196 Fertilization Rate in Superovulated Criolla Goats Following Artificial Insemination or Natural Mating

Autores
Cueto, M. I.; Fernández, J.; Bruno Galarraga, María Macarena; Pereyra Bonnet, Federico Alberto; Gibbons, A.
Año de publicación
2017
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The Criolla breed is a local genetic resource, distributed in Patagonia, Argentina, whose primary production is meat. In the Criolla goat, efforts were made to locate productively superior males and to conserve their genetic material. Studies were carried on the feasibility of obtaining superior offspring through the implementation of embryo transfer programs. We assessed the fertilization rate and embryo production following AI with frozen semen or natural mating in Criolla goats subjected to a superovulation program. During the breeding season (May, 41° S), 26 Criolla goats were treated for oestrus with sponges (60 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate, Progespon®, Syntex, Buenos Aires, Argentina) placed for 13 days. Goat donors were superovulated with a total of 80 mg of porcine (p)FSH (Folltropin V®, Bioniche, Ontario, Canada) every 12 h in 6 decreasing doses (18, 18, 14, 14, 8, and 8 mg) during the last 3 days of progestagen treatment. A dose of 125 μg of cloprostenol (Estrumate®, Schering-Plough, Quebec, Canada) was given in conjunction with the first dose of pFSH. Oestrus detection was performed every 12 h, starting at 24 h after sponge removal. Females were considered to be in oestrus if they passively accepted buck mounting. Goats were randomly assigned to the following treatments: (1) natural mating (NM, n = 12): donors detected in oestrus were individually mated with one proven fertile buck at oestrus and 12 h post-oestrus; does were remove from the male in between (Conventionally accepted treatment); (2) AI (n = 14): donors detected in oestrus were inseminated 12 ± 2 h after the onset of oestrus by laparoscopy with frozen-thawed semen (200 × 106 spermatozoa) from the same fertile buck. Embryo recovery was done by surgical prepubic laparotomy at Day 8 after sponge removal. Superovulation response was estimated by counting the number of corpora lutea (CL). Analysis of variance was used to compare fertilization rate (total number of embryos recovered for each animal, expressed as a proportion of the total number of embryos/oocytes recovered) and embryo production between treatments. Results were expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was accepted at P < 0.05. A total of 92.3% goats were recorded in oestrus (24/26) between 24 and 48 h after sponge removal (10 and 14 goats for NM and AI, respectively). An average of 16.6 ± 2.0 CL (range: 2?32) was observed in response to superovulation treatment. The recovery rate of embryos/oocytes was 60.0 ± 6.9%. No statistical difference was observed in the fertilization rate (52.1 ± 12.1 and 68.6 ± 12.1% for AI and NM, respectively) or the number of total (6.8 ± 2.0 and 4.8 ± 2.4 for AI and NM, respectively) and transferable embryos (5.6 ± 1.4 and 4.0 ± 1.7 for AI and NM, respectively) between treatments (P > 0.05). In conclusion, fertilization rates did not differ following laparoscopic insemination with frozen semen compared to natural mating in superovulated Criolla goats.
