Differences between wheat and barley in leaf and tillering coordination under contrasting nitrogen and sulfur conditions

Autores
Alzueta, Ignacio; Abeledo, Leonor Gabriela; Mignone, César M.; Miralles, Daniel Julio
Año de publicación
2012
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
It is traditionally assumed that barley has a higher tillering capacity than wheat whatever the environmental condition; however, this supposition has not been formally tested under experimental conditions nor analyzed its relationship with leaf appearance. In the present work, leaf appearance and tillering dynamics were studied in wheat and barley genotypes grown under contrasting nitrogen and sulfur levels at sowing. There was no difference in phenology (seedling emergence, first visible node and flowering) between wheat and barley or due to different nutrients. Phyllochron in barley tended to be higher than (or at least equal to) that observed in wheat, without effect of the N or S levels on this trait. Differences in final leaf number were negligible. Tillering dynamics was analyzed considering the tillering appearance rate (TAR), the maximum number of tillers appeared (MTN), the tillering mortality rate (TMR), and the final number of tillers per plant (FTN). TAR was significantly greater in barley than in wheat genotypes in all experiments. In both species, TAR was enhanced as N supply was increased while S promoted TAR only under high N conditions. The MTN was positively and significantly associated with TAR. Although cessation of tillering was similar between both species, the maximum number of tillers was superior in barley than in wheat, due to the differences between species in tiller appearance rate. A high MTN was related to a high tiller mortality rate. In spite of that counterbalance, FTN was closely related to MTN; as a consequence, FTN was pre-defined during the early phase of the tillering process. Barley showed higher values of tiller initiated per leaf appeared (synchrony) than wheat, while N and S deficiencies decreased that synchrony.
Fil: Alzueta, Ignacio. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Cerealicultura; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Abeledo, Leonor Gabriela. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Cerealicultura; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Mignone, César M.. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Cerealicultura; Argentina
Fil: Miralles, Daniel Julio. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Cerealicultura; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina
Materia
Barley
Nxs Availability
Tillers
Wheat
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/16196
Acceder
id CONICETDig_775b06b9259ecd4ad8cd5e8abcb75872
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/16196
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Differences between wheat and barley in leaf and tillering coordination under contrasting nitrogen and sulfur conditionsAlzueta, IgnacioAbeledo, Leonor GabrielaMignone, César M.Miralles, Daniel JulioBarleyNxs AvailabilityTillersWheathttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4It is traditionally assumed that barley has a higher tillering capacity than wheat whatever the environmental condition; however, this supposition has not been formally tested under experimental conditions nor analyzed its relationship with leaf appearance. In the present work, leaf appearance and tillering dynamics were studied in wheat and barley genotypes grown under contrasting nitrogen and sulfur levels at sowing. There was no difference in phenology (seedling emergence, first visible node and flowering) between wheat and barley or due to different nutrients. Phyllochron in barley tended to be higher than (or at least equal to) that observed in wheat, without effect of the N or S levels on this trait. Differences in final leaf number were negligible. Tillering dynamics was analyzed considering the tillering appearance rate (TAR), the maximum number of tillers appeared (MTN), the tillering mortality rate (TMR), and the final number of tillers per plant (FTN). TAR was significantly greater in barley than in wheat genotypes in all experiments. In both species, TAR was enhanced as N supply was increased while S promoted TAR only under high N conditions. The MTN was positively and significantly associated with TAR. Although cessation of tillering was similar between both species, the maximum number of tillers was superior in barley than in wheat, due to the differences between species in tiller appearance rate. A high MTN was related to a high tiller mortality rate. In spite of that counterbalance, FTN was closely related to MTN; as a consequence, FTN was pre-defined during the early phase of the tillering process. Barley showed higher values of tiller initiated per leaf appeared (synchrony) than wheat, while N and S deficiencies decreased that synchrony.Fil: Alzueta, Ignacio. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Cerealicultura; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Abeledo, Leonor Gabriela. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Cerealicultura; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Mignone, César M.. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Cerealicultura; ArgentinaFil: Miralles, Daniel Julio. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Cerealicultura; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; ArgentinaElsevier Science2012-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/16196Alzueta, Ignacio; Abeledo, Leonor Gabriela; Mignone, César M.; Miralles, Daniel Julio; Differences between wheat and barley in leaf and tillering coordination under contrasting nitrogen and sulfur conditions; Elsevier Science; European Journal Of Agronomy; 41; 8-2012; 92-1021161-0301enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.eja.2012.04.002info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1161030112000603info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:21:23Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/16196instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:21:24.06CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Differences between wheat and barley in leaf and tillering coordination under contrasting nitrogen and sulfur conditions
title Differences between wheat and barley in leaf and tillering coordination under contrasting nitrogen and sulfur conditions
spellingShingle Differences between wheat and barley in leaf and tillering coordination under contrasting nitrogen and sulfur conditions
Alzueta, Ignacio
Barley
Nxs Availability
Tillers
Wheat
title_short Differences between wheat and barley in leaf and tillering coordination under contrasting nitrogen and sulfur conditions
title_full Differences between wheat and barley in leaf and tillering coordination under contrasting nitrogen and sulfur conditions
title_fullStr Differences between wheat and barley in leaf and tillering coordination under contrasting nitrogen and sulfur conditions
title_full_unstemmed Differences between wheat and barley in leaf and tillering coordination under contrasting nitrogen and sulfur conditions
title_sort Differences between wheat and barley in leaf and tillering coordination under contrasting nitrogen and sulfur conditions
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Alzueta, Ignacio
Abeledo, Leonor Gabriela
Mignone, César M.
