Does cognition have a role in plasticity of "innate behavior"? A perspective from Drosophila
- Autores
- Gorostiza, Ezequiel Axel
- Año de publicación
- 2018
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- The term innate is usually applied to behaviors commonly characterized as stereotypical reactions to the presence of a specific stimulus. "Innate behaviors", such as escape responses or taxes, are described as inborn, almost inflexible and automatic, with no cognitive demand. However, recent research has shown that many of these behaviors are more complex than initially imagined, and could be largely modulated by context, internal state, and experience, causing in some cases the opposite of the action expected. These processes are sufficient to put the notion of "innate behaviors" as stereotypic and automatic responses under critical scrutiny. This scrutiny has opened the possibility that some cognitive components are involved in ?innate behaviors?. Moreover, the fact that biogenic amines, known for their role in cognitive processes, are emerging as key players in such "innate behaviors" also points in this direction. Here, I present some examples from Drosophila melanogaster supporting a more cognitive interpretation of these behaviors.
Fil: Gorostiza, Ezequiel Axel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Farmacología Experimental de Córdoba. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas. Instituto de Farmacología Experimental de Córdoba; Argentina - Materia
-
BEHAVIORAL FLEXIBILITY
BEHAVIORAL PLASTICITY
DROSOPHILA
INNATE BEHAVIOR
INSECTS
STIMULUS-RESPONSE - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/88618
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_79a89a76a4369ef422071f064d6f7332 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/88618 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Does cognition have a role in plasticity of "innate behavior"? A perspective from DrosophilaGorostiza, Ezequiel AxelBEHAVIORAL FLEXIBILITYBEHAVIORAL PLASTICITYDROSOPHILAINNATE BEHAVIORINSECTSSTIMULUS-RESPONSEhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3The term innate is usually applied to behaviors commonly characterized as stereotypical reactions to the presence of a specific stimulus. "Innate behaviors", such as escape responses or taxes, are described as inborn, almost inflexible and automatic, with no cognitive demand. However, recent research has shown that many of these behaviors are more complex than initially imagined, and could be largely modulated by context, internal state, and experience, causing in some cases the opposite of the action expected. These processes are sufficient to put the notion of "innate behaviors" as stereotypic and automatic responses under critical scrutiny. This scrutiny has opened the possibility that some cognitive components are involved in ?innate behaviors?. Moreover, the fact that biogenic amines, known for their role in cognitive processes, are emerging as key players in such "innate behaviors" also points in this direction. Here, I present some examples from Drosophila melanogaster supporting a more cognitive interpretation of these behaviors.Fil: Gorostiza, Ezequiel Axel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Farmacología Experimental de Córdoba. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas. Instituto de Farmacología Experimental de Córdoba; ArgentinaFrontiers Media S.A.2018-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/88618Gorostiza, Ezequiel Axel; Does cognition have a role in plasticity of "innate behavior"? A perspective from Drosophila; Frontiers Media S.A.; Frontiers in Psychology; 9; AUG; 8-20181664-1078CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01502/fullinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01502info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:42:47Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/88618instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:42:47.646CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Does cognition have a role in plasticity of "innate behavior"? A perspective from Drosophila |
title |
Does cognition have a role in plasticity of "innate behavior"? A perspective from Drosophila |
spellingShingle |
Does cognition have a role in plasticity of "innate behavior"? A perspective from Drosophila Gorostiza, Ezequiel Axel BEHAVIORAL FLEXIBILITY BEHAVIORAL PLASTICITY DROSOPHILA INNATE BEHAVIOR INSECTS STIMULUS-RESPONSE |
title_short |
Does cognition have a role in plasticity of "innate behavior"? A perspective from Drosophila |
title_full |
Does cognition have a role in plasticity of "innate behavior"? A perspective from Drosophila |
title_fullStr |
Does cognition have a role in plasticity of "innate behavior"? A perspective from Drosophila |
title_full_unstemmed |
Does cognition have a role in plasticity of "innate behavior"? A perspective from Drosophila |
title_sort |
Does cognition have a role in plasticity of "innate behavior"? A perspective from Drosophila |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Gorostiza, Ezequiel Axel |
author |
Gorostiza, Ezequiel Axel |
author_facet |
Gorostiza, Ezequiel Axel |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
BEHAVIORAL FLEXIBILITY BEHAVIORAL PLASTICITY DROSOPHILA INNATE BEHAVIOR INSECTS STIMULUS-RESPONSE |
topic |
BEHAVIORAL FLEXIBILITY BEHAVIORAL PLASTICITY DROSOPHILA INNATE BEHAVIOR INSECTS STIMULUS-RESPONSE |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.1 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
The term innate is usually applied to behaviors commonly characterized as stereotypical reactions to the presence of a specific stimulus. "Innate behaviors", such as escape responses or taxes, are described as inborn, almost inflexible and automatic, with no cognitive demand. However, recent research has shown that many of these behaviors are more complex than initially imagined, and could be largely modulated by context, internal state, and experience, causing in some cases the opposite of the action expected. These processes are sufficient to put the notion of "innate behaviors" as stereotypic and automatic responses under critical scrutiny. This scrutiny has opened the possibility that some cognitive components are involved in ?innate behaviors?. Moreover, the fact that biogenic amines, known for their role in cognitive processes, are emerging as key players in such "innate behaviors" also points in this direction. Here, I present some examples from Drosophila melanogaster supporting a more cognitive interpretation of these behaviors. Fil: Gorostiza, Ezequiel Axel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Farmacología Experimental de Córdoba. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas. Instituto de Farmacología Experimental de Córdoba; Argentina |
description |
The term innate is usually applied to behaviors commonly characterized as stereotypical reactions to the presence of a specific stimulus. "Innate behaviors", such as escape responses or taxes, are described as inborn, almost inflexible and automatic, with no cognitive demand. However, recent research has shown that many of these behaviors are more complex than initially imagined, and could be largely modulated by context, internal state, and experience, causing in some cases the opposite of the action expected. These processes are sufficient to put the notion of "innate behaviors" as stereotypic and automatic responses under critical scrutiny. This scrutiny has opened the possibility that some cognitive components are involved in ?innate behaviors?. Moreover, the fact that biogenic amines, known for their role in cognitive processes, are emerging as key players in such "innate behaviors" also points in this direction. Here, I present some examples from Drosophila melanogaster supporting a more cognitive interpretation of these behaviors. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-08 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/88618 Gorostiza, Ezequiel Axel; Does cognition have a role in plasticity of "innate behavior"? A perspective from Drosophila; Frontiers Media S.A.; Frontiers in Psychology; 9; AUG; 8-2018 1664-1078 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/88618 |
identifier_str_mv |
Gorostiza, Ezequiel Axel; Does cognition have a role in plasticity of "innate behavior"? A perspective from Drosophila; Frontiers Media S.A.; Frontiers in Psychology; 9; AUG; 8-2018 1664-1078 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01502/full info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01502 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844613347465494528 |
score |
13.070432 |