Fil: Cueto, M. I.. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Patagonia Norte; Argentina
Fil: Fernández, J.. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Patagonia Norte; Argentina
Fil: Bruno Galarraga, María Macarena. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Patagonia Norte; Argentina
Fil: Pereyra Bonnet, Federico Alberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Patagonia Norte; Argentina
Fil: Gibbons, A.. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Patagonia Norte; Argentina
Materia
Superovulation
Fertilization Rate
Goats
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/68715

id CONICETDig_7684c7e51132701302098a1920bb4149
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/68715
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling 196 Fertilization Rate in Superovulated Criolla Goats Following Artificial Insemination or Natural MatingCueto, M. I.Fernández, J.Bruno Galarraga, María MacarenaPereyra Bonnet, Federico AlbertoGibbons, A.SuperovulationFertilization RateGoatshttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4The Criolla breed is a local genetic resource, distributed in Patagonia, Argentina, whose primary production is meat. In the Criolla goat, efforts were made to locate productively superior males and to conserve their genetic material. Studies were carried on the feasibility of obtaining superior offspring through the implementation of embryo transfer programs. We assessed the fertilization rate and embryo production following AI with frozen semen or natural mating in Criolla goats subjected to a superovulation program. During the breeding season (May, 41° S), 26 Criolla goats were treated for oestrus with sponges (60 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate, Progespon®, Syntex, Buenos Aires, Argentina) placed for 13 days. Goat donors were superovulated with a total of 80 mg of porcine (p)FSH (Folltropin V®, Bioniche, Ontario, Canada) every 12 h in 6 decreasing doses (18, 18, 14, 14, 8, and 8 mg) during the last 3 days of progestagen treatment. A dose of 125 μg of cloprostenol (Estrumate®, Schering-Plough, Quebec, Canada) was given in conjunction with the first dose of pFSH. Oestrus detection was performed every 12 h, starting at 24 h after sponge removal. Females were considered to be in oestrus if they passively accepted buck mounting. Goats were randomly assigned to the following treatments: (1) natural mating (NM, n = 12): donors detected in oestrus were individually mated with one proven fertile buck at oestrus and 12 h post-oestrus; does were remove from the male in between (Conventionally accepted treatment); (2) AI (n = 14): donors detected in oestrus were inseminated 12 ± 2 h after the onset of oestrus by laparoscopy with frozen-thawed semen (200 × 106 spermatozoa) from the same fertile buck. Embryo recovery was done by surgical prepubic laparotomy at Day 8 after sponge removal. Superovulation response was estimated by counting the number of corpora lutea (CL). Analysis of variance was used to compare fertilization rate (total number of embryos recovered for each animal, expressed as a proportion of the total number of embryos/oocytes recovered) and embryo production between treatments. Results were expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was accepted at P < 0.05. A total of 92.3% goats were recorded in oestrus (24/26) between 24 and 48 h after sponge removal (10 and 14 goats for NM and AI, respectively). An average of 16.6 ± 2.0 CL (range: 2?32) was observed in response to superovulation treatment. The recovery rate of embryos/oocytes was 60.0 ± 6.9%. No statistical difference was observed in the fertilization rate (52.1 ± 12.1 and 68.6 ± 12.1% for AI and NM, respectively) or the number of total (6.8 ± 2.0 and 4.8 ± 2.4 for AI and NM, respectively) and transferable embryos (5.6 ± 1.4 and 4.0 ± 1.7 for AI and NM, respectively) between treatments (P > 0.05). In conclusion, fertilization rates did not differ following laparoscopic insemination with frozen semen compared to natural mating in superovulated Criolla goats.Fil: Cueto, M. I.. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Patagonia Norte; ArgentinaFil: Fernández, J.. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Patagonia Norte; ArgentinaFil: Bruno Galarraga, María Macarena. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Patagonia Norte; ArgentinaFil: Pereyra Bonnet, Federico Alberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Patagonia Norte; ArgentinaFil: Gibbons, A.. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Patagonia Norte; ArgentinaCsiro Publishing2017-12-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/68715Cueto, M. I.; Fernández, J.; Bruno Galarraga, María Macarena; Pereyra Bonnet, Federico Alberto; Gibbons, A.; 196 Fertilization Rate in Superovulated Criolla Goats Following Artificial Insemination or Natural Mating; Csiro Publishing; Reproduction Fertility and Development; 30; 1; 4-12-2017; 238-2381031-3613CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1071/RDv30n1Ab196info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.publish.csiro.au/rd/RDv30n1Ab196info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T14:22:26Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/68715instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 14:22:27.264CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv 196 Fertilization Rate in Superovulated Criolla Goats Following Artificial Insemination or Natural Mating
title 196 Fertilization Rate in Superovulated Criolla Goats Following Artificial Insemination or Natural Mating
spellingShingle 196 Fertilization Rate in Superovulated Criolla Goats Following Artificial Insemination or Natural Mating
Cueto, M. I.