Miralles, Daniel Julio
author Alzueta, Ignacio
author_facet Alzueta, Ignacio
Abeledo, Leonor Gabriela
Mignone, César M.
Miralles, Daniel Julio
author_role author
author2 Abeledo, Leonor Gabriela
Mignone, César M.
Miralles, Daniel Julio
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Barley
Nxs Availability
Tillers
Wheat
topic Barley
Nxs Availability
Tillers
Wheat
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv It is traditionally assumed that barley has a higher tillering capacity than wheat whatever the environmental condition; however, this supposition has not been formally tested under experimental conditions nor analyzed its relationship with leaf appearance. In the present work, leaf appearance and tillering dynamics were studied in wheat and barley genotypes grown under contrasting nitrogen and sulfur levels at sowing. There was no difference in phenology (seedling emergence, first visible node and flowering) between wheat and barley or due to different nutrients. Phyllochron in barley tended to be higher than (or at least equal to) that observed in wheat, without effect of the N or S levels on this trait. Differences in final leaf number were negligible. Tillering dynamics was analyzed considering the tillering appearance rate (TAR), the maximum number of tillers appeared (MTN), the tillering mortality rate (TMR), and the final number of tillers per plant (FTN). TAR was significantly greater in barley than in wheat genotypes in all experiments. In both species, TAR was enhanced as N supply was increased while S promoted TAR only under high N conditions. The MTN was positively and significantly associated with TAR. Although cessation of tillering was similar between both species, the maximum number of tillers was superior in barley than in wheat, due to the differences between species in tiller appearance rate. A high MTN was related to a high tiller mortality rate. In spite of that counterbalance, FTN was closely related to MTN; as a consequence, FTN was pre-defined during the early phase of the tillering process. Barley showed higher values of tiller initiated per leaf appeared (synchrony) than wheat, while N and S deficiencies decreased that synchrony.
Fil: Alzueta, Ignacio. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Cerealicultura; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Abeledo, Leonor Gabriela. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Cerealicultura; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Mignone, César M.. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Cerealicultura; Argentina
Fil: Miralles, Daniel Julio. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Cerealicultura; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina
description It is traditionally assumed that barley has a higher tillering capacity than wheat whatever the environmental condition; however, this supposition has not been formally tested under experimental conditions nor analyzed its relationship with leaf appearance. In the present work, leaf appearance and tillering dynamics were studied in wheat and barley genotypes grown under contrasting nitrogen and sulfur levels at sowing. There was no difference in phenology (seedling emergence, first visible node and flowering) between wheat and barley or due to different nutrients. Phyllochron in barley tended to be higher than (or at least equal to) that observed in wheat, without effect of the N or S levels on this trait. Differences in final leaf number were negligible. Tillering dynamics was analyzed considering the tillering appearance rate (TAR), the maximum number of tillers appeared (MTN), the tillering mortality rate (TMR), and the final number of tillers per plant (FTN). TAR was significantly greater in barley than in wheat genotypes in all experiments. In both species, TAR was enhanced as N supply was increased while S promoted TAR only under high N conditions. The MTN was positively and significantly associated with TAR. Although cessation of tillering was similar between both species, the maximum number of tillers was superior in barley than in wheat, due to the differences between species in tiller appearance rate. A high MTN was related to a high tiller mortality rate. In spite of that counterbalance, FTN was closely related to MTN; as a consequence, FTN was pre-defined during the early phase of the tillering process. Barley showed higher values of tiller initiated per leaf appeared (synchrony) than wheat, while N and S deficiencies decreased that synchrony.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-08
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/16196
Alzueta, Ignacio; Abeledo, Leonor Gabriela; Mignone, César M.; Miralles, Daniel Julio; Differences between wheat and barley in leaf and tillering coordination under contrasting nitrogen and sulfur conditions; Elsevier Science; European Journal Of Agronomy; 41; 8-2012; 92-102
1161-0301
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/16196
identifier_str_mv Alzueta, Ignacio; Abeledo, Leonor Gabriela; Mignone, César M.; Miralles, Daniel Julio; Differences between wheat and barley in leaf and tillering coordination under contrasting nitrogen and sulfur conditions; Elsevier Science; European Journal Of Agronomy; 41; 8-2012; 92-102
1161-0301
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.eja.2012.04.002
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1161030112000603
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844614202070663168
score 13.070432

Publicaciones similares