Joint attacks and accrual in argumentation frameworks

Autores
Bikakis, Antonis; Cohen, Andrea; Dvoák, Wolfgang; Flouris, Giorgos; Parsons, Simon
Año de publicación
2021
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
While modelling arguments, it is often useful to represent joint attacks, i.e., cases where multiple arguments jointly attack another (note that this is different from the case where multiple arguments attack another in isolation). Based on this remark, the notion of joint attacks has been proposed as a useful extension of classical Abstract Argumentation Frameworks, and has been shown to constitute a genuine extension in terms of expressive power. In this chapter, we review various works considering the notion of joint attacks from various perspectives, including abstract and structured frameworks. Moreover, we present results detailing the relation among frameworks with joint attacks and classical argumentation frameworks, computational aspects, and applications of joint attacks. Last but not least, we propose a roadmap for future research on the subject, identifying gaps in current research and important research directions.
Fil: Bikakis, Antonis. University College London; Estados Unidos
Fil: Cohen, Andrea. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación. Instituto de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación; Argentina
Fil: Dvoák, Wolfgang. Technische Universitat Wien; Austria
Fil: Flouris, Giorgos. Foundation for Research and Technology; Grecia
Fil: Parsons, Simon. University of Lincoln; Reino Unido
Materia
ARGUMENTATION
JOINT ATTACKS
ACCRUAL
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/152708
Acceder
id CONICETDig_75ce039c3d9f64cd856cbb8291515f8e
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/152708
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Joint attacks and accrual in argumentation frameworksBikakis, AntonisCohen, AndreaDvoák, WolfgangFlouris, GiorgosParsons, SimonARGUMENTATIONJOINT ATTACKSACCRUALhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1While modelling arguments, it is often useful to represent joint attacks, i.e., cases where multiple arguments jointly attack another (note that this is different from the case where multiple arguments attack another in isolation). Based on this remark, the notion of joint attacks has been proposed as a useful extension of classical Abstract Argumentation Frameworks, and has been shown to constitute a genuine extension in terms of expressive power. In this chapter, we review various works considering the notion of joint attacks from various perspectives, including abstract and structured frameworks. Moreover, we present results detailing the relation among frameworks with joint attacks and classical argumentation frameworks, computational aspects, and applications of joint attacks. Last but not least, we propose a roadmap for future research on the subject, identifying gaps in current research and important research directions.Fil: Bikakis, Antonis. University College London; Estados UnidosFil: Cohen, Andrea. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación. Instituto de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación; ArgentinaFil: Dvoák, Wolfgang. Technische Universitat Wien; AustriaFil: Flouris, Giorgos. Foundation for Research and Technology; GreciaFil: Parsons, Simon. University of Lincoln; Reino UnidoCollege Publications2021-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/152708Bikakis, Antonis; Cohen, Andrea; Dvoák, Wolfgang; Flouris, Giorgos; Parsons, Simon; Joint attacks and accrual in argumentation frameworks; College Publications; Journal of Applied Logics: The IfCoLog Journal of Logics and their Applications; 8; 6; 7-2021; 1437-15012631-98102631-9829CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.collegepublications.co.uk/downloads/ifcolog00048.pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:05:33Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/152708instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:05:33.73CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Joint attacks and accrual in argumentation frameworks
title Joint attacks and accrual in argumentation frameworks
spellingShingle Joint attacks and accrual in argumentation frameworks
Bikakis, Antonis
ARGUMENTATION
JOINT ATTACKS
ACCRUAL
title_short Joint attacks and accrual in argumentation frameworks
title_full Joint attacks and accrual in argumentation frameworks
title_fullStr Joint attacks and accrual in argumentation frameworks
title_full_unstemmed Joint attacks and accrual in argumentation frameworks
title_sort Joint attacks and accrual in argumentation frameworks
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Bikakis, Antonis
Cohen, Andrea
Dvoák, Wolfgang
Flouris, Giorgos
Parsons, Simon
author Bikakis, Antonis
author_facet Bikakis, Antonis
Cohen, Andrea
Dvoák, Wolfgang
Flouris, Giorgos
Parsons, Simon
author_role author
author2 Cohen, Andrea
Dvoák, Wolfgang
Flouris, Giorgos
Parsons, Simon
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv ARGUMENTATION
JOINT ATTACKS
ACCRUAL
topic ARGUMENTATION
JOINT ATTACKS
ACCRUAL
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv While modelling arguments, it is often useful to represent joint attacks, i.e., cases where multiple arguments jointly attack another (note that this is different from the case where multiple arguments attack another in isolation). Based on this remark, the notion of joint attacks has been proposed as a useful extension of classical Abstract Argumentation Frameworks, and has been shown to constitute a genuine extension in terms of expressive power. In this chapter, we review various works considering the notion of joint attacks from various perspectives, including abstract and structured frameworks. Moreover, we present results detailing the relation among frameworks with joint attacks and classical argumentation frameworks, computational aspects, and applications of joint attacks. Last but not least, we propose a roadmap for future research on the subject, identifying gaps in current research and important research directions.
Fil: Bikakis, Antonis. University College London; Estados Unidos
Fil: Cohen, Andrea. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación. Instituto de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación; Argentina
Fil: Dvoák, Wolfgang. Technische Universitat Wien; Austria
Fil: Flouris, Giorgos. Foundation for Research and Technology; Grecia
Fil: Parsons, Simon. University of Lincoln; Reino Unido
description While modelling arguments, it is often useful to represent joint attacks, i.e., cases where multiple arguments jointly attack another (note that this is different from the case where multiple arguments attack another in isolation). Based on this remark, the notion of joint attacks has been proposed as a useful extension of classical Abstract Argumentation Frameworks, and has been shown to constitute a genuine extension in terms of expressive power. In this chapter, we review various works considering the notion of joint attacks from various perspectives, including abstract and structured frameworks. Moreover, we present results detailing the relation among frameworks with joint attacks and classical argumentation frameworks, computational aspects, and applications of joint attacks. Last but not least, we propose a roadmap for future research on the subject, identifying gaps in current research and important research directions.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-07
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/152708
Bikakis, Antonis; Cohen, Andrea; Dvoák, Wolfgang; Flouris, Giorgos; Parsons, Simon; Joint attacks and accrual in argumentation frameworks; College Publications; Journal of Applied Logics: The IfCoLog Journal of Logics and their Applications; 8; 6; 7-2021; 1437-1501
2631-9810
2631-9829
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/152708
identifier_str_mv Bikakis, Antonis; Cohen, Andrea; Dvoák, Wolfgang; Flouris, Giorgos; Parsons, Simon; Joint attacks and accrual in argumentation frameworks; College Publications; Journal of Applied Logics: The IfCoLog Journal of Logics and their Applications; 8; 6; 7-2021; 1437-1501
2631-9810
2631-9829
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.collegepublications.co.uk/downloads/ifcolog00048.pdf
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv College Publications
publisher.none.fl_str_mv College Publications
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269916877553664
score 13.13397

Publicaciones similares