Superovulation
Fertilization Rate
Goats
title_short 196 Fertilization Rate in Superovulated Criolla Goats Following Artificial Insemination or Natural Mating
title_full 196 Fertilization Rate in Superovulated Criolla Goats Following Artificial Insemination or Natural Mating
title_fullStr 196 Fertilization Rate in Superovulated Criolla Goats Following Artificial Insemination or Natural Mating
title_full_unstemmed 196 Fertilization Rate in Superovulated Criolla Goats Following Artificial Insemination or Natural Mating
title_sort 196 Fertilization Rate in Superovulated Criolla Goats Following Artificial Insemination or Natural Mating
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Cueto, M. I.
Fernández, J.
Bruno Galarraga, María Macarena
Pereyra Bonnet, Federico Alberto
Gibbons, A.
author Cueto, M. I.
author_facet Cueto, M. I.
Fernández, J.
Bruno Galarraga, María Macarena
Pereyra Bonnet, Federico Alberto
Gibbons, A.
author_role author
author2 Fernández, J.
Bruno Galarraga, María Macarena
Pereyra Bonnet, Federico Alberto
Gibbons, A.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Superovulation
Fertilization Rate
Goats
topic Superovulation
Fertilization Rate
Goats
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.4
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The Criolla breed is a local genetic resource, distributed in Patagonia, Argentina, whose primary production is meat. In the Criolla goat, efforts were made to locate productively superior males and to conserve their genetic material. Studies were carried on the feasibility of obtaining superior offspring through the implementation of embryo transfer programs. We assessed the fertilization rate and embryo production following AI with frozen semen or natural mating in Criolla goats subjected to a superovulation program. During the breeding season (May, 41° S), 26 Criolla goats were treated for oestrus with sponges (60 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate, Progespon®, Syntex, Buenos Aires, Argentina) placed for 13 days. Goat donors were superovulated with a total of 80 mg of porcine (p)FSH (Folltropin V®, Bioniche, Ontario, Canada) every 12 h in 6 decreasing doses (18, 18, 14, 14, 8, and 8 mg) during the last 3 days of progestagen treatment. A dose of 125 μg of cloprostenol (Estrumate®, Schering-Plough, Quebec, Canada) was given in conjunction with the first dose of pFSH. Oestrus detection was performed every 12 h, starting at 24 h after sponge removal. Females were considered to be in oestrus if they passively accepted buck mounting. Goats were randomly assigned to the following treatments: (1) natural mating (NM, n = 12): donors detected in oestrus were individually mated with one proven fertile buck at oestrus and 12 h post-oestrus; does were remove from the male in between (Conventionally accepted treatment); (2) AI (n = 14): donors detected in oestrus were inseminated 12 ± 2 h after the onset of oestrus by laparoscopy with frozen-thawed semen (200 × 106 spermatozoa) from the same fertile buck. Embryo recovery was done by surgical prepubic laparotomy at Day 8 after sponge removal. Superovulation response was estimated by counting the number of corpora lutea (CL). Analysis of variance was used to compare fertilization rate (total number of embryos recovered for each animal, expressed as a proportion of the total number of embryos/oocytes recovered) and embryo production between treatments. Results were expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was accepted at P < 0.05. A total of 92.3% goats were recorded in oestrus (24/26) between 24 and 48 h after sponge removal (10 and 14 goats for NM and AI, respectively). An average of 16.6 ± 2.0 CL (range: 2?32) was observed in response to superovulation treatment. The recovery rate of embryos/oocytes was 60.0 ± 6.9%. No statistical difference was observed in the fertilization rate (52.1 ± 12.1 and 68.6 ± 12.1% for AI and NM, respectively) or the number of total (6.8 ± 2.0 and 4.8 ± 2.4 for AI and NM, respectively) and transferable embryos (5.6 ± 1.4 and 4.0 ± 1.7 for AI and NM, respectively) between treatments (P > 0.05). In conclusion, fertilization rates did not differ following laparoscopic insemination with frozen semen compared to natural mating in superovulated Criolla goats.
