And it burns, burns, burns, the ring-of-fire: Reviewing and harmonizing terminology on wildfire management and policy

Autores
Huidobro, Gabriela; Giessen, Lukas; Burns, Sarah Lilian
Año de publicación
2024
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
In recent decades, extreme wildfire seasons worldwide have disrupted coupled human and natural systems owing to both changing climatic conditions and inadequate land and fire management policies. Given that wildfires are expected to become more frequent, the number of relevant scientific studies has also boomed in recent years. Simultaneously, shifts in fire management approaches have resulted in the development of new policies and vice versa. Originating from diverse fields, the terminology used in research and policy communities is far from consistent, which hinders science-based, up-to-date engagement between wildfire researchers and policymakers. Hence, this study aims to harmonize the terminology on key concepts and establish a typology for systematically classifying all wildfires and management actions observed in the literature. We conducted a scoping literature review and developed a cyclical analytical framework, called the ring-of-fire, drawing on cyclical conceptions of fire management and public policy, respectively. Consequently, we propose criteria for establishing a common dialogue between wildfire actors by providing a system for classifying actions and presenting a reference system for wildfire definitions. Furthermore, we present results by geographical regions regarding fire management actions and discuss the use of the “fire suppression” concept given its ambiguity. This review highlights the importance of consistent terminology in interpreting the differences between management actions and fire types. We hope that removing linguistic uncertainty in wildfire management-related concepts will result in a more rigorous use of the terms among scientists while also clarifying their use in communication between scientists, policymakers, and the broader public.
Fil: Huidobro, Gabriela. Technische Universität Dresden.; Alemania
Fil: Giessen, Lukas. Technische Universität Dresden.; Alemania
Fil: Burns, Sarah Lilian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales. Laboratorio de Investigacion de Sistemas Ecologicos y Ambientales; Argentina. Technische Universität Dresden.; Alemania
Materia
WILDFIRE CONCEPTS
TYPOLOGY
SUPPRESSION
POLICY CYCLE
AGENDA SETTING
LINGUISTIC UNCERTAINTY
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/236780

id CONICETDig_753a104453ce2b3d12758fd113d5b916
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/236780
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling And it burns, burns, burns, the ring-of-fire: Reviewing and harmonizing terminology on wildfire management and policyHuidobro, GabrielaGiessen, LukasBurns, Sarah LilianWILDFIRE CONCEPTSTYPOLOGYSUPPRESSIONPOLICY CYCLEAGENDA SETTINGLINGUISTIC UNCERTAINTYhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4In recent decades, extreme wildfire seasons worldwide have disrupted coupled human and natural systems owing to both changing climatic conditions and inadequate land and fire management policies. Given that wildfires are expected to become more frequent, the number of relevant scientific studies has also boomed in recent years. Simultaneously, shifts in fire management approaches have resulted in the development of new policies and vice versa. Originating from diverse fields, the terminology used in research and policy communities is far from consistent, which hinders science-based, up-to-date engagement between wildfire researchers and policymakers. Hence, this study aims to harmonize the terminology on key concepts and establish a typology for systematically classifying all wildfires and management actions observed in the literature. We conducted a scoping literature review and developed a cyclical analytical framework, called the ring-of-fire, drawing on cyclical conceptions of fire management and public policy, respectively. Consequently, we propose criteria for establishing a common dialogue between wildfire actors by providing a system for classifying actions and presenting a reference system for wildfire definitions. Furthermore, we present results by geographical regions regarding fire management actions and discuss the use of the “fire suppression” concept given its ambiguity. This review highlights the importance of consistent terminology in interpreting the differences between management actions and fire types. We hope that removing linguistic uncertainty in wildfire management-related concepts will result in a more rigorous use of the terms among scientists while also clarifying their use in communication between scientists, policymakers, and the broader public.Fil: Huidobro, Gabriela. Technische Universität Dresden.; AlemaniaFil: Giessen, Lukas. Technische Universität Dresden.; AlemaniaFil: Burns, Sarah Lilian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales. Laboratorio de Investigacion de Sistemas Ecologicos y Ambientales; Argentina. Technische Universität Dresden.; AlemaniaElsevier2024-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/236780Huidobro, Gabriela; Giessen, Lukas; Burns, Sarah Lilian; And it burns, burns, burns, the ring-of-fire: Reviewing and harmonizing terminology on wildfire management and policy; Elsevier; Environmental Science & Policy; 157; 7-2024; 1-131462-90111873-6416CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1462901124001102info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103776info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-22T11:37:35Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/236780instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-22 11:37:35.508CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv And it burns, burns, burns, the ring-of-fire: Reviewing and harmonizing terminology on wildfire management and policy
title And it burns, burns, burns, the ring-of-fire: Reviewing and harmonizing terminology on wildfire management and policy
spellingShingle And it burns, burns, burns, the ring-of-fire: Reviewing and harmonizing terminology on wildfire management and policy
