect of treatment on fracture risk or this relationship may be unique to denosumab. Copyright © 2012 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-03
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/67431
Austin, Matthew; Yang, Yu Ching; Vittinghoff, Eric; Adami, Silvano; Boonen, Steven; et al.; Relationship between bone mineral density changes with denosumab treatment and risk reduction for vertebral and nonvertebral fractures; American Society for Bone and Mineral Research; Journal of Bone and Mineral Research; 27; 3; 3-2012; 687-693
0884-0431
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/67431
identifier_str_mv Austin, Matthew; Yang, Yu Ching; Vittinghoff, Eric; Adami, Silvano; Boonen, Steven; et al.; Relationship between bone mineral density changes with denosumab treatment and risk reduction for vertebral and nonvertebral fractures; American Society for Bone and Mineral Research; Journal of Bone and Mineral Research; 27; 3; 3-2012; 687-693
0884-0431
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1002/jbmr.1472
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jbmr.1472
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv American Society for Bone and Mineral Research
publisher.none.fl_str_mv American Society for Bone and Mineral Research
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842268619884462080
score 13.13397