Fil: Cueto, M. I.. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Patagonia Norte; Argentina
Fil: Fernández, J.. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Patagonia Norte; Argentina
Fil: Bruno Galarraga, María Macarena. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Patagonia Norte; Argentina
Fil: Pereyra Bonnet, Federico Alberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Patagonia Norte; Argentina
Fil: Gibbons, A.. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Patagonia Norte; Argentina
description The Criolla breed is a local genetic resource, distributed in Patagonia, Argentina, whose primary production is meat. In the Criolla goat, efforts were made to locate productively superior males and to conserve their genetic material. Studies were carried on the feasibility of obtaining superior offspring through the implementation of embryo transfer programs. We assessed the fertilization rate and embryo production following AI with frozen semen or natural mating in Criolla goats subjected to a superovulation program. During the breeding season (May, 41° S), 26 Criolla goats were treated for oestrus with sponges (60 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate, Progespon®, Syntex, Buenos Aires, Argentina) placed for 13 days. Goat donors were superovulated with a total of 80 mg of porcine (p)FSH (Folltropin V®, Bioniche, Ontario, Canada) every 12 h in 6 decreasing doses (18, 18, 14, 14, 8, and 8 mg) during the last 3 days of progestagen treatment. A dose of 125 μg of cloprostenol (Estrumate®, Schering-Plough, Quebec, Canada) was given in conjunction with the first dose of pFSH. Oestrus detection was performed every 12 h, starting at 24 h after sponge removal. Females were considered to be in oestrus if they passively accepted buck mounting. Goats were randomly assigned to the following treatments: (1) natural mating (NM, n = 12): donors detected in oestrus were individually mated with one proven fertile buck at oestrus and 12 h post-oestrus; does were remove from the male in between (Conventionally accepted treatment); (2) AI (n = 14): donors detected in oestrus were inseminated 12 ± 2 h after the onset of oestrus by laparoscopy with frozen-thawed semen (200 × 106 spermatozoa) from the same fertile buck. Embryo recovery was done by surgical prepubic laparotomy at Day 8 after sponge removal. Superovulation response was estimated by counting the number of corpora lutea (CL). Analysis of variance was used to compare fertilization rate (total number of embryos recovered for each animal, expressed as a proportion of the total number of embryos/oocytes recovered) and embryo production between treatments. Results were expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was accepted at P < 0.05. A total of 92.3% goats were recorded in oestrus (24/26) between 24 and 48 h after sponge removal (10 and 14 goats for NM and AI, respectively). An average of 16.6 ± 2.0 CL (range: 2?32) was observed in response to superovulation treatment. The recovery rate of embryos/oocytes was 60.0 ± 6.9%. No statistical difference was observed in the fertilization rate (52.1 ± 12.1 and 68.6 ± 12.1% for AI and NM, respectively) or the number of total (6.8 ± 2.0 and 4.8 ± 2.4 for AI and NM, respectively) and transferable embryos (5.6 ± 1.4 and 4.0 ± 1.7 for AI and NM, respectively) between treatments (P > 0.05). In conclusion, fertilization rates did not differ following laparoscopic insemination with frozen semen compared to natural mating in superovulated Criolla goats.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12-04
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/68715
Cueto, M. I.; Fernández, J.; Bruno Galarraga, María Macarena; Pereyra Bonnet, Federico Alberto; Gibbons, A.; 196 Fertilization Rate in Superovulated Criolla Goats Following Artificial Insemination or Natural Mating; Csiro Publishing; Reproduction Fertility and Development; 30; 1; 4-12-2017; 238-238
1031-3613
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/68715
identifier_str_mv Cueto, M. I.; Fernández, J.; Bruno Galarraga, María Macarena; Pereyra Bonnet, Federico Alberto; Gibbons, A.; 196 Fertilization Rate in Superovulated Criolla Goats Following Artificial Insemination or Natural Mating; Csiro Publishing; Reproduction Fertility and Development; 30; 1; 4-12-2017; 238-238
1031-3613
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1071/RDv30n1Ab196
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.publish.csiro.au/rd/RDv30n1Ab196
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Csiro Publishing
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Csiro Publishing
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846082624027623424
score 13.22299