Huidobro, Gabriela
WILDFIRE CONCEPTS
TYPOLOGY
SUPPRESSION
POLICY CYCLE
AGENDA SETTING
LINGUISTIC UNCERTAINTY
title_short And it burns, burns, burns, the ring-of-fire: Reviewing and harmonizing terminology on wildfire management and policy
title_full And it burns, burns, burns, the ring-of-fire: Reviewing and harmonizing terminology on wildfire management and policy
title_fullStr And it burns, burns, burns, the ring-of-fire: Reviewing and harmonizing terminology on wildfire management and policy
title_full_unstemmed And it burns, burns, burns, the ring-of-fire: Reviewing and harmonizing terminology on wildfire management and policy
title_sort And it burns, burns, burns, the ring-of-fire: Reviewing and harmonizing terminology on wildfire management and policy
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Huidobro, Gabriela
Giessen, Lukas
Burns, Sarah Lilian
author Huidobro, Gabriela
author_facet Huidobro, Gabriela
Giessen, Lukas
Burns, Sarah Lilian
author_role author
author2 Giessen, Lukas
Burns, Sarah Lilian
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv WILDFIRE CONCEPTS
TYPOLOGY
SUPPRESSION
POLICY CYCLE
AGENDA SETTING
LINGUISTIC UNCERTAINTY
topic WILDFIRE CONCEPTS
TYPOLOGY
SUPPRESSION
POLICY CYCLE
AGENDA SETTING
LINGUISTIC UNCERTAINTY
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv In recent decades, extreme wildfire seasons worldwide have disrupted coupled human and natural systems owing to both changing climatic conditions and inadequate land and fire management policies. Given that wildfires are expected to become more frequent, the number of relevant scientific studies has also boomed in recent years. Simultaneously, shifts in fire management approaches have resulted in the development of new policies and vice versa. Originating from diverse fields, the terminology used in research and policy communities is far from consistent, which hinders science-based, up-to-date engagement between wildfire researchers and policymakers. Hence, this study aims to harmonize the terminology on key concepts and establish a typology for systematically classifying all wildfires and management actions observed in the literature. We conducted a scoping literature review and developed a cyclical analytical framework, called the ring-of-fire, drawing on cyclical conceptions of fire management and public policy, respectively. Consequently, we propose criteria for establishing a common dialogue between wildfire actors by providing a system for classifying actions and presenting a reference system for wildfire definitions. Furthermore, we present results by geographical regions regarding fire management actions and discuss the use of the “fire suppression” concept given its ambiguity. This review highlights the importance of consistent terminology in interpreting the differences between management actions and fire types. We hope that removing linguistic uncertainty in wildfire management-related concepts will result in a more rigorous use of the terms among scientists while also clarifying their use in communication between scientists, policymakers, and the broader public.
Fil: Huidobro, Gabriela. Technische Universität Dresden.; Alemania
Fil: Giessen, Lukas. Technische Universität Dresden.; Alemania
Fil: Burns, Sarah Lilian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales. Laboratorio de Investigacion de Sistemas Ecologicos y Ambientales; Argentina. Technische Universität Dresden.; Alemania
description In recent decades, extreme wildfire seasons worldwide have disrupted coupled human and natural systems owing to both changing climatic conditions and inadequate land and fire management policies. Given that wildfires are expected to become more frequent, the number of relevant scientific studies has also boomed in recent years. Simultaneously, shifts in fire management approaches have resulted in the development of new policies and vice versa. Originating from diverse fields, the terminology used in research and policy communities is far from consistent, which hinders science-based, up-to-date engagement between wildfire researchers and policymakers. Hence, this study aims to harmonize the terminology on key concepts and establish a typology for systematically classifying all wildfires and management actions observed in the literature. We conducted a scoping literature review and developed a cyclical analytical framework, called the ring-of-fire, drawing on cyclical conceptions of fire management and public policy, respectively. Consequently, we propose criteria for establishing a common dialogue between wildfire actors by providing a system for classifying actions and presenting a reference system for wildfire definitions. Furthermore, we present results by geographical regions regarding fire management actions and discuss the use of the “fire suppression” concept given its ambiguity. This review highlights the importance of consistent terminology in interpreting the differences between management actions and fire types. We hope that removing linguistic uncertainty in wildfire management-related concepts will result in a more rigorous use of the terms among scientists while also clarifying their use in communication between scientists, policymakers, and the broader public.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-07
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/236780
Huidobro, Gabriela; Giessen, Lukas; Burns, Sarah Lilian; And it burns, burns, burns, the ring-of-fire: Reviewing and harmonizing terminology on wildfire management and policy; Elsevier; Environmental Science & Policy; 157; 7-2024; 1-13
1462-9011
1873-6416
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/236780
identifier_str_mv Huidobro, Gabriela; Giessen, Lukas; Burns, Sarah Lilian; And it burns, burns, burns, the ring-of-fire: Reviewing and harmonizing terminology on wildfire management and policy; Elsevier; Environmental Science & Policy; 157; 7-2024; 1-13
1462-9011
1873-6416
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1462901124001102
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103776
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846782025892102144
score 12.982451